mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-27 12:41:57 +03:00
Remove direct uses of ItemPointer.{ip_blkid,ip_posid}
There are no functional changes here; this simply encapsulates knowledge of the ItemPointerData struct so that a future patch can change things without more breakage. All direct users of ip_blkid and ip_posid are changed to use existing macros ItemPointerGetBlockNumber and ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber respectively. For callers where that's inappropriate (because they Assert that the itempointer is is valid-looking), add ItemPointerGetBlockNumberNoCheck and ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck, which lack the assertion but are otherwise identical. Author: Pavan Deolasee Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdNnFon4cJiL=h1mZH3bgUeU+sWHuU4Yr8AB=j3A2p1GiA@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
@ -363,8 +363,8 @@ bt_page_items(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
|
||||
j = 0;
|
||||
values[j++] = psprintf("%d", uargs->offset);
|
||||
values[j++] = psprintf("(%u,%u)",
|
||||
BlockIdGetBlockNumber(&(itup->t_tid.ip_blkid)),
|
||||
itup->t_tid.ip_posid);
|
||||
ItemPointerGetBlockNumberNoCheck(&itup->t_tid),
|
||||
ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(&itup->t_tid));
|
||||
values[j++] = psprintf("%d", (int) IndexTupleSize(itup));
|
||||
values[j++] = psprintf("%c", IndexTupleHasNulls(itup) ? 't' : 'f');
|
||||
values[j++] = psprintf("%c", IndexTupleHasVarwidths(itup) ? 't' : 'f');
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user