For many optional libraries, we extract the -L and -l switches needed
to link the library from a helper program such as llvm-config. In
some cases we put the resulting -L switches into LDFLAGS ahead of
-L switches specified via --with-libraries. That risks breaking
the user's intention for --with-libraries.
It's not such a problem if the library's -L switch points to a
directory containing only that library, but on some platforms a
library helper may "helpfully" offer a switch such as -L/usr/lib
that points to a directory holding all standard libraries. If the
user specified --with-libraries in hopes of overriding the standard
build of some library, the -L/usr/lib switch prevents that from
happening since it will come before the user-specified directory.
To fix, avoid inserting these switches directly into LDFLAGS during
configure, instead adding them to LIBDIRS or SHLIB_LINK. They will
still eventually get added to LDFLAGS, but only after the switches
coming from --with-libraries.
The same problem exists for -I switches: those coming from
--with-includes should appear before any coming from helper programs
such as llvm-config. We have not heard field complaints about this
case, but it seems certain that a user attempting to override a
standard library could have issues.
The changes for this go well beyond configure itself, however,
because many Makefiles have occasion to manipulate CPPFLAGS to
insert locally-desirable -I switches, and some of them got it wrong.
The correct ordering is any -I switches pointing at within-the-
source-tree-or-build-tree directories, then those from the tree-wide
CPPFLAGS, then those from helper programs. There were several places
that risked pulling in a system-supplied copy of libpq headers, for
example, instead of the in-tree files. (Commit cb36f8ec2 fixed one
instance of that a few months ago, but this exercise found more.)
The Meson build scripts may or may not have any comparable problems,
but I'll leave it to someone else to investigate that.
Reported-by: Charles Samborski <demurgos@demurgos.net>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/70f2155f-27ca-4534-b33d-7750e20633d7@demurgos.net
Backpatch-through: 13
Previously we searched for llvm-config-N and clang-N as well as the
unversioned names, and maintained a list of expected values of N. There
doesn't seem to be any reason to think that the default llvm-config and
clang won't be good enough, and if they aren't, they can be overridden
with LLVM_CONFIG and CLANG, so let's stop maintaining that list.
The list had not been updated since LLVM 7 with no complaints, so commit
820b5af73d probably should have just removed it when dropping support
for 7, instead of trying to be helpful by bringing it up to date with
recent version numbers.
The Meson build system didn't have that, so no change there.
Suggested-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BSOP-aR%3DYF_n0dtXGWeCy6x%2BCn-RMWURU5ySQdmeKW1Q%40mail.gmail.com
When scanning build farm results, it's useful to be able to see which
version is in use. For the Meson build system, this information was
already displayed.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4022690.1697852728%40sss.pgh.pa.us
The comment marker "#" is copied to the output, so it's only
appropriate for comments that make sense in the shell output. For
comments about the Autoconf language, "dnl" should be used.
Calling AC_CHECK_DECLS before we've finished setting up the compiler's
CFLAGS seems like a pretty risky proposition, especially now that the
first use of that macro will result in a test to see whether the compiler
gives warning or error for undeclared built-in functions. That answer
could very easily get changed later than where PGAC_LLVM_SUPPORT is
called; furthermore, it's hardly unlikely that flags such as -D_GNU_SOURCE
could change visibility of declarations. Hence, be a little less cavalier
about where to do LLVM-related tests. This results in v11 and HEAD doing
the warning-or-error check at the same place in the script as older
branches are doing it, which seems like a good thing.
Per further thought about commits 0b59b0e8b and 16fbac39f.
Before this commit LLVM 7 was supported, but only if one explicitly
provided LLVM_CONFIG= and CLANG= paths. As LLVM 7 is the first
version that includes our upstreamed debugging and profiling features,
and as debian is planning to default to 7 due to wider architecture
support, it seems good to support auto-detecting that version.
Author: Christoph Berg
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180912124517.GD24584@msg.df7cb.de
Backpatch: 11, where LLVM was introduced
During the work of upstreaming my previous patches for gdb and perf
support the API changed. Adapt. Normally this wouldn't necessarily be
something to backpatch, but the previous API wasn't upstream, and at
least the gdb support is quite useful for debugging.
Author: Andres Freund
Backpatch: 11, where LLVM based JIT support was added.
LLVM will be used for *optional* Just-in-time compilation
support. This commit just adds the configure infrastructure that
detects LLVM.
No documentation has been added for the --with-llvm flag, that'll be
added after the actual supporting code has been added.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
