1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-15 19:21:59 +03:00

Change more places to be less trusting of RestrictInfo.is_pushed_down.

On further reflection, commit e5d83995e didn't go far enough: pretty much
everywhere in the planner that examines a clause's is_pushed_down flag
ought to be changed to use the more complicated behavior where we also
check the clause's required_relids.  Otherwise we could make incorrect
decisions about whether, say, a clause is safe to use as a hash clause.

Some (many?) of these places are safe as-is, either because they are
never reached while considering a parameterized path, or because there
are additional checks that would reject a pushed-down clause anyway.
However, it seems smarter to just code them all the same way rather
than rely on easily-broken reasoning of that sort.

In support of that, invent a new macro RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN that should
be used in place of direct tests on the is_pushed_down flag.

Like the previous patch, back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f8128b11-c5bf-3539-48cd-234178b2314d@proxel.se
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2018-04-20 15:19:16 -04:00
parent 68c23cba34
commit c792c7db41
10 changed files with 64 additions and 37 deletions

View File

@ -1629,7 +1629,8 @@ build_joinrel_partition_info(RelOptInfo *joinrel, RelOptInfo *outer_rel,
*/
if (!IS_PARTITIONED_REL(outer_rel) || !IS_PARTITIONED_REL(inner_rel) ||
outer_rel->part_scheme != inner_rel->part_scheme ||
!have_partkey_equi_join(outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype, restrictlist))
!have_partkey_equi_join(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel,
jointype, restrictlist))
{
Assert(!IS_PARTITIONED_REL(joinrel));
return;