database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-11 10:01:57 +03:00
Code Activity

Phase 2 of pgindent updates.

Browse Source 
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.

Commit e3860ffa4d wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code.  The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there.  BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs.  So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before.  This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.

Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.

This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2017-06-21 15:18:54 -04:00
parent f669c09989
commit c7b8998ebb
1107 changed files with 3433 additions and 3514 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/backend/access/spgist/spgdoinsert.c
View File

@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ doPickSplit(Relation index, SpGistState *state,
insertedNew = true;
}
for (i = 0; i < nToInsert; i++)
leafPageSelect[i] = 0; /* signifies current page */
leafPageSelect[i] = 0; /* signifies current page */
}
else if (in.nTuples == 1 && totalLeafSizes > SPGIST_PAGE_CAPACITY)
{
@ -1076,12 +1076,12 @@ doPickSplit(Relation index, SpGistState *state,
{
if (leafSizes[i] <= curspace)
{
nodePageSelect[i] = 0; /* signifies current page */
nodePageSelect[i] = 0; /* signifies current page */
curspace -= leafSizes[i];
}
else
{
nodePageSelect[i] = 1; /* signifies new leaf page */
nodePageSelect[i] = 1; /* signifies new leaf page */
newspace -= leafSizes[i];
}
}

2
src/backend/access/spgist/spgscan.c
View File

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ typedef void (*storeRes_func) (SpGistScanOpaque so, ItemPointer heapPtr,
typedef struct ScanStackEntry
{
Datum reconstructedValue; /* value reconstructed from parent */
Datum reconstructedValue; /* value reconstructed from parent */
void *traversalValue; /* opclass-specific traverse value */
int level; /* level of items on this page */
ItemPointerData ptr; /* block and offset to scan from */

4
src/backend/access/spgist/spgvacuum.c
View File

@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ typedef struct spgVacPendingItem
{
ItemPointerData tid; /* redirection target to visit */
bool done; /* have we dealt with this? */
struct spgVacPendingItem *next; /* list link */
struct spgVacPendingItem *next; /* list link */
} spgVacPendingItem;
/* Local state for vacuum operations */
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ typedef struct spgBulkDeleteState
/* Additional working state */
SpGistState spgstate; /* for SPGiST operations that need one */
spgVacPendingItem *pendingList; /* TIDs we need to (re)visit */
spgVacPendingItem *pendingList; /* TIDs we need to (re)visit */
TransactionId myXmin; /* for detecting newly-added redirects */
BlockNumber lastFilledBlock; /* last non-deletable block */
} spgBulkDeleteState;