mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-06-14 18:42:34 +03:00
Fix array coercion expressions to ensure that the correct volatility is
seen by code inspecting the expression. The best way to do this seems to be to drop the original representation as a function invocation, and instead make a special expression node type that represents applying the element-type coercion function to each array element. In this way the element function is exposed and will be checked for volatility. Per report from Guillaume Smet.
This commit is contained in:
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
|
||||
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2007, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
||||
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
|
||||
*
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/include/utils/array.h,v 1.63 2007/02/27 23:48:10 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/include/utils/array.h,v 1.64 2007/03/27 23:21:12 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -198,9 +198,6 @@ extern Datum arraycontained(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
|
||||
extern Datum array_dims(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
|
||||
extern Datum array_lower(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
|
||||
extern Datum array_upper(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
|
||||
extern Datum array_type_coerce(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
|
||||
extern Datum array_type_length_coerce(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
|
||||
extern Datum array_length_coerce(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
|
||||
extern Datum array_larger(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
|
||||
extern Datum array_smaller(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user