mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-27 12:41:57 +03:00
Fix and simplify some usages of TimestampDifference().
Introduce TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds() to simplify callers that would rather have the difference in milliseconds, instead of the select()-oriented seconds-and-microseconds format. This gets rid of at least one integer division per call, and it eliminates some apparently-easy-to-mess-up arithmetic. Two of these call sites were in fact wrong: * pg_prewarm's autoprewarm_main() forgot to multiply the seconds by 1000, thus ending up with a delay 1000X shorter than intended. That doesn't quite make it a busy-wait, but close. * postgres_fdw's pgfdw_get_cleanup_result() thought it needed to compute microseconds not milliseconds, thus ending up with a delay 1000X longer than intended. Somebody along the way had noticed this problem but misdiagnosed the cause, and imposed an ad-hoc 60-second limit rather than fixing the units. This was relatively harmless in context, because we don't care that much about exactly how long this delay is; still, it's wrong. There are a few more callers of TimestampDifference() that don't have a direct need for seconds-and-microseconds, but can't use TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds() either because they do need microsecond precision or because they might possibly deal with intervals long enough to overflow 32-bit milliseconds. It might be worth inventing another API to improve that, but that seems outside the scope of this patch; so those callers are untouched here. Given the fact that we are fixing some bugs, and the likelihood that future patches might want to back-patch code that uses this new API, back-patch to all supported branches. Alexey Kondratov and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3b1c053a21c07c1ed5e00be3b2b855ef@postgrespro.ru
This commit is contained in:
@ -350,10 +350,6 @@ GetReplicationApplyDelay(void)
|
||||
WalRcvData *walrcv = WalRcv;
|
||||
XLogRecPtr receivePtr;
|
||||
XLogRecPtr replayPtr;
|
||||
|
||||
long secs;
|
||||
int usecs;
|
||||
|
||||
TimestampTz chunkReplayStartTime;
|
||||
|
||||
SpinLockAcquire(&walrcv->mutex);
|
||||
@ -370,11 +366,8 @@ GetReplicationApplyDelay(void)
|
||||
if (chunkReplayStartTime == 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
TimestampDifference(chunkReplayStartTime,
|
||||
GetCurrentTimestamp(),
|
||||
&secs, &usecs);
|
||||
|
||||
return (((int) secs * 1000) + (usecs / 1000));
|
||||
return TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds(chunkReplayStartTime,
|
||||
GetCurrentTimestamp());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -385,24 +378,14 @@ int
|
||||
GetReplicationTransferLatency(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WalRcvData *walrcv = WalRcv;
|
||||
|
||||
TimestampTz lastMsgSendTime;
|
||||
TimestampTz lastMsgReceiptTime;
|
||||
|
||||
long secs = 0;
|
||||
int usecs = 0;
|
||||
int ms;
|
||||
|
||||
SpinLockAcquire(&walrcv->mutex);
|
||||
lastMsgSendTime = walrcv->lastMsgSendTime;
|
||||
lastMsgReceiptTime = walrcv->lastMsgReceiptTime;
|
||||
SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
TimestampDifference(lastMsgSendTime,
|
||||
lastMsgReceiptTime,
|
||||
&secs, &usecs);
|
||||
|
||||
ms = ((int) secs * 1000) + (usecs / 1000);
|
||||
|
||||
return ms;
|
||||
return TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds(lastMsgSendTime,
|
||||
lastMsgReceiptTime);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user