mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-04-25 21:42:33 +03:00
Collect dependency information for parsed CallStmts.
Parse analysis of a CallStmt will inject mutable information, for instance the OID of the called procedure, so that subsequent DDL may create a need to re-parse the CALL. We failed to detect this for CALLs in plpgsql routines, because no dependency information was collected when putting a CallStmt into the plan cache. That could lead to misbehavior or strange errors such as "cache lookup failed". Before commit ee895a655, the issue would only manifest for CALLs appearing in atomic contexts, because we re-planned non-atomic CALLs every time through anyway. It is now apparent that extract_query_dependencies() probably needs a special case for every utility statement type for which stmt_requires_parse_analysis() returns true. I wanted to add something like Assert(!stmt_requires_parse_analysis(...)) when falling out of extract_query_dependencies_walker without doing anything, but there are API issues as well as a more fundamental point: stmt_requires_parse_analysis is supposed to be applied to raw parser output, so it'd be cheating to assume it will give the correct answer for post-parse-analysis trees. I contented myself with adding a comment. Per bug #18131 from Christian Stork. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18131-576854e79c5cd264@postgresql.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2c2fbf740
commit
dc8d72c1c2
@ -3565,8 +3565,27 @@ extract_query_dependencies_walker(Node *node, PlannerInfo *context)
|
||||
if (query->commandType == CMD_UTILITY)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ignore utility statements, except those (such as EXPLAIN) that
|
||||
* contain a parsed-but-not-planned query.
|
||||
* This logic must handle any utility command for which parse
|
||||
* analysis was nontrivial (cf. stmt_requires_parse_analysis).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Notably, CALL requires its own processing.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (IsA(query->utilityStmt, CallStmt))
|
||||
{
|
||||
CallStmt *callstmt = (CallStmt *) query->utilityStmt;
|
||||
|
||||
/* We need not examine funccall, just the transformed exprs */
|
||||
(void) extract_query_dependencies_walker((Node *) callstmt->funcexpr,
|
||||
context);
|
||||
(void) extract_query_dependencies_walker((Node *) callstmt->outargs,
|
||||
context);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ignore other utility statements, except those (such as EXPLAIN)
|
||||
* that contain a parsed-but-not-planned query. For those, we
|
||||
* just need to transfer our attention to the contained query.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
query = UtilityContainsQuery(query->utilityStmt);
|
||||
if (query == NULL)
|
||||
|
@ -483,3 +483,50 @@ BEGIN
|
||||
END;
|
||||
$$;
|
||||
NOTICE: <NULL>
|
||||
-- check that we detect change of dependencies in CALL
|
||||
-- atomic and non-atomic call sites used to do this differently, so check both
|
||||
CREATE PROCEDURE inner_p (f1 int)
|
||||
AS $$
|
||||
BEGIN
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE 'inner_p(%)', f1;
|
||||
END
|
||||
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
|
||||
CREATE FUNCTION f(int) RETURNS int AS $$ SELECT $1 + 1 $$ LANGUAGE sql;
|
||||
CREATE PROCEDURE outer_p (f1 int)
|
||||
AS $$
|
||||
BEGIN
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE 'outer_p(%)', f1;
|
||||
CALL inner_p(f(f1));
|
||||
END
|
||||
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
|
||||
CREATE FUNCTION outer_f (f1 int) RETURNS void
|
||||
AS $$
|
||||
BEGIN
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE 'outer_f(%)', f1;
|
||||
CALL inner_p(f(f1));
|
||||
END
|
||||
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
|
||||
CALL outer_p(42);
|
||||
NOTICE: outer_p(42)
|
||||
NOTICE: inner_p(43)
|
||||
SELECT outer_f(42);
|
||||
NOTICE: outer_f(42)
|
||||
NOTICE: inner_p(43)
|
||||
outer_f
|
||||
---------
|
||||
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
DROP FUNCTION f(int);
|
||||
CREATE FUNCTION f(int) RETURNS int AS $$ SELECT $1 + 2 $$ LANGUAGE sql;
|
||||
CALL outer_p(42);
|
||||
NOTICE: outer_p(42)
|
||||
NOTICE: inner_p(44)
|
||||
SELECT outer_f(42);
|
||||
NOTICE: outer_f(42)
|
||||
NOTICE: inner_p(44)
|
||||
outer_f
|
||||
---------
|
||||
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -454,3 +454,41 @@ BEGIN
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE '%', v_Text;
|
||||
END;
|
||||
$$;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- check that we detect change of dependencies in CALL
|
||||
-- atomic and non-atomic call sites used to do this differently, so check both
|
||||
|
||||
CREATE PROCEDURE inner_p (f1 int)
|
||||
AS $$
|
||||
BEGIN
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE 'inner_p(%)', f1;
|
||||
END
|
||||
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
|
||||
|
||||
CREATE FUNCTION f(int) RETURNS int AS $$ SELECT $1 + 1 $$ LANGUAGE sql;
|
||||
|
||||
CREATE PROCEDURE outer_p (f1 int)
|
||||
AS $$
|
||||
BEGIN
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE 'outer_p(%)', f1;
|
||||
CALL inner_p(f(f1));
|
||||
END
|
||||
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
|
||||
|
||||
CREATE FUNCTION outer_f (f1 int) RETURNS void
|
||||
AS $$
|
||||
BEGIN
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE 'outer_f(%)', f1;
|
||||
CALL inner_p(f(f1));
|
||||
END
|
||||
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
|
||||
|
||||
CALL outer_p(42);
|
||||
SELECT outer_f(42);
|
||||
|
||||
DROP FUNCTION f(int);
|
||||
CREATE FUNCTION f(int) RETURNS int AS $$ SELECT $1 + 2 $$ LANGUAGE sql;
|
||||
|
||||
CALL outer_p(42);
|
||||
SELECT outer_f(42);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user