1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2026-01-29 12:02:15 +03:00
Commit Graph

716 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Amit Langote
7fbc75b26e Add soft error handling to some expression nodes
This adjusts the expression evaluation code for CoerceViaIO and
CoerceToDomain to handle errors softly if needed.

For CoerceViaIo, this means using InputFunctionCallSafe(), which
provides the option to handle errors softly, instead of calling the
type input function directly.

For CoerceToDomain, this simply entails replacing the ereport() in
ExecEvalConstraintCheck() by errsave().

In both cases, the ErrorSaveContext to be used when evaluating the
expression is stored by ExecInitExprRec() in the expression's struct
in the expression's ExprEvalStep.  The ErrorSaveContext is passed by
setting ExprState.escontext to point to it when calling
ExecInitExprRec() on the expression whose errors are to be handled
softly.

Note that no call site of ExecInitExprRec() has been changed in this
commit, so there's no functional change.  This is intended for
implementing new SQL/JSON expression nodes in future commits that
will use to it suppress errors that may occur during type coercions.

Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqE4XTdfb1nW=Ojoy_tQSRhYt-q_kb6i5d4xcKyrLC1Nbg@mail.gmail.com
2023-10-02 11:52:28 +09:00
Amit Langote
d060e921ea Remove obsolete executor cleanup code
This commit removes unnecessary ExecExprFreeContext() calls in
ExecEnd* routines because the actual cleanup is managed by
FreeExecutorState(). With no callers remaining for
ExecExprFreeContext(), this commit also removes the function.

This commit also drops redundant ExecClearTuple() calls, because
ExecResetTupleTable() in ExecEndPlan() already takes care of
resetting and dropping all TupleTableSlots initialized with
ExecInitScanTupleSlot() and ExecInitExtraTupleSlot().

After these modifications, the ExecEnd*() routines for ValuesScan,
NamedTuplestoreScan, and WorkTableScan became redundant. So, this
commit removes them.

Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFGkMSge6TgC9KQzde0ohpAycLQuV7ooitEEpbKB0O_mg@mail.gmail.com
2023-09-28 09:44:39 +09:00
Amit Kapila
edca342434 Allow the use of a hash index on the subscriber during replication.
Commit 89e46da5e5 allowed using BTREE indexes that are neither
PRIMARY KEY nor REPLICA IDENTITY on the subscriber during apply of
update/delete. This patch extends that functionality to also allow HASH
indexes.

We explored supporting other index access methods as well but they don't
have a fixed strategy for equality operation which is required by the
current infrastructure in logical replication to scan the indexes.

Author: Kuroda Hayato
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Onder Kalaci, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB58669D7414E59664E17A5827F522A@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
2023-07-14 08:21:54 +05:30
Peter Eisentraut
08235203dd Remove obsolete comment
OIDs are no longer system columns, since 578b229718.
2023-06-05 15:33:08 +02:00
Tom Lane
0245f8db36 Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.

This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical.  We've updated to
pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that
have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are
now indented one tab stop).  We've also updated to perltidy version
20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to
add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up.  Going
forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing
code.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230428092545.qfb3y5wcu4cm75ur@alvherre.pgsql
2023-05-19 17:24:48 -04:00
Tom Lane
70b42f2790 Fix misbehavior of EvalPlanQual checks with multiple result relations.
The idea of EvalPlanQual is that we replace the query's scan of the
result relation with a single injected tuple, and see if we get a
tuple out, thereby implying that the injected tuple still passes the
query quals.  (In join cases, other relations in the query are still
scanned normally.)  This logic was not updated when commit 86dc90056
made it possible for a single DML query plan to have multiple result
relations, when the query target relation has inheritance or partition
children.  We replaced the output for the current result relation
successfully, but other result relations were still scanned normally;
thus, if any other result relation contained a tuple satisfying the
quals, we'd think the EPQ check passed, even if it did not pass for
the injected tuple itself.  This would lead to update or delete
actions getting performed when they should have been skipped due to
a conflicting concurrent update in READ COMMITTED isolation mode.

Fix by blocking all sibling result relations from emitting tuples
during an EvalPlanQual recheck.  In the back branches, the fix is
complicated a bit by the need to not change the size of struct
EPQState (else we'd have ABI-breaking changes in offsets in
struct ModifyTableState).  Like the back-patches of 3f7836ff6
and 4b3e37993, add a separately palloc'd struct to avoid that.
The logic is the same as in HEAD otherwise.

This is only a live bug back to v14 where 86dc90056 came in.
However, I chose to back-patch the test cases further, on the
grounds that this whole area is none too well tested.  I skipped
doing so in v11 though because none of the test applied cleanly,
and it didn't quite seem worth extra work for a branch with only
six months to live.

Per report from Ante Krešić (via Aleksander Alekseev)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TMBTN3rcz4=AjYhLPD_w3FFT0Wq_C15jxCDn8U4tZnH1g@mail.gmail.com
2023-05-19 14:26:40 -04:00
Tomas Vondra
8c4040edf4 Allocate hash join files in a separate memory context
Should a hash join exceed memory limit, the hashtable is split up into
multiple batches. The number of batches is doubled each time a given
batch is determined not to fit in memory. Each batch file is allocated
with a block-sized buffer for buffering tuples and parallel hash join
has additional sharedtuplestore accessor buffers.

In some pathological cases requiring a lot of batches, often with skewed
data, bad stats, or very large datasets, users can run out-of-memory
solely from the memory overhead of all the batch files' buffers.

Batch files were allocated in the ExecutorState memory context, making
it very hard to identify when this batch explosion was the source of an
OOM. This commit allocates the batch files in a dedicated memory
context, making it easier to identify the cause of an OOM and work to
avoid it.

Based on initial draft by Tomas Vondra, with significant reworks and
improvements by Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais.

Author: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Author: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by:  Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190421114618.z3mpgmimc3rmubi4@development
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230504193006.1b5b9622%40karst#273020ff4061fc7a2fbb1ba96b281f17
2023-05-19 17:17:58 +02:00
Michael Paquier
d8c3106bb6 Add back SQLValueFunction for SQL keywords
This is equivalent to a revert of f193883 and fb32748, with the addition
that the declaration of the SQLValueFunction node needs to gain a couple
of node_attr for query jumbling.  The performance impact of removing the
function call inlining is proving to be too huge for some workloads
where these are used.  A worst-case test case of involving only simple
SELECT queries with a SQL keyword is proving to lead to a reduction of
10% in TPS via pgbench and prepared queries on a high-end machine.

None of the tests I ran back for this set of changes saw such a huge
gap, but Alexander Lakhin and Andres Freund have found that this can be
noticeable.  Keeping the older performance would mean to do more
inlining in the executor when using COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX for a function
expression, similarly to what SQLValueFunction does.  This requires more
redesign work and there is little time until 16beta1 is released, so for
now reverting the change is the best way forward, bringing back the
previous performance.

Bump catalog version.

Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b32bed1b-0746-9b20-1472-4bdc9ca66d52@gmail.com
2023-05-17 10:19:17 +09:00
Alvaro Herrera
5472743d9e Revert "Move PartitionPruneInfo out of plan nodes into PlannedStmt"
This reverts commit ec38694894 and its fixup 589bb81649.

This change was intended to support query planning avoiding acquisition
of locks on partitions that were going to be pruned; however, the
overall project took a different direction at [1] and this bit is no
longer needed.  Put things back the way they were as agreed in [2], to
avoid unnecessary complexity.

Discussion: [1] https://postgr.es/m/4191508.1674157166@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: [2] https://postgr.es/m/20230502175409.kcoirxczpdha26wt@alvherre.pgsql
2023-05-04 12:09:59 +02:00
Tom Lane
fce3b26e97 Rename ExecAggTransReparent, and improve its documentation.
The name of this function suggests that it ought to reparent R/W
expanded objects to be children of the persistent aggcontext, instead
of copying them.  In fact it does no such thing, and if you try to
make it do so you will see multiple regression failures.  Rename it
to the less-misleading ExecAggCopyTransValue, and add commentary
about why that attractive-sounding optimization won't work.  Also
adjust comments at call sites, some of which were describing logic
that has since been moved into ExecAggCopyTransValue.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3004282.1681930251@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-04-24 13:01:33 -04:00
Alexander Korotkov
2b65bf046d Revert 11470f544e
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230323003003.plgaxjqahjgkuxrk%40awork3.anarazel.de
2023-04-03 16:54:31 +03:00
Alvaro Herrera
6ee30209a6 SQL/JSON: support the IS JSON predicate
This patch introduces the SQL standard IS JSON predicate. It operates
on text and bytea values representing JSON, as well as on the json and
jsonb types. Each test has IS and IS NOT variants and supports a WITH
UNIQUE KEYS flag. The tests are:

IS JSON [VALUE]
IS JSON ARRAY
IS JSON OBJECT
IS JSON SCALAR

These should be self-explanatory.

The WITH UNIQUE KEYS flag makes these return false when duplicate keys
exist in any object within the value, not necessarily directly contained
in the outermost object.

Author: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Author: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>
Author: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Author: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF4Au4w2x-5LTnN_bxky-mq4=WOqsGsxSpENCzHRAzSnEd8+WQ@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220616233130.rparivafipt6doj3@alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/abd9b83b-aa66-f230-3d6d-734817f0995d%40postgresql.org
2023-03-31 22:34:04 +02:00
Alvaro Herrera
9b058f6b0d Move ExecEvalJsonConstructor new function to a more natural place
Commit 7081ac46ac put it at the end of the file, but that doesn't look
very nice.
2023-03-31 12:55:25 +02:00
Thomas Munro
11c2d6fdf5 Parallel Hash Full Join.
Full and right outer joins were not supported in the initial
implementation of Parallel Hash Join because of deadlock hazards (see
discussion).  Therefore FULL JOIN inhibited parallelism, as the other
join strategies can't do that in parallel either.

Add a new PHJ phase PHJ_BATCH_SCAN that scans for unmatched tuples on
the inner side of one batch's hash table.  For now, sidestep the
deadlock problem by terminating parallelism there.  The last process to
arrive at that phase emits the unmatched tuples, while others detach and
are free to go and work on other batches, if there are any, but
otherwise they finish the join early.

That unfairness is considered acceptable for now, because it's better
than no parallelism at all.  The build and probe phases are run in
parallel, and the new scan-for-unmatched phase, while serial, is usually
applied to the smaller of the two relations and is either limited by
some multiple of work_mem, or it's too big and is partitioned into
batches and then the situation is improved by batch-level parallelism.

Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BA6ftXPz4oe92%2Bx8Er%2BxpGZqto70-Q_ERwRaSyA%3DafNg%40mail.gmail.com
2023-03-31 11:34:03 +13:00
David Rowley
902ecd3bd4 Fix outdated comments regarding TupleTableSlots
The tts_flag is named TTS_FLAG_SHOULDFREE, so use that instead of
TTS_SHOULDFREE, which is the name of the macro that checks for that flag.

Additionally, 4da597edf got rid of the TupleTableSlot.tts_tuple field but
forgot to update a comment which referenced that field.  Fix that.

Reported-by: Zhen Mingyang <zhenmingyang@yeah.net>
Reported-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1a96696c.9d3.187193989c3.Coremail.zhenmingyang@yeah.net
2023-03-30 16:37:03 +13:00
Alvaro Herrera
7081ac46ac SQL/JSON: add standard JSON constructor functions
This commit introduces the SQL/JSON standard-conforming constructors for
JSON types:

JSON_ARRAY()
JSON_ARRAYAGG()
JSON_OBJECT()
JSON_OBJECTAGG()

Most of the functionality was already present in PostgreSQL-specific
functions, but these include some new functionality such as the ability
to skip or include NULL values, and to allow duplicate keys or throw
error when they are found, as well as the standard specified syntax to
specify output type and format.

Author: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Author: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>
Author: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF4Au4w2x-5LTnN_bxky-mq4=WOqsGsxSpENCzHRAzSnEd8+WQ@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220616233130.rparivafipt6doj3@alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/abd9b83b-aa66-f230-3d6d-734817f0995d%40postgresql.org
2023-03-29 12:11:36 +02:00
Tom Lane
3c05284d83 Invent GENERIC_PLAN option for EXPLAIN.
This provides a very simple way to see the generic plan for a
parameterized query.  Without this, it's necessary to define
a prepared statement and temporarily change plan_cache_mode,
which is a bit tedious.

One thing that's a bit of a hack perhaps is that we disable
execution-time partition pruning when the GENERIC_PLAN option
is given.  That's because the pruning code may attempt to
fetch the value of one of the parameters, which would fail.

Laurenz Albe, reviewed by Julien Rouhaud, Christoph Berg,
Michel Pelletier, Jim Jones, and myself

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0a29b954b10b57f0d135fe12aa0909bd41883eb0.camel@cybertec.at
2023-03-24 17:07:22 -04:00
Thomas Munro
8fba928fd7 Improve the naming of Parallel Hash Join phases.
* Commit 3048898e dropped -ING from PHJ wait event names.  Update the
  corresponding barrier phases names to match.

* Rename the "DONE" phases to "FREE".  That's symmetrical with
  "ALLOCATE", and names the activity that actually happens in that phase
  (as we do for the other phases) rather than a state.  The bug fixed by
  commit 8d578b9b might have been more obvious with this name.

* Rename the batch/bucket growth barriers' "ALLOCATE" phases to
  "REALLOCATE", a better description of what they do.

* Update the high level comments about phases to highlight phases
  are executed by a single process with an asterisk (mostly memory
  management phases).

No behavior change, as this is just improving internal identifiers.  The
only user-visible sign of this is that a couple of wait events' display
names change from "...Allocate" to "...Reallocate" in pg_stat_activity,
to stay in sync with the internal names.

Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BMDpwF2Eo2LAvzd%3DpOh81wUTsrwU1uAwR-v6OGBB6%2B7g%40mail.gmail.com
2023-03-23 13:14:25 +13:00
Alexander Korotkov
11470f544e Allow locking updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete()
Currently, in read committed transaction isolation mode (default), we have the
following sequence of actions when tuple_update()/tuple_delete() finds
the tuple updated by concurrent transaction.

1. Attempt to update/delete tuple with tuple_update()/tuple_delete(), which
   returns TM_Updated.
2. Lock tuple with tuple_lock().
3. Re-evaluate plan qual (recheck if we still need to update/delete and
   calculate the new tuple for update).
4. Second attempt to update/delete tuple with tuple_update()/tuple_delete().
   This attempt should be successful, since the tuple was previously locked.

This patch eliminates step 2 by taking the lock during first
tuple_update()/tuple_delete() call.  Heap table access method saves some
efforts by checking the updated tuple once instead of twice.  Future
undo-based table access methods, which will start from the latest row version,
can immediately place a lock there.

The code in nodeModifyTable.c is simplified by removing the nested switch/case.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdua-YFw3XTprfutzGp28xXLigFtzNbuFY8yPhqeq6X5kg%40mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Pavel Borisov, Vignesh C, Mason Sharp
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Chris Travers
2023-03-23 00:26:59 +03:00
Thomas Munro
8d578b9b2e Fix race in parallel hash join batch cleanup, take II.
With unlucky timing and parallel_leader_participation=off (not the
default), PHJ could attempt to access per-batch shared state just as it
was being freed.  There was code intended to prevent that by checking
for a cleared pointer, but it was racy.  Fix, by introducing an extra
barrier phase.  The new phase PHJ_BUILD_RUNNING means that it's safe to
access the per-batch state to find a batch to help with, and
PHJ_BUILD_DONE means that it is too late.  The last to detach will free
the array of per-batch state as before, but now it will also atomically
advance the phase, so that late attachers can avoid the hazard.  This
mirrors the way per-batch hash tables are freed (see phases
PHJ_BATCH_PROBING and PHJ_BATCH_DONE).

An earlier attempt to fix this (commit 3b8981b6, later reverted) missed
one special case.  When the inner side is empty (the "empty inner
optimization), the build barrier would only make it to
PHJ_BUILD_HASHING_INNER phase before workers attempted to detach from
the hashtable.  In that case, fast-forward the build barrier to
PHJ_BUILD_RUNNING before proceeding, so that our later assertions hold
and we can still negotiate who is cleaning up.

Revealed by build farm failures, where BarrierAttach() failed a sanity
check assertion, because the memory had been clobbered by dsa_free().
In non-assert builds, the result could be a segmentation fault.

Back-patch to all supported releases.

Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reported-by: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>
Tested-by: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200929061142.GA29096%40paquier.xyz
2023-03-21 14:29:34 +13:00
Tomas Vondra
19d8e2308b Ignore BRIN indexes when checking for HOT updates
When determining whether an index update may be skipped by using HOT, we
can ignore attributes indexed by block summarizing indexes without
references to individual tuples that need to be cleaned up.

A new type TU_UpdateIndexes provides a signal to the executor to
determine which indexes to update - no indexes, all indexes, or only the
summarizing indexes.

This also removes rd_indexattr list, and replaces it with rd_attrsvalid
flag. The list was not used anywhere, and a simple flag is sufficient.

This was originally committed as 5753d4ee32, but then got reverted by
e3fcca0d0d because of correctness issues.

Original patch by Josef Simanek, various fixes and improvements by Tomas
Vondra and me.

Authors: Matthias van de Meent, Josef Simanek, Tomas Vondra
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/05ebcb44-f383-86e3-4f31-0a97a55634cf@enterprisedb.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFp7QwpMRGcDAQumN7onN9HjrJ3u4X3ZRXdGFT0K5G2JWvnbWg%40mail.gmail.com
2023-03-20 11:02:42 +01:00
Tom Lane
b803b7d132 Fill EState.es_rteperminfos more systematically.
While testing a fix for bug #17823, I discovered that EvalPlanQualStart
failed to copy es_rteperminfos from the parent EState, resulting in
failure if anything in EPQ execution wanted to consult that information.

This led me to conclude that commit a61b1f748 had been too haphazard
about where to fill es_rteperminfos, and that we need to be sure that
that happens exactly where es_range_table gets filled.  So I changed the
signature of ExecInitRangeTable to help ensure that this new requirement
doesn't get missed.  (Indeed, pgoutput.c was also failing to fill it.
Maybe we don't ever need it there, but I wouldn't bet on that.)

No test case yet; one will arrive with the fix for #17823.
But that needs to be back-patched, while this fix is HEAD-only.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17823-b64909cf7d63de84@postgresql.org
2023-03-06 13:10:57 -05:00
Andres Freund
78be04e4c6 Add static assertion ensuring sizeof(ExprEvalStep) <= 64 bytes
This was previously only documented in a comment. Given the size of the
struct, it's not hard to miss that comment. As evidenced by the commits
leading up to fe3caa1439, 67b26703b4.

It's possible, but not likely, that we might have to weaken these assertions
on a less commonly used architecture.

Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/295606.1677101684@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-02-22 14:30:39 -08:00
Tom Lane
3f244d020f Make new GENERATED-expressions code more bulletproof.
In commit 8bf6ec3ba I assumed that no code path could reach
ExecGetExtraUpdatedCols without having gone through
ExecInitStoredGenerated.  That turns out not to be the case in
logical replication: if there's an ON UPDATE trigger on the target
table, trigger.c will call this code before anybody has set up its
generated columns.  Having seen that, I don't have a lot of faith in
there not being other such paths.  ExecGetExtraUpdatedCols can call
ExecInitStoredGenerated for itself, as long as we are willing to
assume that it is only called in CMD_UPDATE operations, which on
the whole seems like a safer leap of faith.

Per report from Vitaly Davydov.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d259d69652b8c2ff50e14cda3c236c7f@postgrespro.ru
2023-01-15 13:14:52 -05:00
Bruce Momjian
c8e1ba736b Update copyright for 2023
Backpatch-through: 11
2023-01-02 15:00:37 -05:00
Alvaro Herrera
a61b1f7482 Rework query relation permission checking
Currently, information about the permissions to be checked on relations
mentioned in a query is stored in their range table entries.  So the
executor must scan the entire range table looking for relations that
need to have permissions checked.  This can make the permission checking
part of the executor initialization needlessly expensive when many
inheritance children are present in the range range.  While the
permissions need not be checked on the individual child relations, the
executor still must visit every range table entry to filter them out.

This commit moves the permission checking information out of the range
table entries into a new plan node called RTEPermissionInfo.  Every
top-level (inheritance "root") RTE_RELATION entry in the range table
gets one and a list of those is maintained alongside the range table.
This new list is initialized by the parser when initializing the range
table.  The rewriter can add more entries to it as rules/views are
expanded.  Finally, the planner combines the lists of the individual
subqueries into one flat list that is passed to the executor for
checking.

To make it quick to find the RTEPermissionInfo entry belonging to a
given relation, RangeTblEntry gets a new Index field 'perminfoindex'
that stores the corresponding RTEPermissionInfo's index in the query's
list of the latter.

ExecutorCheckPerms_hook has gained another List * argument; the
signature is now:
typedef bool (*ExecutorCheckPerms_hook_type) (List *rangeTable,
					      List *rtePermInfos,
					      bool ereport_on_violation);
The first argument is no longer used by any in-core uses of the hook,
but we leave it in place because there may be other implementations that
do.  Implementations should likely scan the rtePermInfos list to
determine which operations to allow or deny.

Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGjJDmUhDSfv-U2qhKJjt9ST7Xh9JXC_irsAQ1TAUsJYg@mail.gmail.com
2022-12-06 16:09:24 +01:00
Alvaro Herrera
fb958b5da8 Generalize ri_RootToPartitionMap to use for non-partition children
ri_RootToPartitionMap is currently only initialized for tuple routing
target partitions, though a future commit will need the ability to use
it even for the non-partition child tables, so make adjustments to the
decouple it from the partitioning code.

Also, make it lazily initialized via ExecGetRootToChildMap(), making
that function its preferred access path.  Existing third-party code
accessing it directly should no longer do so; consequently, it's been
renamed to ri_RootToChildMap, which also makes it consistent with
ri_ChildToRootMap.

ExecGetRootToChildMap() houses the logic of setting the map appropriately
depending on whether a given child relation is partition or not.

To support this, also add a separate entry point for TupleConversionMap
creation that receives an AttrMap.  No new code here, just split an
existing function in two.

Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqEYUhDXSK5BTvG_xk=eaAEJCD4GS3C6uH7ybBvv+Z_Tmg@mail.gmail.com
2022-12-02 10:35:55 +01:00
Alvaro Herrera
ec38694894 Move PartitioPruneInfo out of plan nodes into PlannedStmt
The planner will now add a given PartitioPruneInfo to
PlannedStmt.partPruneInfos instead of directly to the
Append/MergeAppend plan node.  What gets set instead in the
latter is an index field which points to the list element
of PlannedStmt.partPruneInfos containing the PartitioPruneInfo
belonging to the plan node.

A later commit will make AcquireExecutorLocks() do the initial
partition pruning to determine a minimal set of partitions to be
locked when validating a plan tree and it will need to consult the
PartitioPruneInfos referenced therein to do so.  It would be better
for the PartitioPruneInfos to be accessible directly than requiring
a walk of the plan tree to find them, which is easier when it can be
done by simply iterating over PlannedStmt.partPruneInfos.

Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFGkMSge6TgC9KQzde0ohpAycLQuV7ooitEEpbKB0O_mg@mail.gmail.com
2022-12-01 12:56:21 +01:00
Michael Paquier
f193883fc9 Replace SQLValueFunction by COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX
This switch impacts 9 patterns related to a SQL-mandated special syntax
for function calls:
- LOCALTIME [ ( typmod ) ]
- LOCALTIMESTAMP [ ( typmod ) ]
- CURRENT_TIME [ ( typmod ) ]
- CURRENT_TIMESTAMP [ ( typmod ) ]
- CURRENT_DATE

Five new entries are added to pg_proc to compensate the removal of
SQLValueFunction to provide backward-compatibility and making this
change transparent for the end-user (for example for the attribute
generated when a keyword is specified in a SELECT or in a FROM clause
without an alias, or when specifying something else than an Iconst to
the parser).

The parser included a set of checks coming from the files in charge of
holding the C functions used for the SQLValueFunction calls (as of
transformSQLValueFunction()), which are now moved within each function's
execution path, so this reduces the dependencies between the execution
and the parsing steps.  As of this change, all the SQL keywords use the
same paths for their work, relying only on COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX.  Like
fb32748, no performance difference has been noticed, while the perf
profiles get reduced with ExecEvalSQLValueFunction() gone.

Bump catalog version.

Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker, Ted Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YzaG3MoryCguUOym@paquier.xyz
2022-11-21 18:31:59 +09:00
Peter Eisentraut
b1099eca8f Remove AssertArg and AssertState
These don't offer anything over plain Assert, and their usage had
already been declared obsolescent.

Author: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20221009210148.GA900071@nathanxps13
2022-10-28 09:19:06 +02:00
Peter Geoghegan
bfcf1b3480 Harmonize parameter names in storage and AM code.
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in storage, catalog,
access method, executor, and logical replication code, as well as in
miscellaneous utility/library code.

Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy.  Later commits will do the
same for other parts of the codebase.

Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
2022-09-19 19:18:36 -07:00
Tom Lane
c35ba141de Future-proof the recursion inside ExecShutdownNode().
The API contract for planstate_tree_walker() callbacks is that they
take a PlanState pointer and a context pointer.  Somebody figured
they could save a couple lines of code by ignoring that, and passing
ExecShutdownNode itself as the walker even though it has but one
argument.  Somewhat remarkably, we've gotten away with that so far.
However, it seems clear that the upcoming C2x standard means to
forbid such cases, and compilers that actively break such code
likely won't be far behind.  So spend the extra few lines of code
to do it honestly with a separate walker function.

In HEAD, we might as well go further and remove ExecShutdownNode's
useless return value.  I left that as-is in back branches though,
to forestall complaints about ABI breakage.

Back-patch, with the thought that this might become of practical
importance before our stable branches are all out of service.
It doesn't seem to be fixing any live bug on any currently known
platform, however.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/208054.1663534665@sss.pgh.pa.us
2022-09-19 12:16:07 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan
2f2b18bd3f Revert SQL/JSON features
The reverts the following and makes some associated cleanups:

    commit f79b803dc: Common SQL/JSON clauses
    commit f4fb45d15: SQL/JSON constructors
    commit 5f0adec25: Make STRING an unreserved_keyword.
    commit 33a377608: IS JSON predicate
    commit 1a36bc9db: SQL/JSON query functions
    commit 606948b05: SQL JSON functions
    commit 49082c2cc: RETURNING clause for JSON() and JSON_SCALAR()
    commit 4e34747c8: JSON_TABLE
    commit fadb48b00: PLAN clauses for JSON_TABLE
    commit 2ef6f11b0: Reduce running time of jsonb_sqljson test
    commit 14d3f24fa: Further improve jsonb_sqljson parallel test
    commit a6baa4bad: Documentation for SQL/JSON features
    commit b46bcf7a4: Improve readability of SQL/JSON documentation.
    commit 112fdb352: Fix finalization for json_objectagg and friends
    commit fcdb35c32: Fix transformJsonBehavior
    commit 4cd8717af: Improve a couple of sql/json error messages
    commit f7a605f63: Small cleanups in SQL/JSON code
    commit 9c3d25e17: Fix JSON_OBJECTAGG uniquefying bug
    commit a79153b7a: Claim SQL standard compliance for SQL/JSON features
    commit a1e7616d6: Rework SQL/JSON documentation
    commit 8d9f9634e: Fix errors in copyfuncs/equalfuncs support for JSON node types.
    commit 3c633f32b: Only allow returning string types or bytea from json_serialize
    commit 67b26703b: expression eval: Fix EEOP_JSON_CONSTRUCTOR and EEOP_JSONEXPR size.

The release notes are also adjusted.

Backpatch to release 15.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/40d2c882-bcac-19a9-754d-4299e1d87ac7@postgresql.org
2022-09-01 17:07:14 -04:00
David Rowley
9fc1776dda Remove unused fields from ExprEvalStep
These were added recently by 1349d2790.

Reported-by: Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALNJ-vTi+YDuAWKp4Z_Dv=mrz=aq81qTg0D7wzc8y7rS_+i_cw@mail.gmail.com
2022-08-03 09:46:02 +12:00
David Rowley
1349d2790b Improve performance of ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates
ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggreagtes have, since implemented in Postgres, been
executed by always performing a sort in nodeAgg.c to sort the tuples in
the current group into the correct order before calling the transition
function on the sorted tuples.  This was not great as often there might be
an index that could have provided pre-sorted input and allowed the
transition functions to be called as the rows come in, rather than having
to store them in a tuplestore in order to sort them once all the tuples
for the group have arrived.

Here we change the planner so it requests a path with a sort order which
supports the most amount of ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregate functions and
add new code to the executor to allow it to support the processing of
ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates where the tuples are already sorted in the
correct order.

Since there can be many ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates in any given query
level, it's very possible that we can't find an order that suits all of
these aggregates.  The sort order that the planner chooses is simply the
one that suits the most aggregate functions.  We take the most strictly
sorted variation of each order and see how many aggregate functions can
use that, then we try again with the order of the remaining aggregates to
see if another order would suit more aggregate functions.  For example:

SELECT agg(a ORDER BY a),agg2(a ORDER BY a,b) ...

would request the sort order to be {a, b} because {a} is a subset of the
sort order of {a,b}, but;

SELECT agg(a ORDER BY a),agg2(a ORDER BY c) ...

would just pick a plan ordered by {a} (we give precedence to aggregates
which are earlier in the targetlist).

SELECT agg(a ORDER BY a),agg2(a ORDER BY b),agg3(a ORDER BY b) ...

would choose to order by {b} since two aggregates suit that vs just one
that requires input ordered by {a}.

Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Ronan Dunklau, James Coleman, Ranier Vilela, Richard Guo, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpHzfo92%3DR4W0%2BxVua3BUYCKMckWAmo-2t_KiXN-wYH%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com
2022-08-02 23:11:45 +12:00
Peter Eisentraut
964d01ae90 Automatically generate node support functions
Add a script to automatically generate the node support functions
(copy, equal, out, and read, as well as the node tags enum) from the
struct definitions.

For each of the four node support files, it creates two include files,
e.g., copyfuncs.funcs.c and copyfuncs.switch.c, to include in the main
file.  All the scaffolding of the main file stays in place.

I have tried to mostly make the coverage of the output match what is
currently there.  For example, one could now do out/read coverage of
utility statement nodes, but I have manually excluded those for now.
The reason is mainly that it's easier to diff the before and after,
and adding a bunch of stuff like this might require a separate
analysis and review.

Subtyping (TidScan -> Scan) is supported.

For the hard cases, you can just write a manual function and exclude
generating one.  For the not so hard cases, there is a way of
annotating struct fields to get special behaviors.  For example,
pg_node_attr(equal_ignore) has the field ignored in equal functions.

(In this patch, I have only ifdef'ed out the code to could be removed,
mainly so that it won't constantly have merge conflicts.  It will be
deleted in a separate patch.  All the code comments that are worth
keeping from those sections have already been moved to the header
files where the structs are defined.)

Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/c1097590-a6a4-486a-64b1-e1f9cc0533ce%40enterprisedb.com
2022-07-09 08:53:59 +02:00
David Rowley
fe3caa1439 Remove size increase in ExprEvalStep caused by hashed saops
50e17ad28 increased the size of ExprEvalStep from 64 bytes up to 88 bytes.
Lots of effort was spent during the development of the current expression
evaluation code to make an instance of this struct as small as possible.
Making this struct larger than needed reduces CPU cache efficiency during
expression evaluation which causes noticeable slowdowns during query
execution.

In order to reduce the size of the struct, here we remove the fn_addr
field. The values from this field can be obtained via fcinfo, just with
some extra pointer dereferencing. The extra indirection does not seem to
cause any noticeable slowdowns.

Various other fields have been moved into the ScalarArrayOpExprHashTable
struct. These fields are only used when the ScalarArrayOpExprHashTable
pointer has already been dereferenced, so no additional pointer
dereferences occur for these. Here we also make hash_fcinfo_data the last
field in ScalarArrayOpExprHashTable so that we can avoid a further pointer
dereference to get the FunctionCallInfoBaseData. This also saves a call to
palloc().

50e17ad28 was added in 14, but it's too late to adjust the size of the
ExprEvalStep in that version, so here we just backpatch to 15, which is
currently in beta.

Author: Andres Freund, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220616233130.rparivafipt6doj3@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch-through: 15
2022-07-06 19:40:32 +12:00
Andres Freund
67b26703b4 expression eval: Fix EEOP_JSON_CONSTRUCTOR and EEOP_JSONEXPR size.
The new expression step types increased the size of ExprEvalStep by ~4 for all
types of expression steps, slowing down expression evaluation noticeably. Move
them out of line.

There's other issues with these expression steps, but addressing them is
largely independent of this aspect.

Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220616233130.rparivafipt6doj3@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 15-
2022-07-05 11:25:08 -07:00
Tom Lane
23e7b38bfe Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.
I manually fixed a couple of comments that pgindent uglified.
2022-05-12 15:17:30 -04:00
Michael Paquier
efb0ef909f Track I/O timing for temporary file blocks in EXPLAIN (BUFFERS)
Previously, the output of EXPLAIN (BUFFERS) option showed only the I/O
timing spent reading and writing shared and local buffers.  This commit
adds on top of that the I/O timing for temporary buffers in the output
of EXPLAIN (for spilled external sorts, hashes, materialization. etc).
This can be helpful for users in cases where the I/O related to
temporary buffers is the bottleneck.

Like its cousin, this information is available only when track_io_timing
is enabled.  Playing the patch, this is showing an extra overhead of up
to 1% even when using gettimeofday() as implementation for interval
timings, which is slightly within the usual range noise still that's
measurable.

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Georgios Kokolatos, Melanie Plageman, Julien Rouhaud,
Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAJgotTeP83p6HiAGDhs_9Fw9pZ2J=_tYTsiO5Ob-V5GQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-04-08 11:27:21 +09:00
Alvaro Herrera
a90641eac2 Revert "Rewrite some RI code to avoid using SPI"
This reverts commit 99392cdd78.
We'd rather rewrite ri_triggers.c as a whole rather than piecemeal.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1ncXX2-000mFt-Pe@gemulon.postgresql.org
2022-04-07 23:42:13 +02:00
Alvaro Herrera
99392cdd78 Rewrite some RI code to avoid using SPI
Modify the subroutines called by RI trigger functions that want to check
if a given referenced value exists in the referenced relation to simply
scan the foreign key constraint's unique index, instead of using SPI to
execute
  SELECT 1 FROM referenced_relation WHERE ref_key = $1
This saves a lot of work, especially when inserting into or updating a
referencing relation.

This rewrite allows to fix a PK row visibility bug caused by a partition
descriptor hack which requires ActiveSnapshot to be set to come up with
the correct set of partitions for the RI query running under REPEATABLE
READ isolation.  We now set that snapshot indepedently of the snapshot
to be used by the PK index scan, so the two no longer interfere.  The
buggy output in src/test/isolation/expected/fk-snapshot.out of the
relevant test case added by commit 00cb86e75d has been corrected.
(The bug still exists in branch 14, however, but this fix is too
invasive to backpatch.)

Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Japin <japinli@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGkfJfYdeq5vHPh6eqPKjSbfpDDY+j-kXYFePQedtSLeg@mail.gmail.com
2022-04-07 21:10:03 +02:00
Alvaro Herrera
297daa9d43 Refactor and cleanup runtime partition prune code a little
* Move the execution pruning initialization steps that are common
between both ExecInitAppend() and ExecInitMergeAppend() into a new
function ExecInitPartitionPruning() defined in execPartition.c.
Those steps include creation of a PartitionPruneState to be used for
all instances of pruning and determining the minimal set of child
subplans that need to be initialized by performing initial pruning if
needed, and finally adjusting the subplan_map arrays in the
PartitionPruneState to reflect the new set of subplans remaining
after initial pruning if it was indeed performed.
ExecCreatePartitionPruneState() is no longer exported out of
execPartition.c and has been renamed to CreatePartitionPruneState()
as a local sub-routine of ExecInitPartitionPruning().

* Likewise, ExecFindInitialMatchingSubPlans() that was in charge of
performing initial pruning no longer needs to be exported.  In fact,
since it would now have the same body as the more generally named
ExecFindMatchingSubPlans(), except differing in the value of
initial_prune passed to the common subroutine
find_matching_subplans_recurse(), it seems better to remove it and add
an initial_prune argument to ExecFindMatchingSubPlans().

* Add an ExprContext field to PartitionPruneContext to remove the
implicit assumption in the runtime pruning code that the ExprContext to
use to compute pruning expressions that need one can always rely on the
PlanState providing it.  A future patch will allow runtime pruning (at
least the initial pruning steps) to be performed without the
corresponding PlanState yet having been created, so this will help.

Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqEYCpEqh2LMDOp9mT+4-QoVe8HgFMKBjntEMCTZLpcCCA@mail.gmail.com
2022-04-05 11:46:48 +02:00
Andrew Dunstan
4e34747c88 JSON_TABLE
This feature allows jsonb data to be treated as a table and thus used in
a FROM clause like other tabular data. Data can be selected from the
jsonb using jsonpath expressions, and hoisted out of nested structures
in the jsonb to form multiple rows, more or less like an outer join.

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zhihong Yu (whose
name I previously misspelled), Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson,
Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7e2cb85d-24cf-4abb-30a5-1a33715959bd@postgrespro.ru
2022-04-04 16:03:47 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan
606948b058 SQL JSON functions
This Patch introduces three SQL standard JSON functions:

JSON() (incorrectly mentioned in my commit message for f4fb45d15c)
JSON_SCALAR()
JSON_SERIALIZE()

JSON() produces json values from text, bytea, json or jsonb values, and
has facilitites for handling duplicate keys.
JSON_SCALAR() produces a json value from any scalar sql value, including
json and jsonb.
JSON_SERIALIZE() produces text or bytea from input which containis or
represents json or jsonb;

For the most part these functions don't add any significant new
capabilities, but they will be of use to users wanting standard
compliant JSON handling.

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-30 16:30:37 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan
1a36bc9dba SQL/JSON query functions
This introduces the SQL/JSON functions for querying JSON data using
jsonpath expressions. The functions are:

JSON_EXISTS()
JSON_QUERY()
JSON_VALUE()

All of these functions only operate on jsonb. The workaround for now is
to cast the argument to jsonb.

JSON_EXISTS() tests if the jsonpath expression applied to the jsonb
value yields any values. JSON_VALUE() must return a single value, and an
error occurs if it tries to return multiple values. JSON_QUERY() must
return a json object or array, and there are various WRAPPER options for
handling scalar or multi-value results. Both these functions have
options for handling EMPTY and ERROR conditions.

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-29 16:57:13 -04:00
Andrew Dunstan
33a377608f IS JSON predicate
This patch intrdocuces the SQL standard IS JSON predicate. It operates
on text and bytea values representing JSON as well as on the json and
jsonb types. Each test has an IS and IS NOT variant. The tests are:

IS JSON [VALUE]
IS JSON ARRAY
IS JSON OBJECT
IS JSON SCALAR
IS JSON  WITH | WITHOUT UNIQUE KEYS

These are mostly self-explanatory, but note that IS JSON WITHOUT UNIQUE
KEYS is true whenever IS JSON is true, and IS JSON WITH UNIQUE KEYS is
true whenever IS JSON is true except it IS JSON OBJECT is true and there
are duplicate keys (which is never the case when applied to jsonb values).

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-28 15:37:08 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera
7103ebb7aa Add support for MERGE SQL command
MERGE performs actions that modify rows in the target table using a
source table or query. MERGE provides a single SQL statement that can
conditionally INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE rows -- a task that would otherwise
require multiple PL statements.  For example,

MERGE INTO target AS t
USING source AS s
ON t.tid = s.sid
WHEN MATCHED AND t.balance > s.delta THEN
  UPDATE SET balance = t.balance - s.delta
WHEN MATCHED THEN
  DELETE
WHEN NOT MATCHED AND s.delta > 0 THEN
  INSERT VALUES (s.sid, s.delta)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
  DO NOTHING;

MERGE works with regular tables, partitioned tables and inheritance
hierarchies, including column and row security enforcement, as well as
support for row and statement triggers and transition tables therein.

MERGE is optimized for OLTP and is parameterizable, though also useful
for large scale ETL/ELT. MERGE is not intended to be used in preference
to existing single SQL commands for INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE since there
is some overhead.  MERGE can be used from PL/pgSQL.

MERGE does not support targetting updatable views or foreign tables, and
RETURNING clauses are not allowed either.  These limitations are likely
fixable with sufficient effort.  Rewrite rules are also not supported,
but it's not clear that we'd want to support them.

Author: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Author: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> (earlier versions)
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> (earlier versions)
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> (earlier versions)
Reviewed-by: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8+jKitBSrB7oTgT9CY2i1ObfOt36z0XMraQc+Xrz8QB0nXA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkJdBuxj9PO=2QaO9-3h3xGbQPZ34kJH=HukRekwM-GZg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201231134736.GA25392@alvherre.pgsql
2022-03-28 16:47:48 +02:00
Andrew Dunstan
f4fb45d15c SQL/JSON constructors
This patch introduces the SQL/JSON standard constructors for JSON:

JSON()
JSON_ARRAY()
JSON_ARRAYAGG()
JSON_OBJECT()
JSON_OBJECTAGG()

For the most part these functions provide facilities that mimic
existing json/jsonb functions. However, they also offer some useful
additional functionality. In addition to text input, the JSON() function
accepts bytea input, which it will decode and constuct a json value from.
The other functions provide useful options for handling duplicate keys
and null values.

This series of patches will be followed by a consolidated documentation
patch.

Nikita Glukhov

Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander
Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu,
Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
2022-03-27 17:03:34 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera
ba9a7e3921 Enforce foreign key correctly during cross-partition updates
When an update on a partitioned table referenced in foreign key
constraints causes a row to move from one partition to another,
the fact that the move is implemented as a delete followed by an insert
on the target partition causes the foreign key triggers to have
surprising behavior.  For example, a given foreign key's delete trigger
which implements the ON DELETE CASCADE clause of that key will delete
any referencing rows when triggered for that internal DELETE, although
it should not, because the referenced row is simply being moved from one
partition of the referenced root partitioned table into another, not
being deleted from it.

This commit teaches trigger.c to skip queuing such delete trigger events
on the leaf partitions in favor of an UPDATE event fired on the root
target relation.  Doing so is sensible because both the old and the new
tuple "logically" belong to the root relation.

The after trigger event queuing interface now allows passing the source
and the target partitions of a particular cross-partition update when
registering the update event for the root partitioned table.  Along with
the two ctids of the old and the new tuple, the after trigger event now
also stores the OIDs of those partitions. The tuples fetched from the
source and the target partitions are converted into the root table
format, if necessary, before they are passed to the trigger function.

The implementation currently has a limitation that only the foreign keys
pointing into the query's target relation are considered, not those of
its sub-partitioned partitions.  That seems like a reasonable
limitation, because it sounds rare to have distinct foreign keys
pointing to sub-partitioned partitions instead of to the root table.

This misbehavior stems from commit f56f8f8da6 (which added support for
foreign keys to reference partitioned tables) not paying sufficient
attention to commit 2f17844104 (which had introduced cross-partition
updates a year earlier).  Even though the former commit goes back to
Postgres 12, we're not backpatching this fix at this time for fear of
destabilizing things too much, and because there are a few ABI breaks in
it that we'd have to work around in older branches.  It also depends on
commit f4566345cf, which had its own share of backpatchability issues
as well.

Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Eduard Català <eduard.catala@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFvkBCmfwkQX_yBqv2Wz8ugUGiBDxum8=WvVbfU1TXaNg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAL54xNZsLwEM1XCk5yW9EqaRzsZYHuWsHQkA2L5MOSKXAwviCQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-03-20 18:43:40 +01:00