Section 10.5 didn't say explicitly that multiple UNIONs are resolved
pairwise. Since the resolution algorithm is described as taking any
number of inputs, readers might well think that a query like
"select x union select y union select z" would be resolved by
considering x, y, and z in one resolution step. But that's not what
happens (and I think that behavior is per SQL spec). Add an example
clarifying this point.
Per bug #15129 from Philippe Beaudoin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152196085023.32649.9916472370480121694@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Extension scripts begin execution with pg_catalog at the front of the
search path, so type names reliably refer to pg_catalog. Remove these
superfluous qualifications. Earlier <programlisting> of this <sect1>
already omitted them. Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions).
If a view lacks an INSTEAD OF trigger, DML on it can only work by rewriting
the command into a command on the underlying base table(s). Then we will
fire triggers attached to those table(s), not those for the view. This
seems appropriate from a consistency standpoint, but nowhere was the
behavior explicitly documented, so let's do that.
There was some discussion of throwing an error or warning if a statement
trigger is created on a view without creating a row INSTEAD OF trigger.
But a simple implementation of that would result in dump/restore ordering
hazards. Given that it's been like this all along, and we hadn't heard
a complaint till now, a documentation improvement seems sufficient.
Per bug #15106 from Pu Qun. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152083391168.1215.16892140713507052796@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Autovacuum's 'workitem' request queue is of limited size, so requests
can fail if they arrive more quickly than autovacuum can process them.
Emit a log message when this happens, to provide better visibility of
this.
Backpatch to 10. While this represents an API change for
AutoVacuumRequestWork, that function is not yet prepared to deal with
external modules calling it, so there doesn't seem to be any risk (other
than log spam, that is.)
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Fabrízio Mello, Ildar Musin, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoB1HrQhp6_4rTyHN5kWEJCEsG8YzsjZNt-ctoXSn5Uisw@mail.gmail.com
The changes in the CREATE POLICY man page from commit
87c2a17fee784c7e1004ba3d3c5d8147da676783 triggered a stylesheet bug that
created some warning messages and incorrect output. This installs a
workaround.
Also improve the whitespace a bit so it looks better.
The LIKE INCLUDING ALL clause to CREATE TABLE intuitively indicates
cloning of extended statistics on the source table, but it failed to do
so. Patch it up so that it does. Also include an INCLUDING STATISTICS
option to the LIKE clause, so that the behavior can be requested
individually, or excluded individually.
While at it, reorder the INCLUDING options, both in code and in docs, in
alphabetical order which makes more sense than feature-implementation
order that was previously used.
Backpatch this to Postgres 10, where extended statistics were
introduced, because this is seen as an oversight in a fresh feature
which is better to get consistent from the get-go instead of changing
only in pg11.
In pg11, comments on statistics objects are cloned too. In pg10 they
are not, because I (Álvaro) was too coward to change the parse node as
required to support it. Also, in pg10 I chose not to renumber the
parser symbols for the various INCLUDING options in LIKE, for the same
reason. Any corresponding user-visible changes (docs) are backpatched,
though.
Reported-by: Stephen Froehlich
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CY1PR0601MB1927315B45667A1B679D0FD5E5EF0@CY1PR0601MB1927.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
In PostgreSQL 9.5, the documentation for pg_stat_replication was moved,
so some of the links pointed to an appropriate location.
Author: Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>
The ability to create like-named objects in different schemas opens up
the potential for users to change the behavior of other users' queries,
maliciously or accidentally. When you connect to a PostgreSQL server,
you should remove from your search_path any schema for which a user
other than yourself or superusers holds the CREATE privilege. If you do
not, other users holding CREATE privilege can redefine the behavior of
your commands, causing them to perform arbitrary SQL statements under
your identity. "SET search_path = ..." and "SELECT
pg_catalog.set_config(...)" are not vulnerable to such hijacking, so one
can use either as the first command of a session. As special
exceptions, the following client applications behave as documented
regardless of search_path settings and schema privileges: clusterdb
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser ecpg (not
programs it generates) initdb oid2name pg_archivecleanup pg_basebackup
pg_config pg_controldata pg_ctl pg_dump pg_dumpall pg_isready
pg_receivewal pg_recvlogical pg_resetwal pg_restore pg_rewind pg_standby
pg_test_fsync pg_test_timing pg_upgrade pg_waldump reindexdb vacuumdb
vacuumlo. Not included are core client programs that run user-specified
SQL commands, namely psql and pgbench. PostgreSQL encourages non-core
client applications to do likewise.
Document this in the context of libpq connections, psql connections,
dblink connections, ECPG connections, extension packaging, and schema
usage patterns. The principal defense for applications is "SELECT
pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', '', false)", and the principal
defense for databases is "REVOKE CREATE ON SCHEMA public FROM PUBLIC".
Either one is sufficient to prevent attack. After a REVOKE, consider
auditing the public schema for objects named like pg_catalog objects.
Authors of SECURITY DEFINER functions use some of the same defenses, and
the CREATE FUNCTION reference page already covered them thoroughly.
This is a good opportunity to audit SECURITY DEFINER functions for
robust security practice.
Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions).
Reviewed by Michael Paquier and Jonathan S. Katz. Reported by Arseniy
Sharoglazov.
Security: CVE-2018-1058
This is mostly cosmetic, but it might fix build failures, on some
platform, when copying from the documentation.
Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions).
Since we now support the server side handler for git over https (so
we're no longer using the "dumb protocol"), make https the primary
choice for cloning the repository, and the git protocol the secondary
choice.
In passing, also change the links to git-scm.com from http to https.
Reviewed by Stefan Kaltenbrunner and David G. Johnston
Commit 9521ce4a7a1125385fb4de9689f345db594c516a from Sep 13, 2017 and
backpatched through 9.5 used rsync examples with datadir. The reporter
has pointed out, and testing has verified, that clusterdir must be used,
so update the docs accordingly.
Reported-by: Don Seiler
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHJZqBD0u9dCERpYzK6BkRv=663AmH==DFJpVC=M4Xg_rq2=CQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.5
Technically, pg_upgrade's --old-datadir and --new-datadir are
configuration directories, not necessarily data directories. This is
reflected in the 'postgres' manual page, so do the same for pg_upgrade.
Reported-by: Yves Goergen
Bug: 14898
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171110220912.31513.13322@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 10
pg_hba_file_rules erroneously reported this as scram-sha256. Fix that.
To avoid future errors and confusion, also adjust documentation links
and internal symbols to have a separator between "sha" and "256".
Reported-by: Christophe Courtois <christophe.courtois@dalibo.com>
Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Document how to properly create root and intermediate certificates using
v3_ca extensions and where to place intermediate certificates so they
are properly transferred to the remote side with the leaf certificate to
link to the remote root certificate. This corrects docs that used to
say that intermediate certificates must be stored with the root
certificate.
Also add instructions on how to create root, intermediate, and leaf
certificates.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180116002238.GC12724@momjian.us
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Backpatch-through: 9.3
~> (cube, int) operator was especially designed for knn-gist search.
However, it appears that knn-gist search can't work correctly with current
behavior of this operator when dataset contains cubes of variable
dimensionality. In this case, the same value of second operator argument
can point to different dimension depending on dimensionality of particular cube.
Such behavior is incompatible with gist indexing of cubes, and knn-gist doesn't
work correctly for it.
This patch changes behavior of ~> (cube, int) operator by introducing dimension
numbering where value of second argument unambiguously identifies number of
dimension. With new behavior, this operator can be correctly supported by
knn-gist. Relevant changes to cube operator class are also included.
Backpatch to v9.6 where operator was introduced.
Since behavior of ~> (cube, int) operator is changed, depending entities
must be refreshed after upgrade. Such as, expression indexes using this
operator must be reindexed, materialized views must be rebuilt, stored
procedures and client code must be revised to correctly use new behavior.
That should be mentioned in release notes.
Noticed by: Tomas Vondra
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed by: Tomas Vondra, Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a9657f6a-b497-36ff-e56-482a2c7e3292@2ndquadrant.com
These functions are stated to be Oracle-compatible, but they weren't.
Yugo Nagata noticed that while our code returns zero for a zero or
negative fourth parameter (occur_index), Oracle throws an error.
Further testing by me showed that there was also a discrepancy in the
interpretation of a negative third parameter (beg_index): Oracle thinks
that a negative beg_index indicates the last place where the target
substring can *begin*, whereas our code thinks it is the last place
where the target can *end*.
Adjust the sample code to behave like Oracle in both these respects.
Also change it to be a CDATA[] section, simplifying copying-and-pasting
out of the documentation source file. And fix minor problems in the
introductory comment, which wasn't very complete or accurate.
Back-patch to all supported branches. Although this patch only touches
documentation, we should probably call it out as a bug fix in the next
minor release notes, since users who have adopted the functions will
likely want to update their versions.
Yugo Nagata and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171229191705.c0b43a8c.nagata@sraoss.co.jp
rewriteTargetListUD's processing is dependent on the relkind of the query's
target table. That was fine at the time it was made to act that way, even
for queries on inheritance trees, because all tables in an inheritance tree
would necessarily be plain tables. However, the 9.5 feature addition
allowing some members of an inheritance tree to be foreign tables broke the
assumption that rewriteTargetListUD's output tlist could be applied to all
child tables with nothing more than column-number mapping. This led to
visible failures if foreign child tables had row-level triggers, and would
also break in cases where child tables belonged to FDWs that used methods
other than CTID for row identification.
To fix, delay running rewriteTargetListUD until after the planner has
expanded inheritance, so that it is applied separately to the (already
mapped) tlist for each child table. We can conveniently call it from
preprocess_targetlist. Refactor associated code slightly to avoid the
need to heap_open the target relation multiple times during
preprocess_targetlist. (The APIs remain a bit ugly, particularly around
the point of which steps scribble on parse->targetList and which don't.
But avoiding such scribbling would require a change in FDW callback APIs,
which is more pain than it's worth.)
Also fix ExecModifyTable to ensure that "tupleid" is reset to NULL when
we transition from rows providing a CTID to rows that don't. (That's
really an independent bug, but it manifests in much the same cases.)
Add a regression test checking one manifestation of this problem, which
was that row-level triggers on a foreign child table did not work right.
Back-patch to 9.5 where the problem was introduced.
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Ildus Kurbangaliev and Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170514150525.0346ba72@postgrespro.ru
