multi-scan indexscan plans; it tried to use the same table-to-index
attribute mapping for all the scans, even if they used different indexes.
It would klugily work as long as OR indexquals never used multikey indexes,
but that's not likely to hold up much longer...
to go along with expression_tree_walker. (_walker is not suitable for
routines that need to alter the tree structure significantly.) Other minor
cleanups in clauses.c.
hashjoinable clause, not one path for a randomly-chosen element of each
set of clauses with the same join operator. That is, if you wrote
SELECT ... WHERE t1.f1 = t2.f2 and t1.f3 = t2.f4,
and both '=' ops were the same opcode (say, all four fields are int4),
then the system would either consider hashing on f1=f2 or on f3=f4,
but it would *not* consider both possibilities. Boo hiss.
Also, revise estimation of hashjoin costs to include a penalty when the
inner join var has a high disbursion --- ie, the most common value is
pretty common. This tends to lead to badly skewed hash bucket occupancy
and way more comparisons than you'd expect on average.
I imagine that the cost calculation still needs tweaking, but at least
it generates a more reasonable plan than before on George Young's example.
so that Case works in WHERE join clauses. Temporary patch --- this routine
is one of many that ought to be changed to use centralized expression-tree-
walking logic.
rels that the inner path needs to join to, but it was only checking for
the first one. Failure could only have been observed with an OR-clause
that mentions 3 or more tables, and then only if the bogus path was
actually selected as cheapest ...
optimizer rather than parser. This has many advantages, such as not
getting fooled by chance uses of operator names ~ and ~~ (the operators
are identified by OID now), and not creating useless comparison operations
in contexts where the comparisons will not actually be used as indexquals.
The new code also recognizes exact-match LIKE and regex patterns, and
produces an = indexqual instead of >= and <=.
This change does NOT fix the problem with non-ASCII locales: the code
still doesn't know how to generate an upper bound indexqual for non-ASCII
collation order. But it's no worse than before, just the same deficiency
in a different place...
Also, dike out loc_restrictinfo fields in Plan nodes. These were doing
nothing useful in the absence of 'expensive functions' optimization,
and they took a considerable amount of processing to fill in.
The only place it was being used was as temporary storage in indxpath.c,
and the logic was wrong: the same restrictinfo node could get chosen to
carry the info for two different joins. Right fix is to return a second
list of unjoined-relids parallel to the list of clause groups.
identified by Hiroshi (incorrect cost attributed to OR clauses
after multiple passes through set_rest_selec()). I think the code
was trying to allow selectivities of OR subclauses to be passed in
from outside, but noplace was actually passing any useful data, and
set_rest_selec() was passing wrong data.
Restructure representation of "indexqual" in IndexPath nodes so that
it is the same as for indxqual in completed IndexScan nodes: namely,
a toplevel list with an entry for each pass of the index scan, having
sublists that are implicitly-ANDed index qual conditions for that pass.
You don't want to know what the old representation was :-(
Improve documentation of OR-clause indexscan functions.
Remove useless 'notclause' field from RestrictInfo nodes. (This might
force an initdb for anyone who has stored rules containing RestrictInfos,
but I do not think that RestrictInfo ever appears in completed plans.)
will gradually replace all of the boilerplate tree-walk-recursion code that
currently exists in O(N) slightly different forms in N subroutines.
I've had it with adding missing cases to these subroutines...
tlist and qual are NULL. It ought to handle these the same as the cases
where tlist contains only constant expressions, ie, be willing to generate
a Result-node plan. This did not use to matter, but it does now because
union_planner will flatten the tlist when aggregates are present. Thus,
'select count(1) from table' now causes query_planner to be given a null
tlist, and to duplicate 6.4's behavior we need it to give back a Result
plan rather than refusing the query. 6.4 was arguably doing the Wrong
Thing for this query, but I'm not going to open a semantics issue right
before 6.5 release ... can revisit that problem later.
returned NULL, which it will do in some cases where an elog(ERROR) would
probably be more appropriate. For the moment, generate a not-very-
informative error message rather than proceeding to certain coredump.
Probably ought to think about making query_planner elog instead of
returning NULL, but this is at least a safe change for now.
redundant) SearchSysCache searches per table column in an INSERT, which
accounted for a good percentage of the CPU time for INSERT ... VALUES().
Now it only does two searches in the typical case.
remove optimizer's arbitrary limit on how large a join it will use hashing
for. (The limit was too large to prevent the problems we'd been seeing,
anyway...)
