> A third idea would be for a heap scan to check if all rows are visible
> and if so set a per-table flag which can be checked by index scans.
> Any change to the table would have to clear the flag. To detect
> changes during the heap scan a counter could be set at the start and
> checked at the end --- if it is the same, the table has not been
> modified --- any table change would increment the counter.
< o Allow UPDATE/DELETE WHERE CURRENT OF cursor
<
< This requires using the row ctid to map cursor rows back to the
< original heap row. This become more complicated if WITH HOLD cursors
< are to be supported because WITH HOLD cursors have a copy of the row
< and no FOR UPDATE lock.
< http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-01/msg01014.php
<
> o -Allow UPDATE/DELETE WHERE CURRENT OF cursor
o -Add a GUC variable to control the tablespace for temporary objects
and sort files
<
< It could start with a random tablespace from a supplied list and
< cycle through the list.
<
< * Allow free-behind capability for large sequential scans, perhaps using
< posix_fadvise()
> * Allow free-behind capability for large sequential scans to avoid
> kernel cache spoiling
scan-resistant:
<
< * Allow free-behind capability for large sequential scans, perhaps using
< posix_fadvise()
<
< Posix_fadvise() can control both sequential/random file caching and
< free-behind behavior, but it is unclear how the setting affects other
< backends that also have the file open, and the feature is not supported
< on all operating systems.
< * Consider allowing 64-bit integers to be passed by value on 64-bit
< platforms
> * Consider allowing 64-bit integers and floats to be passed by value on
> 64-bit platforms
>
> Also change 32-bit floats (float4) to be passed by value at the same
> time.
>
* Improve speed with indexes
For large table adjustments during VACUUM FULL, it is faster to cluster
or reindex rather than update the index. Also, index updates can bloat
the index.
>
> * Implement the SQL standard mechanism whereby REVOKE ROLE revokes only
> the privilege granted by the invoking role, and not those granted
> by other roles
< Last updated: Sat May 5 10:47:39 EDT 2007
> Last updated: Sat May 5 11:39:57 EDT 2007
< * Flush cached query plans when the dependent objects change,
< when the cardinality of parameters changes dramatically, or
> * -Flush cached query plans when the dependent objects change or
<
< A more complex solution would be to save multiple plans for different
< cardinality and use the appropriate plan based on the EXECUTE values.
<
< * Track dependencies in function bodies and recompile/invalidate
<
< This is particularly important for references to temporary tables
< in PL/PgSQL because PL/PgSQL caches query plans. The only workaround
< in PL/PgSQL is to use EXECUTE. One complexity is that a function
< might itself drop and recreate dependent tables, causing it to
< invalidate its own query plan.
<
< * Invalidate prepared queries, like INSERT, when the table definition
> * -Track dependencies in function bodies and recompile/invalidate
> * -Invalidate prepared queries, like INSERT, when the table definition
< * Invalidate prepared queries, like INSERT, when the table definition
< is altered
>
> * Invalidate prepared queries, like INSERT, when the table definition
> is altered
> * -Allow ORDER BY ... LIMIT # to select high/low value without sort or
<
< Right now, if no index exists, ORDER BY ... LIMIT # requires we sort
< all values to return the high/low value. Instead The idea is to do a
< sequential scan to find the high/low value, thus avoiding the sort.
< MIN/MAX already does this, but not for LIMIT > 1.
<
