<
< This will involve adding a way to respond to commit failure by either
< taking the server into offline/readonly mode or notifying the
< administrator
< * Add session start time and last statement time to pg_stat_activity
> * -Add session start time and last statement time to pg_stat_activity
134c134
< * Add the client IP address and port to pg_stat_activity
> * -Add the client IP address and port to pg_stat_activity
< Currently locale can only be set during initdb.
> Currently locale can only be set during initdb. No global tables have
> locale-aware columns. However, the database template used during
> database creation might have locale-aware indexes. The indexes would
> need to be reindexed to match the new locale.
> * Prevent to_char() on interval from returning meaningless values
>
> For example, to_char('1 month', 'mon') is meaningless. Basically,
> most date-related parameters to to_char() are meaningless for
> intervals because interval is not anchored to a date.
>
> * Allow to_char() on interval values to accumulate the highest unit
> requested
>
> o to_char(INTERVAL '1 hour 5 minutes', 'MI') => 65
> o to_char(INTERVAL '43 hours 20 minutes', 'MI' ) => 2600
> o to_char(INTERVAL '43 hours 20 minutes', 'WK:DD:HR:MI') => 0:1:19:20
> o to_char(INTERVAL '3 years 5 months','MM') => 41
>
> Some special format flag would be required to request such
> accumulation. Such functionality could also be added to EXTRACT.
> Prevent accumulation that crosses the month/day boundary because of
> the uneven number of days in a month.
>
< * Allow ORDER BY ... LIMIT 1 to select high/low value without sort or
> * Allow ORDER BY ... LIMIT # to select high/low value without sort or
868c868
< Right now, if no index exists, ORDER BY ... LIMIT 1 requires we sort
> Right now, if no index exists, ORDER BY ... LIMIT # requires we sort
870a871
> MIN/MAX already does this, but not for LIMIT > 1.
> * Allow ORDER BY ... LIMIT 1 to select high/low value without sort or
> index using a sequential scan for highest/lowest values
>
> Right now, if no index exists, ORDER BY ... LIMIT 1 requires we sort
> all values to return the high/low value. Instead The idea is to do a
> sequential scan to find the high/low value, thus avoiding the sort.
>
> One possible implementation is to start sequential scans from the lowest
> numbered buffer in the shared cache, and when reaching the end wrap
> around to the beginning, rather than always starting sequential scans
> at the start of the table.
< This allows vacuum to reclaim free space without requiring
< a sequential scan
> This allows vacuum to target specific pages for possible free space
> without requiring a sequential scan.
< * Consider parallel processing a single query
<
< This would involve using multiple threads or processes to do optimization,
< sorting, or execution of single query. The major advantage of such a
< feature would be to allow multiple CPUs to work together to process a
< single query.
<
< * Allow ORDER BY ... LIMIT 1 to select high/low value without sort or
< index using a sequential scan for highest/lowest values
<
< If only one value is needed, there is no need to sort the entire
< table. Instead a sequential scan could get the matching value.
<
< Solaris) might benefit from threading.
> Solaris) might benefit from threading. Also explore the idea of
> a single session using multiple threads to execute a query faster.
