mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-15 19:21:59 +03:00
Revert "For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations."
This reverts commit 95c5acb3fc
(v17) and
counterparts in each other non-master branch. If released, that commit
would have caused a worst-in-years minor release regression, via
undetected LWLock self-deadlock. This commit and its self-deadlock fix
warrant more bake time in the master branch.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10ec0bc3-5933-1189-6bb8-5dec4114558e@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
@ -1249,24 +1249,14 @@ RecordTransactionCommit(void)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Transactions without an assigned xid can contain invalidation
|
||||
* messages. While inplace updates do this, this is not known to be
|
||||
* necessary; see comment at inplace CacheInvalidateHeapTuple().
|
||||
* Extensions might still rely on this capability, and standbys may
|
||||
* need to process those invals. We can't emit a commit record
|
||||
* without an xid, and we don't want to force assigning an xid,
|
||||
* because that'd be problematic for e.g. vacuum. Hence we emit a
|
||||
* bespoke record for the invalidations. We don't want to use that in
|
||||
* case a commit record is emitted, so they happen synchronously with
|
||||
* commits (besides not wanting to emit more WAL records).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* XXX Every known use of this capability is a defect. Since an XID
|
||||
* isn't controlling visibility of the change that prompted invals,
|
||||
* other sessions need the inval even if this transactions aborts.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS does a nontransactional index_build(), which
|
||||
* queues a relcache inval, including in transactions without an xid
|
||||
* that had read the (empty) table. Standbys don't need any ON COMMIT
|
||||
* DELETE ROWS invals, but we've not done the work to withhold them.
|
||||
* messages (e.g. explicit relcache invalidations or catcache
|
||||
* invalidations for inplace updates); standbys need to process those.
|
||||
* We can't emit a commit record without an xid, and we don't want to
|
||||
* force assigning an xid, because that'd be problematic for e.g.
|
||||
* vacuum. Hence we emit a bespoke record for the invalidations. We
|
||||
* don't want to use that in case a commit record is emitted, so they
|
||||
* happen synchronously with commits (besides not wanting to emit more
|
||||
* WAL records).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (nmsgs != 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user