This commit updates two code paths to use pg_lfind32() introduced by
b6ef167 with TransactionId arrays:
- At the end of TransactionIdIsInProgress(), when checking for the case
of still running but overflowed subxids.
- XidIsConcurrent(), when checking for a serializable conflict.
These cases are less impactful than 37a6e5d, but a bit of
micro-benchmarking of this API shows that linear search speeds up by
~20% depending on the number of items involved (x86_64 and amd64 looked
at here).
Author: Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220901185153.GA783106@nathanxps13
For publication schemas (OBJECT_PUBLICATION_NAMESPACE) and user
mappings (OBJECT_USER_MAPPING), pg_get_object_address() checked the
array length of the second argument, but not of the first argument.
If the first argument was too long, it would just silently ignore
everything but the first argument. Fix that by checking the length of
the first argument as well.
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/caaef70b-a874-1088-92ef-5ac38269c33b%40enterprisedb.com
Previously the following snprintf() wrappers:
* ReplicationSlotNameForTablesync()
* ReplicationOriginNameForTablesync()
... used int as a second argument of snprintf() while the actual type of it
is size_t. Although it doesn't fail at present better replace it with Size
for consistency with the rest of the system.
Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Reviewed-By: Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut%2BPsa8hhfSE6ozUK-ih7GkQziAVAf4f3bqiXEj2nQiu-43g%40mail.gmail.com
expression_tree_walker and allied functions have traditionally
declared their callback functions as, say, "bool (*walker) ()"
to allow for variation in the declared types of the callback
functions' context argument. This is apparently going to be
forbidden by the next version of the C standard, and the latest
version of clang warns about that. In any case it's always
been pretty poor for error-detection purposes, so fixing it is
a good thing to do.
What we want to do is change the callback argument declarations to
be like "bool (*walker) (Node *node, void *context)", which is
correct so far as expression_tree_walker and friends are concerned,
but not change the actual callback functions. Strict compliance with
the C standard would require changing them to declare their arguments
as "void *context" and then cast to the appropriate context struct
type internally. That'd be very invasive and it would also introduce
a bunch of opportunities for future bugs, since we'd no longer have
any check that the correct sort of context object is passed by outside
callers or internal recursion cases. Therefore, we're just going
to ignore the standard's position that "void *" isn't necessarily
compatible with struct pointers. No machine built in the last forty
or so years actually behaves that way, so it's not worth introducing
bug hazards for compatibility with long-dead hardware.
Therefore, to silence these compiler warnings, introduce a layer of
macro wrappers that cast the supplied function name to the official
argument type. Thanks to our use of -Wcast-function-type, this will
still produce a warning if the supplied function is seriously
incompatible with the required signature, without going as far as
the official spec restriction does.
This method fixes the problem without any need for source code changes
outside nodeFuncs.h/.c. However, it is an ABI break because the
physically called functions now have names ending in "_impl". Hence
we can only fix it this way in HEAD. In the back branches, we'll have
to settle for disabling -Wdeprecated-non-prototype.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGKpHPDTv67Y+s6yiC8KH5OXeDg6a-twWo_xznKTcG0kSA@mail.gmail.com
Fix selfuncs.h cpluspluscheck complaint, without reintroducing a
parameter name inconsistency (restore the original declaration names,
and then make corresponding function definitions consistent with that).
Oversight in commit a601366a.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in optimizer, parser,
utility, libpq, and "commands" code, as well as in remaining library
code. Do the same for all code related to frontend programs (with the
exception of pg_dump/pg_dumpall related code).
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will handle
ecpg and pg_dump/pg_dumpall.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
clang 15+ will issue a set-but-not-used warning when the only
use of a variable is in autoincrements (e.g., "foo++;").
That's perfectly sensible, but it detects a few more cases that
we'd not noticed before. Silence the warnings with our usual
methods, such as PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY, or in one case by
actually removing a useless variable.
One thing that we can't nicely get rid of is that with %pure-parser,
Bison emits "yynerrs" as a local variable that falls foul of this
warning. To silence those, I inserted "(void) yynerrs;" in the
top-level productions of affected grammars.
Per recently-established project policy, this is a candidate
for back-patching into out-of-support branches: it suppresses
annoying compiler warnings but changes no behavior. Hence,
back-patch to 9.5, which is as far as these patches go without
issues. (A preliminary check shows that the prior branches
need some other set-but-not-used cleanups too, so I'll leave
them for another day.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/514615.1663615243@sss.pgh.pa.us
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in storage, catalog,
access method, executor, and logical replication code, as well as in
miscellaneous utility/library code.
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will do the
same for other parts of the codebase.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions. Having parameter names
that are reliably consistent in this way will make it easier to reason
about groups of related C functions from the same translation unit as a
module. It will also make certain refactoring tasks easier.
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will do the
same for other parts of the codebase.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
Adjust a handful of remaining function prototypes that were overlooked
by recent commit bc2187ed. This oversight wasn't caught by clang-tidy
because the functions in question are only built in custom REG_DEBUG
builds.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
The header comment for get_cheapest_group_keys_order() claimed that the
output arguments were set to a newly allocated list which may be freed by
the calling function, however, this was not always true as the function
would simply leave these arguments untouched in some cases.
This tripped me up when working on 1349d2790 as I mistakenly assumed I
could perform a list_concat with the output parameters. That turned out
bad due to list_concat modifying the original input lists.
In passing, make it more clear that the number of distinct values is
important to reduce tiebreaks during sorts. Also, explain what the
n_preordered parameter means.
Backpatch-through: 15, where get_cheapest_group_keys_order was introduced.
If role A is a direct or indirect member of role B but does not inherit
B's privileges (because at least one relevant grant was created WITH
INHERIT FALSE) then A should not be permitted to bypass privilege
checks that require the privileges of B. For example, A can't change
the privileges of objects owned by B, nor can A drop those objects.
However, up until now, it's been possible for A to change default
privileges for role B. That doesn't seem to be correct, because a
non-inherited role grant is only supposed to permit you to assume
the identity of the granted role via SET ROLE, and should not
otherwise permit you to exercise the privileges of that role. Most
places followed that rule, but this case was an exception.
This could be construed as a security vulnerability, but it does not
seem entirely clear cut, since older branches were fuzzy about the
distinction between is_member_of_role() and has_privs_of_role() in
a number of other ways as well. Because of this, and because
user-visible behavior changes in minor releases are to be avoided
whenever possible, no back-patch.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobG_YUP06R_PM_2Z7wR0qv_52gQPHD8CYXbJva0cf0E+A@mail.gmail.com
The API contract for planstate_tree_walker() callbacks is that they
take a PlanState pointer and a context pointer. Somebody figured
they could save a couple lines of code by ignoring that, and passing
ExecShutdownNode itself as the walker even though it has but one
argument. Somewhat remarkably, we've gotten away with that so far.
However, it seems clear that the upcoming C2x standard means to
forbid such cases, and compilers that actively break such code
likely won't be far behind. So spend the extra few lines of code
to do it honestly with a separate walker function.
In HEAD, we might as well go further and remove ExecShutdownNode's
useless return value. I left that as-is in back branches though,
to forestall complaints about ABI breakage.
Back-patch, with the thought that this might become of practical
importance before our stable branches are all out of service.
It doesn't seem to be fixing any live bug on any currently known
platform, however.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/208054.1663534665@sss.pgh.pa.us
Since c7aba7c, the transform method used during parse analysis of a
subcripting construct has moved from transformAssignmentSubscripts() to
the per-type transform method (arrays or arbitrary types) the step that
checks for slicing support, but transformAssignmentSubscripts() has kept
traces of it. Removing it simplifies the code, so let's clean up all
that.
Author: Zhang Mingli
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0d7041ac-c704-48ad-86fd-e05feddf08ed@Spark
Make reorderbuffer.h function declarations consistently use named
parameters. Also make sure that the declarations use names that match
corresponding names from function definitions in reorderbuffer.c. This
makes the definitions easier to follow, especially in the case of
functions that happen to have adjoining arguments of the same type.
This patch was written with help from clang-tidy. Specifically, its
"readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name" check and its
"readability-named-parameter" check were used.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3955318.1663377656@sss.pgh.pa.us
So far they were created below CacheMemoryContext. However, that's not
guaranteed to exist in all situations, leading to memory contexts created as
top-level contexts. There isn't actually a good reason anymore to create them
below CacheMemoryContext, so just creating them below TopMemoryContext seems
the best approach.
Reported-by: Reid Thompson <reid.thompson@crunchydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b948b729-42fe-f88c-2f4a-0e65d84c049b@amazon.com
Backpatch: 15-
Since Windows 10 1703, it is additionally necessary to pass a flag
called FILE_MAP_LARGE_PAGES to MapViewOfFile() to enable large pages at
map time. This flag is ignored on older versions of Windows, where
large pages should still be able to work properly without setting it.
Note that the flag would be set only for binaries that knew about it at
compile-time, which should be more or less all the Windows environments
these days.
Since 495ed0e, Windows 10 is the minimum version of Windows supported by
Postgres, making this change easy to reason about on HEAD. Per
discussion, no backpatch is done for the moment.
Reported-by: Okano Naoki
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier, Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17448-0a96583a67edb1f7@postgresql.org
After commit cc2c7d65fc added this flag,
failure to reset it caused assertion failures. In non-assert builds, it
made the system fail to achieve the objectives listed in that commit;
chiefly, we might emit a spurious log message. Back-patch to v15, where
that commit first appeared.
Bharath Rupireddy and Kyotaro Horiguchi. Reviewed by Dilip Kumar,
Nathan Bossart and Michael Paquier. Reported by Dilip Kumar.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-sE3ry=ycMPVtC+Djw4Fd7gbUGVv_qqw6qfzp=JLvqT3g@mail.gmail.com
Commit ecaf7c5df5 removed gram.h from the backend's generated-headers
target. In LLVM builds, this leads to loss of dependency information
when generating .bc files. To fix, add a rule that mirrors ad-hoc .o
dependencies for .bc files as well.
Per cfbot (no buildfarm failures reported)
Analysis by Tom Lane and Andres Freund
Proposed fix by Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220914210427.y26tkagmxo5wwbvp%40awork3.anarazel.de
Referring to the WAL as just "log" invites confusion with the
postmaster log, so avoid doing that in docs and error messages.
Also shorten "WAL segment file" to just "WAL file" in various
places.
Bharath Rupireddy, reviewed by Nathan Bossart and Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACUeXa8tDPaiTLexBDMZ7hgvaN+RTb957-cn5qwv9zf-MQ@mail.gmail.com
In 29f45e299, we added support for optimizing the execution of NOT
IN(values) by using a hash table instead of a linear search over the
array. That commit neglected to update the header comment for
convert_saop_to_hashed_saop() to mention this fact. Here we fix that.
Author: James Coleman
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe99NUpAPcxgchGstgM23fmiGjqQPot8627YgkBgNt=BfA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15, where 29f45e299 was added.
Various bits of code were declaring signal handlers manually,
using "int signum" or variants of that. We evidently have no
platforms where that's actually wrong, but let's use our
SIGNAL_ARGS macro everywhere anyway. If nothing else, it's
good for finding signal handlers easily.
No need for back-patch, since this is just cosmetic AFAICS.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2684964.1663167995@sss.pgh.pa.us
This appears to be a merge mistake in 96ef3237bf. We could put it
back the way it was before JSON_TABLE and it'd be two lines shorter, but
it's likely that JSON_TABLE will be back and will prefer things this
way. It makes no other difference in practice.
Backpatch to 15.
Reported by Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAr4nOcNQskC4oBEZN4S+4heJ=1ch_ZKOxU+_Ef-FQSf-g@mail.gmail.com
This header is semi-private, being used only in files related to
raw parsing, so move to the backend directory where those files
live. This allows removal of Makefile rules that symlink gram.h to
src/include/parser, since gramparse.h can now include gram.h from
within the same directory. This has the side-effect of no longer
installing gram.h and gramparse.h, but there doesn't seem to be a
good reason to continue doing so.
Per suggestion from Andres Freund and Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220904181759.px6uosll6zbxcum5%40awork3.anarazel.de
PG_COMPRESSION_OPTION_LEVEL is removed from the compression
specification logic, and instead the compression level is always
assigned with each library's default if nothing is directly given. This
centralizes the checks on the compression methods supported by a given
build, and always assigns a default compression level when parsing a
compression specification. This results in complaining at an earlier
stage than previously if a build supports a compression method or not,
aka when parsing a specification in the backend or the frontend, and not
when processing it. zstd, lz4 and zlib are able to handle in their
respective routines setting up the compression level the case of a
default value, hence the backend or frontend code (pg_receivewal or
pg_basebackup) has now no need to know what the default compression
level should be if nothing is specified: the logic is now done so as the
specification parsing assigns it. It can also be enforced by passing
down a "level" set to the default value, that the backend will accept
(the replication protocol is for example able to handle a command like
BASE_BACKUP (COMPRESSION_DETAIL 'gzip:level=-1')).
This code simplification fixes an issue with pg_basebackup --gzip
introduced by ffd5365, where the tarball of the streamed WAL segments
would be created as of pg_wal.tar.gz with uncompressed contents, while
the intention is to compress the segments with gzip at a default level.
The origin of the confusion comes from the handling of the default
compression level of gzip (-1 or Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION) and the value of
0 was getting assigned, which is what walmethods.c would consider
as equivalent to no compression when streaming WAL segments with its tar
methods. Assigning always the compression level removes the confusion
of some code paths considering a value of 0 set in a specification as
either no compression or a default compression level.
Note that 010_pg_basebackup.pl has to be adjusted to skip a few tests
where the shape of the compression detail string for client and
server-side compression was checked using gzip. This is a result of the
code simplification, as gzip specifications cannot be used if a build
does not support it.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1400032.1662217889@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 15
guc.c has grown to be one of our largest .c files, making it
a bottleneck for compilation. It's also acquired a bunch of
knowledge that'd be better kept elsewhere, because of our not
very good habit of putting variable-specific check hooks here.
Hence, split it up along these lines:
* guc.c itself retains just the core GUC housekeeping mechanisms.
* New file guc_funcs.c contains the SET/SHOW interfaces and some
SQL-accessible functions for GUC manipulation.
* New file guc_tables.c contains the data arrays that define the
built-in GUC variables, along with some already-exported constant
tables.
* GUC check/assign/show hook functions are moved to the variable's
home module, whenever that's clearly identifiable. A few hard-
to-classify hooks ended up in commands/variable.c, which was
already a home for miscellaneous GUC hook functions.
To avoid cluttering a lot more header files with #include "guc.h",
I also invented a new header file utils/guc_hooks.h and put all
the GUC hook functions' declarations there, regardless of their
originating module. That allowed removal of #include "guc.h"
from some existing headers. The fallout from that (hopefully
all caught here) demonstrates clearly why such inclusions are
best minimized: there are a lot of files that, for example,
were getting array.h at two or more levels of remove, despite
not having any connection at all to GUCs in themselves.
There is some very minor code beautification here, such as
renaming a couple of inconsistently-named hook functions
and improving some comments. But mostly this just moves
code from point A to point B and deals with the ensuing
needs for #include adjustments and exporting a few functions
that previously weren't exported.
Patch by me, per a suggestion from Andres Freund; thanks also
to Michael Paquier for the idea to invent guc_funcs.c.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/587607.1662836699@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit 3a0e385048 introduced a new path for unauthenticated bytes from
the client certificate to be printed unescaped to the logs. There are a
handful of these already, but it doesn't make sense to keep making the
problem worse. \x-escape any unprintable bytes.
The test case introduces a revoked UTF-8 certificate. This requires the
addition of the `-utf8` flag to `openssl req`. Since the existing
certificates all use an ASCII subset, this won't modify the existing
certificates' subjects if/when they get regenerated; this was verified
experimentally with
$ make sslfiles-clean
$ make sslfiles
Unfortunately the test can't be run in the CI yet due to a test timing
issue; see 55828a6b60.
Author: Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAWbhmgsvHrH9wLU2kYc3pOi1KSenHSLAHBbCVmmddW6-mc_=w@mail.gmail.com
The two strings are already a single palloc'd chunk, not freed; there's
no reason to allocate separate copies that have the same lifetime.
This code is only called in short-lived memory contexts (except in some
cases in TopTransactionContext, which is still short-lived enough not to
really matter), and typically only for short arrays, so the memory or
computation saved is likely negligible. However, let's fix it to avoid
leaving a bad example of code to copy. This is the only place I could
find where we're doing this with makeDefElem().
Reported-by: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220909142050.3vv2hjekppk265dd@alvherre.pgsql
The primary fix here is to fix has_matching_range() so it does not
reference ranges->values[-1] when nranges == 0. Similar problems existed
in AssertCheckRanges() too. It does not look like any of these problems
could lead to a crash as the array in question is at the end of the Ranges
struct, and values[-1] is memory that belongs to other fields in the
struct. However, let's get rid of these rather unsafe coding practices.
In passing, I (David) adjusted some comments to try to make it more clear
what some of the fields are for in the Ranges struct. I had to study the
code to find out what nsorted was for as I couldn't tell from the
comments.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAqJQzPitufX-jR=YUbJafpCDAKUnwgdbX_MzSc93wuvdw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14, where multi-range brin was added.
Commit c4c340088 changed geometric operators to use float4 and float8
functions, and handle NaN's in a better way. The circle sameness test
had a typo in the code which resulted in all comparisons with the left
circle having a NaN radius considered same.
postgres=# select '<(0,0),NaN>'::circle ~= '<(0,0),1>'::circle;
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)
This fixes the sameness test to consider the radius of both the left
and right circle.
Backpatch to v12 where this was introduced.
Author: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAo8dK=yctg2ZzjJuzV4zgOPBxRU5+Kb+yatFiddtQk6Rw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: v12
