(materialization into a tuple store) discussed on pgsql-hackers earlier.
I've updated the documentation and the regression tests.
Notes on the implementation:
- I needed to change the tuple store API slightly -- it assumes that it
won't be used to hold data across transaction boundaries, so the temp
files that it uses for on-disk storage are automatically reclaimed at
end-of-transaction. I added a flag to tuplestore_begin_heap() to control
this behavior. Is changing the tuple store API in this fashion OK?
- in order to store executor results in a tuple store, I added a new
CommandDest. This works well for the most part, with one exception: the
current DestFunction API doesn't provide enough information to allow the
Executor to store results into an arbitrary tuple store (where the
particular tuple store to use is chosen by the call site of
ExecutorRun). To workaround this, I've temporarily hacked up a solution
that works, but is not ideal: since the receiveTuple DestFunction is
passed the portal name, we can use that to lookup the Portal data
structure for the cursor and then use that to get at the tuple store the
Portal is using. This unnecessarily ties the Portal code with the
tupleReceiver code, but it works...
The proper fix for this is probably to change the DestFunction API --
Tom suggested passing the full QueryDesc to the receiveTuple function.
In that case, callers of ExecutorRun could "subclass" QueryDesc to add
any additional fields that their particular CommandDest needed to get
access to. This approach would work, but I'd like to think about it for
a little bit longer before deciding which route to go. In the mean time,
the code works fine, so I don't think a fix is urgent.
- (semi-related) I added a NO SCROLL keyword to DECLARE CURSOR, and
adjusted the behavior of SCROLL in accordance with the discussion on
-hackers.
- (unrelated) Cleaned up some SGML markup in sql.sgml, copy.sgml
Neil Conway
refers to a non-DISTINCT output column of a DISTINCT ON subquery, or
if it refers to a function-returning-set, we cannot push it down.
But the old implementation refused to push down *any* quals if the
subquery had any such 'dangerous' outputs. Now we just look at the
output columns actually referenced by each qual expression. More code
than before, but probably no slower since we don't make unnecessary checks.
Add ALTER SEQUENCE to modify min/max/increment/cache/cycle values
Also updated create sequence docs to mention NO MINVALUE, & NO MAXVALUE.
New Files:
doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_sequence.sgml
src/test/regress/expected/sequence.out
src/test/regress/sql/sequence.sql
ALTER SEQUENCE is NOT transactional. It behaves similarly to setval().
It matches the proposed SQL200N spec, as well as Oracle in most ways --
Oracle lacks RESTART WITH for some strange reason.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
utility statement (DeclareCursorStmt) with a SELECT query dangling from
it, rather than a SELECT query with a few unusual fields in it. Add
code to determine whether a planned query can safely be run backwards.
If DECLARE CURSOR specifies SCROLL, ensure that the plan can be run
backwards by adding a Materialize plan node if it can't. Without SCROLL,
you get an error if you try to fetch backwards from a cursor that can't
handle it. (There is still some discussion about what the exact
behavior should be, but this is necessary infrastructure in any case.)
Along the way, make EXPLAIN DECLARE CURSOR work.
RelOid_pg_class, and transaction locks XactLockTableId. RelId is renamed
to objId.
- LockObject() and UnlockObject() functions created, and their use
sprinkled throughout the code to do descent locking for domains and
types. They accept lock modes AccessShare and AccessExclusive, as we
only really need a 'read' and 'write' lock at the moment. Most locking
cases are held until the end of the transaction.
This fixes the cases Tom mentioned earlier in regards to locking with
Domains. If the patch is good, I'll work on cleaning up issues with
other database objects that have this problem (most of them).
Rod Taylor
of the containing query (which really can only happen in a rule context).
Per example from Brandon Craig Rhodes. Also, make the error message
more specific for the similar case with sub-select in FROM. The revised
coding should be easier to adapt to SQL99's LATERAL(), when we get around
to supporting that.
from Greg Stark. Also, twiddle the FuncCall case to not scribble on
the input structure, which was the proximate cause of the problem.
Someday we ought to fix things so that transformExpr() isn't called
on already-transformed trees ...
> =================================================================
> User interface proposal for multi-row function targetlist entries
> =================================================================
> 1. Only one targetlist entry may return a set.
> 2. Each targetlist item (other than the set returning one) is
> repeated for each item in the returned set.
>
Having gotten no objections (actually, no response at all), I can only
assume no one had heartburn with this change. The attached patch covers
the first of the two proposals, i.e. restricting the target list to only
one set returning function.
Joe Conway
spec, which will also make alter sequence a touch easier.
sequence.c init_params() will check for settings which have been
defined twice, and complain.
Rod Taylor
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 21:59, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> I agree. I want to remove OIDs from heaps of our tables when we go to 7.3.
> I'd rather not have to do it in the dump due to down time.
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
> User interface proposal for multi-row function targetlist entries
> =================================================================
> 1. Only one targetlist entry may return a set.
> 2. Each targetlist item (other than the set returning one) is
> repeated for each item in the returned set.
>
Having gotten no objections (actually, no response at all), I can only assume
no one had heartburn with this change. The attached patch covers the first of
the two proposals, i.e. restricting the target list to only one set returning
function.
It compiles cleanly, and passes all regression tests. If there are no
objections, please apply.
Any suggestions on where this should be documented (other than maybe sql-select)?
Thanks,
Joe
p.s. Here's what the previous example now looks like:
CREATE TABLE bar(f1 int, f2 text, f3 int);
INSERT INTO bar VALUES(1, 'Hello', 42);
INSERT INTO bar VALUES(2, 'Happy', 45);
CREATE TABLE foo(a int, b text);
INSERT INTO foo VALUES(42, 'World');
INSERT INTO foo VALUES(42, 'Everyone');
INSERT INTO foo VALUES(45, 'Birthday');
INSERT INTO foo VALUES(45, 'New Year');
CREATE TABLE foo2(a int, b text);
INSERT INTO foo2 VALUES(42, '!!!!');
INSERT INTO foo2 VALUES(42, '????');
INSERT INTO foo2 VALUES(42, '####');
INSERT INTO foo2 VALUES(45, '$$$$');
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION getfoo(int) RETURNS SETOF text AS '
SELECT b FROM foo WHERE a = $1
' language 'sql';
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION getfoo2(int) RETURNS SETOF text AS '
SELECT b FROM foo2 WHERE a = $1
' language 'sql';
regression=# SELECT f1, f2, getfoo(f3) AS f4 FROM bar;
f1 | f2 | f4
----+-------+----------
1 | Hello | World
1 | Hello | Everyone
2 | Happy | Birthday
2 | Happy | New Year
(4 rows)
regression=# SELECT f1, f2, getfoo(f3) AS f4, getfoo2(f3) AS f5 FROM bar;
ERROR: Only one target list entry may return a set result
Joe Conway
targetlist of a set-operation tree. I'm not sure that this solution
will really stand the test of time --- perhaps we need to make a special
RTE for such vars to refer to. But this quick hack fixes Brandon Craig
Rhodes' complaint of 10-Feb-02 about EXCEPT in CREATE RULE, while not
changing any behavior in the better-tested cases where leftmostRTI is
one anyway.
codes, per discussion from last March. parse.h should now be included
*only* by gram.y, scan.l, keywords.c, parser.c. This prevents surprising
misbehavior after seemingly-trivial grammar adjustments.
rid of the assumption that sizeof(Oid)==sizeof(int). This is one small
step towards someday supporting 8-byte OIDs. For the moment, it doesn't
do much except get rid of a lot of unsightly casts.
startup, not in the parser; this allows ALTER DOMAIN to work correctly
with domain constraint operations stored in rules. Rod Taylor;
code review by Tom Lane.
bison 1.875 and later as we did from earlier bison releases. Eventually
we will probably want to adopt the newer message spelling ... but not yet.
Per recent discussion on pgpatches.
Note: I didn't change the build rules for bootstrap, ecpg, or plpgsql
grammars, since these do not affect regression test results.
that used to do it in planner. That was an ancient kluge that was
never satisfactory; errors should be detected at parse time when possible.
But at the time we didn't have the support mechanism (expression_tree_walker
et al) to make it convenient to do in the parser.
Simplify SubLink by storing just a List of operator OIDs, instead of
a list of incomplete OpExprs --- that was a bizarre and bulky choice,
with no redeeming social value since we have to build new OpExprs
anyway when forming the plan tree.
'NOT (x IN (subselect))', that is 'NOT (x = ANY (subselect))',
rather than 'x <> ALL (subselect)' as we formerly did. This
opens the door to optimizing NOT IN the same way as IN, whereas
there's no hope of optimizing the expression using <>. Also,
convert 'x <> ALL (subselect)' to the NOT(IN) style, so that
the optimization will be available when processing rules dumped
by older Postgres versions.
initdb forced due to small change in SubLink node representation.
columns in DefineIndex. So, ALTER TABLE ... PRIMARY KEY will now
automatically add the NOT NULL constraint. It appeared the alter_table
regression test wanted this to occur, as after the change the regression
test better matched in inline 'fails'/'succeeds' comments.
Rod Taylor
beginning/end of cursor.
Have MOVE return 0/1 depending on cursor position.
Matches SQL spec.
Pass cursor counter from parser as a long rather than int.
Doc updates.
disallowed by CREATE TABLE (eg, pseudo-types); also disallow these types
from being introduced by the range-function syntax. While at it, allow
CREATE TABLE to create zero-column tables, per recent pghackers discussion.
I am back-patching this into 7.3 since failure to disallow pseudo-types
is arguably a security hole.
execution state trees, and ExecEvalExpr takes an expression state tree
not an expression plan tree. The plan tree is now read-only as far as
the executor is concerned. Next step is to begin actually exploiting
this property.
make VALUE a non-reserved word again, use less invasive method of passing
ConstraintTestValue into transformExpr, fix problems with nested constraint
testing, do correct thing with NULL result from a constraint expression,
remove memory leak. Domain checks still need much more work if we are going
to allow ALTER DOMAIN, however.
so that all executable expression nodes inherit from a common supertype
Expr. This is somewhat of an exercise in code purity rather than any
real functional advance, but getting rid of the extra Oper or Func node
formerly used in each operator or function call should provide at least
a little space and speed improvement.
initdb forced by changes in stored-rules representation.
logic, dissuade planner from thinking that 'x IS DISTINCT FROM 42' may
be optimized into 'x = 42' (!!), cause dependency on = operator to be
recorded correctly, minor other improvements.
operations: make sure we use operators that are compatible, as determined
by a mergejoin link in pg_operator. Also, add code to planner to ensure
we don't try to use hashed grouping when the grouping operators aren't
marked hashable.
sublink results and COPY's domain constraint checking. A Const that
isn't really constant is just a Bad Idea(tm). Remove hacks in
parse_coerce and other places that were needed because of the former
klugery.
