database/postgres
database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-04-29 13:56:47 +03:00
Code

Fix tuplesort optimization for CLUSTER-on-expression.

Browse Source 
When dispatching sort operations to specialized variants, commit
69749243 failed to handle the case where CLUSTER-sort decides not to
initialize datum1 and isnull1.  Fix by hoisting that decision up a level
and advertising whether datum1 can be relied on, in the Tuplesortstate
object.

Per reports from UBsan and Valgrind build farm animals, while running
the cluster.sql test.

Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFBsxsF1TeK5Fic0M%2BTSJXzbKsY6aBqJGNj6ptURuB09ZF6k_w%40mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Munro 2022-04-04 10:52:02 +12:00
parent 591e088dd5
commit cc58eecc5d
1 changed files with 56 additions and 22 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

64
src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c
View File

@ -306,6 +306,12 @@ struct Tuplesortstate
void (*readtup) (Tuplesortstate *state, SortTuple *stup,
LogicalTape *tape, unsigned int len);
/*
* Whether SortTuple's datum1 and isnull1 members are maintained by the
* above routines. If not, some sort specializations are disabled.
*/
bool haveDatum1;
/*
* This array holds the tuples now in sort memory. If we are in state
* INITIAL, the tuples are in no particular order; if we are in state
@ -1016,6 +1022,7 @@ tuplesort_begin_heap(TupleDesc tupDesc,
state->copytup = copytup_heap;
state->writetup = writetup_heap;
state->readtup = readtup_heap;
state->haveDatum1 = true;
state->tupDesc = tupDesc; /* assume we need not copy tupDesc */
state->abbrevNext = 10;
@ -1095,6 +1102,15 @@ tuplesort_begin_cluster(TupleDesc tupDesc,
state->indexInfo = BuildIndexInfo(indexRel);
/*
* If we don't have a simple leading attribute, we don't currently
* initialize datum1, so disable optimizations that require it.
*/
if (state->indexInfo->ii_IndexAttrNumbers[0] == 0)
state->haveDatum1 = false;
else
state->haveDatum1 = true;
state->tupDesc = tupDesc; /* assume we need not copy tupDesc */
indexScanKey = _bt_mkscankey(indexRel, NULL);
@ -1188,6 +1204,7 @@ tuplesort_begin_index_btree(Relation heapRel,
state->writetup = writetup_index;
state->readtup = readtup_index;
state->abbrevNext = 10;
state->haveDatum1 = true;
state->heapRel = heapRel;
state->indexRel = indexRel;
@ -1262,6 +1279,7 @@ tuplesort_begin_index_hash(Relation heapRel,
state->copytup = copytup_index;
state->writetup = writetup_index;
state->readtup = readtup_index;
state->haveDatum1 = true;
state->heapRel = heapRel;
state->indexRel = indexRel;
@ -1302,6 +1320,7 @@ tuplesort_begin_index_gist(Relation heapRel,
state->copytup = copytup_index;
state->writetup = writetup_index;
state->readtup = readtup_index;
state->haveDatum1 = true;
state->heapRel = heapRel;
state->indexRel = indexRel;
@ -1366,6 +1385,7 @@ tuplesort_begin_datum(Oid datumType, Oid sortOperator, Oid sortCollation,
state->writetup = writetup_datum;
state->readtup = readtup_datum;
state->abbrevNext = 10;
state->haveDatum1 = true;
state->datumType = datumType;
@ -3593,27 +3613,40 @@ tuplesort_sort_memtuples(Tuplesortstate *state)
if (state->memtupcount > 1)
{
/* Do we have a specialization for the leading column's comparator? */
if (state->sortKeys &&
state->sortKeys[0].comparator == ssup_datum_unsigned_cmp)
/*
* Do we have the leading column's value or abbreviation in datum1,
* and is there a specialization for its comparator?
*/
if (state->haveDatum1 && state->sortKeys)
{
if (state->sortKeys[0].comparator == ssup_datum_unsigned_cmp)
{
elog(DEBUG1, "qsort_tuple_unsigned");
qsort_tuple_unsigned(state->memtuples, state->memtupcount, state);
qsort_tuple_unsigned(state->memtuples,
state->memtupcount,
state);
return;
}
else if (state->sortKeys &&
state->sortKeys[0].comparator == ssup_datum_signed_cmp)
else if (state->sortKeys[0].comparator == ssup_datum_signed_cmp)
{
elog(DEBUG1, "qsort_tuple_signed");
qsort_tuple_signed(state->memtuples, state->memtupcount, state);
qsort_tuple_signed(state->memtuples,
state->memtupcount,
state);
return;
}
else if (state->sortKeys &&
state->sortKeys[0].comparator == ssup_datum_int32_cmp)
else if (state->sortKeys[0].comparator == ssup_datum_int32_cmp)
{
elog(DEBUG1, "qsort_tuple_int32");
qsort_tuple_int32(state->memtuples, state->memtupcount, state);
qsort_tuple_int32(state->memtuples,
state->memtupcount,
state);
return;
}
}
/* Can we use the single-key sort function? */
else if (state->onlyKey != NULL)
if (state->onlyKey != NULL)
{
elog(DEBUG1, "qsort_ssup");
qsort_ssup(state->memtuples, state->memtupcount,
@ -4019,7 +4052,6 @@ comparetup_cluster(const SortTuple *a, const SortTuple *b,
datum2;
bool isnull1,
isnull2;
AttrNumber leading = state->indexInfo->ii_IndexAttrNumbers[0];
/* Be prepared to compare additional sort keys */
ltup = (HeapTuple) a->tuple;
@ -4027,7 +4059,7 @@ comparetup_cluster(const SortTuple *a, const SortTuple *b,
tupDesc = state->tupDesc;
/* Compare the leading sort key, if it's simple */
if (leading != 0)
if (state->haveDatum1)
{
compare = ApplySortComparator(a->datum1, a->isnull1,
b->datum1, b->isnull1,
@ -4037,6 +4069,8 @@ comparetup_cluster(const SortTuple *a, const SortTuple *b,
if (sortKey->abbrev_converter)
{
AttrNumber leading = state->indexInfo->ii_IndexAttrNumbers[0];
datum1 = heap_getattr(ltup, leading, tupDesc, &isnull1);
datum2 = heap_getattr(rtup, leading, tupDesc, &isnull2);
@ -4134,7 +4168,7 @@ copytup_cluster(Tuplesortstate *state, SortTuple *stup, void *tup)
* set up first-column key value, and potentially abbreviate, if it's a
* simple column
*/
if (state->indexInfo->ii_IndexAttrNumbers[0] == 0)
if (!state->haveDatum1)
return;
original = heap_getattr(tuple,
@ -4229,7 +4263,7 @@ readtup_cluster(Tuplesortstate *state, SortTuple *stup,
LogicalTapeReadExact(tape, &tuplen, sizeof(tuplen));
stup->tuple = (void *) tuple;
/* set up first-column key value, if it's a simple column */
if (state->indexInfo->ii_IndexAttrNumbers[0] != 0)
if (state->haveDatum1)
stup->datum1 = heap_getattr(tuple,
state->indexInfo->ii_IndexAttrNumbers[0],
state->tupDesc,