From e8c334c47abb6c8f648cb50241c2cd65c9e4e6dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Korotkov Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 11:55:17 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typos in e0b1ee17dc Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin --- src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsearch.c | 2 +- src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsearch.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsearch.c index c47eaed0e98..288c6915864 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsearch.c +++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsearch.c @@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ _bt_readpage(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir, OffsetNumber offnum) /* * If the result of prechecking required keys was true, then in * assert-enabled builds we also recheck that _bt_checkkeys() - * result is is the same. + * result is the same. */ Assert(!requiredMatchedByPrecheck || passes_quals == _bt_checkkeys(scan, itup, indnatts, dir, diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c index 8e9c892f78a..1510b97fbe1 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c +++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c @@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@ _bt_checkkeys(IndexScanDesc scan, IndexTuple tuple, int tupnatts, /* * Is the key required for scanning for either forward or backward - * direction? If so and called told us that these types of keys are + * direction? If so and caller told us that these types of keys are * known to be matched, skip the check. Except for the row keys, * where NULLs could be found in the middle of matching values. */