If the collation of any grouping column doesn’t match the collation of
the corresponding partition key, partitionwise grouping can yield
incorrect results. For example, rows that would be grouped under the
grouping collation may end up in different partitions under the
partitioning collation. In such cases, full partitionwise grouping
would produce results that differ from those without partitionwise
grouping, so disallowed that.
Partial partitionwise aggregation is still allowed, as the Finalize
step reconciles partition-level aggregates with grouping requirements
across all partitions, ensuring that the final output remains
consistent.
This commit also fixes group_by_has_partkey() by ensuring the
RelabelType node is stripped from grouping expressions when matching
them to partition key expressions to avoid false mismatches.
Bug: #18568
Reported-by: Webbo Han <1105066510@qq.com>
Author: Webbo Han <1105066510@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18568-2a9afb6b9f7e6ed3@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_9D9103CDA420C07768349CC1DFF88465F90A@qq.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNno_HKiQ6PqyLYfuqDtwp7KKHZiH1J7Pqyz0nr+PS2Dwg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
When we generate multiple clones of the same qual condition to cope
with outer join identity 3, we need to ensure that all the clones get
the same serial number. To achieve this, we reset the
root->last_rinfo_serial counter each time we produce RestrictInfo(s)
from the qual list (see deconstruct_distribute_oj_quals). This
approach works only if we ensure that we are not changing the qual
list in any way that'd affect the number of RestrictInfos built from
it.
However, with b262ad440, an IS NULL qual on a NOT NULL column might
result in an additional constant-FALSE RestrictInfo. And different
versions of the same qual clause can lead to different conclusions
about whether it can be reduced to constant-FALSE. This would affect
the number of RestrictInfos built from the qual list for different
versions, causing inconsistent RestrictInfo serial numbers across
multiple clones of the same qual. This inconsistency can confuse
users of these serial numbers, such as rebuild_joinclause_attr_needed,
and lead to planner errors such as "ERROR: variable not found in
subplan target lists".
To fix, reset the root->last_rinfo_serial counter after generating the
additional constant-FALSE RestrictInfo.
Back-patch to v17 where the issue crept in. In v17, I failed to make
a test case that would expose this bug, so no test case for v17.
Author: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-B6kafn+LmPuh-TYFwFyEm-vVj3Qqv7Yo-69CEv14rRg@mail.gmail.com
The previous wording is easy to read incorrectly; this change makes it
simpler, less ambiguous, and less prominent.
Backpatch to all live branches.
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202411051201.zody6mld7vkw@alvherre.pgsql
An unfortunate typo in commit 2d819a08a1 can cause wrong results when
the default collation provider is libc, LC_CTYPE=C, and LC_COLLATE is
a real locale. Users with this combination of settings must REINDEX
all affected indexes.
The same typo can also cause performance degradation when LC_COLLATE=C
and LC_CTYPE is a real locale.
Problem does not exist in master (due to refactoring), so fix only in
version 17.
Reported-by: Drew Callahan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d5081a7f4f6d425c28dd69d1e09b2e78f149e726.camel@j-davis.com
Supply a new memory manager for RuntimeDyld, to avoid crashes in
generated code caused by memory placement that can overflow a 32 bit
data type. This is a drop-in replacement for the
llvm::SectionMemoryManager class in the LLVM library, with Michael
Smith's proposed fix from
https://www.github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71968.
We hereby slurp it into our own source tree, after moving into a new
namespace llvm::backport and making some minor adjustments so that it
can be compiled with older LLVM versions as far back as 12. It's harder
to make it work on even older LLVM versions, but it doesn't seem likely
that people are really using them so that is not investigated for now.
The problem could also be addressed by switching to JITLink instead of
RuntimeDyld, and that is the LLVM project's recommended solution as
the latter is about to be deprecated. We'll have to do that soon enough
anyway, and then when the LLVM version support window advances far
enough in a few years we'll be able to delete this code. Unfortunately
that wouldn't be enough for PostgreSQL today: in most relevant versions
of LLVM, JITLink is missing or incomplete.
Several other projects have already back-ported this fix into their fork
of LLVM, which is a vote of confidence despite the lack of commit into
LLVM as of today. We don't have our own copy of LLVM so we can't do
exactly what they've done; instead we have a copy of the whole patched
class so we can pass an instance of it to RuntimeDyld.
The LLVM project hasn't chosen to commit the fix yet, and even if it
did, it wouldn't be back-ported into the releases of LLVM that most of
our users care about, so there is not much point in waiting any longer
for that. If they make further changes and commit it to LLVM 19 or 20,
we'll still need this for older versions, but we may want to
resynchronize our copy and update some comments.
The changes that we've had to make to our copy can be seen by diffing
our SectionMemoryManager.{h,cpp} files against the ones in the tree of
the pull request. Per the LLVM project's license requirements, a copy
is in SectionMemoryManager.LICENSE.
This should fix the spate of crash reports we've been receiving lately
from users on large memory ARM systems.
Back-patch to all supported releases.
Co-authored-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> (license aspects)
Reported-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_Xqr63qj%3DSx7HY6ZiiQ6R_JbX%2B-p6sTPwDYwTWZjUmjsYBg%40mail.gmail.com
PgStat_HashKey is currently initialized in a way that could result in
random data if the structure has any padding bytes. The structure
has no padding bytes currently, fortunately, but it could become a
problem should the structure change at some point in the future.
The code is changed to use some memset(0) so as any padding would be
handled properly, as it would be surprising to see random failures in
the pgstats entry lookups. PgStat_HashKey is a structure internal to
pgstats, and an ABI change could be possible in the scope of a bug fix,
so backpatch down to 15 where this has been introduced.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zyb7RW1y9dVfO0UH@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Backpatch-through: 15
We had been using "diff -upd", which evidently works for most people,
but Solaris's diff doesn't like it. (We'd not noticed because the
Solaris buildfarm animals weren't running this test until they were
upgraded to the latest buildfarm client script.) Change to "diff -U3"
which is what pg_regress has used for ages.
Per buildfarm (and off-list discussion with Noah Misch).
Back-patch to v16 where this test was added. In v16,
also back-patch the relevant part of 628c1d1f2 so that
the test script looks about the same in all branches.
Sloppy refactoring in commit cca97ce6a caused these programs
to pass dbname = NULL to libpq if there was no "--dbname" switch
on the command line, where before "replication" would be passed.
This didn't break things completely, because the source server doesn't
care about the dbname specified for a physical replication connection.
However, it did cause libpq to fail to match a ~/.pgpass entry that
has "replication" in the dbname field. Restore the previous behavior
of passing "replication".
Also, closer inspection shows that if you do specify a dbname
in the connection string, that is what will be matched to ~/.pgpass,
not "replication". This was the pre-existing behavior so we should
not change it, but the SGML docs were pretty misleading about it.
Improve that.
Per bug #18685 from Toshi Harada. Back-patch to v17 where the
error crept in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18685-fee2dd142b9688f1@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2702546.1730740456@sss.pgh.pa.us
Suppose that you run a command like "pg_combinebackup b1 b2 -o output",
but both b1 and b2 contain an INCREMENTAL.$something file in a directory
that is expected to contain relation files. This is an error, but the
previous code would not detect the problem and instead write a garbage
full file named $something to the output directory. This commit adds
code to detect the error and a test case to verify the behavior.
It's difficult to imagine that this will ever happen unless someone
is intentionally trying to break incremental backup, but per discussion,
let's consider that the lack of adequate sanity checking in this area is
a bug and back-patch to v17, where incremental backup was introduced.
Patch by me, reviewed by Bertrand Drouvot and Amul Sul.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaD7dBYPqe7kMtO0dyto7rd0rUh7joh=JPUSaFszKY6Pg@mail.gmail.com
This function is always called with a relative_path that ends in a
slash, so there's no need to insert a second one. So, don't. Instead,
add an assertion to verify that nothing gets broken in the future, and
adjust the comments.
While this is not a critical bug, the duplicate slash is visible in
error messages, which could create confusion, so back-patch to v17.
This is also better in that it keeps the code consistent across
branches.
Patch by me, reviewed by Bertrand Drouvot and Amul Sul.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaD7dBYPqe7kMtO0dyto7rd0rUh7joh=JPUSaFszKY6Pg@mail.gmail.com
Buildfarm member mamba fails to deduce that the function never uses this
variable without initializing it. Back-patch to v12, like commit
b412f402d1e020c5dac94f3bf4a005db69519b99.
Commit a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 enlarged the work done
here under the pg_class heap buffer lock. Two preexisting actions are
best done before holding that lock. Both RelationGetNumberOfBlocks()
and visibilitymap_count() do I/O, and the latter might exclusive-lock a
visibility map buffer. Moving these reduces contention and risk of
undetected LWLock deadlock. Back-patch to v12, like that commit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241031200139.b4@rfd.leadboat.com
This reverts commit 95c5acb3fc261067ab65ddc0b2dca8e162f09442 (v17) and
counterparts in each other non-master branch. If released, that commit
would have caused a worst-in-years minor release regression, via
undetected LWLock self-deadlock. This commit and its self-deadlock fix
warrant more bake time in the master branch.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10ec0bc3-5933-1189-6bb8-5dec4114558e@gmail.com
An operation like '12:34:56'::time_tz takes the UTC offset from
the prevailing time zone, which means that the results change
across DST transitions. One of the test cases added in ed055d249
failed to consider this.
Per report from Bernhard Wiedemann. Back-patch to v17, as the
test case was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ba8e1bc0-8a99-45b7-8397-3f2e94415e03@suse.de
A bug in nbtree's handling of primitive index scan scheduling could lead
to wrong answers when a scrollable cursor was used with an index scan
that had a SAOP index qual. Wrong answers were only possible when the
scan direction changed after a primitive scan was scheduled, but before
_bt_next was asked to fetch the next tuple in line (i.e. for things to
break, _bt_next had to be denied the opportunity to step off the page in
the same direction as the one used when the primscan was scheduled).
Furthermore, the issue only occurred when the page in question happened
to be the first page to be visited by the entire top-level scan; the
issue hinged upon the cursor backing up to the absolute beginning of the
key space that it returns tuples from (fetching in the opposite scan
direction across a "primitive scan boundary" always worked correctly).
To fix, make _bt_next unset the "needs primitive index scan" flag when
it detects that the current scan direction is not the one that was used
by _bt_readpage back when the primitive scan in question was scheduled.
This fixes the cases that are known to be faulty, and also seems like a
good idea on general robustness grounds.
Affected scrollable cursor cases now avoid a spurious primitive index
scan when they fetch backwards to the absolute start of the key space to
be visited by their cursor. Fetching backwards now only returns those
tuples at the start of the scan, as expected. It'll also be okay to
once again fetch forwards from the start at that point, since the scan
will be left in a state that's exactly consistent with the state it was
in before any tuples were ever fetched, as expected.
Oversight in commit 5bf748b8, which enhanced nbtree ScalarArrayOp
execution.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wznv49bFsE2jkt4GuZ0tU2C91dEST=50egzjY2FeOcHL4Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 17-, where commit 5bf748b8 first appears.
* In DetachPartitionFinalize() we were applying a tuple conversion map
to tuples that didn't need one, which can lead to erratic behavior if
a partitioned table has a partition with a different column order, as
reported by Alexander Lakhin. This was introduced by 53af9491a043.
Don't do that. Also, modify a recently added test case to exercise
this.
* The same function as well as CloneFkReferenced() were acquiring
AccessShareLock on a partition, only to have CreateTrigger() later
acquire ShareRowExclusiveLock on it. This can lead to deadlock by
lock escalation, unnecessarily. Avoid that by acquiring the stronger
lock to begin with. This probably dates back to branch 12, but I have
never seen a report of this being a problem in the field.
* Innocuous but wasteful: also introduced by 53af9491a043, we were
reading a pg_constraint tuple from syscache that we don't need, as
reported by Tender Wang. Don't.
Backpatch to 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/461e9c26-2076-8224-e119-84998b6a784e@gmail.com
Commit a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 changed inplace updates
to wait for heap_update() commands like GRANT TABLE and GRANT DATABASE.
By keeping the pin during that wait, a sequence of autovacuum workers
and an uncommitted GRANT starved one foreground LockBufferForCleanup()
for six minutes, on buildfarm member sarus. Prevent, at the cost of a
bit of complexity. Back-patch to v12, like the earlier commit. That
commit and heap_inplace_lock() have not yet appeared in any release.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241026184936.ae.nmisch@google.com
Historical corrections for Mexico, Mongolia, and Portugal.
Notably, Asia/Choibalsan is now an alias for Asia/Ulaanbaatar
rather than being a separate zone, mainly because the differences
between those zones were found to be based on untrustworthy data.
There are two functions that can be used in event triggers to get more
details about a rewrite happening on a relation. Both had a limited
documentation:
- pg_event_trigger_table_rewrite_reason() and
pg_event_trigger_table_rewrite_oid() were not mentioned in the main
event trigger section in the paragraph dedicated to the event
table_rewrite.
- pg_event_trigger_table_rewrite_reason() returns an integer which is a
bitmap of the reasons why a rewrite happens. There was no explanation
about the meaning of these values, forcing the reader to look at the
code to find out that these are defined in event_trigger.h.
While on it, let's add a comment in event_trigger.h where the
AT_REWRITE_* are defined, telling to update the documentation when
these values are changed.
Backpatch down to 13 as a consequence of 1ad23335f36b, where this area
of the documentation has been heavily reworked.
Author: Greg Sabino Mullane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKAnmmL+Z6j-C8dAx1tVrnBmZJu+BSoc68WSg3sR+CVNjBCqbw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Disabling enable_indexscan has always also disabled Index Only Scans.
Here we make that more clear in the documentation in an attempt to
prevent future complaints complaining about this expected behavior.
Reported-by: Melanie Plageman
Author: David G. Johnston, David Rowley
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_atV=kovgpaLREyG68PB5+ncKvJ2UNoeRetEgyC3Yb5Sw@mail.gmail.com
A pg_depend entry between a partitioned table and its table access
method was missing when using CREATE TABLE .. USING with an unpinned
access method. DROP ACCESS METHOD could be used, while it should be
blocked if CASCADE is not specified, even if there was a partitioned
table that depends on the table access method. pg_class.relam would
then hold an orphaned OID value still pointing to the AM dropped.
The problem is fixed by adding a dependency between the partitioned
table and its table access method if set when the relation is created.
A test checking the contents of pg_depend in this case is added.
Issue introduced in 374c7a229042, that has added support for CREATE
TABLE .. USING for partitioned tables.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18674-1ef01eceec278fab@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 17
Coverity complained that pg_saslprep() could suffer integer overflow,
leading to under-allocation of the output buffer, if the input string
exceeds SIZE_MAX/4. This hazard seems largely hypothetical, but it's
easy enough to defend against, so let's do so.
This patch creates a third place in src/common/ where we are locally
defining MaxAllocSize so that we can test against that in the same way
in backend and frontend compiles. That seems like about two places
too many, so the next patch will move that into common/fe_memutils.h.
I'm hesitant to do that in back branches however.
Back-patch to v14. The code looks similar in older branches, but
before commit 67a472d71 there was a separate test on the input string
length that prevented this hazard.
Per Coverity report.
This was introduced in commit bfa2cee784, which replaced the old
bsearch_cmp() function we had in extended_stats.c with the current
implementation. The original discussion or commit message of
bfa2cee784 didn't mention where the new implementation came from, but
based on some googling, I'm guessing *BSD or libiberty, all of which
share this same code, with or without this fix.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEudQAp34o_8u6sGSVraLwuMv9F7T9hyHpePXHmRaxR2Aboi%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
A buffer lock won't stop a reader having already checked tuple
visibility. If a vac_update_datfrozenid() and then a crash happened
during inplace update of a relfrozenxid value, datfrozenxid could
overtake relfrozenxid. That could lead to "could not access status of
transaction" errors. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). In
v14 and earlier, this also back-patches the assertion removal from
commit 7fcf2faf9c7dd473208fd6d5565f88d7f733782b.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240620012908.92.nmisch@google.com
The inplace update survives ROLLBACK. The inval didn't, so another
backend's DDL could then update the row without incorporating the
inplace update. In the test this fixes, a mix of CREATE INDEX and ALTER
TABLE resulted in a table with an index, yet relhasindex=f. That is a
source of index corruption. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions).
The back branch versions don't change WAL, because those branches just
added end-of-recovery SIResetAll(). All branches change the ABI of
extern function PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(). No PGXN extension
calls that, and there's no apparent use case in extensions.
Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240523000548.58.nmisch@google.com
An inplace update's invalidation messages are part of its transaction's
commit record. However, the update survives even if its transaction
aborts or we stop recovery before replaying its transaction commit.
After recovery, a backend that started in recovery could update the row
without incorporating the inplace update. That could result in a table
with an index, yet relhasindex=f. That is a source of index corruption.
This bulk invalidation avoids the functional consequences. A future
change can fix the !RecoveryInProgress() scenario without changing the
WAL format. Back-patch to v17 - v12 (all supported versions). v18 will
instead add invalidations to WAL.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240618152349.7f.nmisch@google.com
Stop computing a never-used value. This removes the read; the read had
no functional implications. Back-patch to v12, like commit
a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6c92f59b-f5bc-e58c-9bdd-d1f21c17c786@gmail.com
It was possible for the code to read out-of-bound data from the
"day_tab" table with some crafted input data. Let's treat these as
invalid input as the month number is incorrect.
A test is added to test this case with a check on the errno returned by
the decoding routine. A test close to the new one added in this commit
was testing for a failure, but did not look at the errno generated, so
let's use this commit to also change it, adding a check on the errno
returned by DecodeDateTime().
Like the other test scripts, dt_test should likely be expanded to
include more checks based on the errnos generated in these code paths.
This is left as future work.
This issue exists since 2e6f97560a83, so backpatch all the way down.
Reported-by: Pavel Nekrasov
Author: Bruce Momjian, Pavel Nekrasov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18614-6bbe00117352309e@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12
... to fix bugs when the referenced table is partitioned.
The catalog representation we chose for foreign keys connecting
partitioned tables (in commit f56f8f8da6af) is inconvenient, in the
sense that a standalone table has a different way to represent the
constraint when referencing a partitioned table, than when the same
table becomes a partition (and vice versa). Because of this, we need to
create additional catalog rows on detach (pg_constraint and pg_trigger),
and remove them on attach. We were doing some of those things, but not
all of them, leading to missing catalog rows in certain cases.
The worst problem seems to be that we are missing action triggers after
detaching a partition, which means that you could update/delete rows
from the referenced partitioned table that still had referencing rows on
that table, the server failing to throw the required errors.
!!!
Note that this means existing databases with FKs that reference
partitioned tables might have rows that break relational integrity, on
tables that were once partitions on the referencing side of the FK.
Another possible problem is that trying to reattach a table
that had been detached would fail indicating that internal triggers
cannot be found, which from the user's point of view is nonsensical.
In branches 15 and above, we fix this by creating a new helper function
addFkConstraint() which is in charge of creating a standalone
pg_constraint row, and repurposing addFkRecurseReferencing() and
addFkRecurseReferenced() so that they're only the recursive routine for
each side of the FK, and they call addFkConstraint() to create
pg_constraint at each partitioning level and add the necessary triggers.
These new routines can be used during partition creation, partition
attach and detach, and foreign key creation. This reduces redundant
code and simplifies the flow.
In branches 14 and 13, we have a much simpler fix that consists on
simply removing the constraint on detach. The reason is that those
branches are missing commit f4566345cf40, which reworked the way this
works in a way that we didn't consider back-patchable at the time.
We opted to leave branch 12 alone, because it's different from branch 13
enough that the fix doesn't apply; and because it is going in EOL mode
very soon, patching it now might be worse since there's no way to undo
the damage if it goes wrong.
Existing databases might need to be repaired.
In the future we might want to rethink the catalog representation to
avoid this problem, but for now the code seems to do what's required to
make the constraints operate correctly.
Co-authored-by: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Reported-by: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Reported-by: Thomas Baehler (SBB CFF FFS) <thomas.baehler2@sbb.ch>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230420144344.40744130@karst
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230705233028.2f554f73@karst
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/GVAP278MB02787E7134FD691861635A8BC9032@GVAP278MB0278.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18541-628a61bc267cd2d3@postgresql.org
If the query is rewritten into a NOTIFY command by a DO INSTEAD
rule, we'd get an assertion failure, or in non-assert builds
issue a rather confusing error message. Improve that.
Also fix a longstanding grammar mistake in a nearby error message.
Per bug #18664 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Tender Wang and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18664-ffd0ebc2386598df@postgresql.org
The finished transaction list can contain XIDs that are older than the
serializable global xmin. It's a short-lived state;
ClearOldPredicateLocks() removes any such transactions from the list,
and it's called whenever the global xmin advances. But if another
backend calls SummarizeOldestCommittedSxact() in that window, it will
call SerialAdd() on an XID that's older than the global xmin, or if
there are no more transactions running, when global xmin is
invalid. That trips the assertion in SerialAdd().
Fixes bug #18658 reported by Andrew Bille. Thanks to Alexander Lakhin
for analysis. Backpatch to all versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18658-7dab125ec688c70b%40postgresql.org
The decision in b6e1157e7 to ignore raw_expr when evaluating a
JsonValueExpr was incorrect. While its value is not ultimately
used (since formatted_expr's value is), failing to initialize it
can lead to problems, for instance, when the expression tree in
raw_expr contains Aggref nodes, which must be initialized to
ensure the parent Agg node works correctly.
Also, optimize eval_const_expressions_mutator()'s handling of
JsonValueExpr a bit. Currently, when formatted_expr cannot be folded
into a constant, we end up processing it twice -- once directly in
eval_const_expressions_mutator() and again recursively via
ece_generic_processing(). This recursive processing is required to
handle raw_expr. To avoid the redundant processing of formatted_expr,
we now process raw_expr directly in eval_const_expressions_mutator().
Finally, update the comment of JsonValueExpr to describe the roles of
raw_expr and formatted_expr more clearly.
Bug: #18657
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Diagnosed-by: Fabio R. Sluzala <fabio3rs@gmail.com>
Diagnosed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18657-1b90ccce2b16bdb8@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 16
The present wording about viewing shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages
seems to suggest that the parameter cannot be viewed after startup
at all, whereas the intent is to make it clear that you can't use
"postgres -C" to view this parameter while the server is running.
This commit rephrases this section to remove the ambiguity.
Author: Seino Yuki
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, David G. Johnston, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/420584fd274f9ec4f337da55ffb3b790%40oss.nttdata.com
Backpatch-through: 15
The arguments of the function were listed in an incorrect order in the
description of the routine. This information can be seen with perldoc.
Issue spotted while working on this area of the code.
Backpatch-through: 17
After repartitioning the inner side of a hash join that would have
exceeded the allowed size, we check if all the tuples from a parent
partition moved to one child partition. That is evidence that it
contains duplicate keys and later attempts to repartition will also
fail, so we should give up trying to limit memory (for lack of a better
fallback strategy).
A thinko prevented the check from working correctly in partition 0 (the
one that is partially loaded into memory already). After
repartitioning, we should check for extreme skew if the *parent*
partition's space_exhausted flag was set, not the child partition's.
The consequence was repeated futile repartitioning until per-partition
data exceeded various limits including "ERROR: invalid DSA memory alloc
request size 1811939328", OS allocation failure, or temporary disk space
errors. (We could also do something about some of those symptoms, but
that's material for separate patches.)
This problem only became likely when PostgreSQL 16 introduced support
for Parallel Hash Right/Full Join, allowing NULL keys into the hash
table. Repartitioning always leaves NULL in partition 0, no matter how
many times you do it, because the hash value is all zero bits. That's
unlikely for other hashed values, but they might still have caused
wasted extra effort before giving up.
Back-patch to all supported releases.
Reported-by: Craig Milhiser <craig@milhiser.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BwnhO1OfgXbmXgC4fv_uu%3DOxcDQuHvfoQ4k0DFeB0Qqd-X-rQ%40mail.gmail.com
This commit adds missing checks for COPY FORCE_NOT_NULL and FORCE_NULL
when applied to all columns via "*". These options now correctly
require CSV mode and are disallowed in COPY TO, making their behavior
consistent with FORCE_QUOTE.
Some regression tests are added to verify the correct behavior for the
all-columns case, including FORCE_QUOTE, which was not tested.
Backpatch down to 17, where support for the all-column grammar with
FORCE_NOT_NULL and FORCE_NULL has been added.
Author: Joel Jacobson
Reviewed-by: Zhang Mingli
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/65030d1d-5f90-4fa4-92eb-f5f50389858e@app.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
Some queries in copy2 are there to check various option combinations,
and used "stdin" or "stdout" incompatible with the COPY TO or FROM
clauses combined with them, which was confusing. This commit rewrites
these queries to use a compatible grammar.
The coverage of the tests is unchanged. Like the original commit
451d1164b9d0, backpatch down to 16 where these have been introduced. A
follow-up commit will rely on this area of the tests for a bug fix.
Author: Joel Jacobson
Reviewed-by: Zhang Mingli
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/65030d1d-5f90-4fa4-92eb-f5f50389858e@app.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16
Commit 2dc1deaea turns out to have been still a brick shy of a load,
because CALL statements executing within a plpgsql exception block
could still pass the wrong snapshot to stable functions within the
CALL's argument list. That happened because standard_ProcessUtility
forces isAtomicContext to true if IsTransactionBlock is true, which
it always will be inside a subtransaction. Then ExecuteCallStmt
would think it does not need to push a new snapshot --- but
_SPI_execute_plan didn't do so either, since it thought it was in
nonatomic mode.
The best fix for this seems to be for _SPI_execute_plan to operate
in atomic execution mode if IsSubTransaction() is true, even when the
SPI context as a whole is non-atomic. This makes _SPI_execute_plan
have the same rules about when non-atomic execution is allowed as
_SPI_commit/_SPI_rollback have about when COMMIT/ROLLBACK are allowed,
which seems appropriately symmetric. (If anyone ever tries to allow
COMMIT/ROLLBACK inside a subtransaction, this would all need to be
rethought ... but I'm unconvinced that such a thing could be logically
consistent at all.)
For further consistency, also check IsSubTransaction() in
SPI_inside_nonatomic_context. That does not matter for its
one present-day caller StartTransaction, which can't be reached
inside a subtransaction. But if any other callers ever arise,
they'd presumably want this definition.
Per bug #18656 from Alexander Alehin. Back-patch to all
supported branches, like previous fixes in this area.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18656-cade1780866ef66c@postgresql.org
Commit a4ccc1cef introduced the Generation Context and modified the
logical decoding process to use a Generation Context with a fixed
block size of 8MB for storing tuple data decoded during logical
decoding (i.e., rb->tup_context). Several reports have indicated that
the logical decoding process can be terminated due to
out-of-memory (OOM) situations caused by excessive memory usage in
rb->tup_context.
This issue can occur when decoding a workload involving several
concurrent transactions, including a long-running transaction that
modifies tuples. By design, the Generation Context does not free a
memory block until all chunks within that block are
released. Consequently, if tuples modified by the long-running
transaction are stored across multiple memory blocks, these blocks
remain allocated until the long-running transaction completes, leading
to substantial memory fragmentation. The memory usage during logical
decoding, tracked by rb->size, does not account for memory
fragmentation, resulting in potentially much higher memory consumption
than the value of the logical_decoding_work_mem parameter.
Various improvement strategies were discussed in the relevant
thread. This change reduces the block size of the Generation Context
used in rb->tup_context from 8MB to 8kB. This modification
significantly decreases the likelihood of substantial memory
fragmentation occurring and is relatively straightforward to
backport. Performance testing across multiple platforms has confirmed
that this change will not introduce any performance degradation that
would impact actual operation.
Backport to all supported branches.
Reported-by: Alex Richman, Michael Guissine, Avi Weinberg
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Fujii Masao, David Rowley
Tested-by: Hayato Kuroda, Shlok Kyal
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBTY1LATZUmvSXEssvq07qDZufV4AF-OHh9VD2pC0VY2A%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
Attempting to use an interval of time less than 1ms would cause \watch
to hang. This was confusing, so let's change the logic so as an
interval lower than 1ms behaves the same as 0.
Comments are added to mention that the internals of do_watch() had
better rely on "sleep_ms", the interval value in milliseconds. While on
it, this commit adds a test to check the behavior of interval values
less than 1ms.
\watch hanging for interval values less than 1ms existed before
6f9ee74d45aa, that has changed the code to support an interval value of
0.
Reported-by: Heikki Linnakangas
Author: Andrey M. Borodin, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/88445e0e-3156-4b9d-afae-9a1a7b1631f6@iki.fi
Backpatch-through: 16
find_computable_ec_member() had the wrong mental model of what
its primary caller prepare_sort_from_pathkeys() would do with
the selected EquivalenceClass member expression. We will not
compute the EC expression in a plan node atop the one returning
the passed-in targetlist; rather, the EC expression will be
computed as an additional column of that targetlist. So any
Var or quasi-Var used in the given tlist is also available to the
EC expression. In simple cases this makes no difference because
the given tlist is just a list of Vars or quasi-Vars --- but if
we are considering an appendrel member produced by flattening
a UNION ALL, the tlist may contain expressions, resulting in
failure to match and a "could not find pathkey item to sort"
error.
To fix, we can flatten both the tlist and the EC members with
pull_var_clause(), and then just check for subset-ness, so
that the code is actually shorter than before.
While this bug is quite old, the present patch only works back to
v13. We could possibly make it work in v12 by back-patching parts
of 375398244. On the whole though I don't like the risk/reward
ratio of that idea. v12's final release is next month, meaning
there would be no chance to correct matters if the patch causes a
regression. Since this failure has escaped notice for 14 years,
it's likely nobody will hit it in the field with v12.
Per bug #18652 from Alexander Lakhin.
Andrei Lepikhov and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18652-deaa782ebcca85d1@postgresql.org
