mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-30 11:03:19 +03:00
Require a C99-compliant snprintf(), and remove related workarounds.
Since our substitute snprintf now returns a C99-compliant result, there's no need anymore to have complicated code to cope with pre-C99 behavior. We can just make configure substitute snprintf.c if it finds that the system snprintf() is pre-C99. (Note: I do not believe that there are any platforms where this test will trigger that weren't already being rejected due to our other C99-ish feature requirements for snprintf. But let's add the check for paranoia's sake.) Then, simplify the call sites that had logic to cope with the pre-C99 definition. I also dropped some stuff that was being paranoid about the possibility of snprintf overrunning the given buffer. The only reports we've ever heard of that being a problem were for Solaris 7, which is long dead, and we've sure not heard any reports of these assertions triggering in a long time. So let's drop that complexity too. Likewise, drop some code that wasn't trusting snprintf to set errno when it returns -1. That would be not-per-spec, and again there's no real reason to believe it is a live issue, especially not for snprintfs that pass all of configure's feature checks. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17245.1534289329@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
46
configure
vendored
46
configure
vendored
@ -16142,7 +16142,7 @@ fi
|
||||
# Run tests below here
|
||||
# --------------------
|
||||
|
||||
# Force use of our snprintf if system's doesn't do arg control
|
||||
# For NLS, force use of our snprintf if system's doesn't do arg control.
|
||||
# See comment above at snprintf test for details.
|
||||
if test "$enable_nls" = yes -a "$pgac_need_repl_snprintf" = no; then
|
||||
{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether snprintf supports argument control" >&5
|
||||
@ -16436,6 +16436,50 @@ $as_echo "$pgac_cv_snprintf_size_t_support" >&6; }
|
||||
fi
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Force use of our snprintf if the system's doesn't handle buffer overrun
|
||||
# as specified by C99.
|
||||
if test "$pgac_need_repl_snprintf" = no; then
|
||||
{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether snprintf reports buffer overrun per C99" >&5
|
||||
$as_echo_n "checking whether snprintf reports buffer overrun per C99... " >&6; }
|
||||
if ${pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result+:} false; then :
|
||||
$as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
|
||||
else
|
||||
if test "$cross_compiling" = yes; then :
|
||||
pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result=cross
|
||||
else
|
||||
cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
|
||||
/* end confdefs.h. */
|
||||
#include <stdio.h>
|
||||
#include <string.h>
|
||||
|
||||
int main()
|
||||
{
|
||||
char buf[10];
|
||||
|
||||
if (snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "12345678901234567890") != 20)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ACEOF
|
||||
if ac_fn_c_try_run "$LINENO"; then :
|
||||
pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result=yes
|
||||
else
|
||||
pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result=no
|
||||
fi
|
||||
rm -f core *.core core.conftest.* gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext \
|
||||
conftest.$ac_objext conftest.beam conftest.$ac_ext
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
fi
|
||||
{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result" >&5
|
||||
$as_echo "$pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result" >&6; }
|
||||
|
||||
if test "$pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result" != yes; then
|
||||
pgac_need_repl_snprintf=yes
|
||||
fi
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Now we have checked all the reasons to replace snprintf
|
||||
if test $pgac_need_repl_snprintf = yes; then
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user