1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-11-07 19:06:32 +03:00

Get rid of IndexIsUniqueNoCache() kluge by the simple expedient of

passing the index-is-unique flag to index build routines (duh! ...
why wasn't it done this way to begin with?).  Aside from eliminating
an eyesore, this should save a few milliseconds in btree index creation
because a full scan of pg_index is not needed any more.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2000-06-17 23:41:51 +00:00
parent d03a933ec5
commit edf0b5f0db
13 changed files with 89 additions and 160 deletions

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/catalog/index.c,v 1.117 2000/06/17 21:48:39 tgl Exp $
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/catalog/index.c,v 1.118 2000/06/17 23:41:34 tgl Exp $
*
*
* INTERFACE ROUTINES
@@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ static void UpdateIndexRelation(Oid indexoid, Oid heapoid,
AttrNumber *attNums, Oid *classOids, Node *predicate,
List *attributeList, bool islossy, bool unique, bool primary);
static void DefaultBuild(Relation heapRelation, Relation indexRelation,
int numberOfAttributes, AttrNumber *attributeNumber,
IndexStrategy indexStrategy, uint16 parameterCount,
Datum *parameter, FuncIndexInfoPtr funcInfo, PredInfo *predInfo);
int numberOfAttributes, AttrNumber *attributeNumber,
FuncIndexInfoPtr funcInfo, PredInfo *predInfo,
bool unique, IndexStrategy indexStrategy);
static Oid IndexGetRelation(Oid indexId);
static bool activate_index(Oid indexId, bool activate);
@@ -952,8 +952,6 @@ index_create(char *heapRelationName,
int numatts,
AttrNumber *attNums,
Oid *classObjectId,
uint16 parameterCount,
Datum *parameter,
Node *predicate,
bool islossy,
bool unique,
@@ -1086,13 +1084,13 @@ index_create(char *heapRelationName,
if (IsBootstrapProcessingMode())
{
index_register(heapRelationName, indexRelationName, numatts, attNums,
parameterCount, parameter, funcInfo, predInfo);
funcInfo, predInfo, unique);
/* XXX shouldn't we close the heap and index rels here? */
}
else
{
index_build(heapRelation, indexRelation, numatts, attNums,
parameterCount, parameter, funcInfo, predInfo);
funcInfo, predInfo, unique);
}
}
@@ -1706,6 +1704,11 @@ FillDummyExprContext(ExprContext *econtext,
/* ----------------
* DefaultBuild
*
* NB: this routine is dead code, and likely always has been, because
* there are no access methods that don't supply their own ambuild procedure.
*
* Anyone want to wager whether it would actually work if executed?
* ----------------
*/
static void
@@ -1713,11 +1716,10 @@ DefaultBuild(Relation heapRelation,
Relation indexRelation,
int numberOfAttributes,
AttrNumber *attributeNumber,
IndexStrategy indexStrategy, /* not used */
uint16 parameterCount, /* not used */
Datum *parameter, /* not used */
FuncIndexInfoPtr funcInfo,
PredInfo *predInfo)
PredInfo *predInfo,
bool unique, /* not used */
IndexStrategy indexStrategy) /* not used */
{
HeapScanDesc scan;
HeapTuple heapTuple;
@@ -1925,10 +1927,9 @@ index_build(Relation heapRelation,
Relation indexRelation,
int numberOfAttributes,
AttrNumber *attributeNumber,
uint16 parameterCount,
Datum *parameter,
FuncIndexInfo *funcInfo,
PredInfo *predInfo)
PredInfo *predInfo,
bool unique)
{
RegProcedure procedure;
@@ -1942,30 +1943,28 @@ index_build(Relation heapRelation,
procedure = indexRelation->rd_am->ambuild;
/* ----------------
* use the access method build procedure if supplied..
* use the access method build procedure if supplied, else default.
* ----------------
*/
if (RegProcedureIsValid(procedure))
OidFunctionCall9(procedure,
OidFunctionCall8(procedure,
PointerGetDatum(heapRelation),
PointerGetDatum(indexRelation),
Int32GetDatum(numberOfAttributes),
PointerGetDatum(attributeNumber),
PointerGetDatum(RelationGetIndexStrategy(indexRelation)),
UInt16GetDatum(parameterCount),
PointerGetDatum(parameter),
PointerGetDatum(funcInfo),
PointerGetDatum(predInfo));
PointerGetDatum(predInfo),
BoolGetDatum(unique),
PointerGetDatum(RelationGetIndexStrategy(indexRelation)));
else
DefaultBuild(heapRelation,
indexRelation,
numberOfAttributes,
attributeNumber,
RelationGetIndexStrategy(indexRelation),
parameterCount,
parameter,
funcInfo,
predInfo);
predInfo,
unique,
RelationGetIndexStrategy(indexRelation));
}
/*
@@ -2016,51 +2015,6 @@ IndexIsUnique(Oid indexId)
return index->indisunique;
}
/*
* IndexIsUniqueNoCache: same as above function, but don't use the
* system cache. if we are called from btbuild, the transaction
* that is adding the entry to pg_index has not been committed yet.
* the system cache functions will do a heap scan, but only with
* NowTimeQual, not SelfTimeQual, so it won't find tuples added
* by the current transaction (which is good, because if the transaction
* is aborted, you don't want the tuples sitting around in the cache).
* so anyway, we have to do our own scan with SelfTimeQual.
* this is only called when a new index is created, so it's OK
* if it's slow.
*/
bool
IndexIsUniqueNoCache(Oid indexId)
{
Relation pg_index;
ScanKeyData skey[1];
HeapScanDesc scandesc;
HeapTuple tuple;
Form_pg_index index;
bool isunique;
pg_index = heap_openr(IndexRelationName, AccessShareLock);
ScanKeyEntryInitialize(&skey[0], (bits16) 0x0,
Anum_pg_index_indexrelid,
(RegProcedure) F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(indexId));
scandesc = heap_beginscan(pg_index, 0, SnapshotSelf, 1, skey);
/* NO CACHE */
tuple = heap_getnext(scandesc, 0);
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tuple))
elog(ERROR, "IndexIsUniqueNoCache: can't find index id %u", indexId);
index = (Form_pg_index) GETSTRUCT(tuple);
Assert(index->indexrelid == indexId);
isunique = index->indisunique;
heap_endscan(scandesc);
heap_close(pg_index, AccessShareLock);
return isunique;
}
/* ---------------------------------
* activate_index -- activate/deactivate the specified index.
@@ -2102,6 +2056,7 @@ reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool force)
*funcInfo = NULL;
int i,
numberOfAttributes;
bool unique;
char *predString;
bool old;
@@ -2121,6 +2076,7 @@ reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool force)
index = (Form_pg_index) GETSTRUCT(indexTuple);
heapId = index->indrelid;
procId = index->indproc;
unique = index->indisunique;
for (i = 0; i < INDEX_MAX_KEYS; i++)
{
@@ -2189,7 +2145,7 @@ reindex_index(Oid indexId, bool force)
/* Initialize the index and rebuild */
InitIndexStrategy(numberOfAttributes, iRel, accessMethodId);
index_build(heapRelation, iRel, numberOfAttributes,
attributeNumberA, 0, NULL, funcInfo, predInfo);
attributeNumberA, funcInfo, predInfo, unique);
/*
* index_build will close both the heap and index relations (but not