Commit 7202d72787 added in passing some const qualifiers, but the one
on the postmaster_child_launch() startup_data argument was incorrect,
because the function itself modifies the pointed-to data. This is
hidden from the compiler because of casts. The qualifiers on the
functions called by postmaster_child_launch() are still correct.
Previously, pg_restore did not skip comments on policies even when
--no-policies was specified. As a result, it could issue COMMENT commands
for policies that were never created, causing those commands to fail.
This commit fixes the issue by ensuring that comments on policies
are also skipped when --no-policies is used.
Backpatch to v18, where --no-policies was added in pg_restore.
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHCt00pR9h51AVu6+yPD5J7JQn=7dQXxqacj0XyDhc-fA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
Previously, pg_restore did not skip comments on publications or subscriptions
even when --no-publications or --no-subscriptions was specified. As a result,
it could issue COMMENT commands for objects that were never created,
causing those commands to fail.
This commit fixes the issue by ensuring that comments on publications and
subscriptions are also skipped when the corresponding options are used.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHCt00pR9h51AVu6+yPD5J7JQn=7dQXxqacj0XyDhc-fA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Add logic to _bt_set_startikey that determines whether row compare keys
are guaranteed to be satisfied by every tuple on a page that is about to
be read by _bt_readpage. This works in essentially the same way as the
existing scalar inequality logic. Testing has shown that the new logic
improves performance to about the same degree as the existing scalar
inequality logic (compared to the unoptimized case). In other words,
the new logic makes many row compare scans significantly faster.
Note that the new row compare inequality logic is only effective when
the same individual row member is the deciding subkey for all tuples on
the page (obviously, all tuples have to satisfy the row compare, too).
This is what makes the new row compare logic very similar to the
existing logic for scalar inequalities. Note, in particular, that this
makes it safe to ignore whether all row compare members are against
either ASC or DESC index attributes (i.e. it doesn't matter if
individual subkeys don't all use the same inequality strategy).
Also stop refusing to set pstate.startikey to an offset beyond any
nonrequired key (don't add logic that'll do that for an individual row
compare subkey, either). We can fully rely on our firstchangingattnum
tests instead. This will do the right thing when a page has a group of
tuples with NULLs in a lower-order attribute that makes the tuples fail
to satisfy a row compare key -- we won't incorrectly conclude that all
tuples must satisfy the row compare, just because firsttup and lasttup
happen to. Our firstchangingattnum test prevents that from happening.
(Note that the original "avoid evaluating nbtree scan keys" mechanism
added by commit e0b1ee17 couldn't support row compares due to issues
with tuples that contain NULLs in a lower-order subkey's attribute.
That original mechanism relied on requiredness markings, which the
replacement _bt_set_startikey mechanism never really needed.)
Follow up to commit 8a510275, which added the _bt_set_startikey
optimization. _bt_set_startikey is now feature complete; there's no
remaining kind of nbtree scan key that it still doesn't support.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznL6Z3H_GTQze9d8T_Ls=cYbnd-_9f-Jo7aYgTGRUD58g@mail.gmail.com
This commit resumes automatic retention of conflict-relevant data for a
subscription. Previously, retention would stop if the apply process failed
to advance its xmin (oldest_nonremovable_xid) within the configured
max_retention_duration and user needs to manually re-enable
retain_dead_tuples option. With this change, retention will resume
automatically once the apply worker catches up and begins advancing its
xmin (oldest_nonremovable_xid) within the configured threshold.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716BE80DAEB0EE2A6A5D1F5949D2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
If extensions of equal names were installed in different directories
in the path, the views pg_available_extensions and
pg_available_extension_versions would show all of them, even though
only the first one was actually reachable by CREATE EXTENSION. To
fix, have those views skip extensions found later in the path if they
have names already found earlier.
Also add a bit of documentation that only the first extension in the
path can be used.
Reported-by: Pierrick <pierrick.chovelon@dalibo.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8f5a0517-1cb8-4085-ae89-77e7454e27ba%40dalibo.com
The TimescaleDB extension expects to be able to change an nbtree scan's
keys across rescans. The issue arises in the extension's implementation
of loose index scan. This is arguably a misuse of the index AM API,
though apparently it worked until recently. It stopped working when the
skipScan flag was added to BTScanOpaqueData by commit 8a510275, though.
The flag wouldn't reliably track whether the scan (actually, the current
rescan) has any skip arrays, leading to confusion in _bt_set_startikey.
nbtree preprocessing will now defensively initialize the scan's skipScan
flag in all cases, including the case where _bt_preprocess_array_keys
returns early due to the (re)scan not using arrays. While nbtree isn't
obligated to support this use case (at least not according to my reading
of the index AM API), it still seems like a good idea to be consistent
here, on general robustness grounds.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Natalya Aksman <natalya@timescale.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJumhcirfMojbk20+W0YimbNDkwdECvJprQGQ-XqK--ph09nQw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit e3ffc3e91 fixed the translation of character classes in
SIMILAR TO regular expressions. Unfortunately the fix broke a corner
case: if there is an escape character right after the opening bracket
(for example in "[\q]"), a closing bracket right after the escape
sequence would not be seen as closing the character class.
There were two more oversights: a backslash or a nested opening bracket
right at the beginning of a character class should remove the special
meaning from any following caret or closing bracket.
This bug suggests that this code needs to be more readable, so also
rename the variables "charclass_depth" and "charclass_start" to
something more meaningful, rewrite an "if" cascade to be more
consistent, and improve the commentary.
Reported-by: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Stephan Springl <springl-psql@bfw-online.de>
Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFCRh-8NwJd0jq6P=R3qhHyqU7hw0BTor3W0SvUcii24et+zAw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
pg_regress has a --no-locale option that forces the temporary database to
have C locale. However, currently, locale C only exists in the 'builtin'
locale provider. This makes 'pg_regress --no-locale' fail when the default
locale provider is not 'builtin'. This commit makes 'pg_regress --no-locale'
specify both LOCALE='C' and LOCALE_PROVIDER='builtin'.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b54921f95e23b4391b1613e9053a3d58%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Oleg Tselebrovskiy <o.tselebrovskiy@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
It's not quite clear to me why this didn't show up in my local
check-world testing, but some of the buildfarm evidently runs
this test with a different database name. Adjust the test
so that that doesn't affect the reported error messages.
If the database or user had no entry in pg_db_role_setting,
RESET silently did nothing --- including not checking the
validity of the given GUC name. This is quite inconsistent
and surprising, because you *would* get such an error if there
were any pg_db_role_setting entry, even though it contains
values for unrelated GUCs.
While this is clearly a bug, changing it in stable branches seems
unwise. The effect will be that some ALTER commands that formerly
were no-ops will now be errors, and people don't like that sort of
thing in minor releases.
Author: Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30783e-68c28a00-9-41004480@130449754
Commit a0b99fc12 caused pg_event_trigger_dropped_objects()
to not fill the object_name field for schemas, which it
should have; and caused it to fill the object_name field
for default values, which it should not have.
In addition, triggers and RLS policies really should behave
the same way as we're making column defaults do; that is,
they should have is_temporary = true if they belong to a
temporary table.
Fix those things, and upgrade event_trigger.sql's woefully
inadequate test coverage of these secondary output columns.
As before, back-patch only to v15.
Reported-by: Sergey Shinderuk <s.shinderuk@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bd7b4651-1c26-4d30-832b-f942fabcb145@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 15
This unblocks rejection of that syntax. One copy was a misspelling of
"SET TABLESPACE pg_default" that instead made no persistent changes.
The other copy just needed to populate a DATABASEOID syscache entry.
This slightly raises database.sql test coverage of catcache.c, while
dbcommands.c coverage remains the same.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1802710.1757608564@sss.pgh.pa.us
A recently added nbtree preprocessing step failed to account for the
fact that DESC columns already had their B-Tree strategy number commuted
at this point in preprocessing. As a result, preprocessing could output
a set of scan keys where one or more keys had the correct strategy
number, but used the wrong comparison routine.
To fix, make the faulty code path that looks up a more restrictive
replacement operator/comparison routine commute its requested inequality
strategy (while outputting the transformed strategy number as before).
This makes the final transformed scan key comport with the approach
preprocessing has always used to deal with DESC columns (which is
described by comments above _bt_fix_scankey_strategy).
Oversight in commit commit b3f1a13f, which made nbtree preprocessing
perform transformations on skip array inequalities that can reduce the
total number of index searches.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Natalya Aksman <natalya@timescale.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19049-b7df801e71de41b2@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 18
Users of logical decoding can encounter an unexpected change of
CurrentResourceOwner and CurrentMemoryContext. The problem is that,
unlike other call sites of RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction(), in
reorderbuffer.c we fail to restore the original values of these global
variables after being clobbered by subtransaction abort. This patch
saves the values prior to the call and restores them eventually.
In addition, logical.c and logicalfuncs.c had a hack to restore resource
owner, presumably because of lack of this restore. Remove that.
Instead, because the test coverage here is not very consistent, add an
Assert() to ensure that the resowner is kept identical; this would make
it easy to detect other cases of bugs were we fail to restore resowner
properly. This could be removed later.
This is arguably an old bug, but there appears to be no reason to
backpatch it and it's risky to do so, so refrain for now.
Author: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Reported-by: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/119497.1756892972@localhost
It was defining yyscan_t as a macro while the rest of the code uses a
typedef with #ifdef guards around it. The latter is also what the
flex generated code uses. So it seems best to make it look like those
other places for consistency.
The old way also had a potential for conflict if some code included
multiple headers providing yyscan_t. exprscan.l includes
#include "fe_utils/psqlscan_int.h"
#include "pgbench.h"
and fe_utils/psqlscan_int.h contains
#ifndef YY_TYPEDEF_YY_SCANNER_T
#define YY_TYPEDEF_YY_SCANNER_T
typedef void *yyscan_t;
#endif
which was then followed by pgbench.h
#define yyscan_t void *
and then the generated code in exprscan.c
#ifndef YY_TYPEDEF_YY_SCANNER_T
#define YY_TYPEDEF_YY_SCANNER_T
typedef void* yyscan_t;
#endif
This works, but if the #ifdef guard in psqlscan_int.h is removed, this
fails.
We want to move toward allowing repeat typedefs, per C11, but for that
we need to make sure they are all the same.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/10d32190-f31b-40a5-b177-11db55597355@eisentraut.org
Clang 21 shows some new compiler warnings, for example:
warning: variable 'dstsize' is uninitialized when passed as a const pointer argument here [-Wuninitialized-const-pointer]
The fix is to initialize the variables when they are defined. This is
similar to, for example, the existing situation in gistKeyIsEQ().
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6604ad6e-5934-43ac-8590-15113d6ae4b1%40eisentraut.org
hashdesc.c was missing a couple of fields in its record descriptions, as
of:
- is_prev_bucket_same_wrt for SQUEEZE_PAGE.
- procid for INIT_META_PAGE.
- old_bucket_flag and new_bucket_flag for SPLIT_ALLOCATE_PAGE.
The author has noted the first hole, and I have spotted the others while
double-checking this area of the code. Note that the only data missing
now are the offsets stored in VACUUM_ONE_PAGE. We could perhaps add
them, if somebody sees value in this data, even if it makes the output
larger. These are discarded here.
Author: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPjc-OVwtZH0Xrkvg7n=2ZwdbMJzqrm_ed_CfjiAzuKVGg@mail.gmail.com
In EXEC_BACKEND builds, GetNamedLWLockTranche() can segfault when
called outside of the postmaster process, as it might access
NamedLWLockTrancheRequestArray, which won't be initialized. Given
the lack of reports, this is apparently unusual, presumably because
it is usually called from a shmem_startup_hook like this:
mystruct = ShmemInitStruct(..., &found);
if (!found)
{
mystruct->locks = GetNamedLWLockTranche(...);
...
}
This genre of shmem_startup_hook evades the aforementioned
segfaults because the struct is initialized in the postmaster, so
all other callers skip the !found path.
We considered modifying the documentation or requiring
GetNamedLWLockTranche() to be called from the postmaster, but
ultimately we decided to simply move the request array to shared
memory (and add it to the BackendParameters struct), thereby
allowing calls outside postmaster on all platforms. Since the main
shared memory segment is initialized after accepting LWLock tranche
requests, postmaster builds the request array in local memory first
and then copies it to shared memory later.
Given the lack of reports, back-patching seems unnecessary.
Reported-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0v1_15QPg5Sqd2Qz5rh_qcsyCeHHmRDY89xVHcy2yt5BQ%40mail.gmail.com
pg_event_trigger_dropped_objects() would report a column default
object with is_temporary = false, even if it belongs to a
temporary table. This seems clearly wrong, so adjust it to
report the table's temp-ness.
While here, refactor EventTriggerSQLDropAddObject to make its
handling of namespace objects less messy and avoid duplication
of the schema-lookup code. And add some explicit test coverage
of dropped-object reports for dependencies of temp tables.
Back-patch to v15. The bug exists further back, but the
GetAttrDefaultColumnAddress function this patch depends on does not,
and it doesn't seem worth adjusting it to cope with the older code.
Author: Antoine Violin <violin.antuan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFjUV9x3-hv0gihf+CtUc-1it0hh7Skp9iYFhMS7FJjtAeAptA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
The comment mistakenly had "the others" for "the other", but this
commit also reorders the comment so it matches the macros below. Now we
describe the levels in increasing strictness. In addition, it seems
easier to follow if we introduce one level at a time, rather than
describing two, followed by "the other" (and then jumping back to one of
the first two). Finally, reword the sentence about the purpose of the
macros, which was slightly off-point.
Author: Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Rustam ALLAKOV <rustamallakov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUp=xja80rBaB6NpY3RRdi750y046x28bo_xg29zKY72Q@mail.gmail.com
This commit adds a missing isolation test for (non-PERIOD) foreign keys.
With REPEATABLE READ, one transaction can insert a referencing row while
another deletes the referenced row, and both see a valid state. But
after they have committed, the table violates referential integrity.
If the INSERT precedes the DELETE, we use a crosscheck snapshot to see
the just-added row, so that the DELETE can raise a foreign key error.
You can see the table violate referential integrity if you change
ri_restrict to pass false for detectNewRows to ri_PerformCheck.
A crosscheck snapshot is not needed when the DELETE comes first, because
the INSERT's trigger takes a FOR KEY SHARE lock that sees the row now
marked for deletion, waits for that transaction to commit, and raises a
serialization error. I (Paul) added a test for that too though.
We already have a similar test (in ri-triggers.spec) for SERIALIZABLE
snapshot isolation showing that you can implement foreign keys with just
pl/pgSQL, but that test does nothing to validate ri_triggers.c. We also
have tests (in fk-snapshot.spec) for other concurrency scenarios, but
not this one: we test concurrently deleting both the referencing and
referenced row, when the constraint activates a cascade/set null action.
But those tests don't exercise ri_restrict, and the consequence of
omitting a crosscheck comparison is different: a serialization failure,
not a referential integrity violation.
Author: Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Rustam ALLAKOV <rustamallakov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUp=xja80rBaB6NpY3RRdi750y046x28bo_xg29zKY72Q@mail.gmail.com
The test assumes that a backend will execute COMMIT PREPARED on the
publisher and hit the injection point commit-after-delay-checkpoint within
the commit critical section. This should cause the apply worker on the
subscriber to wait for the transaction to complete.
However, the test does not guarantee that the injection point is actually
triggered, creating a race condition where the apply worker may proceed
prematurely during COMMIT PREPARED.
This commit resolves the issue by explicitly waiting for the injection
point to be hit before continuing with the test, ensuring consistent and
reliable behavior.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TY4PR01MB1690751D1CA8C128B0770EC6F9409A@TY4PR01MB16907.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
hash_xlog.h included descriptions for the blocks used in WAL records
that were was not completely consistent with how the records are
generated, with one block missing for SQUEEZE_PAGE, and inconsistent
descriptions used for block 0 in VACUUM_ONE_PAGE and MOVE_PAGE_CONTENTS.
This information was incorrect since c11453ce0a, cross-checking the
logic for the record generation.
Author: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPj1j=a1d1hVA3oabRFz0hSU3KKrYtZPijw4UPUM7LY9zw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
If sizeof(Pointer) is 4 then sizeof(SortItem) will be 12, so that
if data->numrows is odd then we placed the values array at a location
that's not a multiple of 8. That was fine when sizeof(Datum) was also
4, but in the wake of commit 2a600a93c it makes some alignment-picky
machines unhappy. (You need a 32-bit machine that nonetheless expects
8-byte alignment of 8-byte quantities, which is an odd-seeming
combination but it does exist outside the Intel universe.)
To fix, MAXALIGN the space allocated to the SortItem array.
In passing, let's make the "len" variable be Size not int,
just for paranoia's sake.
This code was arguably not too safe even before 2a600a93c, but at
present I don't see a strong argument for back-patching.
Reported-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87036018-8d70-40ad-a0ac-192b07bd7b04@vondra.me
Instead of building a separate memory context that's used just
for running hash functions, make the hash functions run in the
per-tuple context of the node's innerecontext. This saves a
little space at runtime, and it avoids needing to reset two
contexts instead of one inside buildSubPlanHash's main loop.
This largely reverts commit 133924e13. That's safe to do now
because bf6c614a2 decoupled the evaluation context used by
TupleHashTableMatch from that used for hash function evaluation,
so that there's no longer a risk of resetting the innerecontext
too soon.
Per discussion of bug #19040, although this is not directly
a fix for that.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Li <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Reviewed-by: Fei Changhong <feichanghong@qq.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19040-c9b6073ef814f48c@postgresql.org
If the hash functions used for hashing tuples leaked any memory,
we failed to clean that up, resulting in query-lifespan memory
leakage in queries using hashed subplans. One way that could
happen is if the values being hashed require de-toasting, since
most of our hash functions don't trouble to clean up de-toasted
inputs.
Prior to commit bf6c614a2, this leakage was largely masked
because TupleHashTableMatch would reset hashtable->tempcxt
(via execTuplesMatch). But it doesn't do that anymore, and
that's not really the right place for this anyway: doing it
there could reset the tempcxt many times per hash lookup,
or not at all. Instead put reset calls into ExecHashSubPlan
and buildSubPlanHash. Along the way to that, rearrange
ExecHashSubPlan so that there's just one place to call
MemoryContextReset instead of several.
This amounts to accepting the de-facto API spec that the caller
of the TupleHashTable routines is responsible for resetting the
tempcxt adequately often. Although the other callers seem to
get this right, it was not documented anywhere, so add a comment
about it.
Bug: #19040
Reported-by: Haiyang Li <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Author: Haiyang Li <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Reviewed-by: Fei Changhong <feichanghong@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19040-c9b6073ef814f48c@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
