1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-11 10:01:57 +03:00

pgindent run for 8.3.

This commit is contained in:
Bruce Momjian
2007-11-15 21:14:46 +00:00
parent 3adc760fb9
commit fdf5a5efb7
486 changed files with 10044 additions and 9664 deletions

View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c,v 1.86 2007/09/12 22:10:26 tgl Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c,v 1.87 2007/11/15 21:14:32 momjian Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ _bt_freestack(BTStack stack)
* that's the only one returned. (So, we return either a single = key,
* or one or two boundary-condition keys for each attr.) However, if we
* cannot compare two keys for lack of a suitable cross-type operator,
* we cannot eliminate either. If there are two such keys of the same
* we cannot eliminate either. If there are two such keys of the same
* operator strategy, the second one is just pushed into the output array
* without further processing here. We may also emit both >/>= or both
* </<= keys if we can't compare them. The logic about required keys still
@ -265,13 +265,13 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan)
{
/*
* We treat all btree operators as strict (even if they're not so
* marked in pg_proc). This means that it is impossible for an
* operator condition with a NULL comparison constant to succeed,
* and we can reject it right away.
* marked in pg_proc). This means that it is impossible for an
* operator condition with a NULL comparison constant to succeed, and
* we can reject it right away.
*
* However, we now also support "x IS NULL" clauses as search
* conditions, so in that case keep going. The planner has not
* filled in any particular strategy in this case, so set it to
* conditions, so in that case keep going. The planner has not filled
* in any particular strategy in this case, so set it to
* BTEqualStrategyNumber --- we can treat IS NULL as an equality
* operator for purposes of search strategy.
*/
@ -303,8 +303,8 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan)
/*
* Initialize for processing of keys for attr 1.
*
* xform[i] points to the currently best scan key of strategy type i+1;
* it is NULL if we haven't yet found such a key for this attr.
* xform[i] points to the currently best scan key of strategy type i+1; it
* is NULL if we haven't yet found such a key for this attr.
*/
attno = 1;
memset(xform, 0, sizeof(xform));
@ -464,6 +464,7 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan)
memcpy(outkey, cur, sizeof(ScanKeyData));
if (numberOfEqualCols == attno - 1)
_bt_mark_scankey_required(outkey);
/*
* We don't support RowCompare using equality; such a qual would
* mess up the numberOfEqualCols tracking.
@ -514,9 +515,9 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan)
else
{
/*
* We can't determine which key is more restrictive. Keep
* the previous one in xform[j] and push this one directly
* to the output array.
* We can't determine which key is more restrictive. Keep the
* previous one in xform[j] and push this one directly to the
* output array.
*/
ScanKey outkey = &outkeys[new_numberOfKeys++];
@ -542,7 +543,7 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan)
* and amoplefttype/amoprighttype equal to the two argument datatypes.
*
* If the opfamily doesn't supply a complete set of cross-type operators we
* may not be able to make the comparison. If we can make the comparison
* may not be able to make the comparison. If we can make the comparison
* we store the operator result in *result and return TRUE. We return FALSE
* if the comparison could not be made.
*
@ -608,8 +609,8 @@ _bt_compare_scankey_args(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanKey op,
* indexscan initiated by syscache lookup will use cross-data-type
* operators.)
*
* If the sk_strategy was flipped by _bt_mark_scankey_with_indoption,
* we have to un-flip it to get the correct opfamily member.
* If the sk_strategy was flipped by _bt_mark_scankey_with_indoption, we
* have to un-flip it to get the correct opfamily member.
*/
strat = op->sk_strategy;
if (op->sk_flags & SK_BT_DESC)
@ -654,7 +655,7 @@ _bt_compare_scankey_args(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanKey op,
static void
_bt_mark_scankey_with_indoption(ScanKey skey, int16 *indoption)
{
int addflags;
int addflags;
addflags = indoption[skey->sk_attno - 1] << SK_BT_INDOPTION_SHIFT;
if ((addflags & SK_BT_DESC) && !(skey->sk_flags & SK_BT_DESC))
@ -874,8 +875,8 @@ _bt_checkkeys(IndexScanDesc scan,
/*
* Since NULLs are sorted before non-NULLs, we know we have
* reached the lower limit of the range of values for this
* index attr. On a backward scan, we can stop if this qual is
* one of the "must match" subset. On a forward scan,
* index attr. On a backward scan, we can stop if this qual
* is one of the "must match" subset. On a forward scan,
* however, we should keep going.
*/
if ((key->sk_flags & SK_BT_REQBKWD) &&
@ -887,8 +888,8 @@ _bt_checkkeys(IndexScanDesc scan,
/*
* Since NULLs are sorted after non-NULLs, we know we have
* reached the upper limit of the range of values for this
* index attr. On a forward scan, we can stop if this qual is
* one of the "must match" subset. On a backward scan,
* index attr. On a forward scan, we can stop if this qual is
* one of the "must match" subset. On a backward scan,
* however, we should keep going.
*/
if ((key->sk_flags & SK_BT_REQFWD) &&
@ -978,7 +979,7 @@ _bt_check_rowcompare(ScanKey skey, IndexTuple tuple, TupleDesc tupdesc,
* Since NULLs are sorted before non-NULLs, we know we have
* reached the lower limit of the range of values for this
* index attr. On a backward scan, we can stop if this qual is
* one of the "must match" subset. On a forward scan,
* one of the "must match" subset. On a forward scan,
* however, we should keep going.
*/
if ((subkey->sk_flags & SK_BT_REQBKWD) &&
@ -991,7 +992,7 @@ _bt_check_rowcompare(ScanKey skey, IndexTuple tuple, TupleDesc tupdesc,
* Since NULLs are sorted after non-NULLs, we know we have
* reached the upper limit of the range of values for this
* index attr. On a forward scan, we can stop if this qual is
* one of the "must match" subset. On a backward scan,
* one of the "must match" subset. On a backward scan,
* however, we should keep going.
*/
if ((subkey->sk_flags & SK_BT_REQFWD) &&
@ -1264,8 +1265,8 @@ _bt_start_vacuum(Relation rel)
LWLockAcquire(BtreeVacuumLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
/*
* Assign the next cycle ID, being careful to avoid zero as well as
* the reserved high values.
* Assign the next cycle ID, being careful to avoid zero as well as the
* reserved high values.
*/
result = ++(btvacinfo->cycle_ctr);
if (result == 0 || result > MAX_BT_CYCLE_ID)