1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-08-18 12:22:09 +03:00

Remove direct uses of ItemPointer.{ip_blkid,ip_posid}

There are no functional changes here; this simply encapsulates knowledge
of the ItemPointerData struct so that a future patch can change things
without more breakage.

All direct users of ip_blkid and ip_posid are changed to use existing
macros ItemPointerGetBlockNumber and ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber
respectively.  For callers where that's inappropriate (because they
Assert that the itempointer is is valid-looking), add
ItemPointerGetBlockNumberNoCheck and ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck,
which lack the assertion but are otherwise identical.

Author: Pavan Deolasee
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdNnFon4cJiL=h1mZH3bgUeU+sWHuU4Yr8AB=j3A2p1GiA@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Alvaro Herrera
2017-03-28 12:52:55 -03:00
parent a99f77021f
commit ce96ce60ca
12 changed files with 79 additions and 58 deletions

View File

@@ -52,20 +52,21 @@ int32
ItemPointerCompare(ItemPointer arg1, ItemPointer arg2)
{
/*
* Don't use ItemPointerGetBlockNumber or ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber here,
* because they assert ip_posid != 0 which might not be true for a
* user-supplied TID.
* Use ItemPointerGet{Offset,Block}NumberNoCheck to avoid asserting
* ip_posid != 0, which may not be true for a user-supplied TID.
*/
BlockNumber b1 = BlockIdGetBlockNumber(&(arg1->ip_blkid));
BlockNumber b2 = BlockIdGetBlockNumber(&(arg2->ip_blkid));
BlockNumber b1 = ItemPointerGetBlockNumberNoCheck(arg1);
BlockNumber b2 = ItemPointerGetBlockNumberNoCheck(arg2);
if (b1 < b2)
return -1;
else if (b1 > b2)
return 1;
else if (arg1->ip_posid < arg2->ip_posid)
else if (ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(arg1) <
ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(arg2))
return -1;
else if (arg1->ip_posid > arg2->ip_posid)
else if (ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(arg1) >
ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(arg2))
return 1;
else
return 0;