database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-28 23:42:10 +03:00
Code Activity

Optimize nbtree backward scan boundary cases.

Browse Source 
Teach _bt_binsrch (and related helper routines like _bt_search and
_bt_compare) about the initial positioning requirements of backward
scans.  Routines like _bt_binsrch already know all about "nextkey"
searches, so it seems natural to teach them about "goback"/backward
searches, too.  These concepts are closely related, and are much easier
to understand when discussed together.

Now that certain implementation details are hidden from _bt_first, it's
straightforward to add a new optimization: backward scans using the <
strategy now avoid extra leaf page accesses in certain "boundary cases".
Consider the following example, which uses the tenk1 table (and its
tenk1_hundred index) from the standard regression tests:

SELECT * FROM tenk1 WHERE hundred < 12 ORDER BY hundred DESC LIMIT 1;

Before this commit, nbtree would scan two leaf pages, even though it was
only really necessary to scan one leaf page.  We'll now descend straight
to the leaf page containing a (12, -inf) high key instead.  The scan
will locate matching non-pivot tuples with "hundred" values starting
from the value 11.  The scan won't waste a page access on the right
sibling leaf page, which cannot possibly contain any matching tuples.

You can think of the optimization added by this commit as disabling an
optimization (the _bt_compare "!pivotsearch" behavior that was added to
Postgres 12 in commit dd299df8) for a small subset of cases where it was
always counterproductive.

Equivalently, you can think of the new optimization as extending the
"pivotsearch" behavior that page deletion by VACUUM has long required
(since the aforementioned Postgres 12 commit went in) to other, similar
cases.  Obviously, this isn't strictly necessary for these new cases
(unlike VACUUM, _bt_first is prepared to move the scan to the left once
on the leaf level), but the underlying principle is the same.

Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=XPzM8HzaLPq278Vms420mVSHfgs9wi5tjFKHcapZCEw@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Peter Geoghegan
2023-12-08 11:05:17 -08:00
parent b437571714
commit c9c0589fda
7 changed files with 210 additions and 149 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c
View File

@ -3165,7 +3165,7 @@ invariant_l_offset(BtreeCheckState *state, BTScanInsert key,
ItemId itemid;
int32 cmp;
Assert(key->pivotsearch);
Assert(!key->nextkey && key->backward);
/* Verify line pointer before checking tuple */
itemid = PageGetItemIdCareful(state, state->targetblock, state->target,
@ -3227,7 +3227,7 @@ invariant_leq_offset(BtreeCheckState *state, BTScanInsert key,
{
int32 cmp;
Assert(key->pivotsearch);
Assert(!key->nextkey && key->backward);
cmp = _bt_compare(state->rel, key, state->target, upperbound);
@ -3250,7 +3250,7 @@ invariant_g_offset(BtreeCheckState *state, BTScanInsert key,
{
int32 cmp;
Assert(key->pivotsearch);
Assert(!key->nextkey && key->backward);
cmp = _bt_compare(state->rel, key, state->target, lowerbound);
@ -3288,7 +3288,7 @@ invariant_l_nontarget_offset(BtreeCheckState *state, BTScanInsert key,
ItemId itemid;
int32 cmp;
Assert(key->pivotsearch);
Assert(!key->nextkey && key->backward);
/* Verify line pointer before checking tuple */
itemid = PageGetItemIdCareful(state, nontargetblock, nontarget,
@ -3514,9 +3514,9 @@ palloc_btree_page(BtreeCheckState *state, BlockNumber blocknum)
* For example, invariant_g_offset() might miss a cross-page invariant failure
* on an internal level if the scankey built from the first item on the
* target's right sibling page happened to be equal to (not greater than) the
* last item on target page. The !pivotsearch tiebreaker in _bt_compare()
* might otherwise cause amcheck to assume (rather than actually verify) that
* the scankey is greater.
* last item on target page. The !backward tiebreaker in _bt_compare() might
* otherwise cause amcheck to assume (rather than actually verify) that the
* scankey is greater.
*/
static inline BTScanInsert
bt_mkscankey_pivotsearch(Relation rel, IndexTuple itup)
@ -3524,7 +3524,7 @@ bt_mkscankey_pivotsearch(Relation rel, IndexTuple itup)
BTScanInsert skey;
skey = _bt_mkscankey(rel, itup);
skey->pivotsearch = true;
skey->backward = true;
return skey;
}