mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-15 19:21:59 +03:00
Change more places to be less trusting of RestrictInfo.is_pushed_down.
On further reflection, commit e5d83995e
didn't go far enough: pretty much
everywhere in the planner that examines a clause's is_pushed_down flag
ought to be changed to use the more complicated behavior where we also
check the clause's required_relids. Otherwise we could make incorrect
decisions about whether, say, a clause is safe to use as a hash clause.
Some (many?) of these places are safe as-is, either because they are
never reached while considering a parameterized path, or because there
are additional checks that would reject a pushed-down clause anyway.
However, it seems smarter to just code them all the same way rather
than rely on easily-broken reasoning of that sort.
In support of that, invent a new macro RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN that should
be used in place of direct tests on the is_pushed_down flag.
Like the previous patch, back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f8128b11-c5bf-3539-48cd-234178b2314d@proxel.se
This commit is contained in:
@ -1629,7 +1629,8 @@ build_joinrel_partition_info(RelOptInfo *joinrel, RelOptInfo *outer_rel,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!IS_PARTITIONED_REL(outer_rel) || !IS_PARTITIONED_REL(inner_rel) ||
|
||||
outer_rel->part_scheme != inner_rel->part_scheme ||
|
||||
!have_partkey_equi_join(outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype, restrictlist))
|
||||
!have_partkey_equi_join(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel,
|
||||
jointype, restrictlist))
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert(!IS_PARTITIONED_REL(joinrel));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user