1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-15 19:21:59 +03:00

Phase 2 of pgindent updates.

Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.

Commit e3860ffa4d wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code.  The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there.  BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs.  So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before.  This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.

Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.

This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2017-06-21 15:18:54 -04:00
parent f669c09989
commit c7b8998ebb
1107 changed files with 3433 additions and 3514 deletions

View File

@ -146,22 +146,22 @@ typedef struct RewriteStateData
BlockNumber rs_blockno; /* block where page will go */
bool rs_buffer_valid; /* T if any tuples in buffer */
bool rs_use_wal; /* must we WAL-log inserts? */
bool rs_logical_rewrite; /* do we need to do logical rewriting */
TransactionId rs_oldest_xmin; /* oldest xmin used by caller to
* determine tuple visibility */
bool rs_logical_rewrite; /* do we need to do logical rewriting */
TransactionId rs_oldest_xmin; /* oldest xmin used by caller to determine
* tuple visibility */
TransactionId rs_freeze_xid; /* Xid that will be used as freeze cutoff
* point */
TransactionId rs_logical_xmin; /* Xid that will be used as cutoff
* point for logical rewrites */
TransactionId rs_logical_xmin; /* Xid that will be used as cutoff point
* for logical rewrites */
MultiXactId rs_cutoff_multi; /* MultiXactId that will be used as cutoff
* point for multixacts */
MemoryContext rs_cxt; /* for hash tables and entries and tuples in
* them */
XLogRecPtr rs_begin_lsn; /* XLogInsertLsn when starting the rewrite */
HTAB *rs_unresolved_tups; /* unmatched A tuples */
HTAB *rs_old_new_tid_map; /* unmatched B tuples */
HTAB *rs_unresolved_tups; /* unmatched A tuples */
HTAB *rs_old_new_tid_map; /* unmatched B tuples */
HTAB *rs_logical_mappings; /* logical remapping files */
uint32 rs_num_rewrite_mappings; /* # in memory mappings */
uint32 rs_num_rewrite_mappings; /* # in memory mappings */
} RewriteStateData;
/*
@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ typedef struct RewriteMappingFile
*/
typedef struct RewriteMappingDataEntry
{
LogicalRewriteMappingData map; /* map between old and new location of
* the tuple */
LogicalRewriteMappingData map; /* map between old and new location of the
* tuple */
dlist_node node;
} RewriteMappingDataEntry;
@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ raw_heap_insert(RewriteState state, HeapTuple tup)
else
heaptup = tup;
len = MAXALIGN(heaptup->t_len); /* be conservative */
len = MAXALIGN(heaptup->t_len); /* be conservative */
/*
* If we're gonna fail for oversize tuple, do it right away