From e3a9a194b7cb70a8c01deeff9f876a2631f1be06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:46:11 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Remove false comment about speculative insertion. There is no full discussion of speculative insertions in the executor README. There is a high-level explanation in execIndexing.c, but it doesn't seem necessary to refer it from here. Peter Geoghegan --- src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c index 874ca6a69bc..1ef76d09285 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c @@ -351,8 +351,7 @@ ExecInsert(ModifyTableState *mtstate, * * We loop back here if we find a conflict below, either during * the pre-check, or when we re-check after inserting the tuple - * speculatively. See the executor README for a full discussion - * of speculative insertion. + * speculatively. */ vlock: specConflict = false;