These format codes produce or consume strings of digits, so they
should be labeled with is_digit = true, but they were not.
This has effect in only one place, where is_next_separator()
is checked to see if the preceding format code should slurp up
all the available digits. Thus, with a format such as '...SSFF3'
with remaining input '12345', the 'SS' code would consume all
five digits (and then complain about seconds being out of range)
when it should eat only two digits.
Per report from Nick Davies. This bug goes back to d589f9446
where the FFn codes were introduced, so back-patch to v13.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM8PR08MB6356AC979252CFEA78B56678B6312@AM8PR08MB6356.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com
Before this patch, misplacing a special must-be-first option for
dispatching to a subprogram (e.g., postgres -D . --single) would
fail with an error like
FATAL: --single requires a value
This patch adjusts this error to more accurately complain that the
special option wasn't listed first. The aforementioned error
message now looks like
FATAL: --single must be first argument
The dispatch option parsing code has been refactored for use
wherever ParseLongOption() is called. Beyond the obvious advantage
of avoiding code duplication, this should prevent similar problems
when new dispatch options are added. Note that we assume that none
of the dispatch option names match another valid command-line
argument, such as the name of a configuration parameter.
Ideally, we'd remove this must-be-first requirement for these
options, but after some investigation, we decided that wasn't worth
the added complexity and behavior changes.
Author: Nathan Bossart, Greg Sabino Mullane
Reviewed-by: Greg Sabino Mullane, Peter Eisentraut, Álvaro Herrera, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKAnmmJkZtZAiSryho%3DgYpbvC7H-HNjEDAh16F3SoC9LPu8rqQ%40mail.gmail.com
parallel_vacuum_reset_dead_items used a local variable to hold a
pointer from the passed vacrel, purely as a shorthand. This pointer
was later freed and a new allocation was made and stored to the
struct. Then the local pointer was mistakenly referenced again.
This apparently happened not to break anything since the freed chunk
would have been put on the context's freelist, so it was accidentally
the same pointer anyway, in which case the DSA handle was correctly
updated. The minimal fix is to change two places so they access
dead_items through the vacrel. This coding style is a maintenance
hazard, so while at it get rid of most other similar usages, which
were inconsistently used anyway.
Analysis and patch by Vallimaharajan G, with further defensive coding
by me
Backpath to v17, when TidStore came in
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1936493cc38.68cb2ef27266.7456585136086197135@zohocorp.com
Ensure stored generated columns that are part of REPLICA IDENTITY must be
published explicitly for UPDATE and DELETE operations to be published. We
can publish generated columns by listing them in the column list or by
enabling the publish_generated_columns option.
This commit changes the behavior of the test added in commit adedf54e65 by
giving an ERROR for the UPDATE operation in such cases. There is no way to
trigger the bug reported in commit adedf54e65 but we didn't remove the
corresponding code change because it is still relevant when replicating
changes from a publisher with version less than 18.
We decided not to backpatch this behavior change to avoid the risk of
breaking existing output plugins that may be sending generated columns by
default although we are not aware of any such plugin. Also, we didn't see
any reports related to this on STABLE branches which is another reason not
to backpatch this change.
Author: Shlok Kyal, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANhcyEVw4V2Awe2AB6i0E5AJLNdASShGfdBLbUd1XtWDboymCA@mail.gmail.com
The validate_sync_standby_slots subroutine requires an LWLock, so it
cannot run in processes without PGPROC; skip it there to avoid a crash.
This replaces the current test for ReplicationSlotCtl being not null,
which appears to be a solution for the same problem but less general.
I also rewrote a related comment that mentioned ReplicationSlotCtl in
StandbySlotsHaveCaughtup.
This code came in with commit bf279ddd1c28; backpatch to 17.
Reported-by: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202411281216.sutbxtr6idnn@alvherre.pgsql
Stuff like
CREATE DOMAIN foo AS int CONSTRAINT cc GENERATED ALWAYS AS (2) STORED
is not supported for domains, but the parser allows it, because it's
the same syntax as for table constraints. But CreateDomain() did not
explicitly handle all ConstrType values, so the above would get an
internal error like
ERROR: unrecognized constraint subtype: 4
Fix that by providing a user-facing error message for all ConstrType
values. Also, remove the switch default case, so future additions to
ConstrType are caught.
Reported-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACJufxF8fmM=Dbm4pDFuV_nKGz2-No0k4YifhrF3-rjXTWJM3w@mail.gmail.com
Commit 811af9786b introduced palloc() calls into systable_beginscan()
and systable_beginscan_ordered(). But there was no pfree(), as is the
usual style.
It turns out that an ANALYZE of a partitioned table can invoke many
thousand system table index scans, and this memory is not cleaned up
until the end of the command, so this can temporarily leak quite a bit
of memory. Maybe there are improvements to be made at a higher level
about this, but for now, insert a couple of corresponding pfree()
calls to fix this particular issue.
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z0XTfIq5xUtbkiIh@pryzbyj2023
The new compact_attrs array stores a few select fields from
FormData_pg_attribute in a more compact way, using only 16 bytes per
column instead of the 104 bytes that FormData_pg_attribute uses. Using
CompactAttribute allows performance-critical operations such as tuple
deformation to be performed without looking at the FormData_pg_attribute
element in TupleDesc which means fewer cacheline accesses. With this
change, NAMEDATALEN could be increased with a much smaller negative impact
on performance.
For some workloads, tuple deformation can be the most CPU intensive part
of processing the query. Some testing with 16 columns on a table
where the first column is variable length showed around a 10% increase in
transactions per second for an OLAP type query performing aggregation on
the 16th column. However, in certain cases, the increases were much
higher, up to ~25% on one AMD Zen4 machine.
This also makes pg_attribute.attcacheoff redundant. A follow-on commit
will remove it, thus shrinking the FormData_pg_attribute struct by 4
bytes.
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrBztXP3yx=NKNmo3xwFAFhEdyPnvrDg3=M0RhDs+4vYw@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Victor Yegorov
Previously, it set only DELAY_CHKPT_COMPLETE. That was important,
because it meant that if the XLOG_SMGR_TRUNCATE record preceded a
XLOG_CHECKPOINT_ONLINE record in the WAL, then the truncation would also
happen on disk before the XLOG_CHECKPOINT_ONLINE record was
written.
However, it didn't guarantee that the sync request for the truncation
was processed before the XLOG_CHECKPOINT_ONLINE record was written. By
setting DELAY_CHKPT_START, we guarantee that if an XLOG_SMGR_TRUNCATE
record is written to WAL before the redo pointer of a concurrent
checkpoint, the sync request queued by that operation must be processed
by that checkpoint, rather than being left for the following one.
This is a refinement of commit 412ad7a556. Back-patch to all supported
releases, like that commit.
Author: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2B-2rjGZC2kwqr2NMLBcEBp4uf59QT1advbWYF_uc%2B0Aw%40mail.gmail.com
MD5 has been considered to be unsuitable for use as a cryptographic
hash algorithm for some time. Furthermore, MD5 password hashes in
PostgreSQL are vulnerable to pass-the-hash attacks, i.e., knowing
the username and hashed password is sufficient to authenticate.
The SCRAM-SHA-256 method added in v10 is not subject to these
problems and is considered to be superior to MD5.
This commit marks MD5 password support in PostgreSQL as deprecated
and to be removed in a future release. The documentation now
contains several deprecation notices, and CREATE ROLE and ALTER
ROLE now emit deprecation warnings when setting MD5 passwords. The
warnings can be disabled by setting the md5_password_warnings
parameter to "off".
Reviewed-by: Greg Sabino Mullane, Jim Nasby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZwbfpJJol7lDWajL%40nathan
According to the SQL standard, if the referential action RESTRICT is
triggered, it has its own error code. We previously didn't use that,
we just used the error code for foreign key violation. But RESTRICT
is not necessarily an actual foreign key violation. The foreign key
might still be satisfied in theory afterwards, but the RESTRICT
setting prevents the action even then. So it's a separate kind of
error condition.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ea5b2777-266a-46fa-852f-6fca6ec480ad@eisentraut.org
As I'd feared, commit 5c9d8636d was still a few bricks shy of a load.
We can't just leave pulled-up lateral-reference Vars with no new
nullingrels: we have to carefully compute what subset of the
to-be-replaced Var's nullingrels apply to them, else we still get
"wrong varnullingrels" errors. This is a bit tedious, but it looks
like we can use the nullingrel data this patch computes for other
purposes, enabling better optimization. We don't want to inject
unnecessary plan changes into stable branches though, so leave that
idea for a later HEAD-only patch.
Patch by me, but thanks to Richard Guo for devising a test case that
broke 5c9d8636d, and for preliminary investigation about how to fix
it. As before, back-patch to v16.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1tGn4j-0003zi-MP@gemulon.postgresql.org
Some lines were indented by an inconsistent number of spaces. While
we're here, also fix some code that used the newline after left
parenthesis style, which is obsolete.
There is no point in transforming OR-clauses into SAOP's if the target index
doesn't support SAOP scans anyway. This commit adds corresponding checks
to match_orclause_to_indexcol() and group_similar_or_args(). The first check
fixes the actual bug, while the second just saves some cycles.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8174de69-9e1a-0827-0e81-ef97f56a5939%40gmail.com
Author: Alena Rybakina
Reviewed-by: Ranier Vilela, Alexander Korotkov, Andrei Lepikhov
If we are pulling up a subquery that's under an outer join, and
the subquery's target list contains a strict expression that uses
both a subquery variable and a lateral-reference variable, it's okay
to pull up the expression without wrapping it in a PlaceHolderVar.
That's safe because if the subquery variable is forced to NULL
by the outer join, the expression result will come out as NULL too,
so we don't have to force that outcome by evaluating the expression
below the outer join. It'd be correct to wrap in a PHV, but that can
lead to very significantly worse plans, since we'd then have to use
a nestloop plan to pass down the lateral reference to where the
expression will be evaluated.
However, when we do that, we should not mark the lateral reference
variable as being nulled by the outer join, because it isn't after
we pull up the expression in this way. So the marking logic added
by cb8e50a4a was incorrect in this detail, leading to "wrong
varnullingrels" errors from the consistency-checking logic in
setrefs.c. It seems to be sufficient to just not mark lateral
references at all in this case. (I have a nagging feeling that more
complexity may be needed in cases where there are several levels of
outer join, but some attempts to break it with that didn't succeed.)
Per report from Bertrand Mamasam. Back-patch to v16, as the previous
patch was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACZ67_UA_EVrqiFXJu9XK50baEpH=ofEPJswa2kFxg6xuSw-ww@mail.gmail.com
The C standard says that sizeof(bool) is implementation-defined, but we
know of no current systems where it is not 1. The last known systems
seem to have been Apple macOS/PowerPC 10.5 and Microsoft Visual C++ 4,
both long defunct.
PostgreSQL has always required sizeof(bool) == 1 for the definition of
bool that it used, but previously it would define its own type if the
system-provided bool had a different size. That was liable to cause
memory layout problems when interacting with system and third-party
libraries on (by now hypothetical) computers with wider _Bool, and now
C23 has introduced a new problem by making bool a built-in datatype
(like C++), so the fallback code doesn't even compile. We could
probably work around that, but then we'd be writing new untested code
for a computer that doesn't exist.
Instead, delete the unreachable and C23-uncompilable fallback code, and
let existing static assertions fail if the system-provided bool is too
wide. If we ever get a problem report from a real system, then it will
be time to figure out what to do about it in a way that also works on
modern compilers.
Note on C++: Previously we avoided including <stdbool.h> or trying to
define a new bool type in headers that might be included by C++ code.
These days we might as well just include <stdbool.h> unconditionally:
it should be visible to C++11 but do nothing, just as in C23. We
already include <stdint.h> without C++ guards in c.h, and that falls
under the same C99-compatibility section of the C++11 standard as
<stdbool.h>, so let's remove the guards here too.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3198438.1731895163%40sss.pgh.pa.us
They were all missing punctuation, one was missing initial capital.
Per our message style guidelines.
No backpatch, to avoid breaking existing translations.
Commit ccd38024bc, which introduced the pg_signal_autovacuum_worker
role, added a call to pgstat_get_beentry_by_proc_number() for the
purpose of determining whether the process is an autovacuum worker.
This function calls pgstat_read_current_status(), which can be
fairly expensive and may return cached, out-of-date information.
Since we just need to look up the target backend's BackendType, and
we already know its ProcNumber, we can instead inspect the
BackendStatusArray directly, which is much less expensive and
possibly more up-to-date. There are some caveats with this
approach (which are documented in the code), but it's still
substantially better than before.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ujenaa2uabzfkwxwmfifawzdozh3ljr7geozlhftsuosgm7n7q%40g3utqqyyosb6
Emitting each variable separately is unnecessarily verbose / hard to skim
over. Emit the whole thing in one ereport() to address that.
Also remove program name and function reference from the message. The former
doesn't seem particularly helpful and the latter is provided by the elog.c
infrastructure these days.
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/leouteo5ozcrux3fepuhtbp6c56tbfd4naxeokidbx7m75cabz@hhw6g4urlowt
Historically we tolerated the absence of various C runtime library
features for the benefit of the MinGW tool chain, because it used
ancient msvcrt.dll for a long period of time. It now uses ucrt by
default (like Windows 10+, Visual Studio 2015+), and that's the only
configuration we're testing.
In practice, we effectively required ucrt already in PostgreSQL 17, when
commit 8d9a9f03 required _create_locale etc, first available in
msvcr120.dll (Visual Studio 2013, the last of the pre-ucrt series of
runtimes), and for MinGW users that practically meant ucrt because it
was difficult or impossible to use msvcr120.dll. That may even not have
been the first such case, but old MinGW configurations had already
dropped off our testing radar so we weren't paying much attention.
This commit formalizes the requirement. It also removes a couple of
obsolete comments that discussed msvcrt.dll limitations, and some tests
of !defined(_MSC_VER) to imply msvcrt.dll. There are many more
anachronisms, but it'll take some time to figure out how to remove them
all. APIs affected relate to locales, UTF-8, threads, large files and
more.
Thanks to Peter Eisentraut for the documentation change. It's not
really necessary to talk about ucrt explicitly in such a short section,
since it's the default for MinGW-w64 and MSYS2. It's enough to prune
references and broken links to much older tools.
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d9e7731c-ca1b-477c-9298-fa51e135574a%40eisentraut.org
This allows for example using LIKE with case-insensitive collations.
There was previously no internal implementation of this, so it was met
with a not-supported error. This adds the internal implementation and
removes the error. The implementation follows the specification of
the SQL standard for this.
Unlike with deterministic collations, the LIKE matching cannot go
character by character but has to go substring by substring. For
example, if we are matching against LIKE 'foo%bar', we can't start by
looking for an 'f', then an 'o', but instead with have to find
something that matches 'foo'. This is because the collation could
consider substrings of different lengths to be equal. This is all
internal to MatchText() in like_match.c.
The changes in GenericMatchText() in like.c just pass through the
locale information to MatchText(), which was previously not needed.
This matches exactly Generic_Text_IC_like() below.
ILIKE is not affected. (It's unclear whether ILIKE makes sense under
nondeterministic collations.)
This also updates match_pattern_prefix() in like_support.c to support
optimizing the case of an exact pattern with nondeterministic
collations. This was already alluded to in the previous code.
(includes documentation examples from Daniel Vérité and test cases
from Paul A Jungwirth)
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/700d2e86-bf75-4607-9cf2-f5b7802f6e88@eisentraut.org
Currently, logical replication produces a generic error message when
targeting a subscriber-side table column that is either missing or
generated. The error message can be misleading for generated columns.
This patch introduces a specific error message to clarify the issue when
generated columns are involved.
Author: Shubham Khanna
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Vignesh C, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHv8RjJBvYtqU7OAofBizOmQOK2Q8h+w9v2_cQWxT_gO7er3Aw@mail.gmail.com
When using a pipeline, a transaction starts from the first command and
is committed with a Sync message or when the pipeline ends.
Functions like IsInTransactionBlock() or PreventInTransactionBlock()
were already able to understand a pipeline as being in a transaction
block, but it was not the case of CheckTransactionBlock(). This
function is called for example to generate a WARNING for SET LOCAL,
complaining that it is used outside of a transaction block.
The current state of the code caused multiple problems, like:
- SET LOCAL executed at any stage of a pipeline issued a WARNING, even
if the command was at least second in line where the pipeline is in a
transaction state.
- LOCK TABLE failed when invoked at any step of a pipeline, even if it
should be able to work within a transaction block.
The pipeline protocol assumes that the first command of a pipeline is
not part of a transaction block, and that any follow-up commands is
considered as within a transaction block.
This commit changes the backend so as an implicit transaction block is
started each time the first Execute message of a pipeline has finished
processing, with this implicit transaction block ended once a sync is
processed. The checks based on XACT_FLAGS_PIPELINING in the routines
checking if we are in a transaction block are not necessary: it is
enough to rely on the existing ones.
Some tests are added to pgbench, that can be backpatched down to v17
when \syncpipeline is involved and down to v14 where \startpipeline and
\endpipeline are available. This is unfortunately limited regarding the
error patterns that can be checked, but it provides coverage for various
pipeline combinations to check if these succeed or fail. These tests
are able to capture the case of SET LOCAL's WARNING. The author has
proposed a different feature to improve the coverage by adding similar
meta-commands to psql where error messages could be checked, something
more useful for the cases where commands cannot be used in transaction
blocks, like REINDEX CONCURRENTLY or VACUUM. This is considered as
future work for v18~.
Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy
Reviewed-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_XqrWO8uNBQrSu5r6jh+vTGi5Oiyk4y8yXDORdE2jbzw8xw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
The error messages in CreateWaitEventSet() made it hard to know whether the
syscall or AcquireExternalFD() failed. This is particularly relevant because
AcquireExternalFD() imposes a lower limit than what would cause syscalls fail
with EMFILE.
I did not change the message in libpqsrv_connect_prepare(), which is the one
other use of AcquireExternalFD() in our codebase, as the error message already
is less ambiguous.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/xjjx7r4xa7beixuu4qtkdhnwdbchrrpo3gaeb3jsbinvvdiat5@cwjw55mna5of
Most came in during the 17 cycle, so backpatch there. Some
(particularly reorderbuffer.h) are very old, but backpatching doesn't
seem useful.
Like commits c9d2977519, c4f113e8fe.
The function get_param_path_clause_serials() is used to get the set of
pushed-down clauses enforced within a parameterized Path. Since we
don't currently support parameterized MergeAppend paths, and it
doesn't look like that is going to change anytime soon (as explained
in the comments for generate_orderedappend_paths), we don't need to
consider MergeAppendPath in this function.
This change won't make any measurable difference in performance; it's
just for clarity's sake.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_Puie4DQ2ODvjQB_3CxYkUODnrJm8jn_ObMAcrjYNW7Q@mail.gmail.com
The ordering of DISTINCT items is semantically insignificant, so we
can reorder them as needed. In fact, in the parser, we absorb the
sorting semantics of the sortClause as much as possible into the
distinctClause, ensuring that one clause is a prefix of the other.
This can help avoid a possible need to re-sort.
In this commit, we attempt to adjust the DISTINCT keys to match the
input path's pathkeys. This can likewise help avoid re-sorting, or
allow us to use incremental-sort to save efforts.
For DISTINCT ON expressions, the parser already ensures that they
match the initial ORDER BY expressions. When reordering the DISTINCT
keys, we must ensure that the resulting pathkey list matches the
initial distinctClause pathkeys.
This introduces a new GUC, enable_distinct_reordering, which allows
the optimization to be disabled if needed.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48dR26cCcX0f=8bja2JKQPcU64136kHk=xekHT9xschiQ@mail.gmail.com
If passed a read-write expanded object pointer, the EEOP_NULLIF
code would hand that same pointer to the equality function
and then (unless equality was reported) also return the same
pointer as its value. This is no good, because a function that
receives a read-write expanded object pointer is fully entitled
to scribble on or even delete the object, thus corrupting the
NULLIF output. (This problem is likely unobservable with the
equality functions provided in core Postgres, but it's easy to
demonstrate with one coded in plpgsql.)
To fix, make sure the pointer passed to the equality function
is read-only. We can still return the original read-write
pointer as the NULLIF result, allowing optimization of later
operations.
Per bug #18722 from Alexander Lakhin. This has been wrong
since we invented expanded objects, so back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18722-fd9e645448cc78b4@postgresql.org
This WARNING appeared because SearchSysCacheLocked1() read
cc_relisshared before catcache initialization, when the field is false
unconditionally. On the basis of reading false there, it constructed a
locktag as though pg_tablespace weren't relisshared. Only shared
catalogs could be affected, and only GRANT TABLESPACE was affected in
practice. SearchSysCacheLocked1() callers use one other shared-relation
syscache, DATABASEOID. DATABASEOID is initialized by the end of
CheckMyDatabase(), making the problem unreachable for pg_database.
Back-patch to v13 (all supported versions). This has no known impact
before v16, where ExecGrant_common() first appeared. Earlier branches
avoid trouble by having a separate ExecGrant_Tablespace() that doesn't
use LOCKTAG_TUPLE. However, leaving this unfixed in v15 could ensnare a
future back-patch of a SearchSysCacheLocked1() call.
Reported by Aya Iwata.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS7PR01MB11964507B5548245A7EE54E70EA212@OS7PR01MB11964.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
When optimizer generates bitmap paths, it considers breaking OR-clause
arguments one-by-one. But now, a group of similar OR-clauses can be
transformed into SAOP during index matching. So, bitmap paths should
keep up.
This commit teaches bitmap paths generation machinery to group similar
OR-clauses into dedicated RestrictInfos. Those RestrictInfos are considered
both to match index as a whole (as SAOP), or to match as a set of individual
OR-clause argument one-by-one (the old way).
Therefore, bitmap path generation will takes advantage of OR-clauses to SAOP's
transformation. The old way of handling them is also considered. So, there
shouldn't be planning regression.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdu5iQOjF93vGbjidsQkhHvY2NSm29duENYH_cbhC6x%2BMg%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov, Andrey Lepikhov
Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina, Andrei Lepikhov, Jian he, Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan
This commit makes match_clause_to_indexcol() match
"(indexkey op C1) OR (indexkey op C2) ... (indexkey op CN)" expression
to the index while transforming it into "indexkey op ANY(ARRAY[C1, C2, ...])"
(ScalarArrayOpExpr node).
This transformation allows handling long OR-clauses with single IndexScan
avoiding diving them into a slower BitmapOr.
We currently restrict Ci to be either Const or Param to apply this
transformation only when it's clearly beneficial. However, in the future,
we might switch to a liberal understanding of constants, as it is in other
cases.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/567ED6CA.2040504%40sigaev.ru
Author: Alena Rybakina, Andrey Lepikhov, Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan, Ranier Vilela, Alexander Korotkov, Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Jian He, Tom Lane, Nikolay Shaplov
