WAL records may span multiple segments, but XLogWrite() does not
wait for the entire record to be written out to disk before
creating archive status files. Instead, as soon as the last WAL page of
the segment is written, the archive status file is created, and the
archiver may process it. If PostgreSQL crashes before it is able to
write and flush the rest of the record (in the next WAL segment), the
wrong version of the first segment file lingers in the archive, which
causes operations such as point-in-time restores to fail.
To fix this, keep track of records that span across segments and ensure
that segments are only marked ready-for-archival once such records have
been completely written to disk.
This has always been wrong, so backpatch all the way back.
Author: Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryo Matsumura <matsumura.ryo@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CBDDFA01-6E40-46BB-9F98-9340F4379505@amazon.com
In a backup manifest, WAL-Ranges stores the range of WAL that is
required for the backup to be valid. pg_verifybackup would then
internally use pg_waldump for the checks based on this data.
When the timeline where the backup started was more than 1 with a
history file looked at for the manifest data generation, the calculation
of the WAL range for the first timeline to check was incorrect. The
previous logic used as start LSN the start position of the first
timeline, but it needs to use the start LSN of the backup. This would
cause failures with pg_verifybackup, or any tools making use of the
backup manifests.
This commit adds a test based on a logic using a self-promoted node,
making it rather cheap.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210818.143031.1867083699202617521.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
In the code, most places used the term "Stream Stop" for the logical
stream message. This commit improves consistency by renaming LogicalRepMsgType
"LOGICAL_REP_MSG_STREAM_END" to "LOGICAL_REP_MSG_STREAM_STOP".
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDeScrsHhLyEPYqN3sydg6PxAPVBboK=30xJfUVihNZDA@mail.gmail.com
This is a combined revert of the following commits:
- c3826f8, a refactoring piece that moved the hex decoding code to
src/common/. This code was cleaned up by aef8948, as it originally
included no overflow checks in the same way as the base64 routines in
src/common/ used by SCRAM, making it unsafe for its purpose.
- aef8948, a more advanced refactoring of the hex encoding/decoding code
to src/common/ that added sanity checks on the result buffer for hex
decoding and encoding. As reported by Hans Buschmann, those overflow
checks are expensive, and it is possible to see a performance drop in
the decoding/encoding of bytea or LOs the longer they are. Simple SQLs
working on large bytea values show a clear difference in perf profile.
- ccf4e27, a cleanup made possible by aef8948.
The reverts of all those commits bring back the performance of hex
decoding and encoding back to what it was in ~13. Fow now and
post-beta3, this is the simplest option.
Reported-by: Hans Buschmann
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1629039545467.80333@nidsa.net
Backpatch-through: 14
Commit a8fd13cab0 added support for prepared transactions to built-in
logical replication via a new option "two_phase" for a subscription. The
"two_phase" option was not allowed with the existing streaming option.
This commit permits the combination of "streaming" and "two_phase"
subscription options. It extends the pgoutput plugin and the subscriber
side code to add the prepare API for streaming transactions which will
apply the changes accumulated in the spool-file at prepare time.
Author: Peter Smith and Ajin Cherian
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C, Amit Kapila, Greg Nancarrow
Tested-By: Haiying Tang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/02DA5F5E-CECE-4D9C-8B4B-418077E2C010@postgrespro.ru
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMGcDxeqEpWj3fTXwqhSwBdXd2RS9jzwWscO-XbeCfso6ts3+Q@mail.gmail.com
This is a non-functional change only to refactor code to extract some
replication logic into static functions.
This is done as preparation for the 2PC streaming patch which also shares
this common logic.
Author: Peter Smith
Reviewed-By: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PuiSA8AiLcE2N5StzSKs46SQEP_vDOUD5fX2XCVtfZ7mQ@mail.gmail.com
When some slots are invalidated due to the max_slot_wal_keep_size limit,
the old segment horizon should move forward to stay within the limit.
However, in commit c655077639 we forgot to call KeepLogSeg again to
recompute the horizon after invalidating replication slots. In cases
where other slots remained, the limits would be recomputed eventually
for other reasons, but if all slots were invalidated, the limits would
not move at all afterwards. Repair.
Backpatch to 13 where the feature was introduced.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Marcin Krupowicz <mk@071.ovh>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17103-004130e8f27782c9@postgresql.org
To add support for streaming transactions at prepare time into the
built-in logical replication, we need to do the following things:
* Modify the output plugin (pgoutput) to implement the new two-phase API
callbacks, by leveraging the extended replication protocol.
* Modify the replication apply worker, to properly handle two-phase
transactions by replaying them on prepare.
* Add a new SUBSCRIPTION option "two_phase" to allow users to enable
two-phase transactions. We enable the two_phase once the initial data sync
is over.
We however must explicitly disable replication of two-phase transactions
during replication slot creation, even if the plugin supports it. We
don't need to replicate the changes accumulated during this phase,
and moreover, we don't have a replication connection open so we don't know
where to send the data anyway.
The streaming option is not allowed with this new two_phase option. This
can be done as a separate patch.
We don't allow to toggle two_phase option of a subscription because it can
lead to an inconsistent replica. For the same reason, we don't allow to
refresh the publication once the two_phase is enabled for a subscription
unless copy_data option is false.
Author: Peter Smith, Ajin Cherian and Amit Kapila based on previous work by Nikhil Sontakke and Stas Kelvich
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Sawada Masahiko, Vignesh C, Dilip Kumar, Takamichi Osumi, Greg Nancarrow
Tested-By: Haiying Tang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/02DA5F5E-CECE-4D9C-8B4B-418077E2C010@postgrespro.ru
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1+opiV4aFTmWWUF9h_32=HfPOW9vZASHarT0UA5oBrtGw@mail.gmail.com
The requirement that IDENTIFY_SYSTEM be run before START_REPLICATION
was both undocumented and unnecessary. Remove the error and ensure
that ThisTimeLineID is initialized in START_REPLICATION.
Elect not to backport because this requirement was expected behavior
(even if inconsistently enforced), and is not likely to cause any
major problem.
Author: Jeff Davis
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/de4bbf05b7cd94227841c433ea6ff71d2130c713.camel%40j-davis.com
The existing code tried to do syscache lookups in an already-failed
transaction, which is problematic to say the least. After some
consideration of alternatives, the best fix seems to be to just drop
type names from the error message altogether. The table and column
names seem like sufficient localization. If the user is unsure what
types are involved, she can check the local and remote table
definitions.
Having done that, we can also discard the LogicalRepTypMap hash
table, which had no other use. Arguably, LOGICAL_REP_MSG_TYPE
replication messages are now obsolete as well; but we should
probably keep them in case some other use emerges. (The complexity
of removing something from the replication protocol would likely
outweigh any savings anyhow.)
Masahiko Sawada and Bharath Rupireddy, per complaint from Andres
Freund. Back-patch to v10 where this code originated.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210106020229.ne5xnuu6wlondjpe@alap3.anarazel.de
Until now, we didn't allow to stream the changes in logical replication
till we receive speculative confirm or the next DML change record after
speculative inserts. The reason was that we never use to process
speculative aborts but after commit 4daa140a2f it is possible to process
them so we can allow streaming once we receive speculative abort after
speculative insertion.
We decided to backpatch to 14 where the feature for streaming in progress
transactions have been introduced as this is a minor change and makes that
functionality better.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-By: Dilip Kumar
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1KdqmTCtrBR6oFfGELrLLbDLDedL6zACcsUOQuTJBj1vw@mail.gmail.com
Extend the replication command CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT to support the
TWO_PHASE option. This will allow decoding commands like PREPARE
TRANSACTION, COMMIT PREPARED and ROLLBACK PREPARED for slots created with
this option. The decoding of the transaction happens at prepare command.
This patch also adds support of two-phase in pg_recvlogical via a new
option --two-phase.
This option will also be used by future patches that allow streaming of
transactions at prepare time for built-in logical replication. With this,
the out-of-core logical replication solutions can enable replication of
two-phase transactions via replication protocol.
Author: Ajin Cherian
Reviewed-By: Jeff Davis, Vignesh C, Amit Kapila
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/02DA5F5E-CECE-4D9C-8B4B-418077E2C010@postgrespro.ruhttps://postgr.es/m/64b9f783c6e125f18f88fbc0c0234e34e71d8639.camel@j-davis.com
Before a restartpoint finishes PreallocXlogFiles(), a startup process
KeepFileRestoredFromArchive() call can unlink the preallocated segment.
If a CHECKPOINT sql command had elicited the restartpoint experiencing
the race condition, that sql command failed. Moreover, the restartpoint
omitted its log_checkpoints message and some inessential resource
reclamation. Prevent the ERROR by skipping open() of the segment.
Since these consequences are so minor, no back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210202151416.GB3304930@rfd.leadboat.com
Only initdb used it. initdb refuses to operate on a non-empty directory
and generally does not cope with pre-existing files of other kinds.
Hence, use the opportunity to simplify.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210202151416.GB3304930@rfd.leadboat.com
I started out with the goal of reporting ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE
when walrcv_connect() fails, but as I looked around I realized that
whoever wrote this code was of the opinion that errcodes are purely
optional. That's not my understanding of our project policy. Hence,
make sure that an errcode is provided in each ereport that (a) is
ERROR or higher level and (b) isn't arguably an internal logic error.
Also fix some very dubious existing errcode assignments.
While this is not per policy, it's also largely cosmetic, since few
of these cases could get reported to applications. So I don't
feel a need to back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2189704.1623512522@sss.pgh.pa.us
During decoding for speculative inserts, we were relying for cleaning
toast hash on confirmation records or next change records. But that
could lead to multiple problems (a) memory leak if there is neither a
confirmation record nor any other record after toast insertion for a
speculative insert in the transaction, (b) error and assertion failures
if the next operation is not an insert/update on the same table.
The fix is to start queuing spec abort change and clean up toast hash
and change record during its processing. Currently, we are queuing the
spec aborts for both toast and main table even though we perform cleanup
while processing the main table's spec abort record. Later, if we have a
way to distinguish between the spec abort record of toast and the main
table, we can avoid queuing the change for spec aborts of toast tables.
Reported-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAExHW5sPKF-Oovx_qZe4p5oM6Dvof7_P+XgsNAViug15Fm99jA@mail.gmail.com
Using an Assert to check the validity of incoming messages is an
extremely poor decision. In a debug build, it should not be that easy
for a broken or malicious remote client to crash the logrep worker.
The consequences could be even worse in non-debug builds, which will
fail to make such checks at all, leading to who-knows-what misbehavior.
Hence, promote every Assert that could possibly be triggered by wrong
or out-of-order replication messages to a full test-and-ereport.
To avoid bloating the set of messages the translation team has to cope
with, establish a policy that replication protocol violation error
reports don't need to be translated. Hence, all the new messages here
use errmsg_internal(). A couple of old messages are changed likewise
for consistency.
Along the way, fix some non-idiomatic or outright wrong uses of
hash_search().
Most of these mistakes are new with the "streaming replication"
patch (commit 464824323), but a couple go back a long way.
Back-patch as appropriate.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1719083.1623351052@sss.pgh.pa.us
apply_handle_tuple_routing(), having detected and reported that
the tuple it needed to update didn't exist, tried to update that
tuple anyway, leading to a null-pointer dereference.
logicalrep_partition_open() failed to ensure that the
LogicalRepPartMapEntry it built for a partition was fully
independent of that for the partition root, leading to
trouble if the root entry was later freed or rebuilt.
Meanwhile, on the publisher's side, pgoutput_change() sometimes
attempted to apply execute_attr_map_tuple() to a NULL tuple.
The first of these was reported by Sergey Bernikov in bug #17055;
I found the other two while developing some test cases for this
sadly under-tested code.
Diagnosis and patch for the first issue by Amit Langote; patches
for the others by me; new test cases by me. Back-patch to v13
where this logic came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17055-9ba800ec8522668b@postgresql.org
The code added to mark replication slots invalid in commit c655077639
had the race condition that a slot can be dropped or advanced
concurrently with checkpointer trying to invalidate it. Rewrite the
code to close those races.
The changes to ReplicationSlotAcquire's API added with c655077639 are
not necessary anymore. To avoid an ABI break in released branches, this
commit leaves that unchanged; it'll be changed in a master-only commit
separately.
Backpatch to 13, where this code first appeared.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210408001037.wfmk6jud36auhfqm@alap3.anarazel.de
It turns out that worker.c's code path for TRUNCATE was also
careless about establishing a snapshot while executing user-defined
code, allowing the checks added by commit 84f5c2908 to fail when
a trigger is fired in that context.
We could just wrap Push/PopActiveSnapshot around the truncate call,
but it seems better to establish a policy of holding a snapshot
throughout execution of a replication step. To help with that and
possible future requirements, replace the previous ensure_transaction
calls with pairs of begin/end_replication_step calls.
Per report from Mark Dilger. Back-patch to v11, like the previous
changes.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B4A3AF82-79ED-4F4C-A4E5-CD2622098972@enterprisedb.com
Commit 19890a064e added the option to enable two_phase commits via
pg_create_logical_replication_slot but didn't extend the support of same
in replication protocol. However, by mistake, it added the two_phase
variable in CreateReplicationSlotCmd which is required only when we extend
the replication protocol.
Reported-by: Jeff Davis
Author: Ajin Cherian
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/64b9f783c6e125f18f88fbc0c0234e34e71d8639.camel@j-davis.com
Release memory allocated when creating the tuple-conversion map and its
component TupleDescs when its owning sync entry is invalidated.
TupleDescs must also be freed when no map is deemed necessary, to begin
with.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Author: Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Takamichi Osumi, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/MEYP282MB166933B1AB02B4FE56E82453B64D9@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
While decoding the multi-insert WAL we can't clean the toast untill we get
the last insert of that WAL record. Now if we stream the changes before we
get the last change, the memory for toast chunks won't be released and we
expect the txn to have streamed all changes after streaming. This
restriction is mainly to ensure the correctness of streamed transactions
and it doesn't seem worth uplifting such a restriction just to allow this
case because anyway we will stream the transaction once such an insert is
complete.
Previously we were using two different flags (one for toast tuples and
another for speculative inserts) to indicate partial changes. Now instead
we replaced both of them with a single flag to indicate partial changes.
Reported-by: Pavan Deolasee
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Pavan Deolasee, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdN-_858zojYN-2tNcHiVTw-nhxPwoQS4quExeweQfG1Ug@mail.gmail.com
If we redirected a replicated tuple operation into a partition child
table, and then tried to fire AFTER triggers for that event, the
relation cache entry for the child table was already closed. This has
no visible ill effects as long as the entry is still there and still
valid, but an unluckily-timed cache flush could result in a crash or
other misbehavior.
To fix, postpone the ExecCleanupTupleRouting call (which is what
closes the child table) until after we've fired triggers. This
requires a bit of refactoring so that the cleanup function can
have access to the necessary state.
In HEAD, I took the opportunity to simplify some of worker.c's
function APIs based on use of the new ApplyExecutionData struct.
However, it doesn't seem safe/practical to back-patch that aspect,
at least not without a lot of analysis of possible interactions
with a04daa97a.
In passing, add an Assert to afterTriggerInvokeEvents to catch
such cases. This seems worthwhile because we've grown a number
of fairly unstructured ways of calling AfterTriggerEndQuery.
Back-patch to v13, where worker.c grew the ability to deal with
partitioned target tables.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3382681.1621381328@sss.pgh.pa.us
COMMIT/ROLLBACK necessarily destroys all snapshots within the session.
The original implementation of intra-procedure transactions just
cavalierly did that, ignoring the fact that this left us executing in
a rather different environment than normal. In particular, it turns
out that handling of toasted datums depends rather critically on there
being an outer ActiveSnapshot: otherwise, when SPI or the core
executor pop whatever snapshot they used and return, it's unsafe to
dereference any toasted datums that may appear in the query result.
It's possible to demonstrate "no known snapshots" and "missing chunk
number N for toast value" errors as a result of this oversight.
Historically this outer snapshot has been held by the Portal code,
and that seems like a good plan to preserve. So add infrastructure
to pquery.c to allow re-establishing the Portal-owned snapshot if it's
not there anymore, and add enough bookkeeping support that we can tell
whether it is or not.
We can't, however, just re-establish the Portal snapshot as part of
COMMIT/ROLLBACK. As in normal transaction start, acquiring the first
snapshot should wait until after SET and LOCK commands. Hence, teach
spi.c about doing this at the right time. (Note that this patch
doesn't fix the problem for any PLs that try to run intra-procedure
transactions without using SPI to execute SQL commands.)
This makes SPI's no_snapshots parameter rather a misnomer, so in HEAD,
rename that to allow_nonatomic.
replication/logical/worker.c also needs some fixes, because it wasn't
careful to hold a snapshot open around AFTER trigger execution.
That code doesn't use a Portal, which I suspect someday we're gonna
have to fix. But for now, just rearrange the order of operations.
This includes back-patching the recent addition of finish_estate()
to centralize the cleanup logic there.
This also back-patches commit 2ecfeda3e into v13, to improve the
test coverage for worker.c (it was that test that exposed that
worker.c's snapshot management is wrong).
Per bug #15990 from Andreas Wicht. Back-patch to v11 where
intra-procedure COMMIT was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15990-eee2ac466b11293d@postgresql.org
While applying the truncate change, the logical apply worker acquires
RowExclusiveLock on the relation being truncated. This allowed truncate on
the relation at a time by two apply workers which lead to a deadlock. The
reason was that one of the workers after updating the pg_class tuple tries
to acquire SHARE lock on the relation and started to wait for the second
worker which has acquired RowExclusiveLock on the relation. And when the
second worker tries to update the pg_class tuple, it starts to wait for
the first worker which leads to a deadlock. Fix it by acquiring
AccessExclusiveLock on the relation before applying the truncate change as
we do for normal truncate operation.
Author: Peter Smith, test case by Haiying Tang
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PsNm43p0jM+idTvWwiGZPcP0hGrHMPK9TOAkc+a4UpUqw@mail.gmail.com
The worker.c global wrconn is only meant to be used by logical apply/
tablesync workers, but there are other variables with the same name. To
reduce future confusion rename the global from "wrconn" to
"LogRepWorkerWalRcvConn".
While this is just cosmetic, it seems better to backpatch it all the way
back to 10 where this code appeared, to avoid future backpatching
issues.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pu7Jv9L2BOEx_Z0UtJxfDevQSAUW2mJqWU+CtmDrEZVAg@mail.gmail.com
Also "make reformat-dat-files".
The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting
of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that
that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
This set of commits has some bugs with known fixes, but at this late
stage in the release cycle it seems best to revert and resubmit next
time, along with some new automated test coverage for this whole area.
Commits reverted:
dc88460c: Doc: Review for "Optionally prefetch referenced data in recovery."
1d257577: Optionally prefetch referenced data in recovery.
f003d9f8: Add circular WAL decoding buffer.
323cbe7c: Remove read_page callback from XLogReader.
Remove the new GUC group WAL_RECOVERY recently added by a55a9847, as the
corresponding section of config.sgml is now reverted.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOuzzgrn7iKnFRsB4MHp3UisEQAGgZMbk_ViTN4HV4-Ksq8zCg%40mail.gmail.com
Currently, replication slot statistics are updated at prepare, commit, and
rollback. Now, if the transaction is interrupted the stats might not get
updated. Fixed this by updating replication statistics after every
stream/spill.
In passing update the docs to change the description of some of the slot
stats.
Author: Vignesh C, Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
During decoding of an in-progress or prepared transaction, we detect
concurrent abort with an error code ERRCODE_TRANSACTION_ROLLBACK. That is
not sufficient because a callback can decide to throw that error code
at other times as well.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1KCjPRS4aZHB48QMM4J8XOC1+TD8jo-4Yu84E+MjwqVhA@mail.gmail.com
Previously, we were using the size of all the changes present in
ReorderBuffer to compute total_bytes after decoding a transaction and that
can lead to counting some of the transactions' changes more than once. Fix
it by using the size of the changes decoded for a transaction to compute
'total_bytes'.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
There were two problems:
a. We were always selecting the next available txn instead of selecting it
when it is larger than the previous transaction.
b. We were selecting the transactions which haven't made any changes to
the database (base snapshot is not set). Later it was hitting an Assert
because we don't decode such transactions and the changes in txn remain as
it is. It is better not to choose such transactions for streaming in the
first place.
Reported-by: Haiying Tang
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB61133B94E63177040F7ECDA1FB429@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
We had a report of confusing server behavior caused by a client bug
that sent junk to the server: the server thought the junk was a
very long message length and waited patiently for data that would
never come. We can reduce the risk of that by being less trusting
about message lengths.
For a long time, libpq has had a heuristic rule that it wouldn't
believe large message size words, except for a small number of
message types that are expected to be (potentially) long. This
provides some defense against loss of message-boundary sync and
other corrupted-data cases. The server does something similar,
except that up to now it only limited the lengths of messages
received during the connection authentication phase. Let's
do the same as in libpq and put restrictions on the allowed
length of all messages, while distinguishing between message
types that are expected to be long and those that aren't.
I used a limit of 10000 bytes for non-long messages. (libpq's
corresponding limit is 30000 bytes, but given the asymmetry of
the FE/BE protocol, there's no good reason why the numbers should
be the same.) Experimentation suggests that this is at least a
factor of 10, maybe a factor of 100, more than we really need;
but plenty of daylight seems desirable to avoid false positives.
In any case we can adjust the limit based on beta-test results.
For long messages, set a limit of MaxAllocSize - 1, which is the
most that we can absorb into the StringInfo buffer that the message
is collected in. This just serves to make sure that a bogus message
size is reported as such, rather than as a confusing gripe about
not being able to enlarge a string buffer.
While at it, make sure that non-mainline code paths (such as
COPY FROM STDIN) are as paranoid as SocketBackend is, and validate
the message type code before believing the message length.
This provides an additional guard against getting stuck on corrupted
input.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2003757.1619373089@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit 8ff1c94649 allowed TRUNCATE command to truncate foreign tables.
Previously the information about "ONLY" options specified in TRUNCATE
command were passed to the foreign data wrapper. Then postgres_fdw
constructed the TRUNCATE command to issue the remote server and
included "ONLY" options in it based on the passed information.
On the other hand, "ONLY" options specified in SELECT, UPDATE or DELETE
have no effect when accessing or modifying the remote table, i.e.,
are not passed to the foreign data wrapper. So it's inconsistent to
make only TRUNCATE command pass the "ONLY" options to the foreign data
wrapper. Therefore this commit changes the TRUNCATE command so that
it doesn't pass the "ONLY" options to the foreign data wrapper,
for the consistency with other statements. Also this commit changes
postgres_fdw so that it always doesn't include "ONLY" options in
the TRUNCATE command that it constructs.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Justin Pryzby, Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/551ed8c1-f531-818b-664a-2cecdab99cd8@oss.nttdata.com
Previously, we used to use the array of size max_replication_slots to
store stats for replication slots. But that had two problems in the cases
where a message for dropping a slot gets lost: 1) the stats for the new
slot are not recorded if the array is full and 2) writing beyond the end
of the array if the user reduces the max_replication_slots.
This commit uses HTAB for replication slot statistics, resolving both
problems. Now, pgstat_vacuum_stat() search for all the dead replication
slots in stats hashtable and tell the collector to remove them. To avoid
showing the stats for the already-dropped slots, pg_stat_replication_slots
view searches slot stats by the slot name taken from pg_replication_slots.
Also, we send a message for creating a slot at slot creation, initializing
the stats. This reduces the possibility that the stats are accumulated
into the old slot stats when a message for dropping a slot gets lost.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Author: Sawada Masahiko, test case by Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Vignesh C, Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
The Truncate operation acquires an exclusive lock on the target relation
and indexes. It then waits for logical replication of the operation to
finish at commit. Now because we are acquiring the shared lock on the
target index to get index attributes in pgoutput while sending the
changes for the Truncate operation, it leads to a deadlock.
Actually, we don't need to acquire a lock on the target index as we build
the cache entry using a historic snapshot and all the later changes are
absorbed while decoding WAL. So, we wrote a special purpose function for
logical replication to get a bitmap of replica identity attribute numbers
where we get that information without locking the target index.
We decided not to backpatch this as there doesn't seem to be any field
complaint about this issue since it was introduced in commit 5dfd1e5a in
v11.
Reported-by: Haiying Tang
Author: Takamichi Osumi, test case by Li Japin
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Ajin Cherian
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB6113C2499C7DC70EE55ADB82FB759@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
We send the prepare for the concurrently aborted xacts so that later when
rollback prepared is decoded and sent, the downstream should be able to
rollback such a xact. For 'streaming' case (when we send changes for
in-progress transactions), we were sending prepare twice when concurrent
abort was detected.
Author: Peter Smith
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f82133c6-6055-b400-7922-97dae9f2b50b@enterprisedb.com
