In pgoutput, when converting the child table's tuple format to match the
parent table's, we temporarily create a new slot to store the converted
tuple. However, we missed to drop such temporary slots, leading to
resource leakage.
Reported-by: Bowen Shi
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM_vCudv8dc3sjWiPkXx5F2b27UV7_YRKRbtSCcE-pv=cVACGA@mail.gmail.com
We missed performing table sync if the invalidation happened while the
non-ready tables list was being prepared. This occurs because the sync
state was set to valid at the end of non-ready table list preparation
irrespective of the invalidations processed while the list is being
prepared.
Fix it by changing the boolean variable to a tri-state enum and by setting
table state to valid only if no invalidations have occurred while the list
is being prepared.
Reprted-by: Alexander Lakhin
Diagnosed-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie, Alexander Lakhin, Ajin Cherian, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/711a6afe-edb7-1211-cc27-1bef8239eec7@gmail.com
In commit 272248a0c, we fixed the catalog lookup due to the wrong snapshot
for transactions and subtransactions during decoding. We failed to
consider the case where top-level xact is already marked as containing
catalog change but its subtransaction is not yet marked as containing
catalog change even though it contained such a change.
This can happen when during decoding, none of the WAL records from the
subtransaction was decoded and top-level xact contains a DDL.
We fix it by marking the transaction and all its subtransactions as
containing catalog changes if the top-level xact contains any catalog
change and it is present in the initial running xacts array.
This fix is required only for 14 and 15 because in prior branches we
already always mark the transaction and all its subtransactions as
containing catalog changes in the same case. In 16 and above, we preserve
the list of transaction IDs and sub-transaction IDs, that have modified
catalogs and are running during snapshot serialization, to the serialized
snapshot (see commit 7f13ac8123).
Author: Fei Changhong
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Hayato Kuroda, Andy Fan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18280-4c8060178cb41750@postgresql.org
The apply worker needs to update the state of the subscription tables to
'READY' during the synchronization phase which requires locking the
corresponding subscription. The apply worker also waits for the
subscription tables to reach the 'SYNCDONE' state after holding the locks
on the subscription and the wait is done using WaitLatch. The 'SYNCDONE'
state is changed by tablesync workers again by locking the corresponding
subscription. Both the state updates use AccessShareLock mode to lock the
subscription, so they can't block each other. However, a backend can
simultaneously try to acquire a lock on the same subscription using
AccessExclusiveLock mode to alter the subscription. Now, the backend's
wait on a lock can sneak in between the apply worker and table sync worker
causing deadlock.
In other words, apply_worker waits for tablesync worker which waits for
backend, and backend waits for apply worker. This is not detected by the
deadlock detector because apply worker uses WaitLatch.
The fix is to release existing locks in apply worker before it starts to
wait for tablesync worker to change the state.
Reported-by: Tomas Vondra
Author: Shlok Kyal
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Peter Smith
Backpatch-through: 12
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d291bb50-12c4-e8af-2af2-7bb9bb4d8e3e@enterprisedb.com
Commit 5a991ef869 accidentally reversed the order of the tuples
and fields parameters, making the error message incorrectly refer
to 3 tuples with 1 field when IDENTIFY_SYSTEM returns 1 tuple and
3 or 4 fields. Fix by changing the order of the parameters. This
also adds a comment describing why we check for < 3 when postgres
since 9.4 has been sending 4 fields.
Backpatch all the way since the bug is almost a decade old.
Author: Tomonari Katsumata <t.katsumata1122@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Bug: #18224
Backpatch-through: v12
52e4f0cd4 introduced a bug in pgoutput in which missing values in tuples
were incorrectly filled in with NULL. The problem was the use of
CreateTupleDescCopy where CreateTupleDescCopyConstr was required, as the
former drops the constraints in the tuple description (specifically, the
default value constraint) on the floor.
The bug could result in incorrectness when a table replicated via
`REPLICA IDENTITY FULL` underwent a schema change that added a column
with a default value. The problem is that in such cases updates fill NULL
values in old tuples for missing columns for default values. Then on the
subscriber, we failed to find a matching tuple and missed updating the
required row.
Author: Nikhil Benesch
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAPWqQZTEpZQamYsGMn6ZDRvVywwpVPiKH6OY4KSgA+NmeqFNzA@mail.gmail.com
The copy command formed for initial sync was using parenthesis for tables
with no columns leading to syntax error. This patch avoids adding
parenthesis for such tables.
Reported-by: Justin G
Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/18203-df37fe354b626670@postgresql.org
The transactions and subtransactions array that was allocated under
snapshot builder memory context and recorded during decoding was not
cleared in case of errors. This can result in an assertion failure if we
attempt to retry logical decoding within the same session. To address this
issue, we register a callback function under the snapshot builder memory
context to clear the recorded transactions and subtransactions array along
with the context.
This problem doesn't exist in PG16 and HEAD as instead of using
InitialRunningXacts, we added the list of transaction IDs and
sub-transaction IDs, that have modified catalogs and are running during
snapshot serialization, to the serialized snapshot (see commit 7f13ac8123).
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/18055-ab3beed9f4b7b7d6@postgresql.org
We include the message type while displaying an error context in the
apply worker. Now, while retrieving the message type string if the
message type is unknown we throw an error that will hide the original
error. So, instead, we need to simply return the string indicating an
unknown message type.
Reported-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Author: Euler Taveira, Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Backpatch-through: 15
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAExHW5suAEDW-mBZt_qu4RVxWZ1vL54-L+ci2zreYWebpzxYsA@mail.gmail.com
Multiple cycles of starting up and shutting down the plugin within a
single session would eventually lead to "out of relcache_callback_list
slots", because pgoutput_startup blindly re-registered its cache
callbacks each time. Fix it to register them only once, as all other
users of cache callbacks already take care to do.
This has been broken all along, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Shi Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB631004A78D743D68921FFAD3FDA79@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whe decoding a transactional logical message, logicalmsg_decode called
SnapBuildGetOrBuildSnapshot. But we may not have a consistent snapshot
yet at that point. We don't actually need the snapshot in this case
(during replay we'll have the snapshot from the transaction), so in
practice this is harmless. But in assert-enabled build this crashes.
Fixed by requesting the snapshot only in non-transactional case, where
we are guaranteed to have SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT.
Backpatch to 11. The issue exists since 9.6.
Backpatch-through: 11
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/84d60912-6eab-9b84-5de3-41765a5449e8@enterprisedb.com
The drop database command waits for the logical replication sync worker to
accept ProcSignalBarrier and the worker's slot creation waits for the drop
database to finish which leads to a deadlock. This happens because the
tablesync worker holds interrupts while creating a slot.
We prevent cancel/die interrupts while creating a slot in the table sync
worker because it is possible that before the server finishes this
command, a concurrent drop subscription happens which would complete
without removing this slot and that leads to the slot existing until the
end of walsender. However, the slot will eventually get dropped at the
walsender exit time, so there is no danger of the dangling slot.
This patch reallows cancel/die interrupts while creating a slot and
modifies the test to wait for slots to become zero to prevent finding an
ephemeral slot.
The reported hang doesn't happen in PG14 as the drop database starts to
wait for ProcSignalBarrier with PG15 (commits 4eb2176318 and e2f65f4255)
but it is good to backpatch this till PG14 as it is not a good idea to
prevent interrupts during a network call that could block indefinitely.
Reported-by: Lakshmi Narayanan Sreethar
Diagnosed-by: Andres Freund
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 14, where it was introduced in commit 6b67d72b60
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+kvmZELXQ4ZD3U=XCXuG3KvFgkuPoN1QrEj8c-rMRodrLOnsg@mail.gmail.com
When libpqrcv_connect (also known as walrcv_connect()) failed, it leaked the
libpq connection. In most paths that's fairly harmless, as the calling process
will exit soon after. But e.g. CREATE SUBSCRIPTION could lead to a somewhat
longer lived leak.
Fix by releasing resources, including the libpq connection, on error.
Add a test exercising the error code path. To make it reliable and safe, the
test tries to connect to port=-1, which happens to fail during connection
establishment, rather than during connection string parsing.
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230121011237.q52apbvlarfv6jm6@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 11-
The creation of a logical decoding context in CreateDecodingContext()
updates some data of its slot for two-phase transactions if enabled by
the caller, but the code forgot to acquire a spinlock when updating
these fields like any other code paths. This could lead to the read of
inconsistent data.
Oversight in a8fd13c.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAD8_fp47191LKuecjDd3DYhoQ4TaucFco1_TEr_jQ-Zw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
After restart, we try to stream the changes for large transactions that
were not sent before server crash and restart. However, we forget to send
the abort message for such transactions. This leads to spurious streaming
files on the subscriber which won't be cleaned till the apply worker or
the subscriber server restarts.
Reported-by: Dilip Kumar
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716A773F46768A1B75BE24394FB9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
We were identifying the updatable generated columns of inheritance
children by transposing the calculation made for their parent.
However, there's nothing that says a traditional-inheritance child
can't have generated columns that aren't there in its parent, or that
have different dependencies than are in the parent's expression.
(At present it seems that we don't enforce that for partitioning
either, which is likely wrong to some degree or other; but the case
clearly needs to be handled with traditional inheritance.)
Hence, drop the very-klugy-anyway "extraUpdatedCols" RTE field
in favor of identifying which generated columns depend on updated
columns during executor startup. In HEAD we can remove
extraUpdatedCols altogether; in back branches, it's still there but
always empty. Another difference between the HEAD and back-branch
versions of this patch is that in HEAD we can add the new bitmap field
to ResultRelInfo, but that would cause an ABI break in back branches.
Like 4b3e37993, add a List field at the end of struct EState instead.
Back-patch to v13. The bogus calculation is also being made in v12,
but it doesn't have the same visible effect because we don't use it
to decide which generated columns to recalculate; as a consequence of
which the patch doesn't apply easily. I think that there might still
be a demonstrable bug associated with trigger firing conditions, but
that's such a weird corner-case usage that I'm content to leave it
unfixed in v12.
Amit Langote and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFshLKNvQUd1DgwJ-7tsTp=dwv7KZqXC4j2wYBV1aCDUA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2793383.1672944799@sss.pgh.pa.us
For Updates and Deletes, we were not honoring the columns list for old
tuple values while sending tuple data via pgoutput. This results in
pgoutput emitting more columns than expected.
This is not a problem for built-in logical replication as we simply ignore
additional columns based on the relation information sent previously which
didn't have those columns. However, some other users of pgoutput plugin
may expect the columns as per the column list. Also, sending extra columns
unnecessarily consumes network bandwidth defeating the purpose of the
column list feature.
Reported-by: Gunnar Morling
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADGJaX9kiRZ-OH0EpWF5Fkyh1ZZYofoNRCrhapBfdk02tj5EKg@mail.gmail.com
In commit 272248a0c, we introduced an InitialRunningXacts array to
remember transactions and subtransactions that were running when the
xl_running_xacts record that we decoded was written. This array was
allocated in the snapshot builder memory context after we restore
serialized snapshot but we forgot to reset the array while freeing the
builder memory context. So, the next time when we start decoding in the
same session where we don't restore any serialized snapshot, we ended up
using the uninitialized array and that can lead to unpredictable behavior.
This problem doesn't exist in HEAD as instead of using
InitialRunningXacts, we added the list of transaction IDs and
sub-transaction IDs, that have modified catalogs and are running during
snapshot serialization, to the serialized snapshot (see commit 7f13ac8123).
Reported-by: Maxim Orlov
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Maxim Orlov
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACG=ezZoz_KG+Ryh9MrU_g5e0HiVoHocEvqFF=NRrhrwKmEQJQ@mail.gmail.com
Once a logical slot has acquired a catalog_xmin, it doesn't let go of
it, even when invalidated by exceeding the max_slot_wal_keep_size, which
means that dead catalog tuples are not removed by vacuum anymore since
the point is invalidated, until the slot is dropped. This could be
catastrophic if catalog churn is high.
Change the computation of Xmin to ignore invalidated slots,
to prevent dead rows from accumulating.
Backpatch to 13, where slot invalidation appeared.
Author: Sirisha Chamarthi <sirichamarthi22@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKrAKeUEDeqquN9vwzNeG-CN8wuVsfRYbeOUV9qKO_RHok=j+g@mail.gmail.com
Since partitions can be foreign tables not only plain tables, but
logical replication only supports plain tables, we'd better check the
relkind of a partition after we find it. (There was some discussion
of checking this when adding a partitioned table to a subscription;
but that would be inadequate since the troublesome partition could be
added later.) Without this, the situation leads to a segfault or
assertion failure.
In passing, add a separate variable for the target Relation of
a cross-partition UPDATE; reusing partrel seemed mighty confusing
and error-prone.
Shi Yu and Tom Lane, per report from Ilya Gladyshev. Back-patch
to v13 where logical replication into partitioned tables became
a thing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6b93e3748ba43298694f376ca8797279d7945e29.camel@gmail.com
This problem has been introduced by commit 272248a0c1 where we started
assigning the subtransactions to the top-level transaction when we mark
both the top-level transaction and its subtransactions as containing
catalog changes. After we assign subtransactions to the top-level
transaction, we were not allowed to execute any invalidations associated
with it when we decide to skip the transaction.
The reason to assign the subtransactions to the top-level transaction was
to avoid the assertion failure in AssertTXNLsnOrder() as they have the
same LSN when we sometimes start accumulating transaction changes for
partial transactions after the restart. Now that with commit 64ff0fe4e8,
we skip this assertion check until we reach the LSN at which we start
decoding the contents of the transaction, so, there is no reason for such
an assignment anymore.
The assignment change was introduced in 15 and prior versions but this bug
doesn't exist in branches prior to 14 since we don't add invalidation
messages to subtransactions. We decided to backpatch through 11 for
consistency but not for 10 since its final release is near.
Reported-by: Kuroda Hayato
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB58660803BCAA7849C8584AA4F57E9%40TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a89b46b6-0239-2fd5-71a9-b19b1f7a7145%40enterprisedb.com
When the logical decoding restarts from NEW_CID, since there is no
association between the top transaction and its subtransaction, both are
created as top transactions and have the same LSN. This caused the
assertion failure in AssertTXNLsnOrder().
This patch skips the assertion check until we reach the LSN at which we
start decoding the contents of the transaction, specifically
start_decoding_at LSN in SnapBuild. This is okay because we don't
guarantee to make the association between top transaction and
subtransaction until we try to decode the actual contents of transaction.
The ordering of the records prior to the start_decoding_at LSN should have
been checked before the restart.
The other assertion failure is due to the reason that we forgot to track
that we have considered top-level transaction id in the list of catalog
changing transactions that were committed when one of its subtransactions
is marked as containing catalog change.
Reported-by: Tomas Vondra, Osumi Takamichi
Author: Masahiko Sawada, Kuroda Hayato
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Dilip Kumar, Kuroda Hayato, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Masahiko Sawada
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a89b46b6-0239-2fd5-71a9-b19b1f7a7145%40enterprisedb.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYCPR01MB83733C6CEAE47D0280814D5AED7A9%40TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Per discussion, the existing routine name able to initialize a SRF
function with materialize mode is unpopular, so rename it. Equally, the
flags of this function are renamed, as of:
- SRF_SINGLE_USE_EXPECTED -> MAT_SRF_USE_EXPECTED_DESC
- SRF_SINGLE_BLESS -> MAT_SRF_BLESS
The previous function and flags introduced in 9e98583 are kept around
for compatibility purposes, so as any extension code already compiled
with v15 continues to work as-is. The declarations introduced here for
compatibility will be removed from HEAD in a follow-up commit.
The new names have been suggested by Andres Freund and Melanie
Plageman.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221013194820.ciktb2sbbpw7cljm@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch-through: 15
Previously PgStat_StatReplSlotEntry contained the slotname, which was mainly
used when writing out the stats during shutdown, to identify the slot in the
serialized data (at runtime the index in ReplicationSlotCtl->replication_slots
is used, but that can change during a restart). Unfortunately the slotname was
overwritten when the slot's stats were reset.
That turned out to only cause "real" problems if the slot was active during
the reset, triggering an assertion failure at the next
pgstat_report_replslot(). In other paths the stats were re-initialized during
pgstat_acquire_replslot().
Fix this by removing slotname from PgStat_StatReplSlotEntry. Instead we can
get the slot's name from the slot itself. Besides fixing a bug, this also is
architecturally cleaner (a name is not really statistics). This is safe
because stats, for a slot removed while shut down, will not be restored at
startup.
In 15 the slotname is not removed, but renamed, to avoid changing the stats
format. In master, bump PGSTAT_FILE_FORMAT_ID.
This commit does not contain a test for the fix. I think this can only be
tested by a tap test starting pg_recvlogical in the background and checking
pg_recvlogical's output. That type of test is notoriously hard to be reliable,
so committing it shortly before the release is wrapped seems like a bad idea.
Reported-by: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YxfagaTXUNa9ggLb@ahch-to
Backpatch: 15-, where the bug was introduced in 5891c7a8ed
I (Álvaro) broke tab-completion for GRANT .. ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA while
removing ALL from the publication syntax for schemas in the
aforementioned commit. I also missed to update a bunch of
tab-completion rules for ALTER/CREATE PUBLICATION that match each
individual piece of ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA. Repair those bugs.
While fixing up that commit, update a couple of outdated comments
related to the same change.
Backpatch to 15.
Author: Shi yu <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB6310FCE8609185A56344EED2FD559@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
We previously thought that allowing such cases can confuse users when they
specify DROP TABLES IN SCHEMA but that doesn't seem to be the case based
on discussion. This helps to uplift the restriction during
ALTER TABLE ... SET SCHEMA which used to ensure that we couldn't end up
with a publication having both a schema and the same schema's table.
To allow this, we need to forbid having any schema on a publication if
column lists on a table are specified (and vice versa). This is because
otherwise we still need a restriction during ALTER TABLE ... SET SCHEMA to
forbid cases where it could lead to a publication having both a schema and
the same schema's table with column list.
Based on suggestions by Peter Eisentraut.
Author: Hou Zhijie and Vignesh C
Reviewed-By: Peter Smith, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2729c9e2-9aac-8cda-f2f4-34f2bcc18f4e@enterprisedb.com
This may be a bit too subtle, but removing that word from there makes
this clause no longer a perfect parallel of the GRANT variant "ALL
TABLES IN SCHEMA": indeed, for publications what we record is the schema
itself, not the tables therein, which means that any tables added to the
schema in the future are also published. This is completely different
to what GRANT does, which is affect only the tables that exist when the
command is executed.
There isn't resounding support for this change, but there are a few
positive votes and no opposition. Because the time to 15 RC1 is very
short, let's get this out now.
Backpatch to 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2729c9e2-9aac-8cda-f2f4-34f2bcc18f4e
Compiling with -Wshadow=compatible-local yields quite a few warnings about
local variables being shadowed by compatible local variables in an inner
scope. Of course, this is perfectly valid in C, but we have had bugs in
the past as a result of developers failing to notice this. af7d270dd is a
recent example.
Here we do a cleanup of warnings we receive from -Wshadow=compatible-local
for code which is new to PostgreSQL 15. We've yet to have the discussion
about if we actually ever want to run that as a standard compilation flag.
We'll need to at least get the number of warnings down to something easier
to manage before we can realistically consider if we want this or not.
This commit is the first step towards reducing the warnings.
The changes being made here are all fairly trivial. Because of that, and
the fact that v15 is still in beta, this is being back-patched into 15.
It seems more risky not to do this as the risk of future bugs is increased
by the additional conflicts that this commit could cause for any future
bug fixes touching the same areas as this commit.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220817145434.GC26426%40telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 15
The table column that stores this is of type oid, but is actually limited
to uint16 and has a different path for creating new values. Some of
the documentation already referred to it as an ID, so let's standardize
on that.
While at it, most format strings already use %u, so for consintency
change the remaining stragglers using %d.
Per suggestions from Tom Lane and Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3437166.1659620465%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch to v15
Previously, we relied on HEAP2_NEW_CID records and XACT_INVALIDATION
records to know if the transaction has modified the catalog, and that
information is not serialized to snapshot. Therefore, after the restart,
if the logical decoding decodes only the commit record of the transaction
that has actually modified a catalog, we will miss adding its XID to the
snapshot. Thus, we will end up looking at catalogs with the wrong
snapshot.
To fix this problem, this changes the snapshot builder so that it
remembers the last-running-xacts list of the decoded RUNNING_XACTS record
after restoring the previously serialized snapshot. Then, we mark the
transaction as containing catalog changes if it's in the list of initial
running transactions and its commit record has XACT_XINFO_HAS_INVALS. To
avoid ABI breakage, we store the array of the initial running transactions
in the static variables InitialRunningXacts and NInitialRunningXacts,
instead of storing those in SnapBuild or ReorderBuffer.
This approach has a false positive; we could end up adding the transaction
that didn't change catalog to the snapshot since we cannot distinguish
whether the transaction has catalog changes only by checking the COMMIT
record. It doesn't have the information on which (sub) transaction has
catalog changes, and XACT_XINFO_HAS_INVALS doesn't necessarily indicate
that the transaction has catalog change. But that won't be a problem since
we use snapshot built during decoding only to read system catalogs.
On the master branch, we took a more future-proof approach by writing
catalog modifying transactions to the serialized snapshot which avoids the
above false positive. But we cannot backpatch it because of a change in
the SnapBuild.
Reported-by: Mike Oh
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Shi yu, Takamichi Osumi, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Bertrand Drouvot, Ahsan Hadi
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/81D0D8B0-E7C4-4999-B616-1E5004DBDCD2%40amazon.com
Multiple non-exclusive backups are able to be run conrrently in different
sessions. But, in the same session, only one non-exclusive backup can be
run at the same moment. If pg_backup_start (pg_start_backup in v14 or before)
is called in the middle of another non-exclusive backup in the same session,
an error is thrown.
However, previously, in logical replication walsender mode, even if that
walsender session had already called pg_backup_start and started
a non-exclusive backup, it could execute BASE_BACKUP command and
start another non-exclusive backup. Which caused subsequent pg_backup_stop
to throw an error because BASE_BACKUP unexpectedly reset the session state
marked by pg_backup_start.
This commit prevents BASE_BACKUP command in the middle of another
non-exclusive backup in the same session.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Masahiko Sawada, Michael Paquier, Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3374718f-9fbf-a950-6d66-d973e027f44c@oss.nttdata.com
This reverts most of 91c0570a79, f28bf667f6, fe0972ee5e, afdeff1052. The
only thing left is the retry loop in 019_replslot_limit.pl that avoids
spurious failures by retrying a couple times.
We haven't seen any hard evidence that this is caused by anything but slow
process shutdown. We did not find any cases where walsenders did not vanish
after waiting for longer. Therefore there's no reason for this debugging code
to remain.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220530190155.47wr3x2prdwyciah@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 15-
When rebuilding the relation mapping on subscribers, we were not releasing
the attribute mapping's memory which was no longer required.
The attribute mapping used in logical tuple conversion was refactored in
PG13 (by commit e1551f96e6) but we forgot to update the related code that
frees the attribute map.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Amit Kapila, Shi yu
Backpatch-through: 10, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB6310F46CD425A967E4AEF736FDA49@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
We build the partition map entries on subscribers while applying the
changes for update/delete on partitions. The component relation in each
entry is closed after its use so we need to update it on successive use of
cache entries.
This problem was there since the original commit f1ac27bfda that
introduced this code but we didn't notice it till the recent commit
26b3455afa started to use the component relation of partition map cache
entry.
Reported-by: Tom Lane, as per buildfarm
Author: Amit Langote, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Shi Yu
Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB6310F46CD425A967E4AEF736FDA49@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
In logical replication, we will check if the target table on the
subscriber is updatable by comparing the replica identity of the table on
the publisher with the table on the subscriber. When the target table is a
partitioned table, we only check its replica identity but not for the
partition tables. This leads to assertion failure while applying changes
for update/delete as we expect those to succeed only when the
corresponding partition table has a primary key or has a replica
identity defined.
Fix it by checking the replica identity of the partition table while
applying changes.
Reported-by: Shi Yu
Author: Shi Yu, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB6310F46CD425A967E4AEF736FDA49@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
We were not updating the partition map cache in the subscriber even when
the corresponding remote rel is changed. Due to this data was getting
incorrectly replicated for partition tables after the publisher has
changed the table schema.
Fix it by resetting the required entries in the partition map cache after
receiving a new relation mapping from the publisher.
Reported-by: Shi Yu
Author: Shi Yu, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB6310F46CD425A967E4AEF736FDA49@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
While building a new attrmap which maps partition attribute numbers to
remoterel's, we incorrectly update the map for dropped column attributes.
Later, it caused cache look-up failure when we tried to use the map to
fetch the information about attributes.
This also fixes the partition map cache invalidation which was using the
wrong type cast to fetch the entry. We were using stale partition map
entry after invalidation which leads to the assertion or cache look-up
failure.
Reported-by: Shi Yu
Author: Hou Zhijie, Shi Yu
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB6310F46CD425A967E4AEF736FDA49@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
pg_stat_get_subscription scanned one more LogicalRepWorker array entry
than is really allocated. In the worst case this could lead to SIGSEGV,
if the LogicalRepCtx data structure is near the end of shared memory.
That seems quite unlikely though (thanks to the ordering of calls in
CreateSharedMemoryAndSemaphores) and we've heard no field reports of it.
A more likely misbehavior is one row of garbage data in the function's
result, but even that is not real likely because of the check that the
pid field matches some live backend.
Report and fix by Kuntal Ghosh. This bug is old, so back-patch
to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGz5QCJykEDzW6jQK6Yz7Qh_PMtD=95de_7QoocbVR2Qy8hWZA@mail.gmail.com
