We must stay in the function's SPI context until done calling the iterator
that returns the set result. Otherwise, any attempt to invoke SPI features
in the python code called by the iterator will malfunction. Diagnosis and
patch by Jan Urbanski, per bug report from Jean-Baptiste Quenot.
Back-patch to 8.2; there was no support for SRFs in previous versions of
plpython.
In general, expression execution state trees aren't re-entrantly usable,
since functions can store private state information in them.
For efficiency reasons, plpgsql tries to cache and reuse state trees for
"simple" expressions. It can get away with that most of the time, but it
can fail if the state tree is dirty from a previous failed execution (as
in an example from Alvaro) or is being used recursively (as noted by me).
Fix by tracking whether a state tree is in use, and falling back to the
"non-simple" code path if so. This results in a pretty considerable speed
hit when the non-simple path is taken, but the available alternatives seem
even more unpleasant because they add overhead in the simple path. Per
idea from Heikki.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
There are numerous methods by which a Perl or Tcl function can subvert
the behavior of another such function executed later; for example, by
redefining standard functions or operators called by the target function.
If the target function is SECURITY DEFINER, or is called by such a
function, this means that any ordinary SQL user with Perl or Tcl language
usage rights can do essentially anything with the privileges of the target
function's owner.
To close this security hole, create a separate Perl or Tcl interpreter for
each SQL userid under which plperl or pltcl functions are executed within
a session. However, all plperlu or pltclu functions run within a session
still share a single interpreter, since they all execute at the trust
level of a database superuser anyway.
Note: this change results in a functionality loss when libperl has been
built without the "multiplicity" option: it's no longer possible to call
plperl functions under different userids in one session, since such a
libperl can't support multiple interpreters in one process. However, such
a libperl already failed to support concurrent use of plperl and plperlu,
so it's likely that few people use such versions with Postgres.
Security: CVE-2010-3433
This is reproducibly possible in Python 2.7 if the user turned
PendingDeprecationWarning into an error, but it's theoretically also possible
in earlier versions in case of exceptional conditions.
backpatched to 8.0
expressions. We need to deal with this when handling subscripts in an array
assignment, and also when catching an exception. In an Assert-enabled build
these omissions led to Assert failures, but I think in a normal build the
only consequence would be short-term memory leakage; which may explain why
this wasn't reported from the field long ago.
Back-patch to all supported versions. 7.4 doesn't have exceptions, but
otherwise these bugs go all the way back.
Heikki Linnakangas and Tom Lane
being used in a PL/pgSQL FOR loop is closed was inadequate, as Tom Lane
pointed out. The bug affects FOR statement variants too, because you can
close an implicitly created cursor too by guessing the "<unnamed portal X>"
name created for it.
To fix that, "pin" the portal to prevent it from being dropped while it's
being used in a PL/pgSQL FOR loop. Backpatch all the way to 7.4 which is
the oldest supported version.
that is a regular table or view owned by a superuser. This prevents a
trojan horse attack whereby any unprivileged SQL user could create such a
table and insert code into it that would then get executed in other users'
sessions whenever they call pltcl functions.
Worse yet, because the code was automatically loaded into both the "normal"
and "safe" interpreters at first use, the attacker could execute unrestricted
Tcl code in the "normal" interpreter without there being any pltclu functions
anywhere, or indeed anyone else using pltcl at all: installing pltcl is
sufficient to open the hole. Change the initialization logic so that the
"unknown" code is only loaded into an interpreter when the interpreter is
first really used. (That doesn't add any additional security in this
particular context, but it seems a prudent change, and anyway the former
behavior violated the principle of least astonishment.)
Security: CVE-2010-1170
fundamentally insecure. Instead apply an opmask to the whole interpreter that
imposes restrictions on unsafe operations. These restrictions are much harder
to subvert than is Safe.pm, since there is no container to be broken out of.
Backported to release 7.4.
In releases 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1 this also includes the necessary backporting of
the two interpreters model for plperl and plperlu adopted in release 8.2.
In versions 8.0 and up, the use of Perl's POSIX module to undo its locale
mangling on Windows has become insecure with these changes, so it is
replaced by our own routine, which is also faster.
Nice side effects of the changes include that it is now possible to use perl's
"strict" pragma in a natural way in plperl, and that perl's $a and
$b variables now work as expected in sort routines, and that function
compilation is significantly faster.
Tim Bunce and Andrew Dunstan, with reviews from Alex Hunsaker and
Alexey Klyukin.
Security: CVE-2010-1169
memory if the result had zero rows, and also if there was any sort of error
while converting the result tuples into Python data. Reported and partially
fixed by Andres Freund.
Back-patch to all supported versions. Note: I haven't tested the 7.4 fix.
7.4's configure check for python is so obsolete it doesn't work on my
current machines :-(. The logic change is pretty straightforward though.
The latter is considered unwarranted chumminess with the implementation,
and can lead to crashes with recent Perl versions.
Report and fix by Tim Bunce. Back-patch to all versions containing the
questionable coding pattern.
old memory context in plpython. Before only one of them was marked
volatile, but per report from Zdenek Kotala, some compilers do the
wrong thing here.
that happens to be composite itself. Per bug #5314 from Oleg Serov.
Backpatch to 8.0 --- 7.4 has got too many other shortcomings in
composite-type support to make this worth worrying about in that branch.
You might think this is unnecessary since that interpreter is never used
to run code --- but it turns out that's wrong. As of Tcl 8.5, the "clock"
command (alone among builtin Tcl commands) is partially implemented by
loaded-on-demand Tcl code, which means that it fails if there's not
unknown-command support, and also that it's impossible to run it directly
in a safe interpreter. The way they get around the latter is that
Tcl_CreateSlave() automatically sets up an alias command that forwards any
execution of "clock" in a safe slave interpreter to its parent interpreter.
Thus, when attempting to execute "clock" in trusted pltcl, the command
actually executes in the "hold" interpreter, where it will fail if
unknown-command support hasn't been introduced by sourcing the standard
init.tcl script, which is done by Tcl_Init(). (This is a pretty dubious
design decision on the Tcl boys' part, if you ask me ... but they didn't.)
Back-patch all the way. It's not clear that anyone would try to use ancient
versions of pltcl with a recent Tcl, but it's not clear they wouldn't, either.
Also add a regression test using "clock", in branches that have regression
test support for pltcl.
Per recent trouble report from Kyle Bateman.
PL/pgSQL function within an exception handler. Make sure we use the right
resource owner when we create the tuplestore to hold returned tuples.
Simplify tuplestore API so that the caller doesn't need to be in the right
memory context when calling tuplestore_put* functions. tuplestore.c
automatically switches to the memory context used when the tuplestore was
created. Tuplesort was already modified like this earlier. This patch also
removes the now useless MemoryContextSwitch calls from callers.
Report by Aleksei on pgsql-bugs on Dec 22 2009. Backpatch to 8.1, like
the previous patch that broke this.
we have to tell Perl it can release its compiled copy of the function
text. Noted by Alexey Klyukin.
Back-patch to 8.2 --- the problem exists further back, but this patch
won't work without modification, and it's probably not worth the trouble.
In PLy_output(), when the elog() call in the TRY branch throws an exception
(this can happen when a statement timeout kicks in, for example), the
PyErr_SetString() call in the CATCH branch can cause a segfault, because the
Py_XDECREF(so) call before it releases memory that is still used by the sv
variable that PyErr_SetString() uses as argument, because sv points into
memory owned by so.
Backpatched back to 8.0, where this code was introduced.
I also threw in a couple of volatile declarations for variables that are used
before and after the TRY. I don't think they caused the crash that I
observed, but they could become issues.
casting effort whenever the input value was NULL. However this prevents
application of not-null domain constraints in the cases that use this
function, as illustrated in bug #4741. Since this function isn't meant
for use in performance-critical paths anyway, this certainly seems like
another case of "premature optimization is the root of all evil".
Back-patch as far as 8.2; older versions made no effort to enforce
domain constraints here anyway.
they are out of scope for any code after that anyway, leaving isnull true
should be harmless. However, PL/pgSQL Debugger doesn't seem to care about
the scoping and crashed, per report by Robert Walker (bug #4635). And it's
good to be tidy for debugging purposes too.
Fix in 8.3, 8.2 and 8.1 branches, CVS HEAD was fixed earlier already.
Analysis and fix by Ashesh Vashi and Dave Page.
in the string, not just at the start. Per bug #4629 from Martin Blazek.
Back-patch to 8.2; prior versions don't have the problem, at least not in
the reported case, because they don't try to recognize INTO in non-SELECT
statements. (IOW, this is really fallout from the RETURNING patch.)
rewritten into another kind of statement, for example if an INSERT is
rewritten into an UPDATE.
Back-patch to 8.3 and 8.2. For HEAD, Tom suggested inventing a new
SPI_OK_REWRITTEN return code, but that's not a backportable solution. I'll
do that as a separate patch, this patch will do as a stopgap measure for HEAD
too in the meanwhile.
OutputFunctionCall, and friends. This allows SPI-using functions to invoke
datatype I/O without concern for the possibility that a SPI-using function
will be called (which could be either the I/O function itself, or a function
used in a domain check constraint). It's a tad ugly, but not nearly as ugly
as what'd be needed to make this work via retail insertion of push/pop
operations in all the PLs.
This reverts my patch of 2007-01-30 that inserted some retail SPI_push/pop
calls into plpgsql; that approach only fixed plpgsql, and not any other PLs.
But the other PLs have the issue too, as illustrated by a recent gripe from
Christian Schröder.
Back-patch to 8.2, which is as far back as this solution will work. It's
also as far back as we need to worry about the domain-constraint case, since
earlier versions did not attempt to check domain constraints within datatype
input. I'm not aware of any old I/O functions that use SPI themselves, so
this should be sufficient for a back-patch.
the isTrigger state explicitly, not rely on nonzero-ness of trigrelOid
to indicate trigger-hood, because trigrelOid will be left zero when compiling
for validation. The (useless) function hash entry built by the validator
was able to match an ordinary non-trigger call later in the same session,
thereby bypassing the check that is supposed to prevent such a call.
Per report from Alvaro.
It might be worth suppressing the useless hash entry altogether, but
that's a bigger change than I want to consider back-patching.
Back-patch to 8.0. 7.4 doesn't have the problem because it doesn't
have validation mode.
whenever possible, as per bug report from Oleg Serov. While at it, reorder
the operations in the RECORD case to avoid possible palloc failure while the
variable update is only partly complete.
Back-patch as far as 8.1. Although the code of the particular function is
similar in 8.0, 8.0's support for composite fields in rows is sufficiently
broken elsewhere that it doesn't seem worth fixing this.
1. Directly reading interp->result is deprecated in Tcl 8.0 and later;
you're supposed to use Tcl_GetStringResult. This code finally broke with
Tcl 8.5, because Tcl_GetVar can now have side-effects on interp->result even
though it preserves the logical state of the result. (There's arguably a
Tcl issue here, because Tcl_GetVar could invalidate the pointer result of a
just-preceding Tcl_GetStringResult, but I doubt the Tcl guys will see it as
a bug.)
2. We were being sloppy about the encoding of the result: some places would
push database-encoding data into the Tcl result, which should not happen,
and we were assuming that any error result coming back from Tcl was in the
database encoding, which is not a good assumption.
3. There were a lot of calls of Tcl_SetResult that uselessly specified
TCL_VOLATILE for constant strings. This is only a minor performance issue,
but I fixed it in passing since I had to look at all the calls anyway.
#2 is a live bug regardless of which Tcl version you are interested in,
so back-patch even to branches that are unlikely to be used with Tcl 8.5.
I went back as far as 8.0, which is as far as the patch applied easily;
7.4 was using a different error processing scheme that has got its own
problems :-(
a trigger's target table. The rowtype could change from one call to the
next, so cope in such cases, while avoiding doing repetitive catalog lookups.
Per bug #3847 from Mark Reid.
Backpatch to 8.2.x. Likely this fix should go further back, but I can't test
it because I no longer have a machine with a pre-2.5 Python installation.
(Maybe we should rethink that idea about not supporting Python 2.5 in the
older branches.)
implicit loading of modules, thereby breaking Safe rules.
We compile and call a tiny perl function on trusted interpreter init, after which
the problem does not occur.
"bool" into plperl.c. This has always been a hazard since Perl allows a
platform-specific choice to define bool as int rather than char, but
evidently this didn't happen on any platform we support ... until OS X 10.5.
Per report from Brandon Maust.
Back-patch as far as 8.0 --- a bit arbitrary, but it seems unlikely anyone
will be trying to port 7.x onto new platforms.
3-Apr and 4-Apr to declare interface functions properly and eliminate casts,
thereby fixing potential problems on 64-bit machines; and changes of 13-Jul
to volatile-qualify some variables to suppress compiler warnings.
Per discussion, we're only worrying about Python 2.5 in PG 8.2 and up,
so no need to patch further back.
The correct test for defined-ness is SvOK(sv), not anything involving
SvTYPE. Per bug #3415 from Matt Taylor.
Back-patch as far as 8.0; no apparent problem in 7.x.
pass-by-reference data type and the RETURN statement is within an EXCEPTION
block. Bug introduced by my fix of 2007-01-28 to use per-subtransaction
ExprContexts/EStates; since that wasn't back-patched into older branches,
only 8.2 and HEAD are affected. Per report from Gary Winslow.
get away with not (re)initializing a local variable if the variable is marked
"isconst" and not "isnull". Unfortunately it makes this decision after having
already freed the old value, meaning that something like
for i in 1..10 loop
declare c constant text := 'hi there';
leads to subsequent accesses to freed memory, and hence probably crashes.
(In particular, this is why Asif Ali Rehman's bug leads to crash and not
just an unexpectedly-NULL value for SQLERRM: SQLERRM is marked CONSTANT
and so triggers this error.)
The whole thing seems wrong on its face anyway: CONSTANT means that you can't
change the variable inside the block, not that the initializer expression is
guaranteed not to change value across successive block entries. Hence,
remove the "optimization" instead of trying to fix it.
DECLARE section needs to know about it. Formerly, everyplace besides DECLARE
that created variables needed to do "plpgsql_add_initdatums(NULL)" to prevent
those variables from being sucked up as part of a subsequent DECLARE block.
This is obviously error-prone, and in fact the SQLSTATE/SQLERRM patch had
failed to do it for those two variables, leading to the bug recently exhibited
by Asif Ali Rehman: a DECLARE within an exception handler tried to reinitialize
SQLERRM.
Although the SQLSTATE/SQLERRM patch isn't in any pre-8.1 branches, and so
I can't point to a demonstrable failure there, it seems wise to back-patch
this into the older branches anyway, just to keep the logic similar to HEAD.
The original coding failed (tried to access deallocated memory) if there were
two active call sites (fn_extra pointers) for the same function and the
function definition was updated. Also, if an update of a recursive function
was detected upon nested entry to the function, the existing compiled version
was summarily deallocated, resulting in crash upon return to the outer
instance. Problem observed while studying a bug report from Sergiy
Vyshnevetskiy.
Bug does not exist before 8.1 since older versions just leaked the memory of
obsoleted compiled functions, rather than trying to reclaim it.
by plpgsql can themselves use SPI --- possibly indirectly, as in the case
of domain_in() invoking plpgsql functions in a domain check constraint.
Per bug #2945 from Sergiy Vyshnevetskiy.
Somewhat arbitrarily, I've chosen to back-patch this as far as 8.0. Given
the lack of prior complaints, it doesn't seem critical for 7.x.
safely in the presence of subtransactions. To ensure that any ExprContext
shutdown callbacks are called at the right times, we have to have a separate
EState for each level of subtransaction. Per "TupleDesc reference leak" bug
report from Stefan Kaltenbrunner.
Although I'm convinced the code is wrong as far back as 8.0, it doesn't seem
that there are any ways for the problem to really manifest before 8.2: AFAICS,
8.0 and 8.1 only use the ExprContextCallback mechanism to handle set-returning
functions, which cannot usefully be executed in a "simple expression" anyway.
Hence, no backpatch before 8.2 --- the risk of unforeseen breakage seems
to outweigh the chance of fixing something.
