From f97a0a2cc4bb029533db4e142a51717f24096de2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 16:56:21 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix assorted inconsistent function declarations.
While gcc doesn't complain if you declare a function "static" and then
define it not-static, other compilers do; and in any case the code is
highly misleading this way. Add the missing "static" keywords to a
couple of recent patches. Per buildfarm member pademelon.
---
contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade.c | 2 +-
src/bin/pg_resetxlog/pg_resetxlog.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade.c b/contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade.c
index 430e74e5f95..0dd7de6337d 100644
--- a/contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade.c
+++ b/contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ CreateRestrictedProcess(char *cmd, PROCESS_INFORMATION *processInfo, const char
}
#endif
-void
+static void
get_restricted_token(const char *progname)
{
#ifdef WIN32
diff --git a/src/bin/pg_resetxlog/pg_resetxlog.c b/src/bin/pg_resetxlog/pg_resetxlog.c
index 1ade239e11a..5aa6b6c5e3b 100644
--- a/src/bin/pg_resetxlog/pg_resetxlog.c
+++ b/src/bin/pg_resetxlog/pg_resetxlog.c
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ CreateRestrictedProcess(char *cmd, PROCESS_INFORMATION *processInfo, const char
}
#endif
-void
+static void
get_restricted_token(const char *progname)
{
#ifdef WIN32