Handle dead branches of aborted HOT chains outside heap_prune_chain()
as a separate phase. This simplifies the logic in heap_prune_chain(),
as well as allowing us to clean up more RECENTLY_DEAD -> DEAD chains.
To accomplish this efficiently, partition tuples into HOT and non-HOT
while first collecting visibility information for each tuple in
heap_page_prune(). Then call heap_prune_chain() only on potential
chain members. Then mop up the leftover HOT tuples afterwards.
As part of this, keep track of which items on page have already been
processed, in 'processed' array. This replaces the 'marked' array
which was only set for tuples marked for removal or redirection. The
'processed' array is updated also for items that are left unchanged,
when we conclude that an item can be left unchanged. At the end of
pruning, every item on the page should be marked as processed in the
array; an assertion is added for that.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240330055710.kqg6ii2cdojsxgje@liskov
Keep track of the number of deleted tuples in PruneState and record this
information when recording a tuple dead, unused or redirected. This
removes a special case from the traversal and chain processing logic as
well as setting a precedent of recording the impact of prune actions in
the record functions themselves. This paradigm will be used in future
commits which move tracking of additional statistics on pruning actions
from lazy_scan_prune() to heap_prune_chain().
Simplify heap_prune_chain()'s chain traversal logic by handling each
case explicitly. That is, do not attempt to share code when processing
different types of chains. For each category of chain, process it
specifically and procedurally: first handling the root, then any
intervening tuples, and, finally, the end of the chain.
While we are at it, add a few new comments to heap_prune_chain()
clarifying some special cases involving RECENTLY_DEAD tuples.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240330055710.kqg6ii2cdojsxgje@liskov
Pass 'page', 'blockno' and 'maxoff' to heap_prune_chain() as
arguments, so that it doesn't need to fetch them from the buffer. This
saves a few cycles per chain.
Remove the "if (off_loc != NULL)" checks, and require the caller to
pass a non-NULL 'off_loc'. Pass a pointer to a dummy local variable
when it's not needed. Those checks are cheap, but it's still better to
avoid them in the per-chain loops when we can do so easily.
The CPU time saving from these changes are hardly measurable, but
fewer instructions is good anyway, so why not. I spotted the potential
for these while reviewing Melanie Plageman's patch set to combine
prune and freeze records.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_abm2tHhrc0QSQa%3D%3DsHe%3DVA1%3Doz1dJMQYUOKuHmu%2B9Xrg%40mail.gmail.com
The new combined WAL record is now used for pruning, freezing and 2nd
pass of vacuum. This is in preparation for changing VACUUM to write a
combined prune+freeze record per page, instead of separate two
records. The new WAL record format now supports that, but the code
still always writes separate records for pruning and freezing.
This reserves separate XLOG_HEAP2_* info codes for when the pruning
record is emitted for on-access pruning or VACUUM, per Peter
Geoghegan's suggestion. The record format is identical, but having
separate info codes makes it easier analyze pruning and vacuuming with
pg_waldump.
The function to emit the new WAL record, log_heap_prune_and_freeze(),
is in pruneheap.c. The existing heap_log_freeze_plan() and its
subroutines are moved to pruneheap.c without changes, to keep them
together with log_heap_prune_and_freeze().
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_azf-zH%3DDgVbquZ3tFWjMY1w5pO8m-TXJaMdri8z3933g@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_b2oE4GL%3Dq4g9mcByS9yT7wTQvEH9OLpabj28e%2BWKFi2A@mail.gmail.com
as determined by include-what-you-use (IWYU)
While IWYU also suggests to *add* a bunch of #include's (which is its
main purpose), this patch does not do that. In some cases, a more
specific #include replaces another less specific one.
Some manual adjustments of the automatic result:
- IWYU currently doesn't know about includes that provide global
variable declarations (like -Wmissing-variable-declarations), so
those includes are being kept manually.
- All includes for port(ability) headers are being kept for now, to
play it safe.
- No changes of catalog/pg_foo.h to catalog/pg_foo_d.h, to keep the
patch from exploding in size.
Note that this patch touches just *.c files, so nothing declared in
header files changes in hidden ways.
As a small example, in src/backend/access/transam/rmgr.c, some IWYU
pragma annotations are added to handle a special case there.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/af837490-6b2f-46df-ba05-37ea6a6653fc%40eisentraut.org
If there are no indexes on a relation, items can be marked LP_UNUSED
instead of LP_DEAD when pruning. This significantly reduces WAL
volume, since we no longer need to emit one WAL record for pruning
and a second to change the LP_DEAD line pointers thus created to
LP_UNUSED.
Melanie Plageman, reviewed by Andres Freund, Peter Geoghegan, and me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_bgvb_k0gKOXWzNKWHt560R0smrGe3E8zewKPs8fiMKkw%40mail.gmail.com
The retry loop is needed because heap_page_prune() calls
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() and then lazy_scan_prune() does the same
thing again, and they might get different answers due to concurrent
clog updates. But this patch makes heap_page_prune() return the
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() results that it computed back to the
caller, which allows lazy_scan_prune() to avoid needing to recompute
those values in the first place. That's nice both because it eliminates
the need for a retry loop and also because it's cheaper.
Melanie Plageman, reviewed by David Geier, Andres Freund, and me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_br124qsGJieuYA0nGjywEukhK1dKBfRdby_4yY3E9SXA%40mail.gmail.com
Previously, one of the values in the struct was returned as the return
value, and another was returned via an output parameter. In
preparation for returning more stuff, consolidate both values into a
struct returned via an output parameter.
Melanie Plageman, reviewed by Andres Freund and by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_br124qsGJieuYA0nGjywEukhK1dKBfRdby_4yY3E9SXA%40mail.gmail.com
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.
This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical. We've updated to
pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that
have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are
now indented one tab stop). We've also updated to perltidy version
20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to
add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up. Going
forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing
code.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230428092545.qfb3y5wcu4cm75ur@alvherre.pgsql
This commit only implements one prerequisite part for allowing logical
decoding. The commit message contains an explanation of the overall design,
which later commits will refer back to.
Overall design:
1. We want to enable logical decoding on standbys, but replay of WAL
from the primary might remove data that is needed by logical decoding,
causing error(s) on the standby. To prevent those errors, a new replication
conflict scenario needs to be addressed (as much as hot standby does).
2. Our chosen strategy for dealing with this type of replication slot
is to invalidate logical slots for which needed data has been removed.
3. To do this we need the latestRemovedXid for each change, just as we
do for physical replication conflicts, but we also need to know
whether any particular change was to data that logical replication
might access. That way, during WAL replay, we know when there is a risk of
conflict and, if so, if there is a conflict.
4. We can't rely on the standby's relcache entries for this purpose in
any way, because the startup process can't access catalog contents.
5. Therefore every WAL record that potentially removes data from the
index or heap must carry a flag indicating whether or not it is one
that might be accessed during logical decoding.
Why do we need this for logical decoding on standby?
First, let's forget about logical decoding on standby and recall that
on a primary database, any catalog rows that may be needed by a logical
decoding replication slot are not removed.
This is done thanks to the catalog_xmin associated with the logical
replication slot.
But, with logical decoding on standby, in the following cases:
- hot_standby_feedback is off
- hot_standby_feedback is on but there is no a physical slot between
the primary and the standby. Then, hot_standby_feedback will work,
but only while the connection is alive (for example a node restart
would break it)
Then, the primary may delete system catalog rows that could be needed
by the logical decoding on the standby (as it does not know about the
catalog_xmin on the standby).
So, it’s mandatory to identify those rows and invalidate the slots
that may need them if any. Identifying those rows is the purpose of
this commit.
Implementation:
When a WAL replay on standby indicates that a catalog table tuple is
to be deleted by an xid that is greater than a logical slot's
catalog_xmin, then that means the slot's catalog_xmin conflicts with
the xid, and we need to handle the conflict. While subsequent commits
will do the actual conflict handling, this commit adds a new field
isCatalogRel in such WAL records (and a new bit set in the
xl_heap_visible flags field), that is true for catalog tables, so as to
arrange for conflict handling.
The affected WAL records are the ones that already contain the
snapshotConflictHorizon field, namely:
- gistxlogDelete
- gistxlogPageReuse
- xl_hash_vacuum_one_page
- xl_heap_prune
- xl_heap_freeze_page
- xl_heap_visible
- xl_btree_reuse_page
- xl_btree_delete
- spgxlogVacuumRedirect
Due to this new field being added, xl_hash_vacuum_one_page and
gistxlogDelete do now contain the offsets to be deleted as a
FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER. This is needed to ensure correct alignment.
It's not needed on the others struct where isCatalogRel has
been added.
This commit just introduces the WAL format changes mentioned above. Handling
the actual conflicts will follow in future commits.
Bumps XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC as the several WAL records are changed.
Author: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> (in an older version)
Author: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> (in an older version)
Reviewed-by: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Standardize on the name snapshotConflictHorizon for all XID fields from
WAL records that generate recovery conflicts when in hot standby mode.
This supersedes the previous latestRemovedXid naming convention.
The new naming convention places emphasis on how the values are actually
used by REDO routines. How the values are generated during original
execution (details of which vary by record type) is deemphasized. Users
of tools like pg_waldump can now grep for snapshotConflictHorizon to see
all potential sources of recovery conflicts in a standardized way,
without necessarily having to consider which specific record types might
be involved.
Also bring a couple of WAL record types that didn't follow any kind of
naming convention into line. These are heapam's VISIBLE record type and
SP-GiST's VACUUM_REDIRECT record type. Now every WAL record whose REDO
routine calls ResolveRecoveryConflictWithSnapshot() passes through the
snapshotConflictHorizon field from its WAL record. This is follow-up
work to the refactoring from commit 9e540599 that made FREEZE_PAGE WAL
records use a standard snapshotConflictHorizon style XID cutoff.
No bump in XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC, since the underlying format of affected WAL
records doesn't change.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzm2CQUmViUq7Opgk=McVREHSOorYaAjR1ZpLYkRN7_dPw@mail.gmail.com
Reclaim space from the line pointer array when heap pruning leaves
behind a contiguous group of LP_UNUSED items at the end of the array.
This happens during subsequent page defragmentation. Certain kinds of
heap line pointer bloat are ameliorated by this new optimization.
Follow-up work to commit 3c3b8a4b26, which taught VACUUM to truncate the
line pointer array in about the same way during VACUUM's second pass
over the heap. We now apply line pointer array truncation during both
the first and the second pass over the heap made by VACUUM. We can also
perform line pointer array truncation during opportunistic pruning.
Matthias van de Meent, with small tweaks by me.
Author: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2WjgaQc55Y5f5CQd3L=eS5CZcff2Obxp=O6pto8-f0hC4w@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2Wg36%2B4at2eWJNcYNiW2FJmht34x3YeX54ctUSs7kKoNcA%40mail.gmail.com
xlog.h is directly and indirectly #included in a lot of places. With
this change, xloginsert.h is no longer unnecessarily included in the
large number of them that don't need it.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACVe-W+WM5P44N7eG9C2_FmaeM8Dq5aCnD3fHt0Ba=WR6w@mail.gmail.com
BufferGetBlockNumber() is not that cheap and obviously cannot change during
one heap_prune_page(), so only call it once. We might be able to do better and
pass the block number from the caller, but that'd be a larger change...
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211211045710.ljtuu4gfloh754rs@alap3.anarazel.de
Corruption of redirect item pointers often only becomes visible well after
being corrupted, as e.g. bug #17255 shows: In the original reproducer,
gigabyte of WAL were between the source of the corruption and the corruption
becoming visible.
To make it easier to find / prevent such bugs, verify whether redirect
pointers are sensible at the end of heap_page_prune_execute(). 5cd7eb1f1c32
introduced related assertions while modifying the page, but they can't easily
detect marking the target of an existing redirect as unused. Sometimes the
corruption will be detected later, but that's harder to diagnose.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211122175914.ayk6gg6nvdwuhrzb@alap3.anarazel.de
Since dc7420c2c92 the horizon used for pruning is determined "lazily". A more
accurate horizon is built on-demand, rather than in GetSnapshotData(). If a
horizon computation is triggered between two HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() calls
for the same tuple, the result can change from RECENTLY_DEAD to DEAD.
heap_page_prune() can process the same tid multiple times (once following an
update chain, once "directly"). When the result of HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum()
of a tuple changes from RECENTLY_DEAD during the first access, to DEAD in the
second, the "tuple is DEAD and doesn't chain to anything else" path in
heap_prune_chain() can end up marking the target of a LP_REDIRECT ItemId
unused.
Initially not easily visible,
Once the target of a LP_REDIRECT ItemId is marked unused, a new tuple version
can reuse it. At that point the corruption may become visible, as index
entries pointing to the "original" redirect item, now point to a unrelated
tuple.
To fix, compute HTSV for all tuples on a page only once. This fixes the entire
class of problems of HTSV changing inside heap_page_prune(). However,
visibility changes can obviously still occur between HTSV checks inside
heap_page_prune() and outside (e.g. in lazy_scan_prune()).
The computation of HTSV is now done in bulk, in heap_page_prune(), rather than
on-demand in heap_prune_chain(). Besides being a bit simpler, it also is
faster: Memory accesses can happen sequentially, rather than in the order of
HOT chains.
There are other causes of HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() results changing between
two visibility checks for the same tuple, even before dc7420c2c92. E.g.
HEAPTUPLE_INSERT_IN_PROGRESS can change to HEAPTUPLE_DEAD when a transaction
aborts between the two checks. None of the these other visibility status
changes are known to cause corruption, but heap_page_prune()'s approach makes
it hard to be confident.
A patch implementing a more fundamental redesign of heap_page_prune(), which
fixes this bug and simplifies pruning substantially, has been proposed by
Peter Geoghegan in
https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmNk6V6tqzuuabxoxM8HJRaWU6h12toaS-bqYcLiht16A@mail.gmail.com
However, that redesign is larger change than desirable for backpatching. As
the new design still benefits from the batched visibility determination
introduced in this commit, it makes sense to commit this narrower fix to 14
and master, and then commit Peter's improvement in master.
The precise sequence required to trigger the bug is complicated and hard to do
exercise in an isolation test (until we have wait points). Due to that the
isolation test initially posted at
https://postgr.es/m/20211119003623.d3jusiytzjqwb62p%40alap3.anarazel.de
and updated in
https://postgr.es/m/20211122175914.ayk6gg6nvdwuhrzb%40alap3.anarazel.de
isn't committable.
A followup commit will introduce additional assertions, to detect problems
like this more easily.
Bug: #17255
Reported-By: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Debugged-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Debugged-By: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211122175914.ayk6gg6nvdwuhrzb@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 14-, the oldest branch containing dc7420c2c92
The term "super-exclusive lock" is a synonym for "buffer cleanup lock"
that first appeared in nbtree many years ago. Standardize things by
consistently using the term cleanup lock. This finishes work started by
commit 276db875.
There is no good reason to have two terms. But there is a good reason
to only have one: to avoid confusion around why VACUUM acquires a full
cleanup lock (not just an ordinary exclusive lock) in index AMs, during
ambulkdelete calls. This has nothing to do with protecting the physical
index data structure itself. It is needed to implement a locking
protocol that ensures that TIDs pointing to the heap/table structure
cannot get marked for recycling by VACUUM before it is safe (which is
somewhat similar to how VACUUM uses cleanup locks during its first heap
pass). Note that it isn't strictly necessary for index AMs to implement
this locking protocol -- several index AMs use an MVCC snapshot as their
sole interlock to prevent unsafe TID recycling.
In passing, update the nbtree README. Cleanly separate discussion of
the aforementioned index vacuuming locking protocol from discussion of
the "drop leaf page pin" optimization added by commit 2ed5b87f. We now
structure discussion of the latter by describing how individual index
scans may safely opt out of applying the standard locking protocol (and
so can avoid blocking progress by VACUUM). Also document why the
optimization is not safe to apply during nbtree index-only scans.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzngHgQa92tz6NQihf4nxJwRzCV36yMJO_i8dS+2mgEVKw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkHPgsBBvGWjz=8PjNhDefy7XRkDKiT5NxMs-n5ZCf2dA@mail.gmail.com
Add a comment explaining why the pgstats accounting used during
opportunistic heap pruning operations (to maintain the current number of
dead tuples in the relation) needs to compensate by subtracting away the
number of new LP_DEAD items. This is needed so it can avoid completely
forgetting about tuples that become LP_DEAD items during pruning -- they
should still count.
It seems more natural to discuss this issue at the only relevant call
site (opportunistic pruning), since the same issue does not apply to the
only other caller (the VACUUM call site). Move everything there too.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzm7f+A6ej650gi_ifTgbhsadVW5cujAL3punpupHff5Yg@mail.gmail.com
It is up to the heap_page_prune() caller to decide what to do about
updating the FSM for a page following pruning. Update old comments that
address what we might want to do as if it was the responsibility of
heap_page_prune() itself. heap_page_prune() doesn't have enough
high-level context to make a sensible choice.
Add new comments that spell out what VACUUM expects from heap pruning:
pruning must never leave behind DEAD tuples that still have tuple
storage. This has at least been the case since commit 8523492d, which
established the principle that vacuumlazy.c doesn't have to deal with
DEAD tuples that still have tuple storage directly, except perhaps by
simply retrying pruning (to handle a rare corner case involving
concurrent transaction abort).
In passing, update some references to old symbol names that were missed
by the snapshot scalability work (specifically commit dc7420c2c9).
These assertions document (and verify) our high level assumptions about
how pruning can and cannot affect existing items from target heap pages.
For example, one of the new assertions verifies that pruning does not
set a heap-only tuple to LP_DEAD.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=vhvBx1GjF+oueHh8YQcHoQYrMi0F0zFMHEr8yc4sCoA@mail.gmail.com
Checking that an offset number isn't past the end of a heap page's line
pointer array was just a defensive sanity check for HOT-chain traversal
code before commit 3c3b8a4b. It's etrictly necessary now, though. Add
comments that reference the issue to code in heapam that needs to get it
right.
Per suggestion from Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f76a292c-9170-1aef-91a0-59d9443b99a3@gmail.com
Also "make reformat-dat-files".
The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting
of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that
that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
Teach VACUUM to truncate the line pointer array of each heap page when a
contiguous group of LP_UNUSED line pointers appear at the end of the
array -- these unused and unreferenced items are excluded. This process
occurs during VACUUM's second pass over the heap, right after LP_DEAD
line pointers on the page (those encountered/pruned during the first
pass) are marked LP_UNUSED.
Truncation avoids line pointer bloat with certain workloads,
particularly those involving continual range DELETEs and bulk INSERTs
against the same table.
Also harden heapam code to check for an out-of-range page offset number
in places where we weren't already doing so.
Author: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2WjgaQc55Y5f5CQd3L=eS5CZcff2Obxp=O6pto8-f0hC4w@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzn6a64PJM1Ggzm=uvx2otsopJMhFQj_g1rAj4GWr3ZSzw@mail.gmail.com
Retry the call to heap_prune_page() in rare cases where there is
disagreement between the heap_prune_page() call and the call to
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() that immediately follows. Disagreement is
possible when a concurrently-aborted transaction makes a tuple DEAD
during the tiny window between each step. This was the only case where
a tuple considered DEAD by VACUUM still had storage following pruning.
VACUUM's definition of dead tuples is now uniformly simple and
unambiguous: dead tuples from each page are always LP_DEAD line pointers
that were encountered just after we performed pruning (and just before
we considered freezing remaining items with tuple storage).
Eliminating the tupgone=true special case enables INDEX_CLEANUP=off
style skipping of index vacuuming that takes place based on flexible,
dynamic criteria. The INDEX_CLEANUP=off case had to know about skipping
indexes up-front before now, due to a subtle interaction with the
special case (see commit dd695979) -- this was a special case unto
itself. Now there are no special cases. And so now it won't matter
when or how we decide to skip index vacuuming: it won't affect how
pruning behaves, and it won't be affected by any of the implementation
details of pruning or freezing.
Also remove XLOG_HEAP2_CLEANUP_INFO records. These are no longer
necessary because we now rely entirely on heap pruning taking care of
recovery conflicts. There is no longer any need to generate recovery
conflicts for DEAD tuples that pruning just missed. This also means
that heap vacuuming now uses exactly the same strategy for recovery
conflicts as index vacuuming always has: REDO routines never need to
process a latestRemovedXid from the WAL record, since earlier REDO of
the WAL record from pruning is sufficient in all cases. The generic
XLOG_HEAP2_CLEAN record type is now split into two new record types to
reflect this new division (these are called XLOG_HEAP2_PRUNE and
XLOG_HEAP2_VACUUM).
Also stop acquiring a super-exclusive lock for heap pages when they're
vacuumed during VACUUM's second heap pass. A regular exclusive lock is
enough. This is correct because heap page vacuuming is now strictly a
matter of setting the LP_DEAD line pointers to LP_UNUSED. No other
backend can have a pointer to a tuple located in a pinned buffer that
can be invalidated by a concurrent heap page vacuum operation.
Heap vacuuming can now be thought of as conceptually similar to index
vacuuming and conceptually dissimilar to heap pruning. Heap pruning now
has sole responsibility for anything involving the logical contents of
the database (e.g., managing transaction status information, recovery
conflicts, considering what to do with HOT chains). Index vacuuming and
heap vacuuming are now only concerned with recycling garbage items from
physical data structures that back the logical database.
Bump XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC due to pruning and heap page vacuum WAL record
changes.
Credit for the idea of retrying pruning a page to avoid the tupgone case
goes to Andres Freund.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznneCXTzuFmcwx_EyRQgfsfJAAsu+CsqRFmFXCAar=nJw@mail.gmail.com
The additional information added will be an offset number for heap
operations. This information will help us in finding the exact tuple due
to which the error has occurred.
Author: Mahendra Singh Thalor and Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko, Justin Pryzby and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKYtNApK488TDF4bMbw+1QH8HJf9cxdNDXquhU50TK5iv_FtCQ@mail.gmail.com
When a table is scanned by heapam_index_build_range_scan (née
IndexBuildHeapScan) and the table lock being held allows concurrent data
changes, it is possible for new HOT chains to sprout in a page that were
unknown when the scan of a page happened. This leads to an error such
as
ERROR: failed to find parent tuple for heap-only tuple at (X,Y) in table "tbl"
because the root tuple was not present when we first obtained the list
of the page's root tuples. This can be fixed by re-obtaining the list
of root tuples, if we see that a heap-only tuple appears to point to a
non-existing root.
This was reported by Anastasia as occurring for BRIN summarization
(which exists since 9.5), but I think it could theoretically also happen
with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY (much older) or REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
(very recent). It seems a happy coincidence that BRIN forces us to
backpatch this all the way to 9.5.
Reported-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>
Diagnosed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>
Co-authored-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/602d8487-f0b2-5486-0088-0f372b2549fa@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch: 9.5 - master
To make GetSnapshotData() more scalable, it cannot not look at at each proc's
xmin: While snapshot contents do not need to change whenever a read-only
transaction commits or a snapshot is released, a proc's xmin is modified in
those cases. The frequency of xmin modifications leads to, particularly on
higher core count systems, many cache misses inside GetSnapshotData(), despite
the data underlying a snapshot not changing. That is the most
significant source of GetSnapshotData() scaling poorly on larger systems.
Without accessing xmins, GetSnapshotData() cannot calculate accurate horizons /
thresholds as it has so far. But we don't really have to: The horizons don't
actually change that much between GetSnapshotData() calls. Nor are the horizons
actually used every time a snapshot is built.
The trick this commit introduces is to delay computation of accurate horizons
until there use and using horizon boundaries to determine whether accurate
horizons need to be computed.
The use of RecentGlobal[Data]Xmin to decide whether a row version could be
removed has been replaces with new GlobalVisTest* functions. These use two
thresholds to determine whether a row can be pruned:
1) definitely_needed, indicating that rows deleted by XIDs >= definitely_needed
are definitely still visible.
2) maybe_needed, indicating that rows deleted by XIDs < maybe_needed can
definitely be removed
GetSnapshotData() updates definitely_needed to be the xmin of the computed
snapshot.
When testing whether a row can be removed (with GlobalVisTestIsRemovableXid())
and the tested XID falls in between the two (i.e. XID >= maybe_needed && XID <
definitely_needed) the boundaries can be recomputed to be more accurate. As it
is not cheap to compute accurate boundaries, we limit the number of times that
happens in short succession. As the boundaries used by
GlobalVisTestIsRemovableXid() are never reset (with maybe_needed updated by
GetSnapshotData()), it is likely that further test can benefit from an earlier
computation of accurate horizons.
To avoid regressing performance when old_snapshot_threshold is set (as that
requires an accurate horizon to be computed), heap_page_prune_opt() doesn't
unconditionally call TransactionIdLimitedForOldSnapshots() anymore. Both the
computation of the limited horizon, and the triggering of errors (with
SetOldSnapshotThresholdTimestamp()) is now only done when necessary to remove
tuples.
This commit just removes the accesses to PGXACT->xmin from
GetSnapshotData(), but other members of PGXACT residing in the same
cache line are accessed. Therefore this in itself does not result in a
significant improvement. Subsequent commits will take advantage of the
fact that GetSnapshotData() now does not need to access xmins anymore.
Note: This contains a workaround in heap_page_prune_opt() to keep the
snapshot_too_old tests working. While that workaround is ugly, the tests
currently are not meaningful, and it seems best to address them separately.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200301083601.ews6hz5dduc3w2se@alap3.anarazel.de
Similar to commits 7e735035f2 and dddf4cdc33, this commit makes the order
of header file inclusion consistent for backend modules.
In the passing, removed a couple of duplicate inclusions.
Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2Sznv8RR6Ex-iJO6xAdsxgWhCoETkaYX=+9DW3q0QCfA@mail.gmail.com
The term "item pointer" should not be used to refer to ItemIdData
variables, since that is needlessly ambiguous. Only
ItemPointerData/ItemPointer variables should be called item pointers.
To fix, establish the convention that ItemIdData variables should always
be referred to either as "item identifiers" or "line pointers". The
term "item identifier" already predominates in docs and translatable
messages, and so should be the preferred alternative there.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=c=MZQjUzde3o9+2PLAPuHTpVZPPdYxN=E4ndQ2--8ew@mail.gmail.com
Given these routines are heap specific, and that there will be more
generic visibility support in via table AM, it makes sense to move the
prototypes to heapam.h (routines like HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum will
not be exposed in a generic fashion, because they are too storage
specific).
Similarly, the code in tqual.c is specific to heap, so moving it into
access/heap/ makes sense.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de
