1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-08-19 23:22:23 +03:00

Generalize hash and ordering support in amapi

Stop comparing access method OID values against HASH_AM_OID and
BTREE_AM_OID, and instead check the IndexAmRoutine for an index to see
if it advertises its ability to perform the necessary ordering,
hashing, or cross-type comparing functionality.  A field amcanorder
already existed, this uses it more widely.  Fields amcanhash and
amcancrosscompare are added for the other purposes.

Author: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E72EAA49-354D-4C2E-8EB9-255197F55330@enterprisedb.com
This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut
2025-02-27 17:03:31 +01:00
parent 6eb8a1a4f9
commit ce62f2f2a0
14 changed files with 50 additions and 26 deletions

View File

@@ -1331,10 +1331,10 @@ ExecIndexBuildScanKeys(PlanState *planstate, Relation index,
varattno = ((Var *) leftop)->varattno;
/*
* We have to look up the operator's associated btree support
* We have to look up the operator's associated support
* function
*/
if (index->rd_rel->relam != BTREE_AM_OID ||
if (!index->rd_indam->amcanorder ||
varattno < 1 || varattno > indnkeyatts)
elog(ERROR, "bogus RowCompare index qualification");
opfamily = index->rd_opfamily[varattno - 1];