mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-05 07:21:24 +03:00
Remove the RTE_GROUP RTE if we drop the groupClause
For an EXISTS subquery, the only thing that matters is whether it returns zero or more than zero rows. Therefore, we remove certain SQL features that won't affect that, among them the GROUP BY clauses. After we drop the groupClause, we'd better remove the RTE_GROUP RTE and clear the hasGroupRTE flag, as they depend on the groupClause. Failing to do so could result in a bogus RTE_GROUP entry in the parent query, leading to an assertion failure on the hasGroupRTE flag. Reported-by: David Rowley Author: Richard Guo Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvp2_yht8uPLyWO-kVGWZhYvx5zjGfSrg4fBQ9fsC13V0g@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
@ -1539,6 +1539,8 @@ convert_EXISTS_sublink_to_join(PlannerInfo *root, SubLink *sublink,
|
||||
static bool
|
||||
simplify_EXISTS_query(PlannerInfo *root, Query *query)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ListCell *lc;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We don't try to simplify at all if the query uses set operations,
|
||||
* aggregates, grouping sets, SRFs, modifying CTEs, HAVING, OFFSET, or FOR
|
||||
@ -1607,6 +1609,28 @@ simplify_EXISTS_query(PlannerInfo *root, Query *query)
|
||||
query->sortClause = NIL;
|
||||
query->hasDistinctOn = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Since we have thrown away the GROUP BY clauses, we'd better remove the
|
||||
* RTE_GROUP RTE and clear the hasGroupRTE flag.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
foreach(lc, query->rtable)
|
||||
{
|
||||
RangeTblEntry *rte = lfirst_node(RangeTblEntry, lc);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Remove the RTE_GROUP RTE and clear the hasGroupRTE flag. (Since
|
||||
* we'll exit the foreach loop immediately, we don't bother with
|
||||
* foreach_delete_current.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rte->rtekind == RTE_GROUP)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert(query->hasGroupRTE);
|
||||
query->rtable = list_delete_cell(query->rtable, lc);
|
||||
query->hasGroupRTE = false;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user