From d1216635610a9855a8ec139e55cd852f67d5ee81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Paquier Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:39:38 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Mention CASCADE/RESTRICT for DROP STATISTICS This grammar has no effect as there are no dependencies on statistics, but it is supported by the parser. This is more consistent with the other DROP commands. Author: Vignesh C Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm1LA=yNmzcSfy+0oe6CEAgsxXRf_-UutE3ZncFi8QkFNQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10 --- doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_statistics.sgml | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_statistics.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_statistics.sgml index f58c3d6d221..1532ca95847 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_statistics.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_statistics.sgml @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ PostgreSQL documentation -DROP STATISTICS [ IF EXISTS ] name [, ...] +DROP STATISTICS [ IF EXISTS ] name [, ...] [ CASCADE | RESTRICT ] @@ -59,6 +59,18 @@ DROP STATISTICS [ IF EXISTS ] name + + CASCADE + RESTRICT + + + + These key words do not have any effect, since there are no dependencies + on statistics. + + + +