From d41202f36eed97a4ee68a6a9f5fcca314f12c35d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Paquier Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:51:33 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Fix comment related to concurrent index swapping in index.c A comment about switching indisvalid of the new and old indexes swapped in REINDEX CONCURRENTLY got this backwards. Issue introduced by 5dc92b8, the original commit of REINDEX CONCURRENTLY. Author: Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200318143340.GA46897@nol Backpatch-through: 12 --- src/backend/catalog/index.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c index 76fd938ce33..023ec7e6188 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c @@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ index_concurrently_swap(Oid newIndexId, Oid oldIndexId, const char *oldName) newIndexForm->indisclustered = oldIndexForm->indisclustered; /* - * Mark the old index as valid, and the new index as invalid similarly + * Mark the new index as valid, and the old index as invalid similarly * to what index_set_state_flags() does. */ newIndexForm->indisvalid = true;