Commit c120550edb optimized the vacuuming of relations without
indexes (a.k.a. one-pass strategy) by directly marking dead item IDs
as LP_UNUSED. However, the periodic FSM vacuum was still checking if
dead item IDs had been marked as LP_DEAD when attempting to vacuum the
FSM every VACUUM_FSM_EVERY_PAGES blocks. This condition was never met
due to the optimization, resulting in missed FSM vacuum
opportunities.
This commit modifies the periodic FSM vacuum condition to use the
number of tuples deleted during HOT pruning. This count includes items
marked as either LP_UNUSED or LP_REDIRECT, both of which are expected
to result in new free space to report.
Back-patch to v17 where the vacuum optimization for tables with no
indexes was introduced.
Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBL8m6B9GSzQfYxVaEgvD7-Kr3AJaS-hJPHC+avm-29zw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
A few places that access system catalogs don't set up an active
snapshot before potentially accessing their TOAST tables. To fix,
push an active snapshot just before each section of code that might
require accessing one of these TOAST tables, and pop it shortly
afterwards. While at it, this commit adds some rather strict
assertions in an attempt to prevent such issues in the future.
Commit 16bf24e0e4 recently removed pg_replication_origin's TOAST
table in order to fix the same problem for that catalog. On the
back-branches, those bugs are left in place. We cannot easily
remove a catalog's TOAST table on released major versions, and only
replication origins with extremely long names are affected. Given
the low severity of the issue, fixing older versions doesn't seem
worth the trouble of significantly modifying the patch.
Also, on v13 and v14, the aforementioned strict assertions have
been omitted because commit 2776922201, which added
HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot(), was not back-patched. While we
could probably back-patch it now, I've opted against it because it
seems unlikely that new TOAST snapshot issues will be introduced in
the oldest supported versions.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18127-fe54b6a667f29658%40postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18309-c0bf914950c46692%40postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZvMSUPOqUU-VNADN%40nathan
Backpatch-through: 13
bbf668d66f lowered the minimum value of maintenance_work_mem to
64kB. However, in parallel vacuum cases, since the initial underlying
DSA size is 256kB, it attempts to perform a cycle of index vacuuming
and table vacuuming with an empty TID store, resulting in an assertion
failure.
This commit ensures that at least one page is processed before index
vacuuming and table vacuuming begins.
Backpatch to 17, where the minimum maintenance_work_mem value was
lowered.
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoCEAmbkkXSKbj4dB+5pJDRL4ZHxrCiLBgES_g_g8mVi1Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
The right mix of DDL and VACUUM could corrupt a catalog page header such
that PageIsVerified() durably fails, requiring a restore from backup.
This affects only catalogs that both have a syscache and have DDL code
that uses syscache tuples to construct updates. One of the test
permutations shows a variant not yet fixed.
This makes !TransactionIdIsValid(TM_FailureData.xmax) possible with
TM_Deleted. I think core and PGXN are indifferent to that.
Per bug #17821 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v13 (all supported
versions). The test case is v17+, since it uses INJECTION_POINT.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17821-dd8c334263399284@postgresql.org
parallel_vacuum_reset_dead_items used a local variable to hold a
pointer from the passed vacrel, purely as a shorthand. This pointer
was later freed and a new allocation was made and stored to the
struct. Then the local pointer was mistakenly referenced again.
This apparently happened not to break anything since the freed chunk
would have been put on the context's freelist, so it was accidentally
the same pointer anyway, in which case the DSA handle was correctly
updated. The minimal fix is to change two places so they access
dead_items through the vacrel. This coding style is a maintenance
hazard, so while at it get rid of most other similar usages, which
were inconsistently used anyway.
Analysis and patch by Vallimaharajan G, with further defensive coding
by me
Backpath to v17, when TidStore came in
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1936493cc38.68cb2ef27266.7456585136086197135@zohocorp.com
This reverts commit 95c5acb3fc (v17) and
counterparts in each other non-master branch. If released, that commit
would have caused a worst-in-years minor release regression, via
undetected LWLock self-deadlock. This commit and its self-deadlock fix
warrant more bake time in the master branch.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10ec0bc3-5933-1189-6bb8-5dec4114558e@gmail.com
Commit a07e03fd8f changed inplace updates
to wait for heap_update() commands like GRANT TABLE and GRANT DATABASE.
By keeping the pin during that wait, a sequence of autovacuum workers
and an uncommitted GRANT starved one foreground LockBufferForCleanup()
for six minutes, on buildfarm member sarus. Prevent, at the cost of a
bit of complexity. Back-patch to v12, like the earlier commit. That
commit and heap_inplace_lock() have not yet appeared in any release.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241026184936.ae.nmisch@google.com
A buffer lock won't stop a reader having already checked tuple
visibility. If a vac_update_datfrozenid() and then a crash happened
during inplace update of a relfrozenxid value, datfrozenxid could
overtake relfrozenxid. That could lead to "could not access status of
transaction" errors. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). In
v14 and earlier, this also back-patches the assertion removal from
commit 7fcf2faf9c.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240620012908.92.nmisch@google.com
The inplace update survives ROLLBACK. The inval didn't, so another
backend's DDL could then update the row without incorporating the
inplace update. In the test this fixes, a mix of CREATE INDEX and ALTER
TABLE resulted in a table with an index, yet relhasindex=f. That is a
source of index corruption. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions).
The back branch versions don't change WAL, because those branches just
added end-of-recovery SIResetAll(). All branches change the ABI of
extern function PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(). No PGXN extension
calls that, and there's no apparent use case in extensions.
Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240523000548.58.nmisch@google.com
The previous commit fixed some ways of losing an inplace update. It
remained possible to lose one when a backend working toward a
heap_update() copied a tuple into memory just before inplace update of
that tuple. In catalogs eligible for inplace update, use LOCKTAG_TUPLE
to govern admission to the steps of copying an old tuple, modifying it,
and issuing heap_update(). This includes MERGE commands. To avoid
changing most of the pg_class DDL, don't require LOCKTAG_TUPLE when
holding a relation lock sufficient to exclude inplace updaters.
Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). In v13 and v12, "UPDATE
pg_class" or "UPDATE pg_database" can still lose an inplace update. The
v14+ UPDATE fix needs commit 86dc90056d,
and it wasn't worth reimplementing that fix without such infrastructure.
Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Heikki Linnakangas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231027214946.79.nmisch@google.com
As previously-added tests demonstrated, heap_inplace_update() could
instead update an unrelated tuple of the same catalog. It could lose
the update. Losing relhasindex=t was a source of index corruption.
Inplace-updating commands like VACUUM will now wait for heap_update()
commands like GRANT TABLE and GRANT DATABASE. That isn't ideal, but a
long-running GRANT already hurts VACUUM progress more just by keeping an
XID running. The VACUUM will behave like a DELETE or UPDATE waiting for
the uncommitted change.
For implementation details, start at the systable_inplace_update_begin()
header comment and README.tuplock. Back-patch to v12 (all supported
versions). In back branches, retain a deprecated heap_inplace_update(),
for extensions.
Reported by Smolkin Grigory. Reviewed by Nitin Motiani, (in earlier
versions) Heikki Linnakangas, and (in earlier versions) Alexander
Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMp+ueZQz3yDk7qg42hk6-9gxniYbp-=bG2mgqecErqR5gGGOA@mail.gmail.com
If vacuum fails to remove a tuple with xmax older than
VacuumCutoffs->OldestXmin and younger than GlobalVisState->maybe_needed,
it may attempt to freeze the tuple's xmax and then ERROR out in
pre-freeze checks with "cannot freeze committed xmax".
Fix this by having vacuum always remove tuples older than OldestXmin.
It is possible for GlobalVisState->maybe_needed to precede OldestXmin if
maybe_needed is forced to go backward while vacuum is running. This can
happen if a disconnected standby with a running transaction older than
VacuumCutoffs->OldestXmin reconnects to the primary after vacuum
initially calculates GlobalVisState and OldestXmin.
In back branches starting with 14, the first version using
GlobalVisState, failing to remove tuples older than OldestXmin during
pruning caused vacuum to infinitely loop in lazy_scan_prune(), as
investigated on this [1] thread. After 1ccc1e05ae removed the retry loop
in lazy_scan_prune() and stopped comparing tuples to OldestXmin, the
hang could no longer happen, but we could still attempt to freeze dead
tuples with xmax older than OldestXmin -- resulting in an ERROR.
Fix this by always removing dead tuples with xmax older than
VacuumCutoffs->OldestXmin. This is okay because the standby won't replay
the tuple removal until the tuple is removable. Thus, the worst that can
happen is a recovery conflict.
[1] https://postgr.es/m/20240415173913.4zyyrwaftujxthf2%40awork3.anarazel.de#1b216b7768b5bd577a3d3d51bd5aadee
Back-patch through 14
Author: Melanie Plageman
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan, Robert Haas, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, and Noah Misch
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_bDD7oq9ZwB2OJqub5BovMG6UjEYsoK2LVttadjEqyRGg%40mail.gmail.com
Make the isolation harness recognize injection_points wait events as a
type of blocked state. Test an extant inplace-update bug.
Reviewed by Robert Haas and Michael Paquier.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240512232923.aa.nmisch@google.com
Commit 667e65aac3 changed both num_dead_tuples and max_dead_tuples
columns to dead_tuple_bytes and max_dead_tuple_bytes columns,
respectively. But as per discussion, the number of dead tuples
collected still provides meaningful insights for users.
This commit reintroduces the column for the count of dead tuples,
renamed as num_dead_item_ids. It avoids confusion with the number of
dead tuples removed by VACUUM, which includes dead heap-only tuples
but excludes any pre-existing LP_DEAD items left behind by
opportunistic pruning.
Bump catalog version.
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan, Álvaro Herrera, Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBL5sJE9TRWPyv%2Bw7k5Ee5QAJqDJEDJBUdAaCzGWAdvZw%40mail.gmail.com
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in a few places. These
inconsistencies were all introduced during Postgres 17 development.
pg_bsd_indent still has a couple of similar inconsistencies, which I
(pgeoghegan) have left untouched for now.
This commit was written with help from clang-tidy, by mechanically
applying the same rules as similar clean-up commits (the earliest such
commit was commit 035ce1fe).
After further review, we want to move in the direction of always
quoting GUC names in error messages, rather than the previous (PG16)
wildly mixed practice or the intermittent (mid-PG17) idea of doing
this depending on how possibly confusing the GUC name is.
This commit applies appropriate quotes to (almost?) all mentions of
GUC names in error messages. It partially supersedes a243569bf6 and
8d9978a717, which had moved things a bit in the opposite direction
but which then were abandoned in a partial state.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAHut%2BPv-kSN8SkxSdoHano_wPubqcg5789ejhCDZAcLFceBR-w%40mail.gmail.com
04e72ed617 pushed the skip fetch optimization (allowing bitmap heap
scans to operate like index-only scans if none of the underlying data is
needed) into heap AM implementations of bitmap table scan callbacks.
04e72ed617 added an assert that all tuples in blocks eligible for the
optimization had been NULL-filled and emitted by the end of the scan.
This assert is incorrect when not all tuples need be scanned to execute
the query; for example: a join in which not all inner tuples need to be
scanned before skipping to the next outer tuple.
Remove the assert and reset the field on which it previously asserted to
avoid incorrectly emitting NULL-filled tuples from a previous scan on
rescan.
Author: Melanie Plageman
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Michael Paquier, Alvaro Herrera
Reported-by: Melanie Plageman
Reproduced-by: Tomas Vondra, Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48orzZVXa7-vP9Nt7vQWLTE04Qy4PePaLQYsVNQgo6qRg%40mail.gmail.com
A parallel worker's buffer usage is accumulated to its pgBufferUsage
and then is accumulated into the leader's one at the end of the
parallel vacuum. However, since the leader process used to use
dedicated VacuumPage{Hit, Miss, Dirty} globals for the buffer usage
reporting, the worker's buffer usage was not included, leading to an
incorrect buffer usage report.
To fix the problem, this commit makes vacuum use pgBufferUsage
instruments for buffer usage reporting instead of VacuumPage{Hit,
Miss, Dirty} globals. These global variables are still used by ANALYZE
command and autoanalyze.
This also fixes the buffer usage report of vacuuming on temporary
tables, since the buffers dirtied by MarkLocalBufferDirty() were not
tracked by the VacuumPageDirty variable.
Parallel vacuum was introduced in 13, but the buffer usage reporting
for VACUUM command with the VERBOSE option was implemented in
15. So backpatch to 15.
Reported-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy
Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy
Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_XqrQk+QZQcYs_C6nk0cMfHuUWk85vT9CrcA1NffFbAVE2A@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
Repeating loads of inplace-updated fields tends to cause bugs like the
one from the previous commit. While there's no bug to fix in these code
sites, adopt the load-once style. This improves the chance of future
copy/paste finding the safe style.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240423003956.e7.nmisch@google.com
While keeping API the same, this commit provides a way for block-level table
AMs to re-use existing acquire_sample_rows() by providing custom callbacks
for getting the next block and the next tuple.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240407214001.jgpg5q3yv33ve6y3%40awork3.anarazel.de
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov
Let table AM define custom reloptions for its tables. This allows specifying
AM-specific parameters by the WITH clause when creating a table.
The reloptions, which could be used outside of table AM, are now extracted
into the CommonRdOptions data structure. These options could be by decision
of table AM directly specified by a user or calculated in some way.
The new test module test_tam_options evaluates the ability to set up custom
reloptions and calculate fields of CommonRdOptions on their base.
The code may use some parts from prior work by Hao Wu.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdurb9ycV8udYqM%3Do0sPS66PJ4RCBM1g-bBpvzUfogY0EA%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AMUA1wBBBxfc3tKRLLdU64rb.1.1683276279979.Hmail.wuhao%40hashdata.cn
Reviewed-by: Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov, Matthias van de Meent, Jess Davis
Until now, heapgetpage()'s loop over all tuples performed some conditional
checks for each tuple, even though condition did not change across the loop.
This commit fixes that by moving the loop into an inline function. By calling
it with different constant arguments, the compiler can generate an optimized
loop for the different conditions, at the price of two per-page checks.
For cases of all-visible tables and an isolation level other than
serializable, speedups of up to 25% have been measured.
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Quan Zongliang <quanzongliang@yeah.net>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230716015656.xjvemfbp5fysjiea@awork3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2ef7ff1b-3d18-2283-61b1-bbd25fc6c7ce@yeah.net
Commit 792752af4e added infrastructure for using AVX-512 intrinsic
functions, and this commit uses that infrastructure to optimize
visibilitymap_count(). Specificially, a new pg_popcount_masked()
function is introduced that applies a bitmask to every byte in the
buffer prior to calculating the population count, which is used to
filter out the all-visible or all-frozen bits as needed. Platforms
without AVX-512 support should also see a nice speedup due to the
reduced number of calls to a function pointer.
Co-authored-by: Ants Aasma
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/BL1PR11MB5304097DF7EA81D04C33F3D1DCA6A%40BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
Commit 7c70996ebf introduced an optimization to allow bitmap
scans to operate like index-only scans by not fetching a block from the
heap if none of the underlying data is needed and the block is marked
all visible in the visibility map.
With the introduction of table AMs, a FIXME was added to this code
indicating that the skip_fetch logic should be pushed into the table
AM-specific code, as not all table AMs may use a visibility map in the
same way.
This commit resolves this FIXME for the current block. The layering
violation is still present in BitmapHeapScans's prefetching code, which
uses the visibility map to decide whether or not to prefetch a block.
However, this can be addressed independently.
Author: Melanie Plageman
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Tomas Vondra, Mark Dilger
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
To allow the use of the read stream API added in b5a9b18cd for
sequential scans on heap tables, here we make some adjustments to make
that change less invasive and perhaps make the code easier to follow in
the process.
Here heapgetpage() gets broken into two functions:
1) The part which reads the block has now been moved into a function
named heapfetchbuf().
2) The part which performed pruning and populated the scan's
rs_vistuples[] array is now moved into a new function named
heap_prepare_pagescan().
The functionality provided by heap_prepare_pagescan() was only ever
required by SO_ALLOW_PAGEMODE scans, so the branching that was
previously done in heapgetpage() is no longer needed as we simply just
don't call heap_prepare_pagescan() from heapgettup() in the refactored
code.
Author: Melanie Plageman
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_YtXJiYKQvb5JsA2SkwrsizYLugs4sSOZh3EAjKUg=gEQ@mail.gmail.com
Execute both freezing and pruning of tuples in the same
heap_page_prune() function, now called heap_page_prune_and_freeze(),
and emit a single WAL record containing all changes. That reduces the
overall amount of WAL generated.
This moves the freezing logic from vacuumlazy.c to the
heap_page_prune_and_freeze() function. The main difference in the
coding is that in vacuumlazy.c, we looked at the tuples after the
pruning had already happened, but in heap_page_prune_and_freeze() we
operate on the tuples before pruning. The heap_prepare_freeze_tuple()
function is now invoked after we have determined that a tuple is not
going to be pruned away.
VACUUM no longer needs to loop through the items on the page after
pruning. heap_page_prune_and_freeze() does all the work. It now
returns the list of dead offsets, including existing LP_DEAD items, to
the caller. Similarly it's now responsible for tracking 'all_visible',
'all_frozen', and 'hastup' on the caller's behalf.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240330055710.kqg6ii2cdojsxgje@liskov
In preparation of freezing and counting tuples which are not
candidates for pruning, split heap_prune_record_unchanged() into
multiple functions, depending the kind of line pointer. That's not too
interesting right now, but makes the next commit smaller.
Recording the lowest soon-to-be prunable xid is one of the actions we
take for unchanged LP_NORMAL item pointers but not for others, so move
that to the new heap_prune_record_unchanged_lp_normal() function. The
next commit will add more actions to these functions.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240330055710.kqg6ii2cdojsxgje@liskov
Previously, we used a simple array for storing dead tuple IDs during
lazy vacuum, which had a number of problems:
* The array used a single allocation and so was limited to 1GB.
* The allocation was pessimistically sized according to table size.
* Lookup with binary search was slow because of poor CPU cache and
branch prediction behavior.
This commit replaces that array with the TID store from commit
30e144287a.
Since the backing radix tree makes small allocations as needed, the
1GB limit is now gone. Further, the total memory used is now often
smaller by an order of magnitude or more, depending on the
distribution of blocks and offsets. These two features should make
multiple rounds of heap scanning and index cleanup an extremely rare
event. TID lookup during index cleanup is also several times faster,
even more so when index order is correlated with heap tuple order.
Since there is no longer a predictable relationship between the number
of dead tuples vacuumed and the space taken up by their TIDs, the
number of tuples no longer provides any meaningful insights for users,
nor is the maximum number predictable. For that reason this commit
also changes to byte-based progress reporting, with the relevant
columns of pg_stat_progress_vacuum renamed accordingly to
max_dead_tuple_bytes and dead_tuple_bytes.
For parallel vacuum, both the TID store and supplemental information
specific to vacuum are shared among the parallel vacuum workers. As
with the previous array, we don't take any locks on TidStore during
parallel vacuum since writes are still only done by the leader
process.
Bump catalog version.
Reviewed-by: John Naylor, (in an earlier version) Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAfOZvmfR0j8VmZorZjL7RhTiQdVttNuC4W-Shdc2a-AA%40mail.gmail.com
Currently there is only one option, HEAP_PAGE_PRUNE_MARK_UNUSED_NOW
which replaces the old boolean argument, but upcoming patches will
introduce at least one more. Having a lot of boolean arguments makes
it hard to see at the call sites what the arguments mean, so prefer a
bitmask of options with human-readable names.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240401172219.fngjosaqdgqqvg4e@liskov
Handle dead branches of aborted HOT chains outside heap_prune_chain()
as a separate phase. This simplifies the logic in heap_prune_chain(),
as well as allowing us to clean up more RECENTLY_DEAD -> DEAD chains.
To accomplish this efficiently, partition tuples into HOT and non-HOT
while first collecting visibility information for each tuple in
heap_page_prune(). Then call heap_prune_chain() only on potential
chain members. Then mop up the leftover HOT tuples afterwards.
As part of this, keep track of which items on page have already been
processed, in 'processed' array. This replaces the 'marked' array
which was only set for tuples marked for removal or redirection. The
'processed' array is updated also for items that are left unchanged,
when we conclude that an item can be left unchanged. At the end of
pruning, every item on the page should be marked as processed in the
array; an assertion is added for that.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240330055710.kqg6ii2cdojsxgje@liskov
Keep track of the number of deleted tuples in PruneState and record this
information when recording a tuple dead, unused or redirected. This
removes a special case from the traversal and chain processing logic as
well as setting a precedent of recording the impact of prune actions in
the record functions themselves. This paradigm will be used in future
commits which move tracking of additional statistics on pruning actions
from lazy_scan_prune() to heap_prune_chain().
Simplify heap_prune_chain()'s chain traversal logic by handling each
case explicitly. That is, do not attempt to share code when processing
different types of chains. For each category of chain, process it
specifically and procedurally: first handling the root, then any
intervening tuples, and, finally, the end of the chain.
While we are at it, add a few new comments to heap_prune_chain()
clarifying some special cases involving RECENTLY_DEAD tuples.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240330055710.kqg6ii2cdojsxgje@liskov
Pass 'page', 'blockno' and 'maxoff' to heap_prune_chain() as
arguments, so that it doesn't need to fetch them from the buffer. This
saves a few cycles per chain.
Remove the "if (off_loc != NULL)" checks, and require the caller to
pass a non-NULL 'off_loc'. Pass a pointer to a dummy local variable
when it's not needed. Those checks are cheap, but it's still better to
avoid them in the per-chain loops when we can do so easily.
The CPU time saving from these changes are hardly measurable, but
fewer instructions is good anyway, so why not. I spotted the potential
for these while reviewing Melanie Plageman's patch set to combine
prune and freeze records.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_abm2tHhrc0QSQa%3D%3DsHe%3DVA1%3Doz1dJMQYUOKuHmu%2B9Xrg%40mail.gmail.com
