This routines includes three code paths that can fail, with the
allocated prepared statement name going out of scope.
Per report from Coverity. Oversight in commit a6eabec680, that has
played with the order of some ecpg_strdup() calls in this code path.
Various code paths of the ECPG code did not check for memory allocation
failures, including the specific case where ecpg_strdup() considers a
NULL value given in input as a valid behavior. strdup() returning
itself NULL on failure, there was no way to make the difference between
what could be valid and what should fail.
With the different cases in mind, ecpg_strdup() is redesigned and gains
a new optional argument, giving its callers the possibility to
differentiate allocation failures and valid cases where the caller is
giving a NULL value in input. Most of the ECPG code does not expect a
NULL value, at the exception of ECPGget_desc() (setlocale) and
ECPGconnect(), like dbname being unspecified, with repeated strdup
calls.
The code is adapted to work with this new routine. Note the case of
ecpg_auto_prepare(), where the code order is switched so as we handle
failures with ecpg_strdup() before manipulating any cached data,
avoiding inconsistencies.
This class of failure is unlikely a problem in practice, so no backpatch
is done. Random OOM failures in ECPGconnect() could cause the driver to
connect to a different server than the one wanted by the caller, because
it could fallback to default values instead of the parameters defined
depending on the combinations of allocation failures and successes.
Author: Evgeniy Gorbanev <gorbanyoves@basealt.ru>
Co-authored-by: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@tigerdata.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a6b193c1-6994-4d9c-9059-aca4aaf41ddd@basealt.ru
Thomas Munro fixed a longstanding annoyance in pg_bsd_indent, that
it would misformat lines containing IsA() macros on the assumption
that the IsA() call should be treated like a cast. This improves
some other cases involving field/variable names that match typedefs,
too. The only places that get worse are a couple of uses of the
OpenSSL macro STACK_OF(); we'll gladly take that trade-off.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200114221814.GA19630@alvherre.pgsql
This reverts commit bd7c95f0c1,
along with assorted follow-on fixes. There are some questions
about the definition and implementation of that statement, and
we don't have time to resolve them before v13 release. Rather
than ship the feature and then have backwards-compatibility
concerns constraining any redesign, let's remove it for now
and try again later.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TY2PR01MB2443EC8286995378AEB7D9F8F5B10@TY2PR01MB2443.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
ecpg_register_prepared_stmt() is pretty obviously checking the wrong
variable while trying to detect malloc failure. Error in commit
a1dc6ab46, spotted by Coverity.
This is still using the 2.0 version of pg_bsd_indent.
I thought it would be good to commit this separately,
so as to document the differences between 2.0 and 2.1 behavior.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16296.1558103386@sss.pgh.pa.us
Besides implementing the new statement this change fix some issues with the
parsing of PREPARE and EXECUTE statements. The different forms of these
statements are now all handled in a ujnified way.
Author: Matsumura-san <matsumura.ryo@jp.fujitsu.com>
DECLARE STATEMENT is a statement that lets users declare an identifier
pointing at a connection. This identifier will be used in other embedded
dynamic SQL statement such as PREPARE, EXECUTE, DECLARE CURSOR and so on.
When connecting to a non-default connection, the AT clause can be used in
a DECLARE STATEMENT once and is no longer needed in every dynamic SQL
statement. This makes ECPG applications easier and more efficient. Moreover,
writing code without designating connection explicitly improves portability.
Authors: Ideriha-san ("Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha.takeshi@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Kuroda-san ("Kuroda, Hayato" <kuroda.hayato@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m4E72940DA2BF16479384A86D54D0988A565669DF@G01JPEXMBKW04
This should reduce confusion, and in particular make it safe to
copy typename.c into preproc/ and compile it there.
This doesn't affect anything outside ecpg, and particularly not
end users, because these files don't get installed; they just
exist to share declarations among the .c files of each subdirectory.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31364.1543511708@sss.pgh.pa.us
Avoid allocating never-used entries in stmtCacheEntries[], other than the
intentionally-unused zero'th entry. Tie the array size directly to the
bucket count and size, rather than having undocumented dependencies between
three magic constants. Fix the hash calculation to be platform-independent
--- notably, it was sensitive to the signed'ness of "char" before, not to
mention having an unnecessary hard-wired dependency on the existence and
size of type "long long". (The lack of complaints says it's been a long
time since anybody tried to build PG on a compiler without "long long",
and certainly with the requirement for C99 this isn't a live bug anymore.
But it's still not per project coding style.) Fix ecpg_auto_prepare's
new-cache-entry path so that it increments the exec count for the new
cache entry not the dummy zero'th entry.
The last of those is an actual bug, though one of little consequence;
the rest is mostly future-proofing and neatnik-ism. Doesn't seem
necessary to back-patch.
This removes a megabyte of storage that isn't used at all in ecpglib's
default operating mode --- you have to enable auto-prepare to get any
use out of it. Seems well worth the trouble to allocate on demand.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181015200754.7y7zfuzsoux2c4ya@alap3.anarazel.de
Looking at this code made my head hurt. Format the comments more
like the way it's done elsewhere, break a few overly long lines.
No actual code changes in this commit.
The parenthesized style has only been used in a few modules. Change
that to use the style that is predominant across the whole tree.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy@gmail.com>
Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they
flow past the right margin.
By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are
within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding
left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the
continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin,
then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin,
if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of
the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations
unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column
limit.
This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers.
Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized
lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.
Commit e3860ffa4d wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.
Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
The new indent version includes numerous fixes thanks to Piotr Stefaniak.
The main changes visible in this commit are:
* Nicer formatting of function-pointer declarations.
* No longer unexpectedly removes spaces in expressions using casts,
sizeof, or offsetof.
* No longer wants to add a space in "struct structname *varname", as
well as some similar cases for const- or volatile-qualified pointers.
* Declarations using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY are formatted more nicely.
* Fixes bug where comments following declarations were sometimes placed
with no space separating them from the code.
* Fixes some odd decisions for comments following case labels.
* Fixes some cases where comments following code were indented to less
than the expected column 33.
On the less good side, it now tends to put more whitespace around typedef
names that are not listed in typedefs.list. This might encourage us to
put more effort into typedef name collection; it's not really a bug in
indent itself.
There are more changes coming after this round, having to do with comment
indentation and alignment of lines appearing within parentheses. I wanted
to limit the size of the diffs to something that could be reviewed without
one's eyes completely glazing over, so it seemed better to split up the
changes as much as practical.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
strncpy() has a well-deserved reputation for being unsafe, so make an
effort to get rid of nearly all occurrences in HEAD.
A large fraction of the remaining uses were passing length less than or
equal to the known strlen() of the source, in which case no null-padding
can occur and the behavior is equivalent to memcpy(), though doubtless
slower and certainly harder to reason about. So just use memcpy() in
these cases.
In other cases, use either StrNCpy() or strlcpy() as appropriate (depending
on whether padding to the full length of the destination buffer seems
useful).
I left a few strncpy() calls alone in the src/timezone/ code, to keep it
in sync with upstream (the IANA tzcode distribution). There are also a
few such calls in ecpg that could possibly do with more analysis.
AFAICT, none of these changes are more than cosmetic, except for the four
occurrences in fe-secure-openssl.c, which are in fact buggy: an overlength
source leads to a non-null-terminated destination buffer and ensuing
misbehavior. These don't seem like security issues, first because no stack
clobber is possible and second because if your values of sslcert etc are
coming from untrusted sources then you've got problems way worse than this.
Still, it's undesirable to have unpredictable behavior for overlength
inputs, so back-patch those four changes to all active branches.
Use bool as type for booleans instead of int.
Do not implicitely cast size_t to int.
Make the compiler stop complaining about unused variables by adding an empty statement.
