1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-11-09 06:21:09 +03:00
Commit Graph

148 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Álvaro Herrera
a2b02293bc Use XLogRecPtrIsValid() in various places
Now that commit 06edbed478 has introduced XLogRecPtrIsValid(), we can
use that instead of:

- XLogRecPtrIsInvalid()
- direct comparisons with InvalidXLogRecPtr
- direct comparisons with literal 0

This makes the code more consistent.

Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aQB7EvGqrbZXrMlg@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
2025-11-06 20:33:57 +01:00
Michael Paquier
567d27e8e2 Fix outdated comments in slru.c
SlruRecentlyUsed() is an inline function since 53c2a97a92, not a
macro.  The description of long_segment_names was missing at the top of
SimpleLruInit(), part forgotten in 4ed8f0913b.

Author: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aLpBLMOYwEQkaleF@jrouhaud
Backpatch-through: 17
2025-09-05 14:10:08 +09:00
Michael Paquier
c6ea528b47 Update outdated references to the SLRU ControlLock
SLRU bank locks are referred as "bank locks" or "SLRU bank locks" in the
code comments.  The comments updated in this commit use the latter term.

Oversight in 53c2a97a92, that has replaced the single ControlLock by
the bank control locks.

Author: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@free.fr>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aLUT2UO8RjJOzZNq@jrouhaud
Backpatch-through: 17
2025-09-03 10:20:28 +09:00
Michael Paquier
eccba079c2 Generate pgstat_count_slru*() functions for slru using macros
This change replaces seven functions definitions by macros, reducing a
bit some repetitive patterns in the code.  An interesting side effect is
that this removes an inconsistency in the naming of SLRU increment
functions with the field names.

This change is similar to 850f4b4c8c, 8018ffbf58 or 83a1a1b566.

Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aLHA//gr4dTpDHHC@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
2025-09-02 16:22:03 +09:00
Álvaro Herrera
c616785516 Refactor some repetitive SLRU code
Functions to bootstrap and zero pages in various SLRU callers were
fairly duplicative.  We can slash almost two hundred lines with a couple
of simple helpers:

 - SimpleLruZeroAndWritePage: Does the equivalent of SimpleLruZeroPage
   followed by flushing the page to disk
 - XLogSimpleInsertInt64: Does a XLogBeginInsert followed by XLogInsert
   of a trivial record whose data is just an int64.

Author: Evgeny Voropaev <evgeny.voropaev@tantorlabs.com>
Reviewed by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed by: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed by: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/97820ce8-a1cd-407f-a02b-47368fadb14b%40tantorlabs.com
2025-07-07 16:49:19 +02:00
Peter Eisentraut
a0ed19e0a9 Use PRI?64 instead of "ll?" in format strings (continued).
Continuation of work started in commit 15a79c73, after initial trial.

Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b936d2fb-590d-49c3-a615-92c3a88c6c19%40eisentraut.org
2025-03-29 10:43:57 +01:00
Álvaro Herrera
69ab446514 Fix SLRU bank selection code
The originally submitted code (using bit masking) was correct when the
number of slots was restricted to be a power of two -- but that
limitation was removed during development that led to commit
53c2a97a92, which made the bank selection code incorrect.  This led to
always using a smaller number of banks than available.  Change said code
to use integer modulo instead, which works correctly with an arbitrary
number of banks.

It's likely that we could improve on this to avoid runtime use of
integer division.  But with this change we're, at least, not wasting
memory on unused banks, and more banks mean less contention, which is
likely to have a much higher performance impact than a single
instruction's latency.

Author: Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9444dc46-ca47-43ed-9058-89c456316306@postgrespro.ru
2025-01-09 07:39:05 +01:00
Bruce Momjian
50e6eb731d Update copyright for 2025
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-01-01 11:21:55 -05:00
Álvaro Herrera
6ba9892f5c Make GUC_check_errdetail messages full sentences
They were all missing punctuation, one was missing initial capital.
Per our message style guidelines.

No backpatch, to avoid breaking existing translations.
2024-11-27 19:49:36 +01:00
Peter Eisentraut
e18512c000 Remove unused #include's from backend .c files
as determined by IWYU

These are mostly issues that are new since commit dbbca2cf29.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0df1d5b1-8ca8-4f84-93be-121081bde049%40eisentraut.org
2024-10-27 08:26:50 +01:00
Fujii Masao
17cc5f666f Fix inconsistent reporting of checkpointer stats.
Previously, the pg_stat_checkpointer view and the checkpoint completion
log message could show different numbers for buffers written
during checkpoints. The view only counted shared buffers,
while the log message included both shared and SLRU buffers,
causing inconsistencies.

This commit resolves the issue by updating both the view and the log message
to separately report shared and SLRU buffers written during checkpoints.
A new slru_written column is added to the pg_stat_checkpointer view
to track SLRU buffers, while the existing buffers_written column now
tracks only shared buffers. This change would help users distinguish
between the two types of buffers, in the pg_stat_checkpointer view and
the checkpoint complete log message, respectively.

Bump catalog version.

Author: Nitin Jadhav
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy, Michael Paquier, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, vignesh C, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMm1aWb18EpT0whJrjG+-nyhNouXET6ZUw0pNYYAe+NezpvsAA@mail.gmail.com
2024-10-02 11:17:47 +09:00
Michael Paquier
bd06cc338d Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbers
This is a continuation of c9e2457390, containing changes included into
the proposed patch that have been missed in the actual commit.  I have
managed to miss these diffs while doing a rebase of the original patch.

Thanks to Noah Misch, Peter Eisentraut and Alexander Korotkov for the
pokes.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/92fe572d-638e-4162-aef6-1c42a2936f25@eisentraut.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240810175055.cd.nmisch@google.com
Backpatch-through: 17
2024-08-19 12:34:18 +09:00
Alvaro Herrera
7b063ff26a Search for SLRU page only in its own bank
One of the two slot scans in SlruSelectLRUPage was not walking only the
slots in the specific bank where the buffer could be; change it to do
that.

Oversight in 53c2a97a92.

Author: Sergey Sargsyan <sergey.sargsyan.2001@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18582-5f301dd30ba91a38@postgresql.org
2024-08-18 20:49:57 -04:00
Michael Paquier
ffb0603929 Improve comments in slru.{c,h} about segment name format
slru.h described incorrectly how SLRU segment names are formatted
depending on the segment number and if long or short segment names are
used.  This commit closes the gap with a better description, fitting
with the reality.

Reported-by: Noah Misch
Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240626002747.dc.nmisch@google.com
Backpatch-through: 17
2024-07-23 16:54:51 +09:00
David Rowley
a42fc1c903 Fix an assortment of typos
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ae9f2fcb-4b24-5bb0-4240-efbbbd944ca1@gmail.com
2024-05-04 02:33:25 +12:00
Alvaro Herrera
0d3a71d0c8 Fix misspelled assertions
Remove an extra & operator, per Tom Lane.  My bugs, introduced with
commit 53c2a97a92.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3885480.1709590472@sss.pgh.pa.us
2024-03-05 12:13:12 +01:00
Alvaro Herrera
f9baaf96d3 Simplify coding in slru.c
New code in 53c2a97a92 uses direct array access to
shared->bank_locks[bankno].lock which can be made a little bit more
legible by using the SimpleLruGetBankLock helper function.
Nothing terribly serious, but let's add some clarity.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202403041517.3a35jw53os65@alvherre.pgsql
2024-03-04 17:37:47 +01:00
Alvaro Herrera
53c2a97a92 Improve performance of subsystems on top of SLRU
More precisely, what we do here is make the SLRU cache sizes
configurable with new GUCs, so that sites with high concurrency and big
ranges of transactions in flight (resp. multixacts/subtransactions) can
benefit from bigger caches.  In order for this to work with good
performance, two additional changes are made:

1. the cache is divided in "banks" (to borrow terminology from CPU
   caches), and algorithms such as eviction buffer search only affect
   one specific bank.  This forestalls the problem that linear searching
   for a specific buffer across the whole cache takes too long: we only
   have to search the specific bank, whose size is small.  This work is
   authored by Andrey Borodin.

2. Change the locking regime for the SLRU banks, so that each bank uses
   a separate LWLock.  This allows for increased scalability.  This work
   is authored by Dilip Kumar.  (A part of this was previously committed as
   d172b717c6f4.)

Special care is taken so that the algorithms that can potentially
traverse more than one bank release one bank's lock before acquiring the
next.  This should happen rarely, but particularly clog.c's group commit
feature needed code adjustment to cope with this.  I (Álvaro) also added
lots of comments to make sure the design is sound.

The new GUCs match the names introduced by bcdfa5f2e2 in the
pg_stat_slru view.

The default values for these parameters are similar to the previous
sizes of each SLRU.  commit_ts, clog and subtrans accept value 0, which
means to adjust by dividing shared_buffers by 512 (so 2MB for every 1GB
of shared_buffers), with a cap of 8MB.  (A new slru.c function
SimpleLruAutotuneBuffers() was added to support this.)  The cap was
previously 1MB for clog, so for sites with more than 512MB of shared
memory the total memory used increases, which is likely a good tradeoff.
However, other SLRUs (notably multixact ones) retain smaller sizes and
don't support a configured value of 0.  These values based on
shared_buffers may need to be revisited, but that's an easy change.

There was some resistance to adding these new GUCs: it would be better
to adjust to memory pressure automatically somehow, for example by
stealing memory from shared_buffers (where the caches can grow and
shrink naturally).  However, doing that seems to be a much larger
project and one which has made virtually no progress in several years,
and because this is such a pain point for so many users, here we take
the pragmatic approach.

Author: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Author: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amul Sul, Gilles Darold, Anastasia Lubennikova,
	Ivan Lazarev, Robert Haas, Thomas Munro, Tomas Vondra,
	Yura Sokolov, Васильев Дмитрий (Dmitry Vasiliev).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2BEC2B3F-9B61-4C1D-9FB5-5FAB0F05EF86@yandex-team.ru
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vzDvNz=ExGXz6gdyjtzGixKSqs0mKHMmaQ8sOSEFZ33A@mail.gmail.com
2024-02-28 17:05:31 +01:00
Alvaro Herrera
5f79cb7629 slru.c: Reduce scope of variables in 'for' blocks
Pretty boring.
2024-02-26 16:49:50 +01:00
Alvaro Herrera
e4b27b5355 Change initial use of pg_atomic_write_u64 to init
This only matters when using atomics emulation with semaphores.

Per buildfarm member rorqual.
2024-02-06 12:08:39 +01:00
Alvaro Herrera
d172b717c6 Use atomic access for SlruShared->latest_page_number
The new concurrency model proposed for slru.c to improve performance
does not include any single lock that would coordinate processes
doing concurrent reads/writes on SlruShared->latest_page_number.
We can instead use atomic reads and writes for that variable.

Author: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vzDvNz=ExGXz6gdyjtzGixKSqs0mKHMmaQ8sOSEFZ33A@mail.gmail.com
2024-02-06 10:54:10 +01:00
Bruce Momjian
29275b1d17 Update copyright for 2024
Reported-by: Michael Paquier

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz

Backpatch-through: 12
2024-01-03 20:49:05 -05:00
Alexander Korotkov
b589f211e0 Fix warning due non-standard inline declaration in 4ed8f0913b
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin, Tom Lane
Author: Pavel Borisov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/55d8800f-4a80-5256-1e84-246fbe79acd0@gmail.com
2023-11-30 11:34:45 +02:00
Alexander Korotkov
4ed8f0913b Index SLRUs by 64-bit integers rather than by 32-bit integers
We've had repeated bugs in the area of handling SLRU wraparound in the past,
some of which have caused data loss. Switching to an indexing system for SLRUs
that does not wrap around should allow us to get rid of a whole bunch
of problems and improve the overall reliability of the system.

This particular patch however only changes the indexing and doesn't address
the wraparound per se. This is going to be done in the following patches.

Author: Maxim Orlov, Aleksander Alekseev, Alexander Korotkov, Teodor Sigaev
Author: Nikita Glukhov, Pavel Borisov, Yura Sokolov
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion, Heikki Linnakangas, Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Japin Li, Pavel Borisov, Tom Lane, Peter Eisentraut, Andres Freund
Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin, Dilip Kumar, Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACG%3DezZe1NQSCnfHOr78AtAZxJZeCvxrts0ygrxYwe%3DpyyjVWA%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TPDOYBYrnCAeyndkBktO0WG2xSdYduTF0nxq%2BvfkmTF5Q%40mail.gmail.com
2023-11-29 01:40:56 +02:00
Peter Eisentraut
611806cd72 Add trailing commas to enum definitions
Since C99, there can be a trailing comma after the last value in an
enum definition.  A lot of new code has been introducing this style on
the fly.  Some new patches are now taking an inconsistent approach to
this.  Some add the last comma on the fly if they add a new last
value, some are trying to preserve the existing style in each place,
some are even dropping the last comma if there was one.  We could
nudge this all in a consistent direction if we just add the trailing
commas everywhere once.

I omitted a few places where there was a fixed "last" value that will
always stay last.  I also skipped the header files of libpq and ecpg,
in case people want to use those with older compilers.  There were
also a small number of cases where the enum type wasn't used anywhere
(but the enum values were), which ended up confusing pgindent a bit,
so I left those alone.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/386f8c45-c8ac-4681-8add-e3b0852c1620%40eisentraut.org
2023-10-26 09:20:54 +02:00
Michael Paquier
8961cb9a03 Fix typos in comments
The changes done in this commit impact comments with no direct
user-visible changes, with fixes for incorrect function, variable or
structure names.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e8c38840-596a-83d6-bd8d-cebc51111572@gmail.com
2023-05-02 12:23:08 +09:00
Michael Paquier
84cc142674 Re-add tracking of wait event SLRUFlushSync
SLRUFlushSync has been accidently removed during dee663f, that has moved
the flush of the SLRU files to the checkpointer, so add it back.  The
issue has been noticed by Thomas when checking for orphaned wait
events.

Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGK6tqm59KuF1z+h5Y8fsWcu5v8+84kduSHwRzwjB2aa_A@mail.gmail.com
2023-04-26 07:10:06 +09:00
Bruce Momjian
c8e1ba736b Update copyright for 2023
Backpatch-through: 11
2023-01-02 15:00:37 -05:00
Michael Paquier
5ca3645cb3 Fix comment of SimpleLruInit() in slru.c
sync_handler was not mentioned in the comment block of the function.

Oversight in dee663f.

Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TPUd9BwNY47TtMxaijLHSbyHNdhu=kvbGnvO_bi+oC6_Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
2022-11-10 16:32:29 +09:00
John Naylor
6291b2546c Remove unnecessary semicolons after goto labels
According to the C standard, a label must followed by a statement.
If there was ever a time we needed an empty statement here, it was
a long time ago.

Japin Li

Reviewed by Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/MEYP282MB16690F40189A4F060B41D56DB65E9%40MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
2022-10-10 15:08:38 +07:00
Thomas Munro
b6d8a60aba Restore pg_pread and friends.
Commits cf112c12 and a0dc8271 were a little too hasty in getting rid of
the pg_ prefixes where we use pread(), pwrite() and vectored variants.

We dropped support for ancient Unixes where we needed to use lseek() to
implement replacements for those, but it turns out that Windows also
changes the current position even when you pass in an offset to
ReadFile() and WriteFile() if the file handle is synchronous, despite
its documentation saying otherwise.

Switching to asynchronous file handles would fix that, but have other
complications.  For now let's just put back the pg_ prefix and add some
comments to highlight the non-standard side-effect, which we can now
describe as Windows-only.

Reported-by: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220923202439.GA1156054%40nathanxps13
2022-09-29 13:12:11 +13:00
Thomas Munro
cf112c1220 Remove dead pread and pwrite replacement code.
pread() and pwrite() are in SUSv2, and all targeted Unix systems have
them.

Previously, we defined pg_pread and pg_pwrite to emulate these function
with lseek() on old Unixen.  The names with a pg_ prefix were a reminder
of a portability hazard: they might change the current file position.
That hazard is gone, so we can drop the prefixes.

Since the remaining replacement code is Windows-only, move it into
src/port/win32p{read,write}.c, and move the declarations into
src/include/port/win32_port.h.

No need for vestigial HAVE_PREAD, HAVE_PWRITE macros as they were only
used for declarations in port.h which have now moved into win32_port.h.

Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGJ3LHeP9w5Fgzdr4G8AnEtJ=z=p6hGDEm4qYGEUX5B6fQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-08-05 09:49:21 +12:00
Andres Freund
be902e2651 pgstat: normalize function naming.
Most of pgstat uses pgstat_<verb>_<subject>() or just <verb>_<subject>(). But
not all (some introduced fairly recently by me). Rename ones that aren't
intentionally following a different scheme (e.g. AtEOXact_*).
2022-04-06 21:29:46 -07:00
Peter Eisentraut
01effb1304 Fix unsigned output format in SLRU error reporting
Avoid printing signed values as unsigned.  (No impact in practice
expected.)

Author: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CALT9ZEHN7hWJo6MgJKqoDMGj%3DGOzQU50wTvOYZXDj7x%3DsUK-kw%40mail.gmail.com
2022-04-06 09:15:05 +02:00
Bruce Momjian
27b77ecf9f Update copyright for 2022
Backpatch-through: 10
2022-01-07 19:04:57 -05:00
Heikki Linnakangas
317632f307 Move InRecovery and standbyState global vars to xlogutils.c.
They are used in code that runs both during normal operation and during
WAL replay, and needs to behave differently during replay. Move them to
xlogutils.c, because that's where we have other helper functions used by
redo routines.

Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b3b71061-4919-e882-4857-27e370ab134a%40iki.fi
2021-07-31 09:50:26 +03:00
Peter Eisentraut
0e392fcc0d Use errmsg_internal for debug messages
An inconsistent set of debug-level messages was not using
errmsg_internal(), thus uselessly exposing the messages to translation
work.  Fix those.
2021-02-17 11:33:25 +01:00
Noah Misch
6db992833c Prevent excess SimpleLruTruncate() deletion.
Every core SLRU wraps around.  With the exception of pg_notify, the wrap
point can fall in the middle of a page.  Account for this in the
PagePrecedes callback specification and in SimpleLruTruncate()'s use of
said callback.  Update each callback implementation to fit the new
specification.  This changes SerialPagePrecedesLogically() from the
style of asyncQueuePagePrecedes() to the style of CLOGPagePrecedes().
(Whereas pg_clog and pg_serial share a key space, pg_serial is nothing
like pg_notify.)  The bug fixed here has the same symptoms and user
followup steps as 592a589a04.  Back-patch
to 9.5 (all supported versions).

Reviewed by Andrey Borodin and (in earlier versions) by Tom Lane.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190202083822.GC32531@gust.leadboat.com
2021-01-16 12:21:35 -08:00
Bruce Momjian
ca3b37487b Update copyright for 2021
Backpatch-through: 9.5
2021-01-02 13:06:25 -05:00
Thomas Munro
c732c3f8c1 Fix unlinking of SLRU segments.
Commit dee663f7 intended to drop any queued up fsync requests before
unlinking segment files, but missed a code path.  Fix, by centralizing
the forget-and-unlink code into a single function.

Reported-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201104013205.icogbi773przyny5%40development
2020-11-05 13:49:49 +13:00
Thomas Munro
dee663f784 Defer flushing of SLRU files.
Previously, we called fsync() after writing out individual pg_xact,
pg_multixact and pg_commit_ts pages due to cache pressure, leading to
regular I/O stalls in user backends and recovery.  Collapse requests for
the same file into a single system call as part of the next checkpoint,
as we already did for relation files, using the infrastructure developed
by commit 3eb77eba.  This can cause a significant improvement to
recovery performance, especially when it's otherwise CPU-bound.

Hoist ProcessSyncRequests() up into CheckPointGuts() to make it clearer
that it applies to all the SLRU mini-buffer-pools as well as the main
buffer pool.  Rearrange things so that data collected in CheckpointStats
includes SLRU activity.

Also remove the Shutdown{CLOG,CommitTS,SUBTRANS,MultiXact}() functions,
because they were redundant after the shutdown checkpoint that
immediately precedes them.  (I'm not sure if they were ever needed, but
they aren't now.)

Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> (parts)
Tested-by: Jakub Wartak <Jakub.Wartak@tomtom.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGLJ=84YT+NvhkEEDAuUtVHMfQ9i-N7k_o50JmQ6Rpj_OQ@mail.gmail.com
2020-09-25 19:00:15 +12:00
Thomas Munro
aca74843e4 Fix missing fsync of SLRU directories.
Harmonize behavior by moving reponsibility for fsyncing directories down
into slru.c.  In 10 and later, only the multixact directories were
missed (see commit 1b02be21), and in older branches all SLRUs were
missed.

Back-patch to all supported releases.

Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLtsTUOScnNoSMZ-2ZLv%2BwGh01J6kAo_DM8mTRq1sKdSQ%40mail.gmail.com
2020-09-24 10:39:52 +12:00
Noah Misch
566372b3d6 Prevent concurrent SimpleLruTruncate() for any given SLRU.
The SimpleLruTruncate() header comment states the new coding rule.  To
achieve this, add locktype "frozenid" and two LWLocks.  This closes a
rare opportunity for data loss, which manifested as "apparent
wraparound" or "could not access status of transaction" errors.  Data
loss is more likely in pg_multixact, due to released branches' thin
margin between multiStopLimit and multiWrapLimit.  If a user's physical
replication primary logged ":  apparent wraparound" messages, the user
should rebuild standbys of that primary regardless of symptoms.  At less
risk is a cluster having emitted "not accepting commands" errors or
"must be vacuumed" warnings at some point.  One can test a cluster for
this data loss by running VACUUM FREEZE in every database.  Back-patch
to 9.5 (all supported versions).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190218073103.GA1434723@rfd.leadboat.com
2020-08-15 10:15:53 -07:00
Peter Eisentraut
1784f278a6 Replace remaining StrNCpy() by strlcpy()
They are equivalent, except that StrNCpy() zero-fills the entire
destination buffer instead of providing just one trailing zero.  For
all but a tiny number of callers, that's just overhead rather than
being desirable.

Remove StrNCpy() as it is now unused.

In some cases, namestrcpy() is the more appropriate function to use.
While we're here, simplify the API of namestrcpy(): Remove the return
value, don't check for NULL input.  Nothing was using that anyway.
Also, remove a few unused name-related functions.

Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/44f5e198-36f6-6cdb-7fa9-60e34784daae%402ndquadrant.com
2020-08-10 23:20:37 +02:00
Thomas Munro
e2b37d9e7c Use pg_pread() and pg_pwrite() in slru.c.
This avoids lseek() system calls at every SLRU I/O, as was
done for relation files in commit c24dcd0c.

Reviewed-by: Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2Biqke4uTRFj8D8uEUUgj%2BRokPSp%2BCWM6YYzaaamG9Wvg%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJ%2BoHhnvqjn3%3DHro7xu-YDR8FPr0FL6LF35kHRX%3D_bUzg%40mail.gmail.com
2020-08-02 00:23:35 +12:00
Tom Lane
5da14938f7 Rename SLRU structures and associated LWLocks.
Originally, the names assigned to SLRUs had no purpose other than
being shmem lookup keys, so not a lot of thought went into them.
As of v13, though, we're exposing them in the pg_stat_slru view and
the pg_stat_reset_slru function, so it seems advisable to take a bit
more care.  Rename them to names based on the associated on-disk
storage directories (which fortunately we *did* think about, to some
extent; since those are also visible to DBAs, consistency seems like
a good thing).  Also rename the associated LWLocks, since those names
are likewise user-exposed now as wait event names.

For the most part I only touched symbols used in the respective modules'
SimpleLruInit() calls, not the names of other related objects.  This
renaming could have been taken further, and maybe someday we will do so.
But for now it seems undesirable to change the names of any globally
visible functions or structs, so some inconsistency is unavoidable.

(But I *did* terminate "oldserxid" with prejudice, as I found that
name both unreadable and not descriptive of the SLRU's contents.)

Table 27.12 needs re-alphabetization now, but I'll leave that till
after the other LWLock renamings I have in mind.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28683.1589405363@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-05-15 14:28:25 -04:00
Tom Lane
29c3e2dd5a Collect built-in LWLock tranche names statically, not dynamically.
There is little point in using the LWLockRegisterTranche mechanism for
built-in tranche names.  It wastes cycles, it creates opportunities for
bugs (since failing to register a tranche name is a very hard-to-detect
problem), and the lack of any centralized list of names encourages
sloppy nonconformity in name choices.  Moreover, since we have a
centralized list of the tranches anyway in enum BuiltinTrancheIds, we're
certainly not buying any flexibility in return for these disadvantages.

Hence, nuke all the backend-internal LWLockRegisterTranche calls,
and instead provide a const array of the builtin tranche names.

(I have in mind to change a bunch of these names shortly, but this
patch is just about getting them into one place.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9056.1589419765@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-05-14 11:10:31 -04:00
Tom Lane
81ca868630 Improve management of SLRU statistics collection.
Instead of re-identifying which statistics bucket to use for a given
SLRU on every counter increment, do it once during shmem initialization.
This saves a fair number of cycles, and there's no real cost because
we could not have a bucket assignment that varies over time or across
backends anyway.

Also, get rid of the ill-considered decision to let pgstat.c pry
directly into SLRU's shared state; it's cleaner just to have slru.c
pass the stats bucket number.

In consequence of these changes, there's no longer any need to store
an SLRU's LWLock tranche info in shared memory, so get rid of that,
making this a net reduction in shmem consumption.  (That partly
reverts fe702a7b3.)

This is basically code review for 28cac71bd, so I also cleaned up
some comments, removed a dangling extern declaration, fixed some
things that should be static and/or const, etc.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3618.1589313035@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-05-13 13:08:23 -04:00
Tomas Vondra
2b88fdde30 Track SLRU page hits in SimpleLruReadPage_ReadOnly
SLRU page hits were tracked only in SimpleLruReadPage, but that's not
enough because we may hit the page in SimpleLruReadPage_ReadOnly in
which case we don't call SimpleLruReadPage at all.

Reported-by: Kuntal Ghosh
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200119143707.gyinppnigokesjok@development
2020-04-08 02:15:47 +02:00
Tomas Vondra
28cac71bd3 Collect statistics about SLRU caches
There's a number of SLRU caches used to access important data like clog,
commit timestamps, multixact, asynchronous notifications, etc. Until now
we had no easy way to monitor these shared caches, compute hit ratios,
number of reads/writes etc.

This commit extends the statistics collector to track this information
for a predefined list of SLRUs, and also introduces a new system view
pg_stat_slru displaying the data.

The list of built-in SLRUs is fixed, but additional SLRUs may be defined
in extensions. Unfortunately, there's no suitable registry of SLRUs, so
this patch simply defines a fixed list of SLRUs with entries for the
built-in ones and one entry for all additional SLRUs. Extensions adding
their own SLRU are fairly rare, so this seems acceptable.

This patch only allows monitoring of SLRUs, not tuning. The SLRU sizes
are still fixed (hard-coded in the code) and it's not entirely clear
which of the SLRUs might need a GUC to tune size. In a way, allowing us
to determine that is one of the goals of this patch.

Bump catversion as the patch introduces new functions and system view.

Author: Tomas Vondra
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20200119143707.gyinppnigokesjok@development
2020-04-02 02:34:21 +02:00