1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-06-29 10:41:53 +03:00

Accumulated fixups.

Add some chapters on new topics.
Change to referencing OASIS/Docbook v3.1 rather than Davenport/Docbook v3.0
Grepped for and fixed apparent tag mangling from emacs
 "Normalize" operation. Should be the last of those.
This commit is contained in:
Thomas G. Lockhart
2000-03-30 22:22:41 +00:00
parent 2cc8e6ac1f
commit f75bf1877a
19 changed files with 1369 additions and 1304 deletions

View File

@ -1,11 +1,18 @@
<!--
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/Attic/admin.sgml,v 1.19 2000/03/28 14:16:06 thomas Exp $
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/Attic/admin.sgml,v 1.20 2000/03/30 22:22:40 thomas Exp $
Postgres Administrator's Guide.
Derived from postgres.sgml.
- thomas 1998-10-27
$Log: admin.sgml,v $
Revision 1.20 2000/03/30 22:22:40 thomas
Accumulated fixups.
Add some chapters on new topics.
Change to referencing OASIS/Docbook v3.1 rather than Davenport/Docbook v3.0
Grepped for and fixed apparent tag mangling from emacs
"Normalize" operation. Should be the last of those.
Revision 1.19 2000/03/28 14:16:06 thomas
Update SGML catalog references to DocBook 3.1 on FreeBSD.
Matches postgresql.org/hub.org environment.
@ -34,6 +41,7 @@ Clean out duplicate stuff in odbc.sgml resulting from a faulty patch.
<!entity info SYSTEM "info.sgml">
<!entity legal SYSTEM "legal.sgml">
<!entity notation SYSTEM "notation.sgml">
<!entity problems SYSTEM "problems.sgml">
<!entity y2k SYSTEM "y2k.sgml">
<!entity config SYSTEM "config.sgml">

View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
<para>
Having covered the basics of using
<productname>e>Postgr</productname>e> <acronym>SQL</acronym> to
<productname>Postgres</productname> <acronym>SQL</acronym> to
access your data, we will now discuss those features of
<productname>Postgres</productname> that distinguish it from conventional data
managers. These features include inheritance, time
@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ SELECT c.name, c.altitude
be run over cities and all classes below cities in the
inheritance hierarchy. Many of the commands that we
have already discussed (<command>select</command>,
<command>and>up</command>and> and <command>delete</command>)
<command>update</command> and <command>delete</command>)
support this <quote>*</quote> notation, as do others, like
<command>alter</command>.
</para>

View File

@ -1,296 +0,0 @@
<Sect1>
<title>Bug Reporting Guidelines</title>
<para>
When you encounter a bug in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> we want to
hear about it. Your bug reports are an important part in making
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> more reliable because even the utmost
care cannot guarantee that every part of PostgreSQL will work on every
platform under every circumstance.
</para>
<para>
The following suggestions are intended to assist you in forming bug reports
that can be handled in an effective fashion. No one is required to follow
them but it tends to be to everyone's advantage.
</para>
<para>
We cannot promise to fix every bug right away. If the bug is obvious, critical,
or affects a lot of users, chances are good that someone will look into it. It
could also happen that we tell you to update to a newer version to see if the
bug happens there. Or we might decide that the bug
cannot be fixed before some major rewrite we might be planning is done. Or
perhaps it's simply too hard and there are more important things on the agenda.
If you need help immediately, consider obtaining a commercial support contract.
</para>
<Sect2>
<title>Identifying Bugs</title>
<para>
Before you ask <quote>Is this a bug?</quote>, please read and re-read the
documentation to verify that you can really do whatever it is you are
trying. If it is not clear from the documentation whether you can do
something or not, please report that too, it's a bug in the documentation.
If it turns out that the program does something different from what the
documentation says, that's a bug. That might include, but is not limited to,
the following circumstances:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
A program terminates with a fatal signal or an operating system
error message that would point to a problem in the program (for
example not <quote>disk full</quote>).
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
A program produces the wrong output for any given input.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
A program refuses to accept valid input.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
A program accepts invalid input without a notice or error message.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> fails to compile, build, or
install according to the instructions on supported platforms.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
Here <quote>program</quote> refers to any executable, not only the backend server.
</para>
<para>
Being slow or resource-hogging is not necessarily a bug. Read the documentation
or ask on one of the mailing lists for help in tuning your applications. Failing
to comply to <acronym>SQL</acronym> is not a bug unless compliance for the
specific feature is explicitly claimed.
</para>
<para>
Before you continue, check on the TODO list and in the FAQ to see if your bug is
already known. If you can't decode the information on the TODO list, report your
problem. The least we can do is make the TODO list clearer.
</para>
</Sect2>
<Sect2>
<title>What to report</title>
<para>
The most important thing to remember about bug reporting is to state all
the facts and only facts. Do not speculate what you think went wrong, what
<quote>it seemed to do</quote>, or which part of the program has a fault.
If you are not familiar with the implementation you would probably guess
wrong and not help us a bit. And even if you are, educated explanations are
a great supplement to but no substitute for facts. If we are going to fix
the bug we still have to see it happen for ourselves first.
Reporting the bare facts
is relatively straightforward (you can probably copy and paste them from the
screen) but all too often important details are left out because someone
thought it doesn't matter or the report would <quote>ring a bell</quote>
anyway.
</para>
<para>
The following items should be contained in every bug report:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
The exact sequence of steps <emphasis>from program startup</emphasis>
necessary to reproduce the problem. This should be self-contained;
it is not enough to send in a bare select statement without the
preceeding create table and insert statements, if the output should
depend on the data in the tables. We do not have the time
to decode your database schema, and if we are supposed to make up
our own data we would probably miss the problem.
The best format for a test case for
query-language related problems is a file that can be run through the
<application>psql</application> frontend
that shows the problem. (Be sure to not have anything in your
<filename>~/.psqlrc</filename> startup file.) You are encouraged to
minimize the size of your example, but this is not absolutely necessary.
If the bug is reproduceable, we'll find it either way.
</para>
<para>
If your application uses some other client interface, such as PHP, then
please try to isolate the offending queries. We probably won't set up a
web server to reproduce your problem. In any case remember to provide
the exact input files, do not guess that the problem happens for
<quote>large files</quote> or <quote>mid-size databases</quote>, etc.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
The output you got. Please do not say that it <quote>didn't work</quote> or
<quote>failed</quote>. If there is an error message,
show it, even if you don't understand it. If the program terminates with
an operating system error, say which. If nothing at all happens, say so.
Even if the result of your test case is a program crash or otherwise obvious
it might not happen on our platform. The easiest thing is to copy the output
from the terminal, if possible.
</para>
<note>
<para>
In case of fatal errors, the error message provided by the client might
not contain all the information available. In that case, also look at the
output of the database server. If you do not keep your server output,
this would be a good time to start doing so.
</para>
</note>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
The output you expected is very important to state. If you just write
<quote>This command gives me that output.</quote> or <quote>This is not
what I expected.</quote>, we might run it ourselves, scan the output, and
think it looks okay and is exactly what we expected. We shouldn't have to
spend the time to decode the exact semantics behind your commands.
Especially refrain from merely saying that <quote>This is not what SQL says/Oracle
does.</quote> Digging out the correct behavior from <acronym>SQL</acronym>
is not a fun undertaking, nor do we all know how all the other relational
databases out there behave. (If your problem is a program crash you can
obviously omit this item.)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Any command line options and other startup options, including concerned
environment variables or configuration files that you changed from the
default. Again, be exact. If you are using a pre-packaged
distribution that starts the database server at boot time, you should try
to find out how that is done.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Anything you did at all differently from the installation instructions.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
The PostgreSQL version. You can run the command
<literal>SELECT version();</literal> to
find out. If this function does not exist, say so, then we know that
your version is old enough. If you can't start up the server or a
client, look into the README file in the source directory or at the
name of your distribution file or package name. If your version is older
than 6.5 we will almost certainly tell you to upgrade. There are tons
of bugs in old versions, that's why we write new ones.
</para>
<para>
If you run a pre-packaged version, such as RPMs, say so, including any
subversion the package may have. If you are talking about a CVS
snapshot, mention that, including its date and time.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Platform information. This includes the kernel name and version, C library,
processor, memory information. In most cases it is sufficient to report
the vendor and version, but do not assume everyone knows what exactly
<quote>Debian</quote> contains or that everyone runs on Pentiums. If
you have installation problems information about compilers, make, etc.
is also necessary.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
Do not be afraid if your bug report becomes rather lengthy. That is a fact of life.
It's better to report everything the first time than us having to squeeze the
facts out of you. On the other hand, if your input files are huge, it is
fair to ask first whether somebody is interested in looking into it.
</para>
<para>
Do not spend all your time to figure out which changes in the input make
the problem go away. This will probably not help solving it. If it turns
out that the bug can't be fixed right away, you will still have time to
find and share your work around. Also, once again, do not waste your time
guessing why the bug exists. We'll find that out soon enough.
</para>
<para>
When writing a bug report, please choose non-confusing terminology.
The software package as such is called <quote>PostgreSQL</quote>,
sometimes <quote>Postgres</quote> for short. (Sometimes
the abbreviation <quote>Pgsql</quote> is used but don't do that.) When you
are specifically talking about the backend server, mention that, don't
just say <quote>Postgres crashes</quote>. The interactive frontend is called
<quote>psql</quote> and is for all intends and purposes completely separate
from the backend.
</para>
</Sect2>
<Sect2>
<title>Where to report bugs</title>
<para>
In general, send bug reports to &lt;pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org&gt;. You are
invited to find a descriptive subject for your email message, perhaps parts
of the error message.
</para>
<para>
Do not send bug reports to any of the user mailing lists, such as
pgsql-sql or pgsql-general. These mailing lists are for answering
user questions, their subscribers normally do not wish to receive
bug reports. More importantly, they are unlikely to fix them.
</para>
<para>
Also, please do <emphasis>not</emphasis> send reports to
&lt;pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org&gt;. This list is for discussing the
development of <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, it would be nice
if we could keep the bug reports separate. We might choose take up a
discussion
about your bug report on it, if the bug needs more review.
</para>
<para>
If you have a problem with the documentation, send email to
&lt;pgsql-docs@postgresql.org&gt;. Refer to the document, chapter, and sections.
</para>
<para>
If your bug is a portability problem on a non-supported platform, send
mail to &lt;pgsql-ports@postgresql.org&gt;, so we (and you) can work on
porting <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> to your platform.
</para>
<note>
<para>
Due to the unfortunate amount of spam going around, all of the above
email addresses are closed mailing lists. That is, you need to be
subscribed to them in order to be allowed to post. If you simply
want to send mail but do not want to receive list traffic, you can
subscribe to the special pgsql-loophole <quote>list</quote>, which
allows you to post to all <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
mailing lists without receiving any messages. Send email to
&lt;pgsql-loophole-request@postgresql.org&gt; to subscribe.
</para>
</note>
</Sect2>
</Sect1>

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@ -1404,7 +1404,7 @@ Not defined by this name. Implements the intersection operator '#'
<!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
Local variables:
mode: sgml
mode:sgml
sgml-omittag:nil
sgml-shorttag:t
sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ sgml-indent-data:t
sgml-parent-document:nil
sgml-default-dtd-file:"./reference.ced"
sgml-exposed-tags:nil
sgml-local-catalogs:"/usr/lib/sgml/catalog"
sgml-local-catalogs:("/usr/lib/sgml/catalog")
sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
End:
-->

View File

@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ CREATE MEMSTORE ON &lt;table&gt; COLUMNS &lt;cols&gt;
<!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
Local variables:
mode: sgml
mode:sgml
sgml-omittag:nil
sgml-shorttag:t
sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ sgml-indent-data:t
sgml-parent-document:nil
sgml-default-dtd-file:"./reference.ced"
sgml-exposed-tags:nil
sgml-local-catalogs:"/usr/lib/sgml/catalog"
sgml-local-catalogs:("/usr/lib/sgml/catalog")
sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
End:
-->

View File

@ -1,10 +1,17 @@
<!--
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/installation.sgml,v 1.7 1999/12/06 16:37:11 thomas Exp $
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/installation.sgml,v 1.8 2000/03/30 22:22:40 thomas Exp $
Postgres quick Installation Guide.
- thomas 1998-10-26
$Log: installation.sgml,v $
Revision 1.8 2000/03/30 22:22:40 thomas
Accumulated fixups.
Add some chapters on new topics.
Change to referencing OASIS/Docbook v3.1 rather than Davenport/Docbook v3.0
Grepped for and fixed apparent tag mangling from emacs
"Normalize" operation. Should be the last of those.
Revision 1.7 1999/12/06 16:37:11 thomas
Remove references to PostgreSQL as "public-domain" since that has a
specific meaning wrt copyright (or lack thereof).
@ -39,7 +46,7 @@ First cut at standalone installation guide to replace INSTALL text source.
-->
<!doctype book PUBLIC "-//Davenport//DTD DocBook V3.0//EN" [
<!doctype book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook V3.1//EN" [
<!entity about SYSTEM "about.sgml">
<!entity history SYSTEM "history.sgml">

View File

@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
&info;
&notation;
&problems;
&y2k;
&legal;
@ -26,7 +27,7 @@
<!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
Local variables:
mode: sgml
mode:sgml
sgml-omittag:nil
sgml-shorttag:t
sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ sgml-indent-data:t
sgml-parent-document:nil
sgml-default-dtd-file:"./reference.ced"
sgml-exposed-tags:nil
sgml-local-catalogs:"/usr/lib/sgml/CATALOG"
sgml-local-catalogs:("/usr/lib/sgml/CATALOG")
sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
End:
-->

View File

@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
&info;
&notation;
&problems;
&y2k;
&legal;
@ -46,7 +47,7 @@
<!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
Local variables:
mode: sgml
mode:sgml
sgml-omittag:nil
sgml-shorttag:t
sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ sgml-indent-data:t
sgml-parent-document:nil
sgml-default-dtd-file:"./reference.ced"
sgml-exposed-tags:nil
sgml-local-catalogs:"/usr/lib/sgml/CATALOG"
sgml-local-catalogs:("/usr/lib/sgml/CATALOG")
sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
End:
-->

View File

@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
&about;
&info;
&notation;
&bug-reporting;
&problems;
&y2k;
&legal;

View File

@ -233,13 +233,13 @@ Class.forName("postgresql.Driver");
<listitem>
<para>
jdbc:postgresql://<replaceable class="parameter">>hos</replaceable>>/<replaceable class="parameter">database</replaceable>
jdbc:postgresql://<replaceable class="parameter">host</replaceable>/<replaceable class="parameter">database</replaceable>
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
jdbc:postgresql://<replaceable class="parameter">>hos</replaceable>><replaceable class="parameter">">po</replaceable>e>/<replaceable class="parameter">database</replaceable>
jdbc:postgresql://<replaceable class="parameter">host</replaceable><replaceable class="parameter">port</replaceable>/<replaceable class="parameter">database</replaceable>
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

View File

@ -671,6 +671,16 @@ the number of attributes in each tuple.
</VARLISTENTRY>
<VARLISTENTRY>
<TERM>
-list VarName
</TERM>
<LISTITEM>
<PARA>
assign the results to a list of lists.
</PARA>
</LISTITEM>
</VARLISTENTRY>
<VARLISTENTRY>
<TERM>
-assign arrayName
</TERM>
<LISTITEM>

263
doc/src/sgml/plan.sgml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
<chapter>
<title>Understanding Performance</title>
<para>
Query performance can be affected by many things. Some of these can
be manipulated by the user, while others are fundamental to the underlying
design of the system.
</para>
<para>
Some performance issues, such as index creation and bulk data
loading, are covered elsewhere. This chapter will discuss the
<command>EXPLAIN</command> command, and will show how the details
of a query can affect the query plan, and hence overall
performance.
</para>
<sect1>
<title>Using <command>EXPLAIN</command></title>
<note>
<title>Author</title>
<para>
Written by Tom Lane, from e-mail dated 2000-03-27.
</para>
</note>
<para>
Plan-reading is an art that deserves a tutorial, and I haven't
had time to write one. Here is some quick & dirty explanation.
</para>
<para>
The numbers that are currently quoted by EXPLAIN are:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
Estimated startup cost (time expended before output scan can start,
eg, time to do the sorting in a SORT node).
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Estimated total cost (if all tuples are retrieved, which they may not
be --- LIMIT will stop short of paying the total cost, for
example).
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Estimated number of rows output by this plan node.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Estimated average width (in bytes) of rows output by this plan
node.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
The costs are measured in units of disk page fetches. (There are some
fairly bogus fudge-factors for converting CPU effort estimates into
disk-fetch units; see the SET ref page if you want to play with these.)
It's important to note that the cost of an upper-level node includes
the cost of all its child nodes. It's also important to realize that
the cost only reflects things that the planner/optimizer cares about.
In particular, the cost does not consider the time spent transmitting
result tuples to the frontend --- which could be a pretty dominant
factor in the true elapsed time, but the planner ignores it because
it cannot change it by altering the plan. (Every correct plan will
output the same tuple set, we trust.)
</para>
<para>
Rows output is a little tricky because it is *not* the number of rows
processed/scanned by the query --- it is usually less, reflecting the
estimated selectivity of any WHERE-clause constraints that are being
applied at this node.
</para>
<para>
Average width is pretty bogus because the thing really doesn't have
any idea of the average length of variable-length columns. I'm thinking
about improving that in the future, but it may not be worth the trouble,
because the width isn't used for very much.
</para>
<para>
Here are some examples (using the regress test database after a
vacuum analyze, and current sources):
<programlisting>
regression=# explain select * from tenk1;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Seq Scan on tenk1 (cost=0.00..333.00 rows=10000 width=148)
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
About as straightforward as it gets. If you do
<programlisting>
select * from pg_class where relname = 'tenk1';
</programlisting>
you'll find out that tenk1 has 233 disk
pages and 10000 tuples. So the cost is estimated at 233 block
reads, defined as 1.0 apiece, plus 10000 * cpu_tuple_cost which is
currently 0.01 (try <command>show cpu_tuple_cost</command>).
</para>
<para>
Now let's modify the query to add a qualification clause:
<programlisting>
regression=# explain select * from tenk1 where unique1 &lt; 1000;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Seq Scan on tenk1 (cost=0.00..358.00 rows=1000 width=148)
</programlisting>
Estimated output rows has gone down because of the WHERE clause.
(The uncannily accurate estimate is just because tenk1 is a particularly
simple case --- the unique1 column has 10000 distinct values ranging
from 0 to 9999, so the estimator's linear interpolation between min and
max column values is dead-on.) However, the scan will still have to
visit all 10000 rows, so the cost hasn't decreased; in fact it has gone
up a bit to reflect the extra CPU time spent checking the WHERE
condition.
</para>
<para>
Modify the query to restrict the qualification even more:
<programlisting>
regression=# explain select * from tenk1 where unique1 &lt; 100;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 (cost=0.00..89.35 rows=100 width=148)
</programlisting>
and you will see that if we make the WHERE condition selective
enough, the planner will
eventually decide that an indexscan is cheaper than a sequential scan.
This plan will only have to visit 100 tuples because of the index,
so it wins despite the fact that each individual fetch is expensive.
</para>
<para>
Add another condition to the qualification:
<programlisting>
regression=# explain select * from tenk1 where unique1 &lt; 100 and
regression-# stringu1 = 'xxx';
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 (cost=0.00..89.60 rows=1 width=148)
</programlisting>
The added clause "stringu1 = 'xxx'" reduces the output-rows estimate,
but not the cost because we still have to visit the same set of tuples.
</para>
<para>
Let's try joining two tables, using the fields we have been discussing:
<programlisting>
regression=# explain select * from tenk1 t1, tenk2 t2 where t1.unique1 &lt; 100
regression-# and t1.unique2 = t2.unique2;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Nested Loop (cost=0.00..144.07 rows=100 width=296)
-&gt; Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 t1
(cost=0.00..89.35 rows=100 width=148)
-&gt; Index Scan using tenk2_unique2 on tenk2 t2
(cost=0.00..0.53 rows=1 width=148)
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
In this nested-loop join, the outer scan is the same indexscan we had
in the example before last, and the cost and row count are the same
because we are applying the "unique1 &lt; 100" WHERE clause at this node.
The "t1.unique2 = t2.unique2" clause isn't relevant yet, so it doesn't
affect the row count. For the inner scan, we assume that the current
outer-scan tuple's unique2 value is plugged into the inner indexscan
to produce an indexqual like
"t2.unique2 = <replaceable>constant</replaceable>". So we get the
same inner-scan plan and costs that we'd get from, say, "explain select
* from tenk2 where unique2 = 42". The loop node's costs are then set
on the basis of the outer scan's cost, plus one repetition of the
inner scan for each outer tuple (100 * 0.53, here), plus a little CPU
time for join processing.
</para>
<para>
In this example the loop's output row count is the same as the product
of the two scans' row counts, but that's not true in general, because
in general you can have WHERE clauses that mention both relations and
so can only be applied at the join point, not to either input scan.
For example, if we added "WHERE ... AND t1.hundred &lt; t2.hundred",
that'd decrease the output row count of the join node, but not change
either input scan.
</para>
<para>
We can look at variant plans by forcing the planner to disregard
whatever strategy it thought was the winner (a pretty crude tool,
but it's what we've got at the moment):
<programlisting>
regression=# set enable_nestloop = 'off';
SET VARIABLE
regression=# explain select * from tenk1 t1, tenk2 t2 where t1.unique1 < 100
regression-# and t1.unique2 = t2.unique2;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Hash Join (cost=89.60..574.10 rows=100 width=296)
-&gt; Seq Scan on tenk2 t2
(cost=0.00..333.00 rows=10000 width=148)
-&gt; Hash (cost=89.35..89.35 rows=100 width=148)
-&gt; Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 t1
(cost=0.00..89.35 rows=100 width=148)
</programlisting>
This plan proposes to extract the 100 interesting rows of tenk1
using ye same olde indexscan, stash them into an in-memory hash table,
and then do a sequential scan of tenk2, probing into the hash table
for possible matches of "t1.unique2 = t2.unique2" at each tenk2 tuple.
The cost to read tenk1 and set up the hash table is entirely startup
cost for the hash join, since we won't get any tuples out until we can
start reading tenk2. The total time estimate for the join also
includes a pretty hefty charge for CPU time to probe the hash table
10000 times. Note, however, that we are NOT charging 10000 times 89.35;
the hash table setup is only done once in this plan type.
</para>
</sect1>
</chapter>
<!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
Local variables:
mode:sgml
sgml-omittag:nil
sgml-shorttag:t
sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
sgml-always-quote-attributes:t
sgml-indent-step:1
sgml-indent-data:t
sgml-parent-document:nil
sgml-default-dtd-file:"./reference.ced"
sgml-exposed-tags:nil
sgml-local-catalogs:("/usr/lib/sgml/CATALOG")
sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
End:
-->

View File

@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
<!doctype book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook V3.1//EN" [
<!entity about SYSTEM "about.sgml">
<!entity bug-reporting SYSTEM "bug-reporting.sgml">
<!entity history SYSTEM "history.sgml">
<!entity info SYSTEM "info.sgml">
<!entity legal SYSTEM "legal.sgml">
<!entity notation SYSTEM "notation.sgml">
<!entity problems SYSTEM "problems.sgml">
<!entity y2k SYSTEM "y2k.sgml">
<!-- tutorial -->
@ -27,7 +27,11 @@
<!entity manage SYSTEM "manage.sgml">
<!entity mvcc SYSTEM "mvcc.sgml">
<!entity oper SYSTEM "oper.sgml">
<!entity pgaccess SYSTEM "pgaccess.sgml">
<!entity plan SYSTEM "plan.sgml">
<!entity plperl SYSTEM "plperl.sgml">
<!entity plsql SYSTEM "plsql.sgml">
<!entity pltcl SYSTEM "pltcl.sgml">
<!entity populate SYSTEM "populate.sgml">
<!entity psql SYSTEM "psql.sgml">
<!entity query-ug SYSTEM "query-ug.sgml">
<!entity storage SYSTEM "storage.sgml">
@ -62,6 +66,7 @@
<!entity func-ref SYSTEM "func-ref.sgml">
<!entity gist SYSTEM "gist.sgml">
<!entity intro-pg SYSTEM "intro-pg.sgml">
<!entity indexcost SYSTEM "indexcost.sgml">
<!entity jdbc SYSTEM "jdbc.sgml">
<!entity libpq SYSTEM "libpq.sgml">
<!entity libpqpp SYSTEM "libpq++.sgml">
@ -88,6 +93,7 @@
<!entity cvs SYSTEM "cvs.sgml">
<!entity docguide SYSTEM "docguide.sgml">
<!entity geqo SYSTEM "geqo.sgml">
<!entity index SYSTEM "index.sgml">
<!entity options SYSTEM "pg_options.sgml">
<!entity page SYSTEM "page.sgml">
<!entity protocol SYSTEM "protocol.sgml">
@ -181,10 +187,15 @@ Your name here...
&indices;
&array;
&inherit;
&plsql;
&pltcl;
&plperl;
&mvcc;
&environ;
&manage;
&storage;
&plan;
&populate;
&commands;
</Part>
@ -237,6 +248,7 @@ Your name here...
&xaggr;
&rules;
&xindex;
&indexcost;
&gist;
&dfunc;
&trigger;

View File

@ -1,9 +1,16 @@
<!--
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/Attic/programmer.sgml,v 1.22 2000/03/28 14:16:06 thomas Exp $
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/Attic/programmer.sgml,v 1.23 2000/03/30 22:22:41 thomas Exp $
Postgres Programmer's Guide.
$Log: programmer.sgml,v $
Revision 1.23 2000/03/30 22:22:41 thomas
Accumulated fixups.
Add some chapters on new topics.
Change to referencing OASIS/Docbook v3.1 rather than Davenport/Docbook v3.0
Grepped for and fixed apparent tag mangling from emacs
"Normalize" operation. Should be the last of those.
Revision 1.22 2000/03/28 14:16:06 thomas
Update SGML catalog references to DocBook 3.1 on FreeBSD.
Matches postgresql.org/hub.org environment.
@ -49,6 +56,7 @@ Make new file current.sgml to hold release info for the current release.
<!entity info SYSTEM "info.sgml">
<!entity legal SYSTEM "legal.sgml">
<!entity notation SYSTEM "notation.sgml">
<!entity problems SYSTEM "problems.sgml">
<!entity y2k SYSTEM "y2k.sgml">
<!entity arch-pg SYSTEM "arch-pg.sgml">
@ -58,6 +66,7 @@ Make new file current.sgml to hold release info for the current release.
<!entity func-ref SYSTEM "func-ref.sgml">
<!entity gist SYSTEM "gist.sgml">
<!entity intro-pg SYSTEM "intro-pg.sgml">
<!entity indexcost SYSTEM "indexcost.sgml">
<!entity jdbc SYSTEM "jdbc.sgml">
<!entity libpq SYSTEM "libpq.sgml">
<!entity libpqpp SYSTEM "libpq++.sgml">
@ -65,6 +74,7 @@ Make new file current.sgml to hold release info for the current release.
<!entity lisp SYSTEM "lisp.sgml">
<!entity lobj SYSTEM "lobj.sgml">
<!entity odbc SYSTEM "odbc.sgml">
<!entity plperl SYSTEM "plperl.sgml">
<!entity rules SYSTEM "rules.sgml">
<!entity spi SYSTEM "spi.sgml">
<!entity trigger SYSTEM "trigger.sgml">
@ -169,8 +179,10 @@ Your name here...
&xaggr;
&rules;
&xindex;
&indexcost;
&gist;
&xplang;
&plperl;
&dfunc;
<!-- reference -->

View File

@ -1 +1 @@
<!doctype refentry PUBLIC "-//Davenport//DTD DocBook V3.0//EN">
<!doctype refentry PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook V3.1//EN">

View File

@ -1,10 +1,17 @@
<!-- reference.sgml
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/reference.sgml,v 1.6 1999/05/26 17:30:30 thomas Exp $
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/reference.sgml,v 1.7 2000/03/30 22:22:41 thomas Exp $
Postgres User's Reference documentation.
- thomas 1998-08-31
$Log: reference.sgml,v $
Revision 1.7 2000/03/30 22:22:41 thomas
Accumulated fixups.
Add some chapters on new topics.
Change to referencing OASIS/Docbook v3.1 rather than Davenport/Docbook v3.0
Grepped for and fixed apparent tag mangling from emacs
"Normalize" operation. Should be the last of those.
Revision 1.6 1999/05/26 17:30:30 thomas
Add chapters on CVS access, MVCC, SQL theory to the docs.
Add an appendix with more details on date/time attributes and handling.
@ -24,7 +31,7 @@ Bigger updates to the installation instructions (install and config).
-->
<!doctype book PUBLIC "-//Davenport//DTD DocBook V3.0//EN" [
<!doctype book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook V3.1//EN" [
<!entity intro SYSTEM "intro.sgml">
<!entity % allfiles SYSTEM "ref/allfiles.sgml">

View File

@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
<!entity info SYSTEM "info.sgml">
<!entity legal SYSTEM "legal.sgml">
<!entity notation SYSTEM "notation.sgml">
<!entity problems SYSTEM "problems.sgml">
<!entity y2k SYSTEM "y2k.sgml">
<!entity advanced SYSTEM "advanced.sgml">

View File

@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
<!doctype book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook V3.1//EN" [
<!entity about SYSTEM "about.sgml">
<!entity bug-reporting SYSTEM "bug-reporting.sgml">
<!entity history SYSTEM "history.sgml">
<!entity info SYSTEM "info.sgml">
<!entity legal SYSTEM "legal.sgml">
<!entity notation SYSTEM "notation.sgml">
<!entity problems SYSTEM "problems.sgml">
<!entity y2k SYSTEM "y2k.sgml">
<!entity advanced SYSTEM "advanced.sgml">
@ -21,6 +21,11 @@
<!entity manage SYSTEM "manage.sgml">
<!entity mvcc SYSTEM "mvcc.sgml">
<!entity oper SYSTEM "oper.sgml">
<!entity plan SYSTEM "plan.sgml">
<!entity plperl SYSTEM "plperl.sgml">
<!entity plsql SYSTEM "plsql.sgml">
<!entity pltcl SYSTEM "pltcl.sgml">
<!entity populate SYSTEM "populate.sgml">
<!entity storage SYSTEM "storage.sgml">
<!entity syntax SYSTEM "syntax.sgml">
<!entity typeconv SYSTEM "typeconv.sgml">
@ -108,10 +113,15 @@ Your name here...
&indices;
&array;
&inherit;
&plsql;
&pltcl;
&plperl;
&mvcc;
&environ;
&manage;
&storage;
&plan;
&populate
&commands;
<!-- appendices -->