We must test GetLastError() even when CreateFileMapping() returns a
non-null handle. If that value were left over from some previous system
call, we might be fooled into thinking the segment already existed.
Experimentation on Windows 7 suggests that CreateFileMapping() clears
the error code on success, but it is not documented to do so, so let's
not rely on that happening in all Windows releases.
Amit Kapila
Discussion: <20811.1474390987@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Otherwise, attempts to run multiple postmasters running on the same
machine may fail, because Windows sometimes returns ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED
rather than ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS when there is an existing segment.
Hitting this bug is much more likely because of another defect not
fixed by this patch, namely that dsm_postmaster_startup() uses
random() which returns the same value every time. But that's not
a reason not to fix this.
Kyotaro Horiguchi and Amit Kapila, reviewed by Michael Paquier
Discussion: <CAA4eK1JyNdMeF-dgrpHozDecpDfsRZUtpCi+1AbtuEkfG3YooQ@mail.gmail.com>
If you have previously pinned a segment and decide that you don't
actually want to keep it around until shutdown, this new API lets you
remove the pin. This is pretty trivial except on Windows, where it
requires closing the duplicate handle that was used to implement the
pin.
Thomas Munro and Amit Kapila, reviewed by Amit Kapila and by me.
This fixes a bunch of somewhat pedantic warnings with new
compilers. Since by far the majority of other functions definitions use
the (void) style it just seems to be consistent to do so as well in the
remaining few places.
Nobody seemed concerned about this naming when it originally went in,
but there's a pending patch that implements the opposite of
dsm_keep_mapping, and the term "unkeep" was judged unpalatable.
"unpin" has existing precedent in the PostgreSQL code base, and the
English language, so use this terminology instead.
Per discussion, back-patch to 9.4.
Apparently, Windows can sometimes return an error code even when the
operation actually worked just fine. Rearrange the order of checks
according to what appear to be the best practices in this area.
Amit Kapila
Since C99, it's been standard for printf and friends to accept a "z" size
modifier, meaning "whatever size size_t has". Up to now we've generally
dealt with printing size_t values by explicitly casting them to unsigned
long and using the "l" modifier; but this is really the wrong thing on
platforms where pointers are wider than longs (such as Win64). So let's
start using "z" instead. To ensure we can do that on all platforms, teach
src/port/snprintf.c to understand "z", and add a configure test to force
use of that implementation when the platform's version doesn't handle "z".
Having done that, modify a bunch of places that were using the
unsigned-long hack to use "z" instead. This patch doesn't pretend to have
gotten everyplace that could benefit, but it catches many of them. I made
an effort in particular to ensure that all uses of the same error message
text were updated together, so as not to increase the number of
translatable strings.
It's possible that this change will result in format-string warnings from
pre-C99 compilers. We might have to reconsider if there are any popular
compilers that will warn about this; but let's start by seeing what the
buildfarm thinks.
Andres Freund, with a little additional work by me
Apparently, shifts greater than or equal to the width of the type
are undefined, and can surprisingly produce a non-zero value.
Amit Kapila, with a comment by me.
To wit,
bgworker.c: In function `RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker':
bgworker.c:761: warning: `generation' might be used uninitialized in this function
dsm_impl.c: In function `dsm_impl_op':
dsm_impl.c:197: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
Neither of these represent actual bugs, but we may as well tweak the code
so that more compilers can tell that. This won't change the generated code
on compilers that do recognize that the cases are unreachable.
