Clean up assorted misuses of snprintf()'s result value.

Fix a small number of places that were testing the result of snprintf()
but doing so incorrectly.  The right test for buffer overrun, per C99,
is "result >= bufsize" not "result > bufsize".  Some places were also
checking for failure with "result == -1", but the standard only says
that a negative value is delivered on failure.

(Note that this only makes these places correct if snprintf() delivers
C99-compliant results.  But at least now these places are consistent
with all the other places where we assume that.)

Also, make psql_start_test() and isolation_start_test() check for
buffer overrun while constructing their shell commands.  There seems
like a higher risk of overrun, with more severe consequences, here
than there is for the individual file paths that are made elsewhere
in the same functions, so this seemed like a worthwhile change.

Also fix guc.c's do_serialize() to initialize errno = 0 before
calling vsnprintf.  In principle, this should be unnecessary because
vsnprintf should have set errno if it returns a failure indication ...
but the other two places this coding pattern is cribbed from don't
assume that, so let's be consistent.

These errors are all very old, so back-patch as appropriate.  I think
that only the shell command overrun cases are even theoretically
reachable in practice, but there's not much point in erroneous error
checks.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17245.1534289329@sss.pgh.pa.us

src/port/getaddrinfo.c

@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ getnameinfo(const struct sockaddr *sa, int salen,
 			ret = snprintf(service, servicelen, "%d",
 						   pg_ntoh16(((struct sockaddr_in *) sa)->sin_port));
 		}
-		if (ret == -1 || ret >= servicelen)
+		if (ret < 0 || ret >= servicelen)
 			return EAI_MEMORY;
 	}