From c985a43df379e044e0de43c41daa1ba0847de459 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alvaro Herrera Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 12:38:41 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Add missing words in comment Reported by Zhihong Yu. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALNJ-vR6uZivg_XkB1zKjEXeyZDEgoYanFXB-++1kBT9yZQoUw@mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c index e82a6d0d81d..6dacda0634e 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c @@ -17738,9 +17738,9 @@ ATExecDetachPartition(List **wqueue, AlteredTableInfo *tab, Relation rel, * constraint would change. And there's a definitional problem: what * should happen to the tuples that are being inserted that belong to * the partition being detached? Putting them on the partition being - * detached would be wrong, since they'd become "lost" after the but - * we cannot put them in the default partition either until we alter - * its partition constraint. + * detached would be wrong, since they'd become "lost" after the + * detaching completes but we cannot put them in the default partition + * either until we alter its partition constraint. * * I think we could solve this problem if we effected the constraint * change before committing the first transaction. But the lock would