1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-28 23:42:10 +03:00

Spell checking and markup refinement

This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut
2011-05-19 01:14:45 +03:00
parent 0ee391b77a
commit c13dc6402b
37 changed files with 97 additions and 97 deletions

View File

@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ gistbuildempty(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("unlogged GIST indexes are not supported")));
errmsg("unlogged GiST indexes are not supported")));
PG_RETURN_VOID();
}
@ -1405,7 +1405,7 @@ initGISTstate(GISTSTATE *giststate, Relation index)
* functions don't care about collation, so we just do it
* unconditionally. (We could alternatively call get_typcollation,
* but that seems like expensive overkill --- there aren't going to be
* any cases where a GIST storage type has a nondefault collation.)
* any cases where a GiST storage type has a nondefault collation.)
*/
if (OidIsValid(index->rd_indcollation[i]))
giststate->supportCollation[i] = index->rd_indcollation[i];

View File

@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ gistindex_keytest(IndexScanDesc scan,
int i;
if (GistPageIsLeaf(page)) /* shouldn't happen */
elog(ERROR, "invalid GIST tuple found on leaf page");
elog(ERROR, "invalid GiST tuple found on leaf page");
for (i = 0; i < scan->numberOfOrderBys; i++)
so->distances[i] = -get_float8_infinity();
return true;

View File

@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ gist_redo(XLogRecPtr lsn, XLogRecord *record)
MemoryContext oldCxt;
/*
* GIST indexes do not require any conflict processing. NB: If we ever
* GiST indexes do not require any conflict processing. NB: If we ever
* implement a similar optimization we have in b-tree, and remove killed
* tuples outside VACUUM, we'll need to handle that here.
*/

View File

@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ T052 MAX and MIN for row types NO
T053 Explicit aliases for all-fields reference NO
T061 UCS support NO
T071 BIGINT data type YES
T101 Enhanced nullability determiniation NO
T101 Enhanced nullability determination NO
T111 Updatable joins, unions, and columns NO
T121 WITH (excluding RECURSIVE) in query expression YES
T122 WITH (excluding RECURSIVE) in subquery YES

View File

@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ DefineIndex(RangeVar *heapRelation,
{
/*
* Hack to provide more-or-less-transparent updating of old RTREE
* indexes to GIST: if RTREE is requested and not found, use GIST.
* indexes to GiST: if RTREE is requested and not found, use GIST.
*/
if (strcmp(accessMethodName, "rtree") == 0)
{

View File

@ -1177,7 +1177,7 @@ WHERE p1.amprocfamily = p3.oid AND p3.opfmethod = p2.oid AND
-- Detect missing pg_amproc entries: should have as many support functions
-- as AM expects for each datatype combination supported by the opfamily.
-- GIST/GIN are special cases because each has an optional support function.
-- GiST/GIN are special cases because each has an optional support function.
SELECT p1.amname, p2.opfname, p3.amproclefttype, p3.amprocrighttype
FROM pg_am AS p1, pg_opfamily AS p2, pg_amproc AS p3
WHERE p2.opfmethod = p1.oid AND p3.amprocfamily = p2.oid AND
@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ WHERE p2.opfmethod = p1.oid AND p3.amprocfamily = p2.oid AND
--------+---------+----------------+-----------------
(0 rows)
-- Similar check for GIST/GIN, allowing one optional proc
-- Similar check for GiST/GIN, allowing one optional proc
SELECT p1.amname, p2.opfname, p3.amproclefttype, p3.amprocrighttype
FROM pg_am AS p1, pg_opfamily AS p2, pg_amproc AS p3
WHERE p2.opfmethod = p1.oid AND p3.amprocfamily = p2.oid AND
@ -1205,7 +1205,7 @@ WHERE p2.opfmethod = p1.oid AND p3.amprocfamily = p2.oid AND
(0 rows)
-- Also, check if there are any pg_opclass entries that don't seem to have
-- pg_amproc support. Again, GIST/GIN have to be checked specially.
-- pg_amproc support. Again, GiST/GIN have to be checked specially.
SELECT amname, opcname, count(*)
FROM pg_am am JOIN pg_opclass op ON opcmethod = am.oid
LEFT JOIN pg_amproc p ON amprocfamily = opcfamily AND

View File

@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ WHERE p1.amprocfamily = p3.oid AND p3.opfmethod = p2.oid AND
-- Detect missing pg_amproc entries: should have as many support functions
-- as AM expects for each datatype combination supported by the opfamily.
-- GIST/GIN are special cases because each has an optional support function.
-- GiST/GIN are special cases because each has an optional support function.
SELECT p1.amname, p2.opfname, p3.amproclefttype, p3.amprocrighttype
FROM pg_am AS p1, pg_opfamily AS p2, pg_amproc AS p3
@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ WHERE p2.opfmethod = p1.oid AND p3.amprocfamily = p2.oid AND
p4.amproclefttype = p3.amproclefttype AND
p4.amprocrighttype = p3.amprocrighttype);
-- Similar check for GIST/GIN, allowing one optional proc
-- Similar check for GiST/GIN, allowing one optional proc
SELECT p1.amname, p2.opfname, p3.amproclefttype, p3.amprocrighttype
FROM pg_am AS p1, pg_opfamily AS p2, pg_amproc AS p3
@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ WHERE p2.opfmethod = p1.oid AND p3.amprocfamily = p2.oid AND
NOT IN (p1.amsupport, p1.amsupport - 1);
-- Also, check if there are any pg_opclass entries that don't seem to have
-- pg_amproc support. Again, GIST/GIN have to be checked specially.
-- pg_amproc support. Again, GiST/GIN have to be checked specially.
SELECT amname, opcname, count(*)
FROM pg_am am JOIN pg_opclass op ON opcmethod = am.oid