database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-08-30 06:01:21 +03:00
Code Activity

Remove STATUS_FOUND

Browse Source 
Replace the solitary use with a bool.

Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a6f91ead-0ce4-2a34-062b-7ab9813ea308%402ndquadrant.com
This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut
2019-12-29 09:09:20 +01:00
parent 38fc056074
commit c096a804d9
4 changed files with 16 additions and 23 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

24
src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
View File

@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
ResourceOwner owner;
uint32 hashcode;
LWLock *partitionLock;
int status;
bool found_conflict;
bool log_lock = false;
if (lockmethodid <= 0 || lockmethodid >= lengthof(LockMethods))
@@ -979,12 +979,12 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
* (That's last because most complex check.)
*/
if (lockMethodTable->conflictTab[lockmode] & lock->waitMask)
status = STATUS_FOUND;
found_conflict = true;
else
status = LockCheckConflicts(lockMethodTable, lockmode,
found_conflict = LockCheckConflicts(lockMethodTable, lockmode,
lock, proclock);
if (status == STATUS_OK)
if (!found_conflict)
{
/* No conflict with held or previously requested locks */
GrantLock(lock, proclock, lockmode);
@@ -992,8 +992,6 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
}
else
{
Assert(status == STATUS_FOUND);
/*
* We can't acquire the lock immediately. If caller specified no
* blocking, remove useless table entries and return
@@ -1330,7 +1328,7 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
* LockCheckConflicts -- test whether requested lock conflicts
* with those already granted
*
* Returns STATUS_FOUND if conflict, STATUS_OK if no conflict.
* Returns true if conflict, false if no conflict.
*
* NOTES:
* Here's what makes this complicated: one process's locks don't
@@ -1340,7 +1338,7 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
* the same group. So, we must subtract off these locks when determining
* whether the requested new lock conflicts with those already held.
*/
int
bool
LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
LOCKMODE lockmode,
LOCK *lock,
@@ -1367,7 +1365,7 @@ LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
if (!(conflictMask & lock->grantMask))
{
PROCLOCK_PRINT("LockCheckConflicts: no conflict", proclock);
return STATUS_OK;
return false;
}
/*
@@ -1393,7 +1391,7 @@ LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
if (totalConflictsRemaining == 0)
{
PROCLOCK_PRINT("LockCheckConflicts: resolved (simple)", proclock);
return STATUS_OK;
return false;
}
/* If no group locking, it's definitely a conflict. */
@@ -1402,7 +1400,7 @@ LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
Assert(proclock->tag.myProc == MyProc);
PROCLOCK_PRINT("LockCheckConflicts: conflicting (simple)",
proclock);
return STATUS_FOUND;
return true;
}
/*
@@ -1439,7 +1437,7 @@ LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
{
PROCLOCK_PRINT("LockCheckConflicts: resolved (group)",
proclock);
return STATUS_OK;
return false;
}
}
otherproclock = (PROCLOCK *)
@@ -1449,7 +1447,7 @@ LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
/* Nope, it's a real conflict. */
PROCLOCK_PRINT("LockCheckConflicts: conflicting (group)", proclock);
return STATUS_FOUND;
return true;
}
/*