database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-11-16 15:02:33 +03:00
Code Activity

pgindent run for 8.2.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Bruce Momjian
2006-10-04 00:30:14 +00:00
parent 451e419e98
commit f99a569a2e
522 changed files with 21297 additions and 17170 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

22
src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c
View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c,v 1.99 2006/07/25 19:13:00 tgl Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c,v 1.100 2006/10/04 00:29:49 momjian Exp $
*
* NOTES
* Postgres btree pages look like ordinary relation pages. The opaque
@@ -124,10 +124,10 @@ _bt_getroot(Relation rel, int access)
/*
* Since the cache might be stale, we check the page more carefully
* here than normal. We *must* check that it's not deleted.
* If it's not alone on its level, then we reject too --- this
* may be overly paranoid but better safe than sorry. Note we
* don't check P_ISROOT, because that's not set in a "fast root".
* here than normal. We *must* check that it's not deleted. If it's
* not alone on its level, then we reject too --- this may be overly
* paranoid but better safe than sorry. Note we don't check P_ISROOT,
* because that's not set in a "fast root".
*/
if (!P_IGNORE(rootopaque) &&
rootopaque->btpo.level == rootlevel &&
@@ -662,18 +662,18 @@ _bt_delitems(Relation rel, Buffer buf,
PageIndexMultiDelete(page, itemnos, nitems);
/*
* We can clear the vacuum cycle ID since this page has certainly
* been processed by the current vacuum scan.
* We can clear the vacuum cycle ID since this page has certainly been
* processed by the current vacuum scan.
*/
opaque = (BTPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(page);
opaque->btpo_cycleid = 0;
/*
* Mark the page as not containing any LP_DELETE items. This is not
* certainly true (there might be some that have recently been marked,
* but weren't included in our target-item list), but it will almost
* always be true and it doesn't seem worth an additional page scan
* to check it. Remember that BTP_HAS_GARBAGE is only a hint anyway.
* certainly true (there might be some that have recently been marked, but
* weren't included in our target-item list), but it will almost always be
* true and it doesn't seem worth an additional page scan to check it.
* Remember that BTP_HAS_GARBAGE is only a hint anyway.
*/
opaque->btpo_flags &= ~BTP_HAS_GARBAGE;