1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-02 09:02:37 +03:00

Fix UPDATE/DELETE WHERE CURRENT OF to support repeated update and update-

then-delete on the current cursor row.  The basic fix is that nodeTidscan.c
has to apply heap_get_latest_tid() to the current-scan-TID obtained from the
cursor query; this ensures we get the latest row version to work with.
However, since that only works if the query plan is a TID scan, we also have
to hack the planner to make sure only that type of plan will be selected.
(Formerly, the planner might decide to apply a seqscan if the table is very
small.  This change is probably a Good Thing anyway, since it's hard to see
how a seqscan could really win.)  That means the execQual.c code to support
CurrentOfExpr as a regular expression type is dead code, so replace it with
just an elog().  Also, add regression tests covering these cases.  Note
that the added tests expose the fact that re-fetching an updated row
misbehaves if the cursor used FOR UPDATE.  That's an independent bug that
should be fixed later.  Per report from Dharmendra Goyal.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2007-10-24 18:37:09 +00:00
parent 9226ba817b
commit c29a9c37bf
6 changed files with 225 additions and 43 deletions

View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execQual.c,v 1.222 2007/09/06 17:31:58 tgl Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execQual.c,v 1.223 2007/10/24 18:37:08 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -3694,45 +3694,17 @@ ExecEvalArrayCoerceExpr(ArrayCoerceExprState *astate,
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecEvalCurrentOfExpr
*
* Normally, the planner will convert CURRENT OF into a TidScan qualification,
* but we have plain execQual support in case it doesn't.
* The planner must convert CURRENT OF into a TidScan qualification.
* So, we have to be able to do ExecInitExpr on a CurrentOfExpr,
* but we shouldn't ever actually execute it.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
static Datum
ExecEvalCurrentOfExpr(ExprState *exprstate, ExprContext *econtext,
bool *isNull, ExprDoneCond *isDone)
{
CurrentOfExpr *cexpr = (CurrentOfExpr *) exprstate->expr;
bool result;
bool lisnull;
Oid tableoid;
ItemPointer tuple_tid;
ItemPointerData cursor_tid;
if (isDone)
*isDone = ExprSingleResult;
*isNull = false;
Assert(cexpr->cvarno != INNER);
Assert(cexpr->cvarno != OUTER);
Assert(!TupIsNull(econtext->ecxt_scantuple));
/* Use slot_getattr to catch any possible mistakes */
tableoid = DatumGetObjectId(slot_getattr(econtext->ecxt_scantuple,
TableOidAttributeNumber,
&lisnull));
Assert(!lisnull);
tuple_tid = (ItemPointer)
DatumGetPointer(slot_getattr(econtext->ecxt_scantuple,
SelfItemPointerAttributeNumber,
&lisnull));
Assert(!lisnull);
if (execCurrentOf(cexpr, econtext, tableoid, &cursor_tid))
result = ItemPointerEquals(&cursor_tid, tuple_tid);
else
result = false;
return BoolGetDatum(result);
elog(ERROR, "CURRENT OF cannot be executed");
return 0; /* keep compiler quiet */
}

View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeTidscan.c,v 1.55 2007/06/11 22:22:40 tgl Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeTidscan.c,v 1.56 2007/10/24 18:37:08 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ TidListCreate(TidScanState *tidstate)
tidList = (ItemPointerData *)
palloc(numAllocTids * sizeof(ItemPointerData));
numTids = 0;
tidstate->tss_isCurrentOf = false;
foreach(l, evalList)
{
@ -165,6 +166,7 @@ TidListCreate(TidScanState *tidstate)
numAllocTids * sizeof(ItemPointerData));
}
tidList[numTids++] = cursor_tid;
tidstate->tss_isCurrentOf = true;
}
}
else
@ -182,6 +184,9 @@ TidListCreate(TidScanState *tidstate)
int lastTid;
int i;
/* CurrentOfExpr could never appear OR'd with something else */
Assert(!tidstate->tss_isCurrentOf);
qsort((void *) tidList, numTids, sizeof(ItemPointerData),
itemptr_comparator);
lastTid = 0;
@ -269,7 +274,8 @@ TidNext(TidScanState *node)
/*
* XXX shouldn't we check here to make sure tuple matches TID list? In
* runtime-key case this is not certain, is it?
* runtime-key case this is not certain, is it? However, in the
* WHERE CURRENT OF case it might not match anyway ...
*/
ExecStoreTuple(estate->es_evTuple[scanrelid - 1],
@ -319,6 +325,15 @@ TidNext(TidScanState *node)
while (node->tss_TidPtr >= 0 && node->tss_TidPtr < numTids)
{
tuple->t_self = tidList[node->tss_TidPtr];
/*
* For WHERE CURRENT OF, the tuple retrieved from the cursor might
* since have been updated; if so, we should fetch the version that
* is current according to our snapshot.
*/
if (node->tss_isCurrentOf)
heap_get_latest_tid(heapRelation, snapshot, &tuple->t_self);
if (heap_fetch(heapRelation, snapshot, tuple, &buffer, false, NULL))
{
/*