This commit makes use of the overflow-aware routines in int.h to
fix a variety of reported overflow bugs in the date and timestamp
code. It seems unlikely that this fixes all such bugs in this
area, but since the problems seem limited to cases that are far
beyond any realistic usage, I'm not going to worry too much. Note
that for one bug, I've chosen to simply add a comment about the
overflow hazard because fixing it would require quite a bit of code
restructuring that doesn't seem worth the risk.
Since this is a bug fix, it could be back-patched, but given the
risk of conflicts with the new routines in int.h and the overall
risk/reward ratio of this patch, I've opted not to do so for now.
Fixes bug #18585 (except for the one case that's just commented).
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Matthew Kim, Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Joseph Koshakow, Jian He
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31ad2cd1-db94-bdb3-f91a-65ffdb4bef95%40gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18585-db646741dd649abd%40postgresql.org
This commit attempts to update a few places, such as the money,
numeric, and timestamp types, to no longer rely on signed integer
wrapping for correctness. This is intended to move us closer
towards removing -fwrapv, which may enable some compiler
optimizations. However, there is presently no plan to actually
remove that compiler option in the near future.
Besides using some of the existing overflow-aware routines in
int.h, this commit introduces and makes use of some new ones.
Specifically, it adds functions that accept a signed integer and
return its absolute value as an unsigned integer with the same
width (e.g., pg_abs_s64()). It also adds functions that accept an
unsigned integer, store the result of negating that integer in a
signed integer with the same width, and return whether the negation
overflowed (e.g., pg_neg_u64_overflow()).
Finally, this commit adds a couple of tests for timestamps near
POSTGRES_EPOCH_JDATE.
Author: Joseph Koshakow
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas, Jian He
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHdBPOyEGS7s%2Bxf4iaW0-cgiq25jpYdWBqQqvLtLe_t6tw%40mail.gmail.com
This commit adds integer comparison functions that are designed to
be as efficient as possible while avoiding overflow. A follow-up
commit will make use of these functions in many of the in-tree
qsort() comparators. The new functions are not better in all cases
(e.g., when the comparator function is inlined), so it is important
to consider the context before using them.
Author: Mats Kindahl
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas, Andres Freund, Thomas Munro, Andrey Borodin, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2B14426g2Wa9QuUpmakwPxXFWG_1FaY0AsApkvcTBy-YfS6uaw%40mail.gmail.com
When computing "0 - INT64_MIN", most platforms would report an
overflow error, which is correct. However, platforms without integer
overflow builtins or 128-bit integers would fail to spot the overflow,
and incorrectly return INT64_MIN.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Patch be me. Thanks to Jian He for initial investigation, and Laurenz
Albe and Tom Lane for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUNK-AZSD0jVdgkk0N%3DNcAXBWeAEX-QU9AnJPensikmdQ%40mail.gmail.com
Similarly to the signed versions added in 4d6ad31, this adds a set of
inline functions for overflow checks with unsigned integers, including
uint16, uint32 and uint64. This relies on compiler built-in overflow
checks by default if available. The behavior of unsigned integers is
well-defined so the fallback implementations checks are simple for
additions and subtractions. Multiplications avoid division-based checks
which are expensive if possible, still this can happen for uint64 if
128-bit integers are not available.
While on it, the code in common/int.h is reorganized to avoid too many
duplicated comments. The new macros will be used in a follow-up patch.
All thanks to Andres Freund for the input provided.
Author: Fabien Coelho, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190830073423.GB2354@paquier.xyz
Some older compilers otherwise sometimes complain about undefined
values, even though the return value should not be used in the
overflow case. We assume that any decent compiler will optimize away
the unnecessary assignment in performance critical cases.
We do not want to restrain the returned value to a specific value,
e.g. 0 or the wrapped-around value, because some fast ways to
implement overflow detecting math do not easily allow for
that (e.g. msvc intrinsics). As the function documentation already
documents the returned value in case of intrinsics to be
implementation defined, no documentation has to be updated.
Per complaint from Tom Lane and his buildfarm member prairiedog.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18169.1513958454@sss.pgh.pa.us
It's not easy to get signed integer overflow checks correct and
fast. Therefore abstract the necessary infrastructure into a common
header providing addition, subtraction and multiplication for 16, 32,
64 bit signed integers.
The new macros aren't yet used, but a followup commit will convert
several open coded overflow checks.
Author: Andres Freund, with some code stolen from Greg Stark
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171024103954.ztmatprlglz3rwke@alap3.anarazel.de
