mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-09-03 15:22:11 +03:00
Fix bogus logic for reporting which hash partition conflicts.
Commit efbfb6424
added logic for reporting exactly which existing
partition conflicts when complaining that a new hash partition's
modulus isn't compatible with the existing ones. However, it
misunderstood the partitioning data structure, and would select
the wrong partition in some cases, or crash outright due to fetching
a bogus table OID in other cases.
Per bug #17076 from Alexander Lakhin. Fix by Amit Langote;
some further work on the code comments by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17076-89a16ae835d329b9@postgresql.org
This commit is contained in:
@@ -780,14 +780,20 @@ CREATE TABLE hash_parted (
|
||||
CREATE TABLE hpart_1 PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 10, REMAINDER 0);
|
||||
CREATE TABLE hpart_2 PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 50, REMAINDER 1);
|
||||
CREATE TABLE hpart_3 PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 200, REMAINDER 2);
|
||||
CREATE TABLE hpart_4 PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 10, REMAINDER 3);
|
||||
-- modulus 25 is factor of modulus of 50 but 10 is not a factor of 25.
|
||||
CREATE TABLE fail_part PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 25, REMAINDER 3);
|
||||
ERROR: every hash partition modulus must be a factor of the next larger modulus
|
||||
DETAIL: The new modulus 25 is not divisible by 10, the modulus of existing partition "hpart_1".
|
||||
DETAIL: The new modulus 25 is not divisible by 10, the modulus of existing partition "hpart_4".
|
||||
-- previous modulus 50 is factor of 150 but this modulus is not a factor of next modulus 200.
|
||||
CREATE TABLE fail_part PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 150, REMAINDER 3);
|
||||
ERROR: every hash partition modulus must be a factor of the next larger modulus
|
||||
DETAIL: The new modulus 150 is not a factor of 200, the modulus of existing partition "hpart_3".
|
||||
-- overlapping remainders
|
||||
CREATE TABLE fail_part PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 100, REMAINDER 3);
|
||||
ERROR: partition "fail_part" would overlap partition "hpart_4"
|
||||
LINE 1: ...BLE fail_part PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODU...
|
||||
^
|
||||
-- trying to specify range for the hash partitioned table
|
||||
CREATE TABLE fail_part PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES FROM ('a', 1) TO ('z');
|
||||
ERROR: invalid bound specification for a hash partition
|
||||
@@ -1100,7 +1106,7 @@ Number of partitions: 3 (Use \d+ to list them.)
|
||||
--------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
|
||||
a | integer | | |
|
||||
Partition key: HASH (a)
|
||||
Number of partitions: 3 (Use \d+ to list them.)
|
||||
Number of partitions: 4 (Use \d+ to list them.)
|
||||
|
||||
-- check that we get the expected partition constraints
|
||||
CREATE TABLE range_parted4 (a int, b int, c int) PARTITION BY RANGE (abs(a), abs(b), c);
|
||||
|
@@ -631,10 +631,13 @@ CREATE TABLE hash_parted (
|
||||
CREATE TABLE hpart_1 PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 10, REMAINDER 0);
|
||||
CREATE TABLE hpart_2 PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 50, REMAINDER 1);
|
||||
CREATE TABLE hpart_3 PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 200, REMAINDER 2);
|
||||
CREATE TABLE hpart_4 PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 10, REMAINDER 3);
|
||||
-- modulus 25 is factor of modulus of 50 but 10 is not a factor of 25.
|
||||
CREATE TABLE fail_part PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 25, REMAINDER 3);
|
||||
-- previous modulus 50 is factor of 150 but this modulus is not a factor of next modulus 200.
|
||||
CREATE TABLE fail_part PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 150, REMAINDER 3);
|
||||
-- overlapping remainders
|
||||
CREATE TABLE fail_part PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 100, REMAINDER 3);
|
||||
-- trying to specify range for the hash partitioned table
|
||||
CREATE TABLE fail_part PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES FROM ('a', 1) TO ('z');
|
||||
-- trying to specify list value for the hash partitioned table
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user