database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-10-18 04:29:09 +03:00
Code Activity

Harmonize parameter names in storage and AM code.

Browse Source 
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in storage, catalog,
access method, executor, and logical replication code, as well as in
miscellaneous utility/library code.

Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy.  Later commits will do the
same for other parts of the codebase.

Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Peter Geoghegan
2022-09-19 19:18:36 -07:00
parent c47885bd8b
commit bfcf1b3480
80 changed files with 228 additions and 218 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c
View File

@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static TupleTableSlot *ExecHashJoinGetSavedTuple(HashJoinState *hjstate,
TupleTableSlot *tupleSlot);
static bool ExecHashJoinNewBatch(HashJoinState *hjstate);
static bool ExecParallelHashJoinNewBatch(HashJoinState *hjstate);
static void ExecParallelHashJoinPartitionOuter(HashJoinState *node);
static void ExecParallelHashJoinPartitionOuter(HashJoinState *hjstate);
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1502,11 +1502,11 @@ ExecHashJoinInitializeDSM(HashJoinState *state, ParallelContext *pcxt)
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
ExecHashJoinReInitializeDSM(HashJoinState *state, ParallelContext *cxt)
ExecHashJoinReInitializeDSM(HashJoinState *state, ParallelContext *pcxt)
{
int plan_node_id = state->js.ps.plan->plan_node_id;
ParallelHashJoinState *pstate =
shm_toc_lookup(cxt->toc, plan_node_id, false);
shm_toc_lookup(pcxt->toc, plan_node_id, false);
/*
* It would be possible to reuse the shared hash table in single-batch